938
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

National Institutes of Health initiatives for advancing scientific developments in clinical neuropsychology

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 246-270 | Received 14 Mar 2018, Accepted 08 Sep 2018, Published online: 14 Feb 2019

References

  • Adams, K. M., Kvale, V. I., & Keegan, J. F. (1984). Relative accuracy of three automated systems for neuropsychological interpretation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 6(4), 413–431. doi: 10.1080/01688638408401232
  • Alberdi, A., Aztiria, A., & Basarab, A. (2016). On the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease from multimodal signals: A survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 71, 1–29.
  • Alhanai, T., Au, R., & Glass, J. (2017, December). Spoken language biomarkers for detecting cognitive impairment. In Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU), 2017 IEEE (pp. 409–416). IEEE.
  • APA Committee on Training in Clinical Psychology. (1947). First report of the new accreditation process in psychology. American Psychologist, 2, 539–558.
  • Aramendi, A. A., Weakley, A., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Cook, D. J., Goenaga, A. A., Basarab, A., & Carrasco, M. B. (2018). Smart home-based prediction of multi-domain symptoms related to Alzheimer's disease. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.
  • Armstrong, C. M., Reger, G. M., Edwards, J., Rizzo, A. A., Courtney, C. G., & Parsons, T. D. (2013). Validity of the virtual reality stroop task (VRST) in active duty military. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35, 113–123.
  • Au, R., Piers, R. J., & Devine, S. (2017). How technology is reshaping cognitive assessment: Lessons from the Framingham Heart Study. Neuropsychology, 31(8), 846.
  • Barkley, R. A. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Beauchamp, M. (2017). Neuropsychology’s social landscape: Common ground with social neuroscience. Neuropsychology, 31, 981–1002.
  • Beaumont, J. G. (2008). Introduction to neuropsychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Benfatto, M. N., Seimyr, G. Ö., Ygge, J., Pansell, T., Rydberg, A., & Jacobson, C. (2016). Screening for dyslexia using eye tracking during reading. PLoS One, 11(12), e0165508.
  • Benton, A. L., & Sivan, A. B. (2007). Clinical neuropsychology: A brief history. Disease-A-Month, 53(3), 142–147.
  • Berke, E. M., Choudhury, T., Ali, S., & Rabbi, M. (2011). Objective measurement of sociability and activity: Mobile sensing in the community. The Annals of Family Medicine, 9(4), 344–350.
  • Bigler, E. D. (2016). Systems biology, neuroimaging, neuropsychology, neuroconnectivity and traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10.
  • Bigler, E. D. (2017). Evidence-based integration of clinical neuroimaging findings in neuropsychology. Neuropsychological assessment in the age of evidence-based practice. Diagnostic and Treatment Evaluations, 1, 183–210.
  • Bilder, R. M. (2011). Neuropsychology 3.0: Evidence-based science and practice. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(01), 7–13.
  • Bilder, R. M., Poldrack, R. A., Stott, P. D., et al (2009a). Cognitive phenomics. The neuropsychology of mental illness (pp. 271–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bilder, R. M., Sabb, F. W., Parker, D. S., Kalar, D., Chu, W. W., Fox, J.,… & Poldrack, R. A. (2009b). Cognitive ontologies for neuropsychiatric phenomics research. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 14(4–5), 419–450.
  • Boger, J., & Mihailidis, A. (2011). The future of intelligent assistive technologies for cognition: Devices under development to support independent living and aging-with-choice. Neurorehabilitation, 28, 271–280.
  • Bohil, C. J., Alicea, B., & Biocca, F. A. (2011). Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 752–762.
  • Boll, S., Heuten, W., Meyer, H. M., & Meis, M. (2010). Development of a multimodal reminder system for older persons in their residential homes. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 35, 104–124.
  • Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Forbes, C., Costello, A., Laure, M. C., Dawson, D. R., … & Channon, S. (2006). The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(2), 194–209.
