Identifying prospective memory deficits in multiple sclerosis: Preliminary evaluation of the criterion and ecological validity of a single item version of the memory for intentions test (MIST)

References

• Bruce, J. M., Hancock, L. M., Arnett, P., & Lynch, S. (2010). Treatment adherence in multiple sclerosis: Association with emotional status, personality, and cognition. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 219–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca, J. (2008). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. The Lancet. Neurology, 7(12), 1139–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70259-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais, E., Rouleau, I., Tremblay, A., Demers, M., Roger, É., Jobin, C., & Duquette, P. (2016). Role of executive functions in prospective memory in multiple sclerosis: Impact of the strength of cue–action association. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 38(1), 127–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delprado, J., Kinsella, G., Ong, B., Pike, K., Ames, D., Storey, E., Saling, M., Clare, L., Mullaly, E., & Rand, E. (2012). Clinical measures of prospective memory in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 18(2), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561771100172X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(S1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goksuluk, D., Korkmaz, S., Zararsiz, G., & Karaagaoglu, A. E. (2016). easyROC: An interactive web-tool for ROC curve analysis using R language environment. The R Journal, 8(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-042
   Google Scholar
• Gromisch, E. S., & Foley, F. W. (2020). Can semantic fluency be used as an alternative or additional measure in the abbreviated Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (aMACFIMS)? Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 410, 116640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.116640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromisch, E. S., Neto, L. O., & Turner, A. P. (2021). What biopsychosocial factors explain self-management behaviors in multiple sclerosis? The role of demographics, cognition, personality, and psychosocial and physical functioning. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 102(10), 1982–1988.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ampr.2021.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromisch, E. S., Portnoy, J. G., & Foley, F. W. (2018). Comparison of the abbreviated minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (aMACFIMS) and the brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 388, 70–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromisch, E. S., Turner, A. P., Leipertz, S. L., Beauvais, J., & Haselkorn, J. K. (2020). Who is not coming to clinic? A predictive model of excessive missed appointments in persons with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 38, 101513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.101513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromisch, E. S., Zemon, V., Benedict, R. H. B., Chiaravalloti, N. D., DeLuca, J., Picone, M. A., Kim, S., & Foley, F. W. (2013). Using a highly abbreviated California Verbal Learning Test-II to detect verbal memory deficits. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 19(4), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458512454347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromisch, E. S., Zemon, V., Holtzer, R., Chiaravalloti, N. D., DeLuca, J., Beier, M., Farrell, E., Snyder, S., Schairer, L. C., Glukhovsky, L., Botvinick, J., Sloan, J., Picone, M. A., Kim, S., & Foley, F. W. (2016). Assessing the criterion validity of four highly abbreviated measures from the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MACFIMS). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(7), 1032–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1189597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohol, M., Orav, E., & Weiner, H. (1995). Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: A simple approach to evaluate disease progression. Neurology, 45(2), 251–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohol, M., Orav, E., & Weiner, H. (1999). Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: A longitudinal study comparing disease steps and EDSS to evaluate disease progression. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 5(5), 349–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honan, C. A., Brown, R. F., & Batchelor, J. (2015). Perceived cognitive difficulties and cognitive test performance as predictors of employment outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 21(2), 156–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmar, J. H., Gaudino, E. A., Moore, N. B., Halper, J., & DeLuca, J. (2008). The relationship between cognitive deficits and everyday functional activities in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 22(4), 442–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardiasmenos, K. S., Clawson, D. M., Wilken, J. A., & Wallin, M. T. (2008). Prospective memory and the efficacy of a memory strategy in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 22(6), 746–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karter, A. J., Parker, M. M., Moffet, H. H., Ahmed, A. T., Ferrara, A., Liu, J. Y., & Selby, J. V. (2004). Missed appointments and poor glycemic control: An opportunity to identify high-risk diabetic patients. Medical Care, 42(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000109023.64650.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvavilashvili, L., & Ford, R. M. (2014). Metamemory prediction accuracy for simple prospective and retrospective memory tasks in 5-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 127, 65–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, D. W., Amato, M. P., Boringa, J., Brochet, B., Foley, F., Fredrikson, S., Hämäläinen, P., Hartung, H.-P., Krupp, L., Penner, I. K., Reder, A. T., & Benedict, R. H. B. (2012). Recommendations for a brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 18(6), 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511431076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth, Y. C., Motl, R. W., Sandroff, B. M., Pula, J. H., & Cadavid, D. (2013). Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurology, 13(1), 37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Ong, B., Pike, K. E., Mullaly, E., Rand, E., Storey, E., Ames, D., Saling, M., Clare, L., & Kinsella, G. J. (2016). The contribution of prospective memory performance to the neuropsychological assessment of mild cognitive impairment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1135983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcone, S., Gagnon, J.-F., Desjardins, C., David, A.