References
- Clark, P. 2001. “Velleman’s Autonomism.” Ethics 111 (3): 580–593. doi: 10.1086/233527
- Cocking, D., and J. Kennett. 2000. “Friendship and Moral Danger.” Journal of Philosophy 5 (97): 278–296. doi: 10.2307/2678396
- Enoch, D. 2006. “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from What is Constitutive of Action.” The Philosophical Review 115 (2): 169–198. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2005-014
- Enoch, D. 2011. “Shmagency Revisited.” In New Waves in Metaethics, edited by M. Brady, 208–233. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ferrero, L. 2009. “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4: 303–333.
- Foot, P. 1978. “Are Moral Considerations Overriding?” In Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, edited by P. Foot, 181–188. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Herman, B. 1981. “On the Value of Acting from the Motive of Duty.” The Philosophical Review 90 (3): 359–382. doi: 10.2307/2184978
- Kant, I. 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kant, I. 1998a. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ( Kant’s works are quoted with the Academy Edition page numbering.)
- Kant, I. 1998b. Kant: Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: And Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Katsafanas, P. 2013. Agency and the Foundation of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kolodny, N. 2005. “Why be Rational?” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 114 (455): 509–563. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzi509
- Korsgaard, C. 1996. Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lavin, D. 2004. “Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error.” Ethics 114 (3): 424–457. doi: 10.1086/381695
- McDowell, J. 1978. “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 52: 13–29. doi: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/52.1.13
- Scanlon, T. 2014. Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Schafer, K. 2017. “Rationality as the Capacity for Understanding.” Noûs. doi:10.1111/nous.12231.
- Silverstein, M. 2015. “The Shmagency Question.” Philosophical Studies 172 (5): 1127–1142. doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0340-x
- Street, S. 2012. “Coming to Terms with Contingency: Humean Constructivism About Practical Reason.” In Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, edited by James Lenman, and Yonatan Shemmer, 40–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Tenenbaum, S. “Why All Practical Truth is Theoretical.” Manuscript, University of Toronto.
- Tenenbaum, S. 2011. “Korsgaard, Christine M. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.” Ethics 121 (2): 449–455. doi: 10.1086/657967
- Tenenbaum, S. 2012. “The Idea of Freedom and Moral Cognition in Groundwork III.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3): 555–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00462.x
- Tenenbaum, S. 2015. “Acting and Satisficing.” In Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency, edited by G. Pavlakos, and V. Rodriguez-Blanco, 31–51. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
- Tenenbaum, S. Forthcoming. Rational Powers in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Velleman, D. 2009. How We Get Along. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Walden, K. 2012. “Laws of Nature, Laws of Freedom, and the Social Construction of Normativity.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 7: 37–79. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653492.003.0002