  • Bylsma, L. M., Taylor-Clift, A., & Rottenberg, J. (2011). Emotional reactivity to daily events in major and minor depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(1), 155.
  • Cappelletti, M., Didino, D., Stoianov, I., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Number skills are maintained in healthy ageing. Cognitive Psychology, 69, 25–45.
  • Casaletto, K. B., & Heaton, R. K. (2017). Neuropsychological assessment: Past and future. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23(9–10), 778–790.
  • Cendes, F., Theodore, W. H., Brinkmann, B. H., Sulc, V., & Cascino, G. D. (2016). Neuroimaging of epilepsy. In Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 136, pp. 985–1014). Elsevier.
  • Cernich, A. N., Brennana, D. M., Barker, L. M., & Bleiberg, J. (2007). Sources of error in computerized neuropsychological assessment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 39–48.
  • Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13, 181–197.
  • Collins, F. S., & Riley, W. T. (2016). NIH’s transformative opportunities for the behavioral and social sciences. Science Translational Medicine, 8, 366ed314.
  • Cook, D. J., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2009). Assessing the quality of activities in a smart environment. Methods of Information in Medicine, 48, 480–485.
  • Cook, P. F., McElwain, C. J., & Bradley‐Springer, L. A. (2010). Feasibility of a daily electronic survey to study prevention behavior with HIV‐infected individuals. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(3), 221–234.
  • Crosson, B., Hampstead, B. M., Krishnamurthy, L. C., Krishnamurthy, V., McGregor, K. M., Nocera, J. R., … & Tran, S. M. (2017). Advances in neurocognitive rehabilitation research from 1992 to 2017. The Ascension of Neural Plasticity.
  • Cullum, C. M., Hynan, L. S., Grosch, M., Parikh, M., & Weiner, M. F. (2014). Teleneuropsychology: Evidence for video teleconference-based neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(10), 1028–1033. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000873
  • Dawadi, P. N., Cook, D. J., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2016). Automated cognitive health assessment from smart home-based behavior data. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 20(4), 1188–1194.
  • Dodrill, C. B. (1997). Myths of neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11(1), 1–1. doi: 10.1080/13854049708407025
  • Duff, K. (2012). Evidence-based indicators of neuropsychological change in the individual patient: Relevant concepts and methods. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(3), 248–261.
  • Fletcher, J. M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2017). Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: The past and the future. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23(9–10), 930–940.
  • Franzen, M. D., & Wilhelm, K. L. (1996). Conceptual foundations of ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment.
  • Galambos, C., Skubic, M., Wang, S., & Rantz, M. (2013). Management of dementia and depression utilizing in-home passive sensor data. Gerontechnology, 11(3), 457.
  • Gao, P., & Ganguli, S. (2015). On simplicity and complexity in the brave new world of large-scale neuroscience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 32, 148–155.
  • Genon, S., Reid, A., Langner, R., Amunts, K., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2018). How to characterize the function of a brain region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
  • Gershon, R. C., Cella, D., Fox, N. A., Havlik, R. J., Hendrie, H. C., & Wagster, M. V. (2010). Assessment of neurological and behavioral function: the NIH toolbox. Lancet Neurology, 9(2), 138–139.
  • Gershon, R. C., Wagster, M. V., Hendrie, H. C., Fox, N. A., Cook, K. F., & Nowinski, C. J. (2013). NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function. Neurology, 80(11 Suppl 3), S2–S6.
  • Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., Frank, E., Fagiolini, A., Grochocinski, V. J., … Immekus, J. C. (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services, 59, 361–368.
  • Greher, M. R., & Wodushek, T. R. (2017). Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: Scientific basis and clinical application—A brief review. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 23(2), 134–140.
  • Hayes, T. L., Abendroth, F., Adami, A., Pavel, M., Zitzelberger, T. A., & Kaye, J. A. (2008). Unobtrusive assessment of activity patterns associated with mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 4(6), 395–405.
