Publication Cover
Philosophical Explorations
An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action
Volume 25, 2022 - Issue 2
128
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Why (getting) the phenomenology of recognition (right) matters for epistemology

Pages 232-250 | Received 27 Jul 2020, Accepted 20 Aug 2021, Published online: 07 Jan 2022

References

  • Austin, John L. 1946. “Other Minds.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 20: 148–197.
  • Bayne, Tim. 2009. “Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236): 385–404.
  • Berger, Jacob. 2015. “The Sensory Content of Perceptual Experience.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (4): 446–468.
  • Bergmann, Michael. 2006. Justification Without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Block, Ned. 2014. “Seeing-as in the Light of Vision Science.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (3): 560–572.
  • Brandom, Robert B. 2002. “Non-inferential Knowledge, Perceptual Experience, and Secondary Qualities: Placing McDowell's Empiricism.” In Reading McDowell: On Mind and World, edited by Robert Brandom, 92–105. New York: Routledge.
  • Brewer, Bill. 2011. Perception and its Objects. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Campbell, John. 2011. “Visual Attention and the Epistemic Role of Consciousness.” In Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, edited by Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies, and Wayne Wu, 323–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cavedon-Taylor, Dan. 2015. “Kind Properties and the Metaphysics of Perception: Towards Impure Relationalism.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (4): 487–509.
  • Dretske, Fred. 1969. Seeing and Knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Eilan, Naomi. 2013. “On the Paradox of Gestalt Switches: Wittgenstein’s Response to Kohler.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (3): 1–21.
  • Evans, Gareth. 1982. The Variety of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fish, William. 2013. “High-level Properties and Visual Experience.” Philosophical Studies 162 (1): 43–55.
  • Gersel, Johan, Rasmus Thybo Jensen, and Morten S. Thaning. 2017. “McDowell’s New Conceptualism and the Difference Between Chickens, Colours and Cardinals.” Philosophical Explorations 20 (1): 88–105.
  • Logue, Heather. 2013. “Visual Experience of Natural Kind Properties: Is There any Fact of the Matter?” Philosophical Studies 162 (1): 1–12.
  • Lyons, Jack. 2005. “Perceptual Belief and Nonexperiential Looks.” Philosophical Perspectives 19: 237–256.
  • Lyons, Jack. 2009. Perception and Basic Beliefs. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Masrour, Farid. 2011. “Is Perceptual Phenomenology Thin?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2): 366–397.
  • McDowell, John. 2009. “Avoiding the Myth of the Given.” In Reprinted in Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars, edited by John McDowell, 256–272. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 2010. “Brandom on Observation.” In Reading Brandom: On Making it Explicit, edited by Bernhard Weiss and Jeremy Wanderer, 139–154. New York: Routledge.
  • McDowell, John. 2011. “Anscombe on Bodily Self-knowledge.” In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention, edited by Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby, and Frederick Stoutland, 128–146. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 2013. “Perceptual Experience: Both Relational and Contentful.” European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1): 144–157.
  • Millar, Alan. 2011. “How Visual Perception Yields Reasons for Belief.” Philosophical Issues 21: 332–351.
  • Nanay, Bence. 2011. “Do We See Apples as Edible?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3): 305–322.
  • Noordhof, Paul. 2018. “Evaluative Perception as Response-Dependent Representation.” In Evaluative Perception, edited by Anna Bergqvist, and Robert Cowan, 80–108. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Price, Richard. 2009. “Aspect-Switching and Visual Phenomenal Character.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236): 508–518.
  • Prinz, Jesse. 2013. “Siegel’s get Rich Quick Scheme.” Philosophical Studies 163 (3): 827–835.
  • Reiland, Indrek, and Jack Lyons. 2015. “The Disunity of Perception: An Introduction.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (4): 443–445.
  • Roessler, Johannes. 2009. “Perceptual Experience and Perceptual Knowledge.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 118 (472): 1013–1041.
  • Siegel, Susanna. 2006. “Which Properties are Represented in Experience?” In Perceptual Experience, edited by Tamar Szabó -Gendler, and John Hawthorne, 481–503. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Siegel, Susanna. 2011. The Contents of Visual Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Siegel, Susanna. 2019. “The Uneasy Heirs of Acquaintance.” Philosophical Issues 29 (1): 348–365.
  • Siegel, Susanna, and Alex Byrne. 2016. “Rich or Thin?” In Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception, edited by Bence Nanay, 59–80. New York: Routledge.
  • Siewert, Charles. 2013. “Intellectualism, Experience, and Motor Understanding.” In Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World, edited by Joseph Schear, 204–236. New York: Routledge.
  • Speaks, Jeff. 2005. “Is There a Problem About Nonconceptual Content?” The Philosophical Review 114 (3): 359–398.
  • Speaks, Jeff. 2010. “Attention and Intentionalism.” The Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239): 325–342.
  • Stalnaker, Robert. 1998. “What Might Nonconceptual Content Be?” Philosophical Issues 9: 339–352.
  • Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1979. “Perception and its Objects.” In Perception and Identity: Essays Presented to A. J. Ayer, edited by Graham MacDonald, 41–60. London: Palgrave.
  • Travis, Charles. 2004. “The Silence of the Senses.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 113 (449): 57–94.
  • Tye, Michael. 1995. Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Watzl, Sebastian. 2011. “The Philosophical Significance of Attention.” Philosophy Compass 6 (10): 722–733.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Volume II. Oxford: Blackwell.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.