Publication Cover
Philosophical Explorations
An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action
Volume 17, 2014 - Issue 2
911
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Theory of mind and the unobservability of other minds

&

  • Anisfeld, M 1996. “Only Tongue Protruding Modeling is Matched by Neonates”. Developmental Review, 16 (2): 149–161. doi: 10.1006/drev.1996.0006
  • Apperly, I. 2010. Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of “Theory of Mind”, Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism on Theory of Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Biro, S., and A. Leslie 2007. “Infants’ Perception of Goal-Directed Actions: Development Through Cue-Based Bootstrapping”. Developmental Science, 10 (3): 379–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00544.x
  • Bohl, V., and W. van den Bos 2012. “Toward an Integrative Account of Social Cognition: Marrying Theory of Mind and Interactionism to Study the Interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 Processes”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6 (274): 1–15.
  • Butterfill, S., and I. Apperly 2009. “Do Humans have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?”. Psychological Review, 116 (4): 953–970. doi: 10.1037/a0016923
  • Butterfill, S., and I. Apperly Forthcoming. “How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind?”. Mind and Language,
  • Carruthers, P 1996. “Simulation and Self-Knowledge: A Defence on Theory-Theory”. In Theories of Theories of Mind, edited by P. Carruthers, and P. K. Smith, 22–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carruthers, P 2013. “Mindreading in Infancy”. Mind and Language, 28 (2): 141–172. doi: 10.1111/mila.12014
  • Castiello, U., C. Becchio, Zoia, S., C. Nelini, Sartori, L., L. Blason, D'Ottavio, G., M. Bulgheroni, Gallese, V. 2010. “Wired to be Social: The Ontogeny of Human Interaction”. PLoS ONE, 5 (10): e13199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013199
  • Dennett, D 1969. Content and Consciousness, London: Routledge.
  • Dennett, D 1987. The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gallagher, S 2004. “Understanding Interpersonal Problems in Autism: Interaction Theory as an Alternative to Theory of Mind”. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 11 (3): 199–217. doi: 10.1353/ppp.2004.0063
  • Gallagher, S 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gallagher, S 2007. “Simulation Trouble”. Social Neuroscience, 2 (2–4): 353–365. doi: 10.1080/17470910601183549
  • Gallagher, S 2008a. “Direct Perception in the Intersubjective Context”. Consciousness and Cognition, 17 (2): 535–543. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003
  • Gallagher, S 2008b. “Inference or Interaction: Social Cognition Without Precursors”. Philosophical Explorations, 11 (3): 163–174. doi: 10.1080/13869790802239227
  • Gallagher, S 2008c. “Understanding Others: Embodied Social Cognition”. In Elsevier Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach, edited by P. Calvo, and T. Gomila, 439–452. London: Elsevier.
  • Gallagher, S., and D. Zahavi 2012. The Phenomenological Mind. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. (First edition published 2008)
  • Gallagher, S., and D.J. Povinelli 2012. “Enactive and Behavioural Abstraction Accounts of Social Understanding in Chimpanzees, Infants and Adults”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3 (1): 145–169. doi: 10.1007/s13164-012-0093-4
  • Gallese, V 2003. “The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity”. Psychopathology, 36 (4): 171–180. doi: 10.1159/000072786
  • Gallese, V 2005. “Embodied Simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (1): 23–48. doi: 10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z
  • Gangopadhyay, N., and L. Schilbach 2011. “Seeing Minds: A Neurophilosophical Investigation of the Role of Perception-Action Coupling in Social Perception”. Social Neuroscience, 7 (4): 410–423. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.633754
  • Goldman, A 2006. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gomez, J.-C. 1996. “Non-Human Primate Theories of Minds”. In Theories of Theories of Mind, edited by P. Carruthers, and P. K. Smith, 330–343. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gopnik, A 1993. “How We Know Our Minds: The Illusion of First-Person Knowledge of Intentionality”. In Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science, edited by Alvin I. Goldman, 315–346. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gordon, R.M. 2008. “Beyond Mindreading”. Philosophical Explorations, 11 (3): 219–222. doi: 10.1080/13869790802239250
  • Hansen, N.R. 1958. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heider, F., and M. Simmel 1944. “An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior”. American Journal of Psychology, 57 (2): 243–259. doi: 10.2307/1416950
  • Herschbach, M 2008. “Folk Psychological and Phenomenological Accounts of Social Perception”. Philosophical Explorations, 11 (3): 223–235. doi: 10.1080/13869790802239268
  • Husserl, E. 1960. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by D. Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
  • Husserl, E. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy – Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Translated by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer
  • Hutto, D 2009. “ToM Rules, but It Is Not OK!”. In Against Theory of Mind, edited by I. Leudar, and A. Costall, 221–262. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jacob, P 2011. “The Direct-Perception Model of Empathy: A Critique”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2 (3): 519–540. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0065-0
  • Jones, S 2009. “The Development of Imitation in Infancy”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364 (1528): 2325–2335. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0045
  • Krueger, J 2012. “Seeing Mind in Action”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2): 149–173. doi: 10.1007/s11097-011-9226-y
  • Kuhn, T 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lavelle, J.S. 2012. “Theory-Theory and the Direct Perception of Mental States”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3 (2): 213–230. doi: 10.1007/s13164-012-0094-3
  • Legerstee, M., and G. Markova 2008. “Variations in 10-Month-Old Infant Imitation of People and Things”. Infant Behavior & Development, 31 (1): 81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.07.006
  • Leudar, I., and A. Costall 2009a. “Introduction: Against ‘Theory of Mind’”. In Against Theory of Mind, edited by I. Leudar, and A. Costall, 1–16. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Leudar, I., and A. Costall 2009b. Against Theory of Mind, In I. Leudar, and A. Costall (Eds.), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mameli, M 2001. “Mindreading, Mindshaping, and Evolution”. Biology and Philosophy, 16 (5): 597–628. doi: 10.1023/A:1012203830990
  • McNeill, W.E. S. 2012. “Embodiment and the Perceptual Hypothesis”. The Philosophical Quarterly, 62 (248): 569–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00065.x
  • Meltzoff, A.N., and M.K. Moore 1977. “Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates”. Science, 198 (4312): 75–78. doi: 10.1126/science.198.4312.75
  • Meltzoff, A.N., and M.K. Moore 1983. “Newborn Infants Imitate Adult Facial Gestures”. Child Development, 54 (3): 702–709. doi: 10.2307/1130058
  • Meltzoff, A.N., and M.K. Moore 1997. “Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model”. Early Development and Parenting, 6 (3–4): 179–192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4<179::AID-EDP157>3.0.CO;2-R
  • Meltzoff, A.N., A. Gopnik, Repacholi, B.M. 1999. “Toddlers’ Understanding of Intentions, Desires, and Emotions: Explorations of the Dark Ages”. In Developing Theories of Intention: Social Understanding and Self-Control, edited by P. D. Zelazo, J. W. Astington, and D. R. Olson, 17–41. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Michael, J 2011. “Interactionism and Mindreading”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2 (3): 559–578. doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0066-z
  • Premack, D., and G. Woodruff 1978. “Does the Chimpanzee have a Theory of Mind?”. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1 (4): 515–526. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512
  • Reddy, V 2008. How Infants Know Minds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ratcliffe, M 2007. Rethinking Commonsense Psychology: A Critique of Folk Psychology, Theory of Mind and Simulation, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • van Riel, R 2008. “On how we Perceive the Social World. Criticizing Gallagher's View on Direct Perception and Outlining an Alternative”. Consciousness and Cognition, 17 (2): 544–552. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.009
  • Sellars, W 1956. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Smith, J 2010. “Seeing Other People”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81 (3): 731–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00392.x
  • Spaulding, S 2010. “Embodied Cognition and Mindreading”. Mind and Language, 25 (1): 119–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01383.x
  • Welton, D. 2003. The New Husserl: A Critical Reader, In D. Welton (Eds.), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Zahavi, D 2005. Subjectivity and Selfhood, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Zahavi, D 2007. “Expression and Empathy”. In Folk-Psychology Re-Assessed, edited by M. Ratcliffe, and D. Hutto, 25–40. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Zahavi, D. 2011. “Empathy and Direct Social Perception: A Phenomenological Proposal”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2 (3): 541–558
  • Zahavi, D 2012. “Empathy and Mirroring: Husserl and Gallese”. Life, Subjectivity & Art. Phenomenologica, 201, 217–254. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2211-8_9
  • Zahavi, D., and S. Gallagher 2008. “The (in)Visibility of Others: A Reply to Herschbach”. Philosophical Explorations, 11 (3): 237–244. doi: 10.1080/13869790802302306
  • Zahavi, D., and J. Parnas 2003. “Conceptual Problems in Infantile Autism Research: Why Cognitive Science Needs Phenomenology”. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10 (9): 53–71.
  • Zawidzki, T 2008. “The Function of Folk Psychology: Mind Reading or Mind Shaping?”. Philosophical Explorations, 11 (3): 193–210. doi: 10.1080/13869790802239235

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.