  • Henry, M., Joyal, C. C., & Nolin, P. (2012). Development and initial assessment of a newparadigm for assessing cognitive and motor inhibition: The bimodal virtual-reality Stroop. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 210, 125–31.
  • Heron, K. E., & Smyth, J. M. (2010). Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(1), 1–39.
  • Huys, Q. J., Maia, T. V., & Frank, M. J. (2016). Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications. Nature Neuroscience, 19(3), 404.
  • Insel, T. R., Landis, S. C., & Collins, F. S. (2013). Research priorities. The NIH BRAIN initiative. Science, 340(6133), 687–688.
  • Iriarte, Y., Diaz-Orueta, U., Cueto, E., Irazustabarrena, P., Banterla, F., & Climent, G. (2016). AULA—Advanced virtual reality tool for the assessment of attention: Normative study in Spain. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(6), 542–568.
  • Jagaroo, V. (2009). Neuroinformatics for neuropsychology (pp. 25–84). USA: Springer.
  • Jagaroo, V., & Santangelo, S. L. (Eds.). (2017). Neurophenotypes: Advancing psychiatry and neuropsychology in the “omics” era. Springer.
  • Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. MIT Press.
  • Larrabee, G. J. (2008). Flexible vs. fixed batteries in forensic neuropsychological assessment: Reply to Bigler and Hom. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(7–8), 763–776.
  • MacDonell, K. E., Naar-King, S., Murphy, D. A., Parsons, J. T., & Huszti, H. (2011). Situational temptation for HIV medication adherence in high-risk youth. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 25(1), 47–52.
  • Manchester, D., Priestley, N., & Jackson, H. (2004). The assessment of executive functions: Coming out of the office. Brain Injury, 18(11), 1067–1081.
  • Mante, V., Sussillo, D., Shenoy, K. V., & Newsome, W. T. (2013). Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex. Nature, 503, 78–84.
  • Meehl, P. E. (1987). Foreword. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized psychological assessment (pp. xv–xvi). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Miller, J. B., & Barr, W. B. (2017). The technology crisis in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1–14.
  • Najafabadi, M. M., Villanustre, F., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Seliya, N., Wald, R., & Muharemagic, E. (2015). Deep learning applications and challenges in big data analytics. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 1.
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH). OBSSR Strategic Plan, Fiscal Years 2017-2021 (2015). Retrieved from https://obssr.od.nih.gov/2017-strategic-plan.
  • Nilsen, W. J., & Pavel, M. (2013). Moving behavioral theories into the 21st century: Technological advancements for improving quality of life. IEEE Pulse, 4(5), 25–28.
  • Olson, K., & Jacobson, K. (2015). Cross-cultural considerations in pediatric neuropsychology: A review and call to attention. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 4(3), 166–177.
  • Parsey, C. M., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2013). Applications of technology in neuropsychological assessment. Clin. Neuropsychol. 27, 1328–1361.
  • Parsons, T. D. (2016). Clinical neuropsychology and technology. New York, NY: Springer Press.
  • Parsons, T. D., & Barnett, M. (2017). Validity of a newly developed measure of memory: Feasibility study of the virtual environment grocery store. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 59, 1227–1235.
  • Parsons, T. D., Bowerly, T., Buckwalter, J. G., & Rizzo, A. A. (2007). A controlled clinical comparison of attention performance in children with ADHD in a virtual reality classroom compared to standard neuropsychological methods. Child Neuropsychology, 13, 363–381.
  • Parsons, T. D., & Carlew, A. R. (2016). Bimodal virtual reality stroop for assessing distractor inhibition in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(4), 1255–1267.
  • Parsons, T. D., Carlew, A. R., Magtoto, J., & Stonecipher, K. (2017). The potential of function-led virtual environments for ecologically valid measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 37(5), 777–807.