-C., Postuma, R. B., Montplaisir, J., Joubert, S., & Rouleau, I. (2019). Prospective memory in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder with or without mild cognitive impairment: A preliminary study. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(3), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1435825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrie, R. A., & Goldman, M. (2007). Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 13(9), 1176–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458507078388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, P., Santos, F. H., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2020). When we must forget: The effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors. Memory (Hove, England), 28(3), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1726399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, B., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2015). Loads and loads and loads: The influence of prospective load, retrospective load, and ongoing task load in prospective memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. K., Basso, M. R., Candilis, P. J., Combs, D. R., & Woods, S. P. (2014). Pain is associated with prospective memory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 36(8), 887–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. J., & Selmes, T. (2007). Why don’t patients attend their appointments? Maintaining engagement with psychiatric services. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 13(6), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.106.003202
   Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. ETS Research Report Series, 1992(1), i–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1992.tb01436.x
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Economic Research. (n.d). Zip code distance database. https://www.nber.org/research/data/zip-code-distance-database
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H., Han, H.-R., Kim, M. T., & Chan, K. S. (2014). An introduction to item response theory for patient-reported outcome measurement. The Patient, 7(1), 23–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nwabuo, C. C., Dy, S. M., Weeks, K., & Young, J. H. (2014). Factors associated with appointment non-adherence among African-Americans with severe, poorly controlled hypertension. PloS One, 9(8), e103090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pek, J., Wong, O., & Wong, A. (2018). How to address non-normality: A taxonomy of approaches, reviewed, and illustrated. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirogovsky, E., Woods, S. P., Filoteo, J. V., & Gilbert, P. E. (2012). Prospective memory deficits are associated with poorer everyday functioning in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 18(6), 986–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimo, S., Trojano, L., Gaita, M., Spitaleri, D., & Santangelo, G. (2019). High openness and high extroversion are linked with better time-based prospective memory in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, 266(11), 2665–2671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin, S. A. (2009). Memory for intentions screening test: Psychometric properties and clinical evidence. Brain Impairment, 10(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.10.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin, S. A., Buckheit, C., & Sherrod, C. (2010). Memory for intentions screening test: Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rendell, P. G., Jensen, F., & Henry, J. D. (2007). Prospective memory in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 13(3), 410–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011). pROC: An open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics, 12(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouleau, I., Dagenais, E., Tremblay, A., Demers, M., Roger, É., Jobin, C., & Duquette, P. (2018). Prospective memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: A review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(5), 922–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari, S., Baratloo, A., Elfil, M., & Negida, A. (2016). Evidence based emergency medicine; part 5 receiver operating curve and area under the curve. Emergency (Tehran, Iran), 4(2), 111–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, A. (1982). Symbol digit modalities test: Manual. Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, C., & Hielscher, T. (2014). DTComPair: Comparison of binary diagnostic tests in a paired study design. R Package Version, 1(3), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). Compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Multiple Sclerosis International Federation (MSIF). 2020). Part 1: Mapping multiple sclerosis around the world, key epidemiology findings. https://www.msif.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Atlas-Epidemiology-report-Sept-2020-Final-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, G. L., & Favia, A. (2012). Data analysis using item response theory methodology: An introduction to selected programs and applications.
   Google Scholar
• Twamley, E. W., Woods, S. P., Zurhellen, C. H., Vertinski, M., Narvaez, J. M., Mausbach, B. T., Patterson, T. L., & Jeste, D. V. (2008). Neuropsychological substrates and everyday functioning implications of prospective memory impairment in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 106(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2007.10.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E., Chiaravalloti, N. D., DeLuca, J., & Goverover, Y. (2019). Time-based prospective memory is associated with functional performance in persons with MS. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 25(10), 1035–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2005). The Cambridge prospective memory test: CAMPROMPT. Pearson Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., Baddeley, A., & Hiorns, R. (1989). The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11(6), 855–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, S. P., Iudicello, J. E., Moran, L. M., Carey, C. L., Dawson, M. S., & Grant, I. (2008). HIV-associated prospective memory impairment increases risk of dependence in everyday functioning. Neuropsychology, 22(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.1.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youden, W. J. (1950). Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamroziewicz, M., Raskin, S. A., Tennen, H., Austad, C. S., Wood, R. M., Fallahi, C. R., Dager, A. D., Sawyer, B., Leen, S., & Pearlson, G. D. (2017). Effects of drinking patterns on prospective memory performance in college students. Neuropsychology, 31(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar