References
- Anscombe, G. E. M. 1963. Intention. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Bishop, John. 1989. Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Dancy, Jonathan. 2000. Practical Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Davidson, Donald. [1963] 2001. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” In Essays on Actions and Events. 2nd ed. 3–20. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Davidson, Donald. [1969] 2001. “How is Weakness of the Will Possible?” In Essays on Actions and Events. 2nd ed. 21–42. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Davidson, Donald. 2001. “Introduction.” In Essays on Actions and Events. 2nd ed. xv–xxi. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Lowe, E. J. 2010. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
- McDowell, John. [1978] 1998. “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?” In Mind, Value and Reality, 77–94. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Mele, Alfred R. 1983. “‘Akrasia’, Reasons, and Causes.” Philosophical Studies 44 (3): 345–368.
- Mele, Alfred R. 1998. “Motivational strength.” Noûs 32 (1): 23–36. doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.00085
- Mele, Alfred R. 2003. “Philosophy of action.” In Donald Davidson, edited by Kirk Ludwig, 64–84. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Ruben, David-Hillel. 2009. “Con-reasons as Causes.” In New Essays on the Explanation of Action, edited by Constantine Sandis, 62–74. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ruben, David-Hillel. 2010. “Causal and Deliberative Strength of Reasons for Action: The Case of Con-Reasons.” In Causing Human Action: New Perspectives on the Causal Theory of Action, edited by Jesús H. Aguilar and Andrei E. Buckareff, 167–182. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Schueler, G. F. 1995. Desire: Its Role in Practical Reasoning and the Explanation of Action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
- Tenenbaum, Sergio. 2007. Appearances of the Good. New York: Cambridge University Press.