Explaining embodied emotions – with and without representations

References

• Barrett, Feldman Lisa. 2006. “Are Emotions Natural Kinds?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (1): 28–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, Feldman Lisa. 2017. How Emotions Are Made the Secret Life of the Brain. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Lisa, Michael Lewis, and Jeanette Haviland-Jones. 2016. Handbook of Emotions. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Andy. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colombetti, Giovanna. 2014. The Feeling Body. Affective Sciences Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, Anthony. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• D'Arms, Justin, and Daniel Jacobson. 2000. “Sentiment and Value.” Ethics 110 (4): 722–748. doi: 10.1086/233371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deonna, Julien. 2006. “Emotion, Perception and Perspective.” Dialectica 60 (1): 29–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2005.01031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deonna, Julien, and Fabrice Teroni. 2012. The Emotions. A Philosophical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., and Anthony Manstead. 2016. “Social Functions of Emotion and Emotion Regulation.” In Handbook of Emotions, edited by L. F. Barrett, M. Lewis, and J. Haviland Jones, 4th ed., 424–439. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry. 1990. A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, Nico. 1986. The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Paul. 1997. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, Benett. 2001. Emotional Reason: Deliberation, Motivation, and the Nature of Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, Benett. 2010. “Emotions and Motivation. Reconsidering Neojamesian Accounts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, edited by Peter Goldie, 303–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hufendiek, Rebekka. 2016. Embodied Emotions: A Naturalist Approach to a Normative Phenomenon. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hufendiek, Rebekka. 2017. “Affordances and the Normativity of Emotions.” Synthese 194 (11): 4455–4476. doi: 10.1007/s11229-016-1144-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutto, Daniel. 2012. “Truly Enactive Emotion.” Emotion Review, 4 (2): 176–181. doi: 10.1177/1754073911430134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutto, Daniel, and Erik Myin. 2013. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, Daniel, and Erik Myin. 2017. Evolving Enactivism: Basic Minds Meet Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, Daniel, and Glenda Satne. 2015. “The Natural Origins of Content.” Philosophia 43 (3): 521–536. doi: 10.1007/s11406-015-9644-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, Richard. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, Ruth. 1993. White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, Ruth. 1995. “Pushmi-Pullyu Representations.” Philosophical Perspectives 9: 185–200. doi: 10.2307/2214217
   Google Scholar
• Neander, Karen. 2017. A Mark of the Mental: In Defense of Informational Teleosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Brian, Agneta Fischer, and Anthony Manstead. 2005. Emotions in Social Relations: Cultural, Group, and Interpersonal Processes. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, Jesse. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, William. 2007. Representation Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, William. 2017. “Must Cognition be Representational?” Synthese 194 (11): 4197–4214. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0644-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmela, Mikko. 2011. “Can Emotions Be Modeled on Perception?” Dialectica 65 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2011.01259.x
   Google Scholar