Can we replicate real human behaviour using artificial neural networks?

References

• S. Abar, G.K. Theodoropoulos, P. Lemarinier, and G.M. O’Hare, Agent based modelling and simulation tools: A review of the state-of-artsoftware, Comput. Sci. Rev. 24 (2017), pp. 13–33. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.R. Parry, and M. Bithell, Large scale agent-based modelling: A review and guidelines for model scaling, in Agent-based Models of Geographical Systems, Heppenstall, Alison J., CrooksLinda, Andrew T., and SeeMichael Batty, M., eds., Springer, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 271–308.
   Google Scholar
• L. An, Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models, Ecol Modell 229 (2012), pp. 25–36. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Barbati, G. Bruno, and A. Genovese, Applications of agent-based models for optimization problems: A literature review, Expert. Syst. Appl. 39 (2012), pp. 6020–6028. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Hansen, X. Liu, and G.M. Morrison, Agent-based modelling and socio-technical energy transitions: A systematic literature review, Energy Res. Social Sci. 49 (2019), pp. 41–52. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lippe, M. Bithell, N. Gotts, D. Natalini, P. Barbrook-Johnson, C. Giupponi, M. Hallier, G.J. Hofstede, C. Le Page, R.B. Matthews et al., Using agent-based modelling to simulate social-ecological systems across scales, GeoInformatica 23 (2019), pp. 269–298. doi:10.1007/s10707-018-00337-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zhang and Y. Vorobeychik, Empirically grounded agent-based models of innovation diffusion: A critical review, Artif. Intell. Rev. 52 (2019), pp. 707–741. doi:10.1007/s10462-017-9577-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Letort, A. Montagud, G. Stoll, R. Heiland, E. Barillot, P. Macklin, A. Zinovyev, and L. Calzone, Physiboss: A multi-scale agent-based modelling framework integrating physical dimension and cell signalling, Bioinformatics 35 (2019), pp. 1188–1196. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Haer, W.W. Botzen, and J.C. Aerts, Advancing disaster policies by integrating dynamic adaptive behaviour in risk assessments using an agent-based modelling approach, Environ. Res. Lett. 14 (2019), pp. 044022. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab0770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Geschke, J. Lorenz, and P. Holtz, The triple-filter bubble: Using agent-based modelling to test a meta-theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers, Br.J. Soc. Psychol. 58 (2019), pp. 129–149. doi:10.1111/bjso.12286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.R. Groff, S.D. Johnson, and A. Thornton, State of the art in agent-based modeling of urban crime: An overview, J Quant Criminol 35 (2019), pp. 155–193. doi:10.1007/s10940-018-9376-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Fagiolo, M. Guerini, F. Lamperti, A. Moneta, and A. Roventini, Validation of agent-based models in economics and finance, in Computer Simulation Validation, Springer, Heidelberg, 2019, pp. 763–787.
   Google Scholar
• L. Whitmarsh, I. Lorenzoni, and S. O’Neill, Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication, Whitmarsh, Lorraine, O'Neill, Saffron, and Lorenzoni, Irene, eds, Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• J. Urry, Climate Change and Society, in Why the Social Sciences Matter, Springer, Heidelberg, 2015, pp. 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• B. Beckage, L.J. Gross, K. Lacasse, E. Carr, S.S. Metcalf, J.M. Winter, P.D. Howe, N. Fefferman, T. Franck, A. Zia et al., Linking models of human behaviour and climate alters projected climate change, Nat. Clim. Chang. 8 (2018), pp. 79–84. doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0031-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Clayton, P. Devine-Wright, P.C. Stern, L. Whitmarsh, A. Carrico, L. Steg, J. Swim, and M. Bonnes, Psychological research and global climate change, Nat. Clim. Chang. 5 (2015), pp. 640–646. doi:10.1038/nclimate2622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Chater, Facing up to the uncertainties of covid-19, Nat. Hum. Behav. 4 (2020), pp. 439. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0865-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Van Bavel, K. Baicker, P.S. Boggio, V. Capraro, A. Cichocka, M. Cikara, M.J. Crockett, A.J. Crum, K.M. Douglas, J.N. Druckman et al., Using social and behavioural science to support covid-19 pandemic response, Nat. Hum. Behav. 4 (2020), pp. 460–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Betsch, How behavioural science data helps mitigate the covid-19 crisis, Nat. Hum. Behav. 4 (2020), pp. 438. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0866-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Cuevas, An agent-based model to evaluate the covid-19 transmission risks in facilities, Comput. Biol. Med. 121 (2020), pp. 103827. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.C. Kerr, R.M. Stuart, D. Mistry, R.G. Abeysuriya, G. Hart, K. Rosenfeld, P. Selvaraj, R.C. Nunez, B. Hagedorn, and L. George et al., Covasim: An agent-based model of covid-19 dynamics and interventions, PLoS Comput Biol, (2020), 17(7), pp. e1009149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.C. Silva, P.V. Batista, H.S. Lima, M.A. Alves, F.G. Guimarães, and R.C. Silva, Covid-abs: An agent-based model of covid-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions, Chaos. Solitons. Fractals. 139 (2020), pp. 110088. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Macal, Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation, J. Simul. 10 (2016), pp. 144–156. doi:10.1057/jos.2016.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Klabunde and F. Willekens, Decision-making in agent-based models of migration: State of the art and challenges, Eur. J. Popul. 32 (2016), pp. 73–97. doi:10.1007/s10680-015-9362-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. An, V. Grimm, and B.L. Turner II, Meeting grand challenges in agent-based models, J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 23 (2020). doi:10.18564/jasss.4012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dhall, R. Kaur, and M. Juneja, Machine learning: A review of the algorithms and its applications, Proceedings of ICRIC 2019, Jammu, India, 2020, pp. 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• P.C. Sen, M. Hajra, and M. Ghosh, Supervised classification algorithms in machine learning: A survey and review, in Emerging Technology in Modelling and Graphics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2020, pp. 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• E. Samadi, A. Badri, and R. Ebrahimpour, Decentralized multi-agent based energy management of microgrid using reinforcement learning, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 122 (2020), pp. 106211. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Bone and S. Dragićević, Simulation and validation of a reinforcement learning agent-based model for multi-stakeholder forest management, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 34 (2010), pp. 162–174. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Jalalimanesh, H.S. Haghighi, A. Ahmadi, and M. Soltani, Simulation-based optimization of radiotherapy: Agent-based modeling and reinforcement learning, Math. Comput. Simul. 133 (2017), pp. 235–248. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2016.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Jang, D. Kim, D. Lee, and Y. Son, An agent-based simulation modeling with deep reinforcement learning for smart traffic signal control, in 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju Island, Korea. IEEE, 2018, pp. 1028–1030.
   Google Scholar
• S. Hassanpour, A.A. Rassafi, V. Gonzalez, and J. Liu, A hierarchical agent-based approach to simulate a dynamic decision-making process of evacuees using reinforcement learning, J. Choice Modell. 39 (2021), pp. 100288. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Maeda, D. deGraw, M. Kitano, H. Matsushima, H. Sakaji, K. Izumi, and A. Kato, Deep reinforcement learning in agent based financial market simulation, J. Risk Financ. Manage. 13 (2020), pp. 71. doi:10.3390/jrfm13040071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Collins, J. Sokolowski, and C. Banks, Applying reinforcement learning to an insurgency agent-based simulation, J. Def. Model. Simul. 11 (2014), pp. 353–364. doi:10.1177/1548512913501728.
   Google Scholar
• E. Sert, Y. Bar-Yam, and A.J. Morales, Segregation dynamics with reinforcement learning and agent based modeling, Sci Rep 10 (2020), pp. 1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68447-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Jäger, Replacing rules by neural networks a framework for agent-based modelling, Big Data Cognit. Comput. 3 (2019), pp. 51. doi:10.3390/bdcc3040051.
   Google Scholar
• G. Jäger, Using neural networks for a universal framework for agent-based models, Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 27 (2021), pp. 162–178. doi:10.1080/13873954.2021.1889609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.C. Schelling, Dynamic models of segregation, J. Math. Sociol. 1 (1971), pp. 143–186. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Epstein, and R. Axtell, Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• E. Fehr and U. Fischbacher, The nature of human altruism, Nature 425 (2003), pp. 785–791. doi:10.1038/nature02043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Piliavin and H.W. Charng, Altruism: A review of recent theory and research, Annu Rev Sociol. 16 (1990), pp. 27–65. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. McAuliffe, P.R. Blake, N. Steinbeis, and F. Warneken, The developmental foundations of human fairness, Nat. Hum. Behav. 1 (2017), pp. 0042. Available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Morgan and K. Laland, The biological bases of conformity, Front. Neurosci. 6 (2012), pp. 87. Available at https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2012.00087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Coultas, When in Rome … an evolutionary perspective on conformity, Group Processes Intergroup Relat. 7 (2004), pp. 317–331. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204046141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.K. Hansen and P. Salamon, Neural network ensembles, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12 (1990), pp. 993–1001. doi:10.1109/34.58871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G.E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks“, in Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA, 2012, pp. 1097–1105.
   Google Scholar
• A. Krogh, and J. Vedelsby, Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, (1995), pp. .
   Google Scholar
• F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg et al., Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (2011), pp. 2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Murtagh, Multilayer perceptrons for classification and regression, Neurocomputing 2 (1991), pp. 183–197. doi:10.1016/0925-2312(91)90023-5.
   Google Scholar
• H. Gintis, Beyond homo economicus: Evidence from experimental economics, Ecol. Econ. 35 (2000), pp. 311–322. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800900002160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.H. Thaler, From homo economicus to homo sapiens, J. Econ.Perspect. 14 (2000), pp. 133–141. Available at https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.14.1.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Dorfman, A formula for the gini coefficient, Rev. Econ. Stat. 61 (1979), pp. 146–149. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1924845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Milanovic, A simple way to calculate the gini coefficient, and some implications, Econ. Lett. 56 (1997), pp. 45–49. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176597001018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Axelrod and W. Hamilton, The evolution of cooperation, Science. 211 (1981), pp. 1390–1396. Available at https://science.sciencemag.org/content/211/4489/1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. McGinty and G. Milam, Public goods provision by asymmetric agents: Experimental evidence, Soc. Choice Welfare. 40 (2013), pp. 1159–1177. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0658-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Fehr and K.M. Schmidt, A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation*, Q. J. Econ. 114 (1999), pp. 817–868. Available at https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Andreoni, W. Harbaugh, and L. Vesterlund, The carrot or the stick: Rewards, punishments, and cooperation, Am. Econ. Rev. 93 (2003), pp. 893–902. Available at https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/000282803322157142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Fehr and K.M. Schmidt, Fairness, incentives, and contractual choices, Eur Econ Rev 44 (2000), pp. 1057–1068. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(99)00046-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.E. Bolton and A. Ockenfels, Self-centered fairness in games with more than two players, Handb. Exp. Econ. Results. 1 (2008), pp. 531–540.
   Google Scholar
• T. Dietz, Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), pp. 1654–1655. Available at https://www.pnas.org/content/112/6/1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.G. Rand and Z.G. Epstein, Risking your life without a second thought: Intuitive decision-making and extreme altruism, PLOS ONE. 9 (2014), pp. 1–6. Available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Fehr and B. Rockenbach, Human altruism: Economic, neural, and evolutionary perspectives, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 (2004), pp. 784–790. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438804001606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Fischbacher, S. Gächter, and E. Fehr, Are people conditionally cooperative? evidence from a public goods experiment, Econ Lett 71 (2001), pp. 397–404. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Gilbert and P. Terna, How to build and use agent-based models in social science, Mind Soc. 1 (2000), pp. 57–72. doi:10.1007/BF02512229.
   Google Scholar
• K.H. Van Dam, I. Nikolic, and Z. Lukszo, Agent-based Modelling of Socio-technical Systems, Vol. 9, Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg, 2012.
   Google Scholar