Publication Cover
Philosophical Explorations
An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action
Volume 22, 2019 - Issue 2: Varieties of Constitutivism
558
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Formalism and constitutivism in Kantian practical philosophy

Pages 163-176 | Received 20 Mar 2019, Accepted 20 Mar 2019, Published online: 16 May 2019

References

  • Clark, P. 2001. “Velleman’s Autonomism.” Ethics 111 (3): 580–593. doi: 10.1086/233527
  • Cocking, D., and J. Kennett. 2000. “Friendship and Moral Danger.” Journal of Philosophy 5 (97): 278–296. doi: 10.2307/2678396
  • Enoch, D. 2006. “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from What is Constitutive of Action.” The Philosophical Review 115 (2): 169–198. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2005-014
  • Enoch, D. 2011. “Shmagency Revisited.” In New Waves in Metaethics, edited by M. Brady, 208–233. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ferrero, L. 2009. “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4: 303–333.
  • Foot, P. 1978. “Are Moral Considerations Overriding?” In Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, edited by P. Foot, 181–188. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Herman, B. 1981. “On the Value of Acting from the Motive of Duty.” The Philosophical Review 90 (3): 359–382. doi: 10.2307/2184978
  • Kant, I. 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kant, I. 1998a. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ( Kant’s works are quoted with the Academy Edition page numbering.)
  • Kant, I. 1998b. Kant: Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: And Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Katsafanas, P. 2013. Agency and the Foundation of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kolodny, N. 2005. “Why be Rational?” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 114 (455): 509–563. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzi509
  • Korsgaard, C. 1996. Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lavin, D. 2004. “Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error.” Ethics 114 (3): 424–457. doi: 10.1086/381695
  • McDowell, J. 1978. “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 52: 13–29. doi: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/52.1.13
  • Scanlon, T. 2014. Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schafer, K. 2017. “Rationality as the Capacity for Understanding.” Noûs. doi:10.1111/nous.12231.
  • Silverstein, M. 2015. “The Shmagency Question.” Philosophical Studies 172 (5): 1127–1142. doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0340-x
  • Street, S. 2012. “Coming to Terms with Contingency: Humean Constructivism About Practical Reason.” In Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, edited by James Lenman, and Yonatan Shemmer, 40–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tenenbaum, S. “Why All Practical Truth is Theoretical.” Manuscript, University of Toronto.
  • Tenenbaum, S. 2011. “Korsgaard, Christine M. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.” Ethics 121 (2): 449–455. doi: 10.1086/657967
  • Tenenbaum, S. 2012. “The Idea of Freedom and Moral Cognition in Groundwork III.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3): 555–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00462.x
  • Tenenbaum, S. 2015. “Acting and Satisficing.” In Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency, edited by G. Pavlakos, and V. Rodriguez-Blanco, 31–51. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tenenbaum, S. Forthcoming. Rational Powers in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Velleman, D. 2009. How We Get Along. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walden, K. 2012. “Laws of Nature, Laws of Freedom, and the Social Construction of Normativity.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 7: 37–79. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653492.003.0002

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.