Publication Cover
Philosophical Explorations
An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action
Volume 20, 2017 - Issue 1
422
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

McDowell’s new conceptualism and the difference between chickens, colours and cardinals

, &
Pages 88-105 | Received 01 Sep 2015, Accepted 04 Dec 2016, Published online: 09 Jan 2017

References

  • Burge, Tyler. 2010. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Crane, Tim. 2013. “The Given.” In Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, edited by Joseph Schear, 229–249. London: Routledge.
  • Evans, Gareth. 1982. Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gersel, Johan. Forthcoming. “What Is the Myth of the Given?” In In the Light of Experience: Essays on Reasons and Perception, edited by Johan Gersel, Rasmus Thybo Jensen, Morten S. Thaning, and Søren Overgaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Heck, Richard G. 2000. “Nonconceptual Content and the ‘Space of Reasons’.” Philosophical Review 109 (4): 483–523. doi: 10.1215/00318108-109-4-483
  • McDowell, John. 1996. Mind and World. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 1998a. “Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge.” In Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, 369–394. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 1998b. “Knowledge by Hearsay.” In Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, 414–443. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 2002. “Responses, Robert Brandom.” In Reading McDowell – On Mind and World, edited by Nicholas H. Smith, 279–281. London: Routledge.
  • McDowell, John. 2006a. “Response to Costas Pagondiotis.” Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (1): 115–120.
  • McDowell, John. 2006b. “Response to Jonathan Dancy.” In McDowell and His Critics, edited by Cynthia Macdonald and Graham Macdonald, 134–141. Malden: Blackwell.
  • McDowell, John. 2009a. “Intentionality as a Relation.” In Having the World in View – Essays on Kant, Hegel and Sellars, 44–55. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 2009b. “Why Is Sellars’s Essay Called ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind?’.” In Having the World in View – Essays on Kant, Hegel and Sellars, 221–238. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 2009c. “Avoiding the Myth.” In Having the World in View – Essays on Kant, Hegel and Sellars, 256–272. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 2010. “Brandom on Observation.” In Reading Brandom, edited by Bernhard Weiss, and Jeremy Wanderer, 129–144. New York: Routledge.
  • McDowell, John. 2011. Perception as a Capacity for Knowledge. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 2013. “Perceptual Experience: Both Relational and Contentful.” European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1): 144–157. doi: 10.1111/ejop.12005
  • Millar, Alan. 2007. “What the Disjunctivist is Right About.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1): 176–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00008.x
  • O’shea, James R. 2010. “Having a Sensible World in View: McDowell and Sellars on Perceptual Experience.” Philosophical Books 51 (2): 63–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0149.2010.00502.x
  • Roessler, Johannes. 2009. “Perceptual Experience and Perceptual Knowledge.” Mind 118 (472): 1013–1041. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzp131
  • Sellars, Wilfred. (1956) 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Travis, Charles. Forthcoming. “The Move, The Divide, The Myth, and Its Dogma.” In In the Light of Experience: Essays on Reasons and Perception, edited by Johan Gersel, Rasmus Thybo Jensen, Morten S. Thaning, and Søren Overgaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.