Neuropsychological testimony: Some emerging concerns

References

• APA . 1981 . Standards for providers of psychological services Council of Representatives
   Google Scholar
• APA . 1982 . State Association Bulletin , APA Professional Affairs Office . Unpublished monograph
   Google Scholar
• APA . 1987 . Victory for psychologists' expertise in brain injury case . Practioner , 1 : 8
   Google Scholar
• French , L. and Dublin , P. 1977 . The value of computerized tomography in the management of 1000 consecutive head injuries . Surgical Neurology , 171 : 173 – 179 .
   Google Scholar
• INS‐Division 40 Task Force . 1987 . Reports of the INS‐Division 40 task force on education, accreditation, and credentialing . The Clinical Neuropsychologist , 1 : 29 – 34 .
   Google Scholar
• McMahon , E. and Satz , P. 1981 . “ Some forensic applications in clinical neuropsychology ” . In Handbook of clinical neuropsychology , Edited by: Filskov , S. B. and Boll , T. J. 686 – 701 . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Meier , M. 1987 . Continuing education: An alternative to respecialization in clinical neuropsychology . The Clinical Neuropsychologist , 1 : 9 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz , M. L. 1987 . Limitations on neuropsychological testimony by the Florida Appellate Decisions: Action, reaction, and counteraction . The Clinical Neuropsychologist , 1 : 51 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• Stapp , P. , Tucker , L. and Vandenbos , M. 1983 . Consensus of psychological personnel . American Psychologist , 40 : 1317
   Google Scholar
• Woocher , B. 1986 . Legal principles governing expert testimony by experimental psychologists . Law & Human Behavior , 10 : 47 – 52 .
   Google Scholar