  • Parsons, T. D., & Courtney, C. (2014). An initial validation of the virtual reality paced auditory serial addition test in a college sample. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.006
  • Parsons, T. D., McMahan, T., & Kane, R. (2018). Practice parameters facilitating adoption of advanced technologies for enhancing neuropsychological assessment paradigms. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(1), 16–41.
  • Parsons, T. D., & Rizzo, A. A. (in press). A virtual classroom for ecologically valid assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In P. Sharkey (Ed.), Virtual reality technologies for health and clinical applications: Psychological and neurocognitive interventions. Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Parsons, T. D., & Rizzo, A. A. (2008). Initial validation of a virtual environment for assessment of memory functioning: Virtual reality cognitive performance assessment test. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 17–25 doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9934
  • Piers, R. J., Devlin, K. N., Ning, B., Liu, Y., Wasserman, B., Massaro, J. M., … & Penney, D. L. (2017). Age and graphomotor decision making assessed with the digital clock drawing test: The Framingham heart study. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 60(4), 1611–1620.
  • Pitkow, X., & Angelaki, D. E. (2017). Inference in the brain: Statistics flowing in redundant population codes. Neuron, 94(5), 943–953.
  • Plancher, G., Barra, J., Orriols, E., & Piolino, P. (2013). The influence of action on episodic memory: A virtual reality study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 895–909.
  • Plancher, G., Gyselinck, V., & Piolino, P. (2018). The integration of realistic episodic memories relies on different working memory processes: Evidence from virtual navigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 47.
  • Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kalar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., … & Bilder, R. M. (2011). The cognitive atlas: toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 5, 17.
  • Ponsford, J. (2017). International growth of neuropsychology. Neuropsychology, 31(8), 921.
  • Price, C. J. (2018). The evolution of cognitive models: From neuropsychology to neuroimaging and back. Cortex.
  • Price C. J., & Friston K. (2005) Functional ontologies for cognition: The systematic definition of structure and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 262–275.
  • Rabin, L. A., Paolillo, E., & Barr, W. B. (2016). Stability in test-usage practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada over a 10-year period: A follow-up survey of INS and NAN members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(3), 206–230.
  • Rabin, L. A., Spadaccini, A. T., Brodale, D. L., Grant, K. S., Elbulok-Charcape, M. M., & Barr, W. B. (2014). Utilization rates of computerized tests and test batteries among clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45, 368–377.
  • Reece, A. G., & Danforth, C. M. (2017). Instagram photos reveal predictive markers of depression. EPJ Data Science, 6(1), 15.
  • Renison, B., Ponsford, J., Testa, R., Richardson, B., & Brownfield, K. (2012). The ecological and construct validity of a newly developed measure of executive function: The virtual library task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 440–450.
  • Riley, W. T. (2016). A new era of clinical research methods in a data-rich environment. In B. W. Hesse, D. K. Ahem, & E. Beckjord (Eds.), Oncology informatics: Using health information technology to improve processes and outcomes in cancer (pp. 343–355). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  • Rivera, D. E., & Jimison, H. B. (2013). Systems modeling of behavior change: Two illustrations from optimized interventions for improved health outcomes. IEEE Pulse, 4(6), 41–47.
  • Rizzo, A., Bowerly, T., Buckwalter, J., Klimchuk, D., Mitura, R., & Parsons, T. D. (2006). A virtual reality scenario for all seasons: The virtual classroom. CNS Spectrums, 11(1), 35–44.
  • Runyan, J. D., Steenbergh, T. A., Bainbridge, C., Daugherty, D. A., Oke, L., & Fry, B. N. (2013). A smartphone ecological momentary assessment/intervention “app” for collecting real-time data and promoting self-awareness. PLoS One, 8(8), e71325.
  • Sabb, F. W., Bearden, C. E., Glahn, D. C., Parker, D. S., Freimer, N., & Bilder, R. M. (2008). A collaborative knowledge base for cognitive phenomics. Molecular Psychiatry, 13(4), 350–360.
  • Saez, A., Rigotti, M., Ostojic, S., Fusi, S., & Salzman, C. D. (2015). Abstract context representations in primate amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 87, 869–881.
  • Saranummi, N., Spruijt-Metz, D., Intille, S. S., Korhone, I., Nilsen, W. J., & Pavel, M. (2013). Moving the science of behavior change into the 21st century: Novel solutions to prevent disease and promote health. IEEE Pulse, 4(5), 22–24.
  • Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Cook, D., Weakley, A., & Dawadi, P. (2017). Using smart environment technologies to monitor and assess everyday functioning and deliver real-time intervention. In T. Parsons & R. Kane (Eds.), The role of technology in clinical neuropsychology (pp. 293–325). Oxford University Press.
  • Schultheis, M. T., Rebimbas, J., Mourant, R., & Millis, S. R. (2007). Examining the usability of a virtual reality driving simulator. Assistive Technology, 19(1), 1–10.
  • Silver, C. H., Ruff, R. M., Iverson, G. L., Barth, J. T., Broshek, D. K., Bush, S. S., … Planning Committee. (2008). Learning disabilities: The need for neuropsychological evaluation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(2), 217–219.
  • Singla, G., Cook, D. J., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2010). Recognizing independent and joint activities among multiple residents in smart environments. Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Journal, 1, 57–63.
  • Spring, B., Gotsis, M., Paiva, A., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2013). Healthy apps: Mobile devices for continuous monitoring and intervention. IEEE Pulse, 4(6), 34–40.
  • Spruijt-Metz, D., Hekler, E., Saranummi, N., Intille, S., Korhonen, I., Nilsen, W., … & Sanna, A. (2015). Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: New opportunities in behavioral research. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 5(3), 335–346.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Intelligence and lifelong learning: What’s new and how can we use it? American Psychologist, 52, 1134–1139.
  • Testolin, A., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Probabilistic models and generative neural networks: Towards an unified framework for modeling normal and impaired neurocognitive functions. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 10, 73.
  • Thomas, M. L. (2011). The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: A review. Assessment, 18, 291–307.
  • Thomas, M. L., Brown, G. G., Gur, R. C., Moore, T. M., Patt, V. M., Risbrough, V. B., & Baker, D. G. (2018). A signal detection–item response theory model for evaluating neuropsychological measures. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1–16.
  • Wade, J., Zhang, L., Bian, D., Fan, J., Swanson, A., Weitlauf, A., … & Sarkar, N. (2016). A gaze-contingent adaptive virtual reality driving environment for intervention in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 6(1), 3.
  • Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S.S., Heaton, R. K., Tulsky, D. S., Zelazo, P. D., Bauer, P. J., & Gershon, R. C. (2013). Cognition assessment using the NIH toolbox. Neurology, 80(11 Suppl 3), S54–S64.
  • Weiss, D. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(2), 70–84.
  • Weissberger, G. H., Strong, J. V., Stefanidis, K. B., Summers, M. J., Bondi, M. W., & Stricker, N. H. (2017). Diagnostic accuracy of memory measures in Alzheimer’s dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 1–35.
  • Wood-Shapiro, L. (2018). How technology helped me cheat dyslexia. Retrieved from June 18, 2018, https://www.wired.com/story/end-of-dyslexia/.
  • Woodard, J. L. (2017). A quarter century of advances in the statistical analysis of longitudinal neuropsychological data. Neuropsychology, 31(8), 1020.
  • Wu, D., Courtney, C., Lance, B., Narayanan, S. S., Dawson, M., Oie, K., & Parsons, T. D. (2010). Optimal arousal identification and classification for affective computing: Virtual reality stroop task. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1, 109–118.
  • Wu, D., Lance, B., & Parsons, T. D. (2013). Collaborative filtering for brain-computer interaction using transfer learning and active class selection. PLOS ONE, 1–18.
  • Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. (2009). The need for a cognitive neuroscience of naturalistic social cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1), 16–30.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.