Coordinating signs and eye gaze in the depiction of directions and spatial scenes by fluent and L2 signers of Norwegian Sign Language

References

• Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A cross-linguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, K., Quinto-Pozos, D., Sevcikova, Z., & Schembri, A. (2012). Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language and Communication, 32(4), 329–348. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, K., Smith, S., & Sevcikova-Sehyr, Z. (2015). Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language and Linguistics, 18(2), 167–204. doi:10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coventry, K. R., Guijarro-Fuentes, P., & Valdés, B. (2012). On the first and second language acquisition of spatial language. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 12(4), 219–230. doi:10.1080/13875868.2012.713058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crasborn, O., & Sloetjes, H. (2008). Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In O. Crasborn, E. Efthimiou, T. Hanke, E. D. Thoutenhoofd, & I. Zwitserlood (Eds.), The third workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages: Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora (pp. 39–43). Paris, France: European Language Resources Association.
   Google Scholar
• de Beuzeville, L. (2006). Visual and linguistic representation in the acquisition of depicting verbs: A study of native signing deaf children of Auslan (Australian Sign Language) (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dudis, P. (2004). Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 223–238. doi:10.1515/cogl.2004.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudis, P. (2011). The body in scene depictions. In C. Roy (Ed.), Discourse in signed languages (pp. 3–45). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehricha, V., & Kosterb, C. (1983). Discourse organization and sentence form: The structure of room descriptions in Dutch. Discourse Processes, 6(2), 169–195. doi:10.1080/01638538309544561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., & Falgier, B. (1999). Talking about space with space: Describing environments in ASL. In E. Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in deaf communities (pp. 3–26). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(3), 157–180. doi:10.1023/A:1013118114571
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg, Germany: Signum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg-Pedersen, E. (2003). From pointing to reference and predication: Pointing signs, eye gaze, and head and body orientation in Danish Sign Language. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 269–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Engberg-Pedersen, E. (2016). Perspective in signed discourse: The privileged status of the signer’s locus and gaze. Open Linguistics, 1, 411–431. doi:10.1515/opli-2015-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Principles of conceptual integration. In J.-P. Koening (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 269–283). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, L., & Nilsson, A.-L. (2017). Describing spatial layouts as an M2 signed language learner. Sign Language and Linguistics, 20(1), 1–26. doi:10.1075/sll.20.1.01fer
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forker, D. (2012). Spatial relations in Hinuq and Bezhta. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: Linguistic diversity (pp. 15–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. (2005). Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica, 156(1–4), 21–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen, T. (2004). Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 149–174. doi:10.1515/cogl.2004.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2016). Auslan corpus annotation guidelines. Manuscript. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University. http://www.auslan.org.au/about/corpus/
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (2007). Australian Sign Language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (2010). Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. Langage et société, 131(March), 19–35. doi:10.3917/ls.131.0019
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, R. (1980). The acquisition of classifiers in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 28, 193–208. doi:10.1353/sls.1980.0000
   Google Scholar
• Landau, B., Dessalegn, B., & Goldberg, A. M. (2010). Language and space: Momentary interactions. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 51–77). London, UK: Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1996). Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 353–382. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, C., & Labov, W. (1975). Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language, 51(4), 924–939. doi:10.2307/412701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marotta, G., & Meini, L. (2012). Spatial prepositions in Italian L2: Universal and language-specific principles. In L. Filipovic & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: Linguistic diversity (pp. 289–323). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. R., & Morgan, G. (2014). From gesture to sign language: Conventionalization of classifier constructions by adult hearing learners of British Sign Language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1–20. doi:10.1111/tops.12118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntire, M. L., & Reilly, J. S. (1998). Nonmanual behaviors in L1 & L2 learners of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 61(Winter), 351–375. doi:10.1353/sls.1988.0034
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. (1995). Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp. 255–271). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1999). Event packaging in British Sign Language discourse. In E. Winston (Ed.), Storytelling and conversation, discourse in deaf communities (pp. 27–58). Washington, DC.: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neidle, C., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Bahan, B., & Lee, R. G. (2000). The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A.-L., & Ferrara, L. (2015, August 18–21). Depicting from experience: Learning to give directions in space. Paper presented at The Fifth Conference of the Scandinavian Association for Language and Cognition (SALC V), NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A.-L., & Ferrara, L. (2016, January 4–7). Meaningful use of space: Easy or hard for hearing L2 learners? Paper presented at the TISLR 12, Melbourne, Australia: La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Padden, C. (1986). Verbs and role-shifting in ASL. In C. Padden (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching (pp. 44–57). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Perniss, P. (2007). Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua, 117(7), 1315–1338. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perniss, P. (2012). Use of sign space. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 412–431). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Pyers, J. E., Perniss, P., & Emmorey, K. (2015). Viewpoint in the visual-spatial modality: The coordination of spatial perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 15(3), 143–169. doi:10.1080/13875868.2014.1003933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinto-Pozos, D., & Parrill, F. (2015). Signers and co-speech gesturers adopt similar strategies for portraying viewpoint in narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 12–35. doi:10.1111/tops.12120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, J. S. (2000). Bringing affective expression into the service of language: Acquiring perspective marking in narratives. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 415–433). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiter, J. P., de Rossignol, S., Vuurpijl, L., Cunningham, D. W., & Levelt, W. (2003). SLOT: A research platform for investigating multimodal communication. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(3), 408–419. doi:10.3758/BF03195518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, B. S. (1990). Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics, 1(1), 15–40.
   Google Scholar
• Shusterman, A., & Peggy, L. (2016). Frames of reference in spatial language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 115–161. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., Weinberg, A., Piers, J., … Thumann, H. (2003). A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers”. In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign language (pp. 271–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Cormier, K. (2014). In or out? Spatial scale and enactment in narratives of native and non-native signing children acquiring BSL. Sign Language Studies, 14(3), 275–301. doi:10.1353/sls.2014.0008
   Google Scholar
• Stec, K. (2012). Meaningful shifts: A review of the viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture, 12(3), 327–360. doi:10.1075/gest.12.3.03ste
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (1993). Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs, 60(4), 275–299. doi:10.1080/03637759309376314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supalla, T. (1982). Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in ASL (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Supalla, T. (1986). The classifier system in American Sign Language. In C. G. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization: Proceedings of a symposium on categorization and noun classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983 (pp. 181–214). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, G., & Sze, F. Y. B. (2002). Nominal expressions in Hong Kong Sign Language: Does modality make a difference? In R. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 296–321). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 257–280). Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. (2012). Spatial language, polysemy, and cross-linguistic semantic mismatches: Cognitive linguistics insights into challenges for second language learners. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 12(4), 305–335. doi:10.1080/13875868.2012.698670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar