Coordinated pluralism as a means to facilitate integrative taxonomies of cognition

References

• Abend, G. 2016. “What are Neural Correlates Neural Correlates of?” Biosocieties. doi:10.1057/s41292-016-0019-y.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Ankeny, R., and S. Leonelli. 2015. “Repertoires: How to Transform a Project into a Research Community.” Bioscience 65 (7): 701–708. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankeny, R., and S. Leonelli. 2016. “Repertoires: A Post-Kuhnian Perspective on Scientific Change and Collaborative Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60: 18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barch, D. M., M. G. Berman, R. Engle, J. Jones, J. Jonides, A. Macdonald 3rd, D. Nee, T. Redick, and S. Sponheim. 2009. “CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Working Memory.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 35 (1): 136–152. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barch, D., T. Braver, C. Carter, R. Poldrack, and T. Robbins. 2009. “CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Executive Control.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 35 (1): 115–135. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barch, D., and C. Carter. 2007. “Measurement Issues in the Use of Cognitive Neuroscience Tasks in Drug Development for Impaired Cognition in Schizophrenia: A Report of the Second Consensus Building Conference of the CNTRICS Initiative.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 34 (4): 613–618. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilder, R., A. Howe, and F. Sabb. 2013. “Multilevel Models from Biology to Psychology: Mission Impossible?” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122 (3): 917–927. doi: 10.1037/a0032263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, P., S. Silverstein, and S. Dakin. 2008. “Visual Perception and Its Impairment in Schizophrenia.” Biological Psychiatry 64 (1): 40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C., and D. Barch. 2007. “Cognitive Neuroscience-Based Approaches to Measuring and Improving Treatment Effects on Cognition in Schizophrenia: The CNTRICS Initiative.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 33 (5): 1131–1137. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C., D. Barch, R. Buchanan, E. Bullmore, J. Krystal, J. Cohen, M. Geyer, et al. 2008. “Identifying Cognitive Mechanisms Targeted for Treatment Development in Schizophrenia: An Overview of the First Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Initiative.” Biological Psychiatry 64 (1): 4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C., J. Kerns, and J. Cohen. 2004. “Cognitive Neuroscience: Bridging Thinking and Feeling to the Brain, and its Implications for Psychiatry.” In Neurobiology of Mental Illness. 3rd ed., edited by D. Charney, and E. Nestler, 180–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2007. Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2012. Is Water H₂O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, Lee, and Paul Meehl. 1955. “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.” Psychological Bulletin 52: 281–302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, B., and M. Kozak. 2013. “Constructing Constructs for Psychopathology: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC).” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122 (3): 928–937. doi: 10.1037/a0034028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feest, U. 2005. “Operationism in Psychology: What the Debate is About, What the Debate Should Be About.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 41 (2): 131–149. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.20079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feest, U. 2010. “Concepts as Tools in the Experimental Generation of Knowledge in Cognitive Neuropsychology.” Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 4 (1): 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Feest, U. 2011. “Remembering (Short-Term) Memory: Oscillations of an Epistemic Thing.” Erkenntnis 75 (3): 391–411. doi: 10.1007/s10670-011-9341-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feest, U. 2016. “The Experimenter’s Regress Reconsidered: Replication, Tacit Knowledge and the Dynamics of Knowledge Generation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 58: 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figdor, C. 2011. “Semantics and Metaphysics in Informatics: Toward an Ontology of Tasks.” Topics in Cognitive Science 3: 222–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01133.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francken, J. C., and M. Slors. 2014. “From Commonsense to Science, and Back: The use of Cognitive Concepts in Neuroscience.” Consciousness and Cognition 29: 248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, J., D. Barch, C. Carter, S. Dakin, S. Luck, A. MacDonald III, J. Ragland, et al. 2012. “Clinical, Functional and Intertask Correlations of Measures Developed by the Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 38 (1): 144–152. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. 1996. “What are the Functional Consequences of Neurocognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia?” American Journal of Psychiatry 153: 321–330. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M., R. Kern, and R. Heaton. 2004. “Longitudinal Studies of Cognition and Functional Outcome in Schizophrenia: Implications for MATRICS.” Schizophrenia Research 72 (1): 41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, N. 2013. “Reliability, Validity, and the Mixed Blessings of Operationalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry, edited by K. W. M. Fulford, M. Davies, R. Gipps, G. Graham, J. Sadler, G. Tanghellini, and T. Thornton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. 1959/1965. “Fundamentals of Taxonomy.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays, 137–154. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstein, E. 2012. “Minds, Models and Mechanisms: A New Perspective on Intentional Psychology.” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 24 (4): 547–557. doi: 10.1080/0952813X.2012.693688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstein, E. 2013. “Intentional Models as Essential Scientific Tools.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (2): 199–217. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2013.813251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S., H. Longino, and K. Waters. 2006. Scientific Pluralism. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerns, J., K. Nuechterlein, T. Braver, and D. Barch. 2008. “Executive Functioning Component Mechanisms and Schizophrenia.” Biological Psychiatry 64 (1): 26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.04.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalidi, M. 2013. Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krakauer, J., A. Ghazanfar, A. Gomez-Marin, M. MacIver, and D. Poeppel. 2017. “Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias.” Neuron 93 (3): 480–490. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonelli, S. 2009. “On the locality of data and claims about phenomena.” Philosophy of Science 76(5): 737–749. doi: 10.1086/605804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonelli, S. 2013. “Integrating Data to Acquire New Knowledge: Three Modes of Integration in Plant Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4): 503–514. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.03.020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. 2014. “The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): An Analysis of Methodological and Conceptual Challenges.” Behaviour Research and Therapy 62: 129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S., and M. Treadway. 2016. “Clashing Diagnostic Approaches: DSM-ICD Versus RDoC.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12: 435–463. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S., and J. Gold. 2008. “The Construct of Attention in Schizophrenia.” Biological Psychiatry 64 (1): 34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N. 2016. “Towards a Practice Oriented Integration of the Mind-Brain Sciences”. Paper presented at the 25th biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Chicago, IL. November 3–5, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S., and B. Cuthbert. 2012. “Research Domain Criteria: Cognitive Systems, Neural Circuits, and Dimensions of Behavior.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 14: 29–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institute of Mental Health, National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on Tasks and Measures for Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). 2016. “Behavioral Assessment of Methods for RDoC Constructs.” https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups/namhc/reports/rdoc_council_workgroup_report_153440.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nuechterlein, K., S. Luck, C. Lustig, and M. Sarter. 2009. “CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Control of Attention.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 35 (1): 182–196. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccinini, G., and C. Craver. 2011. “Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Functional Analyses as Mechanism Sketches.” Synthese 183 (3): 283–311. doi: 10.1007/s11229-011-9898-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland, J., and S. Tekin. 2017. Extraordinary Science and Psychiatry: Responses to the Crisis in Mental Health Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R. 2010. “Subtraction and Beyond: The Logic of Experimental Designs for Neuroimaging.” In Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping, edited by Stephen Hanson, and Martin Bunzl, 147–159. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R., A. Kittur, D. Kalar, E. Miller, C. Seppa, Y. Gil, D. Parker, F. Sabb, and R. Bilder. 2011. “The Cognitive Atlas: Toward a Knowledge Foundation for Cognitive Neuroscience.” Neuroinformatics 5 (17): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R., and T. Yarkoni. 2016. “From Brain Maps to Cognitive Ontologies: Informatics and the Search for Mental Structure.” Annual Review of Psychology 67: 587–612. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragland, J., N. Cohen, R. Cools, M. Frank, D. Hannula, and C. Ranganath. 2012. “CNTRICS Imaging Biomarkers Final Task Selection: Long-Term Memory and Reinforcement Learning.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 38 (1): 62–72. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragland, J., R. Cools, M. Frank, D. Pizzagalli, A. Preston, C. Ranganath, and A. Wagner. 2009. “CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Long-Term Memory.” Schizophrenia Bulletin 35 (1): 197–212. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger III, H., Y. Dudai, and S. Fitzpatrick. 2007. Science of Memory: Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanislow, C., D. Pine, K. Quinn, M. Kozak, M. Garvey, R. Heinssen, P. Wang, and B. Cuthbert. 2010. “Developing Constructs for Psychopathology Research: Research Domain Criteria.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 119 (4): 631–639. doi: 10.1037/a0020909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W., T. Cook, and D. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sochat, V., I. Eisenberg, A. Enkavi, J. Li, P. Bissett, and R. Poldrack. 2016. “The Experiment Factory: Standardizing Behavioral Experiments.” Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, C. 2016. “Mechanisms in Psychology: Ripping Nature at Its Seams.” Synthese 193 (5): 1585–1614. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0871-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. 2009. “The Multiplicity of Experimental Protocols: A Challenge to Reductionist and Nonreductionist Models of the Unity of Science.” Synthese 167: 511–539. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9389-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. 2010. “Reconsidering ‘Spatial Memory’ and the Morris Water Maze.” Synthese, 177 (2): 261–283. doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9849-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. 2014a. “Is the Next Frontier in Neuroscience a Decade of the Mind?” In Brain Theory, edited by Charles Wolfe, 45–67. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. 2014b. “Stabilizing Mental Disorders: Prospects and Problems.” In Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds, edited by Harold Kincaid, and Jacqueline Sullivan, 257–281. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. 2016a. “Construct Stabilization and the Unity of the Mind-Brain Sciences.” Philosophy of Science 83: 662–673. doi: 10.1086/687853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. 2016b. “Stabilizing Constructs Across Different Research Fields as a Way to Foster the Integrative Approach of the Research Domain Criteria Project.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 309. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. 2016c. “Neuroscientific Kinds Through the Lens of Scientific Practice.” In Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, edited by Catherine Kendig, 47–56. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tabb, K. 2016. “Philosophy of Psychiatry After Diagnostic Kinds.”
   Google Scholar
• Theurer, K., and D. Hartner. 2016. “Mechanisms, Networks, and Values in Psychiatry: New Arguments for Old Insights into the Science of (Mental) Pathology”.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. A., and A. R. Laird. 2012. “The Cognitive Paradigm Ontology: Design and Application.” Neuroinformatics 10: 57–66. doi: 10.1007/s12021-011-9126-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, W. 2001. The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar