Young Children's Perception of Diagrammatic Representations

References

• Bremner, J. G., Morse, R., Hughes, S., & Andreasen, G. (2000). Relations between drawing cubes and copying line diagrams of cubes in 7- to 10-year-old children. Child Development, 71, 621–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. B. (1969). The 3D reconstruction of a 2D visual display. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 115, 257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. V. (1986). The child's point of view: The development of cognition and language. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. M. (1985). The canonical bias: Young children's drawings of familiar objects. In N. H. Freeman & M. V. Cox (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 202–213). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLoache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child Development, 62, 736–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache, J. S., & Burns, N. M. (1994). Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition, 52, 83–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache, J. S., Pierroutsakos, S. L., & Uttal, D. H. (2003). The origins of pictorial competence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 114–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, R. M. (1985). The representation of space: Its development in children and in cartography. In R. Cohen (Ed.), The development of spatial cognition (pp. 323–345). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ebersbach, M., & Hagedorn, H. (2011). The role of cognitive flexibility in the spatial representation of children's drawings. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 32–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebersbach, M., Stiehler, S., & Asmus, P. (2011). On the relationship between children's perspective taking in complex scenes and their spatial drawing ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 455–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, N. H., & Janikoun, R. (1972). Intellectual realism in children's drawings of a familiar object with distinctive features. Child Development, 43, 1116–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, A., Möhring, W., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Picturing perspectives: Development of perspective-taking abilities in 4- to 8-year-olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:386, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, M. A. (1974). Picture perception: Toward a theoretical model. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 471–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1962). Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: A study of one child's performance. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 624–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2009). Counter-stereotypic beliefs in math do not protect school girls from stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1024–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahoda, G., & McGurk, H. (1974). Pictorial depth perception: A developmental study. British Journal of Psychology, 65, 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, J. A., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2009). The effect of concreteness on children's ability to detect common proportion. In Proceedings of the XXXI Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 335–340)
   Google Scholar
• Kellman, P. J., & Arterberry, M. A. (2006). Infant visual perception. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 109–160). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kellman, P. J., Spelke, E. S., & Short, K. R. (1986). Infant perception of object unity from translatory motion in depth and vertical translation. Child Development, 57, 72–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange-Küttner, C., & Ebersbach, M. (2013). Girls in detail, boys in shape: Gender differences when drawing cubes in depth. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 413–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighty, K. A., Menzel, C. R., & Fragaszy, D. M. (2008). How young children and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) perceive objects in a 2D display: Putting an assumption to the test. Developmental Science, 11, 778–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S., & Downs, R. M. (1993). Understanding person-space-map relations: Cartographic and developmental perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 29, 739–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S., & Yekel, C. A. (1996). Preschoolers’ understanding of plan and oblique maps: The role of geometric and representational correspondence. Child Development, 67, 2780–2796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luquet, G.-H. (2001). Children's drawings (A. Costall, Trans.). London, UK: Free Association Books. (Original work published 1927).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. J. (1973). Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial materials. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 135–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchelmore, M. C. (1978). Developmental stages in children's representation of regular solid figures. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 133, 229–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A. L., & Kennedy, J. M. (1992). Drawing development: From similarity of features to direction. Child Development, 63, 227–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space (F. J. Langdon & J.L. Lunzer, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1948).
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1973). La géométrie spontanée de l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (First edition published 1948).
   Google Scholar
• Picard, D., & Durand, K. (2005). Are young children's drawings canonically biased? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 48–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S. A. (1977). Infants’ transfer of response between 2D and 3D stimuli. Child Development, 48, 1086–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloutsky, V. M., Kaminski, J. A., & Heckler, A. F. (2005). The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 508–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J. Y., Smith, L. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). Simplicity and generalization: Short-cutting abstraction in children's object categorizations. Cognition, 108, 626–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willats, J. (1977). How children learn to draw realistic pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 367–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willats, J. (1997). Art and representation: New principles in the analysis of pictures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler-Rhoades, N., Carey, S. C., & Spelke, E. S. (2013). Two-year-old children interpret abstract, purely geometric maps. Developmental Science, 16, 365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2011). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 574–603). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar