Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation for infinite-dimensional systems – a variational point of view

References

• C. Campos, M. de León, M. de Diego, and J. Vankerschaver, Unambiguous formalism for higher order Lagrangian field theories, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009), pp. 475207. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/47/475207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Giachetta, L. Mangiarotti, and G. Sardanashvily, New Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Methods in Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• O. Krupková, Hamiltonian field theory, J. Geometry Phys. 43 (2002), pp. 93–132. doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(01)00087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Marsden and T. Hughes, Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity, Dover Publications, New York, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• J. Marsden, S. Pekarsky, S. Shkoller, and M. West, Variational methods, multisymplectic geometry and continuum mechanics, J. Geometry Phys. 38 (2001), pp. 253–284. doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(00)00066-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• D. Saunders, The Geometry of Jet Bundles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• M. Gotay, A multisymplectic framework for classical field theory and the calculus of variations ii: space + time decomposition, Differ. Geom. Appl. 1 (1991), pp. 375–390. doi:10.1016/0926-2245(91)90014-Z
   Google Scholar
• A. van der Schaft and B. Maschke, Hamiltonian formulation of distributed-parameter systems with boundary energy flow, J. Geometry Phys. 42 (2002), pp. 166–194. doi:10.1016/S0393-0440(01)00083-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Macchelli, A. van der Schaft, and C. Melchiorri, Port Hamiltonian formulation of infinite dimensional systems I. Modeling, Proceedings 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlantis, 2004, pp. 3762–3767.
   Google Scholar
• A. Macchelli, A. van der Schaft, and C. Melchiorri, Port Hamiltonian formulation of infinite dimensional systems II. Boundary control by interconnection, Proceedings 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlantis, 2004, pp. 3768–3773.
   Google Scholar
• K. Schlacher, Mathematical modeling for nonlinear control: a Hamiltonian approach, Math. Comput. Simul. 79 (2008), pp. 829–849. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2008.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Schöberl and A. Siuka, Jet bundle formulation of infinite-dimensional port-Hamiltonian systems using differential operators, Automatica 50 (2014), pp. 607–613. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2013.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Schlacher and M. Schöberl, How to choose the state for distributed-parameter systems, a geometric point of view, Proceedings 8th Vienna International Conference on Mathematical Modelling, Vienna, 2015, pp. 500–501.
   Google Scholar
• M. Schöberl and K. Schlacher, Lagrangian and port-Hamiltonian formulation for distributed-parameter systems, Proceedings 8th Vienna International Conference on Mathematical Modelling, Vienna, 2015, pp. 610–615.
   Google Scholar
• M. Schöberl and K. Schlacher, First-order Hamiltonian field theory and mechanics, Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 17 (2011), pp. 105–121. doi:10.1080/13873954.2010.537526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Luenberger, Optimization by Vector Space Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• T. Frankel, The Geometry of Physics, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• L. Meirovitch, Principles and Techniques of Vibrations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• A. Macchelli and C. Melchiorri, Modeling and control of the Timoshenko beam. The distributed port Hamiltonian approach, SIAM J. Control Optim. 43 (2004), pp. 743–767. doi:10.1137/S0363012903429530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Siuka, M. Schöberl, and K. Schlacher, Port-Hamiltonian modelling and energy-based control of the Timoshenko beam – An approach based on structural invariants, Acta Mech. 222 (2011), pp. 69–89. doi:10.1007/s00707-011-0510-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar