Speaking of location: a review of spatial language research

References

• Acheson, E., & Purves, R. S. (2021). Extracting and modeling geographic information from scientific articles. PLoS One, 16(1), e0244918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alazzawi, A. N., Abdelmoty, A. I., & Jones, C. B. (2012). What can I do there? Towards the automatic discovery of place-related services and activities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(2), 345–364. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.595954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, M., Souza, R., & Fonseca, F. (2011). Semantics in the semantic web: A critical evaluation. Knowledge Organization, 38(3), 187–203. doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2011-3-187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arampatzis, A., Kreveld, M. V., Reinbacher, I., Jones, C. B., Vaid, S., Clough, P. D., … Sanderson, M. (2006). Web-based delineation of imprecise regions. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30(4), 436–459. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, P., Schmidt, J. E., & Lameli, A. (2010). Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ballatore, A. (2016). Semantic challenges for volunteered geographic information. European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information, 87.
   Google Scholar
• Bartie, P., Reitsma, F., Clementini, E., & Kingham, S. (2011). Referring expressions in location based services: The Case of the ‘opposite’ relation. In O. De Troyer, C. B. Medeiros, R. Billen, P. Hallot, A. Simitsis, & H. Van Mingroot (Eds.), Advances in conceptual modeling. recent developments and new directions (pp. 231–240). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24574-9_30
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, J. A., Hois, J., Ross, R., & Tenbrink, T. (2010). A linguistic ontology of space for natural language processing. Artificial Intelligence, 174(14), 1027–1071. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudoin, J. (2007). Folksonomies: Flickr image tagging: Patterns made visible. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 34(1), 26–29. doi:10.1002/bult.2007.1720340108
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A., & Carroll, M. (1997). The acquisition of spatial relations in a second language (Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, B. (2001). Application of supervaluation semantics to vaguely defined spatial concepts. In D. R. Montello (Ed.), Spatial information theory (pp. 108–123). Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-45424-1_8
   Google Scholar
• Bisk, Y., Shih, K., Choi, Y., & Marcu, D. (2018). Learning interpretable spatial operations in a rich 3D blocks world. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 32( 1), Article 1. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/12026
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, T., & Stell, J. G. (2002). Vagueness and Rough location. GeoInformatica, 6(2), 99–121. doi:10.1023/A:1015291525685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnemeyer, J. (2008). MesoSpaceSpatial language and cognition in Mesoamerica. Retrieved from https://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/MesoSpaceManual2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bohnemeyer, J., & O’Meara, C. K. (2012). Vectors and frames of reference evidence from Seri and Yucatec. In Space and time in languages and cultures: Language, culture, and cognition 217–249. John Benjamins Publishing. https://benjamins.com/catalog/hcp.37.16boh
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Brabyn, L. (2012). An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 317–331. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burenhult, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2008). Language and landscape: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences, 30(2), 135–150. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough, P. A., van Gaans, P. F., & Hootsmans, R. (1997). Continuous classification in soil survey: Spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries. Geoderma, 77(2–4), 115–135. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00018-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough, P. A., McDonnell, R. A., & Lloyd, C. D. (2015). Principles of geographical information systems (Third ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caduff, D., & Timpf, S. (2008). On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cognitive Processing, 9(4), 249–267. doi:10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, G., Wang, H., MacEachren, A. M., & Fuhrmann, S. (2005). Natural conversational interfaces to geospatial databases. Transactions in GIS, 9(2), 199–221. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2005.00213.x
   Google Scholar
• Canter, D. (1997). The facets of place. In G. T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Toward the integration of theory, methods, research, and utilization (pp. 109–147). Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4425-5_4
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L., & van der Zee, E. (Eds.). (2005). Functional features in language and space: Insights from perception, categorization, and development (Vol. xiv, pp. 386). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1996). The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection. Psychological Science, 7(1), 56–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., Covey, E. S., & Lattanzi, K. M. (1999). “What” effects on “where”: Functional influences on spatial relations. Psychological Science, 10(6), 516–521. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Winter, S., & Vasardani, M. (2018). Georeferencing places from collective human descriptions using place graphs. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2018(17), 31–62. doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2018.17.417
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., McDonough, L., Bowerman, M., & Mandler, J. M. (1999). Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean. Cognitive Development, 14(2), 241–268. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00004-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claramunt, C. (2020). Ontologies for geospatial information: Progress and challenges ahead. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2020(20), 35–41. doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2020.20.666
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A. G., Bennett, B., Gooday, J., & Gotts, N. M. (1997). Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning with the region connection calculus. GeoInformatica, 1(3), 275–316. doi:10.1023/A:1009712514511
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A. G., & Hazarika, S. M. (2001). Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning: An overview. Fundamenta Informaticae, 46(1–2), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collell, G., Gool, L. V., & Moens, M.-F. (2018, April 27). Acquiring common sense spatial knowledge through implicit spatial templates. Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/16232
   Google Scholar
• Coventry, K. R., & Garrod, S. C. (2004). Saying, seeing and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203641521
   Google Scholar
• Coventry, K. R., Tenbrink, T., & Bateman, J. (2009). Spatial language and dialogue (Vol. 3). OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Coventry, K. R., Lynott, D., Cangelosi, A., Monrouxe, L., Joyce, D., & Richardson, D. C. (2010). Spatial language, visual attention, and perceptual simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 202–213. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuayáhuitl, H., Dethlefs, N., Richter, K.-F., Tenbrink, T., & Bateman, J. (2010). A dialogue system for indoor wayfinding using text-based natural language. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications, 1(1–2), 285–304.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, E., & Martins, B. (2014). Using one-class classifiers and multiple kernel learning for defining imprecise geographic regions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(11), 2220–2241. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.916040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunninghan, W., & Cunningham, M. (2019). Principles of environmental science. McGraw Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/principles-environmental-science-cunningham-cunningham/M9781260219715.html
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Klein, W., & Levinson, S. C. (2005). The cornerstones of twenty-first century psycholinguistics. In Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 1–20). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, I. (1978). A referent-oriented, analytical concept theory for INTERCONCEPT. Knowledge Organization, 5(3), 142–151. doi:10.5771/0943-7444-1978-3-142
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R., Geldof, S., & Prost, J.-P. 2005. Using natural language generation in automatic route description. Journal of Research and Practice in Information, Technology http://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.015346326352219
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, M.-P., Carité, L., & Denis, M. (1996). Modes of linearization in the description of spatial configurations. In J. Portugali (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps (pp. 297–318). Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-0-585-33485-1_13
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, M.-P., Tom, A., Manghi, E., & Denis, M. (2003). Testing the value of route directions through navigational performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3(4), 269–289. doi:10.1207/s15427633scc0304_2
   Google Scholar
• Danziger, E. (2010). Deixis, gesture, and cognition in spatial frame of reference typology. Studies in Language, 34(1), 167–185. doi:10.1075/sl.34.1.16dan
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C., Holt, I., Green, J., Harding, J., & Diamond, L. (2009). User needs and implications for modelling vague named places. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 9(3), 174–194. doi:10.1080/13875860903121830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D. (2002). What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), 767–790. doi:10.1191/0309132502ph402oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, M. (2017). Space and spatial cognition: A multidisciplinary perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derungs, C., & Purves, R. S. (2016). Characterising landscape variation through spatial folksonomies. Applied Geography, 75, 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), 4171–4186. doi:10.18653/v1/N19-1423
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, H., & Coventry, K. R. (2020). Demonstratives in spatial language and social interaction: An interdisciplinary review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, V., Denaux, R., Hart, G., Dolbear, C., Holt, I., & Cohn, A. G. (2008). Involving domain experts in authoring OWL ontologies. In A. Sheth, S. Staab, M. Dean, M. Paolucci, D. Maynard, T. Finin, & K. Thirunarayan (Eds.), The semantic web—ISWC 2008 (pp. 1–16). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Downs, R. M., & Stea, D. (1973). Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Du, H., Alechina, N., Jackson, M., & Hart, G. (2013). Matching formal and informal geospatial ontologies. In D. Vandenbroucke, B. Bucher, & J. Crompvoets (Eds.), Geographic information science at the heart of Europe (pp. 155–171). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00615-4_9
   Google Scholar
• Du, S., Wang, X., Feng, -C.-C., & Zhang, X. (2017). Classifying natural-language spatial relation terms with random forest algorithm. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31(3), 542–568. doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1212356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckham, M., Winter, S., & Robinson, M. (2010). Including landmarks in routing instructions. Journal of Location Based Services, 4(1), 28–52. doi:10.1080/17489721003785602
   Google Scholar
• Egorova, E., Moncla, L., Gaio, M., Claramunt, C., & Purves, R. S. (2018). Fictive motion extraction and classification. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(11), 2247–2271. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1498503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (p. 426). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, M. I. (2008). Space between languages. Cognitive Science, 32(7), 1177–1199. doi:10.1080/03640210802152335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, R., Church, A., & Winter, M. (2016). Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 21, 208–217. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic Semantics. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315044644
   Google Scholar
• Freksa, C. (1992). Using orientation information for qualitative spatial reasoning. In A. U. Frank, I. Campari, & U. Formentini (Eds.), Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space (pp. 162–178). Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-55966-3_10
   Google Scholar
• Freksa, C. (2015). Strong spatial cognition. In S. I. Fabrikant, M. Raubal, M. Bertolotto, C. Davies, S. Freundschuh, & S. Bell (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 65–86). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23374-1_4
   Google Scholar
• Gapp, K.-P. (1995). Angle, distance, shape, and their relationship to projective relations. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 112–117. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Angle%2C-Distance%2C-Shape%2C-and-their-Relationship-to-Gapp/e2175dc074d72a5cb99f38f2d5f2e8d29429b534
   Google Scholar
• Gliozzo, G., Pettorelli, N., & Haklay, M. (2016). Using crowdsourced imagery to detect cultural ecosystem services: A case study in South Wales, UK. Ecology and Society, 21. doi:10.5751/ES-08436-210306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G., Smith, T. R., Pellegrino, J. W., Doherty, S., & Marshall, S. P. (1985). A conceptual model and empirical analysis of children’s acquisition of spatial knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(2), 125–152. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(85)80014-1
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. (1999). Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes, 5–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, T. R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5), 907–928. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino, N., Oberle, D., & Staab, S. (2009). What Is an Ontology? In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on Ontologies (pp. 1–17). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0
   Google Scholar
• Gudde, E. G., & Bright, W. (2010). California place names: The origin and etymology of current geographical names. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M., Smart, P. D., & Jones, C. B. (2011). Interpreting spatial language in image captions. Cognitive Processing, 12(1), 67–94. doi:10.1007/s10339-010-0385-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M., Jones, C. B., & Smart, P. (2015). Spatial natural language generation for location description in photo captions. In S. I. Fabrikant, M. Raubal, M. Bertolotto, C. Davies, S. Freundschuh, & S. Bell (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 196–223). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M., & Jones, C. B. (2021). Generating geographical location descriptions with spatial templates: A salient toponym driven approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36(1), 55–85. doi:10.1080/13658816.2021.1913498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannes, E., Kusumastuti, D., Espinosa, M. L., Janssens, D., Vanhoof, K., & Wets, G. (2012). Mental maps and travel behaviour: Meanings and models. Journal of Geographical Systems, 14(2), 143–165. doi:10.1007/s10109-010-0144-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassani, K., & Lee, W.-S. (2017). Disambiguating spatial prepositions using deep convolutional networks. Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 3209–3215.
   Google Scholar
• Hercus, L., Hodges, F., & Simpson, J., Eds. 2009. The land is a map: Placenames of indigenous origin in Australia. ANU Press. doi:10.26530/OAPEN_459353
   Google Scholar
• Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hois, J., & Kutz, O. (2008). Natural language meets spatial calculi. In C. Freksa, N. S. Newcombe, P. Gärdenfors, & S. Wölfl (Eds.), Spatial cognition VI. Learning, reasoning, and talking about space (pp. 266–282). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_20
   Google Scholar
• Hollenstein, L., & Purves, R. (2010). Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr tags to describe city cores. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2010(1), 21–48. doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2010.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Holton, G. (2011). Differing conceptualizations of the same landscape. In Landscape in language. transdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 225–237). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, A. S., Tellex, S., Bachrach, A., Kollar, T., Roy, D., & Roy, N. (2010). Natural language command of an autonomous micro-air vehicle. 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2663–2669.
   Google Scholar
• Inkpen, R., & Wilson, G. (2013). Science, philosophy and physical geography. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition (Vol. 8). MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeawak, S., Jones, C. B., & Schockaert, S. (2017). Using Flickr for characterizing the environment: An exploratory analysis. 13th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2017), 21:1–21:13. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2017.21
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., Croitoru, A., Crooks, A. T., & Stefanidis, A. (2016). Crowdsourcing a collective sense of place. PloS One, 11(4), e0152932. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. M., & Hunn, E. S. (2010). Landscape ethnoecology: Concepts of biotic and physical space. Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. M. (2010). Trail of story, traveller’s path: Reflections on ethnoecology and landscape. Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2013). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. B. (1997). Geographical information systems and computer cartography. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315846231
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. B., Alani, H., & Tudhope, D. (2001). Geographical information retrieval with ontologies of place. COSIT 2001: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science, 322–335. doi:10.1007/3-540-45424-1_22
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. B., Purves, R. S., Clough, P. D., & Joho, H. (2008). Modelling vague places with knowledge from the web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(10), 1045–1065. doi:10.1080/13658810701850547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, T., Raubal, M., Gartrell, B., & Egenhofer, M. (1998). An affordance-based model of place in GIS. 8th Int. Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, SDH, 98, 98–109.
   Google Scholar
• Ju, Y., Adams, B., Janowicz, K., Hu, Y., Yan, B., & McKenzie, G. (2016). Things and strings: Improving place name disambiguation from short texts by combining entity co-occurrence with topic modeling. European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, 353–367.
   Google Scholar
• Karimzadeh, M., Pezanowski, S., MacEachren, A. M., & Wallgrün, J. O. (2019). GeoTxt: A scalable geoparsing system for unstructured text geolocation. Transactions in GIS, 23(1), 118–136. doi:10.1111/tgis.12510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavouras, M., Kokla, M., & Tomai, E. (2005). Comparing categories among geographic ontologies. Computers & Geosciences, 31(2), 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2004.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, J. D., & Costello, F. J. (2009). Applying computational models of spatial prepositions to visually situated dialog. Computational Linguistics, 35(2), 271–306. doi:10.1162/coli.06-78-prep14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon, D. (1991). The origins of Lancashire. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Vasardani, M., & Winter, S. (2013). Extracting spatial information from place descriptions. Proceedings of The First ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Models of Place, 62: 62:69. doi:10.1145/2534848.2534857
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W. (1983). Deixis and spatial orientation in route directions. In H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation (pp. 283–311). Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_12
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Kulik, L., & Lee, P. U. (2005). Wayfinding choremes—A language for modeling conceptual route knowledge. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 16(4), 311–329. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2004.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordjamshidi, P., Van Otterlo, M., & Moens, M.-F. (2011). Spatial role labeling: towards extraction of spatial relations from natural language. ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process, 8(3), 4:1–4:36. doi:10.1145/2050104.2050105
   Google Scholar
• Kordjamshidi, P., Roth, D., & Moens, M.-F. (2015). Structured learning for spatial information extraction from biomedical text: Bacteria biotopes. BMC Bioinformatics, 16(1), 129. doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0542-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruijff, G.-J. M., Zender, H., Jensfelt, P., & Christensen, H. I. (2007). Situated dialogue and spatial organization: What, where … and why? International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 4(1), 16. doi:10.5772/5701
   Google Scholar
• Kudashev, I., & Kudasheva, I. (2010). Semiotic triangle revisited for the purposes of ontology-based terminology management. TOTh 2010. Actes de La Quatrième Conférence TOTh-Annecy–3 & 4 Juin 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, W. (2005). Geospatial semantics: Why, of what, and how? In S. Spaccapietra & E. Zimányi (Eds.), Journal on data semantics III (pp. 1–24). Springer. doi:10.1007/11496168_1
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, W. (2009). Semantic engineering. In G. Navratil (Ed.), Research trends in geographic information science (pp. 63–76). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88244-2_5
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, B. (1978). Modeling spatial knowledge. Cognitive Science, 2(2), 129–153. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(78)80003-2
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2008). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 217–238. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00029733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1986). An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 1–40. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80007-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lautenschütz, A.-K., Davies, C., Raubal, M., Schwering, A., & Pederson, E. (2006). The influence of scale, context and spatial preposition in linguistic topology. International Conference on Spatial Cognition, 439–452.
   Google Scholar
• Le Guen, O. (2011). Modes of pointing to existing spaces and the use of frames of reference. Gesture, 11(3), 271–307. doi:10.1075/gest.11.3.02leg
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. U., & Tversky, B. (2005). Interplay between visual and spatial: The effect of landmark descriptions on comprehension of route/survey spatial descriptions. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(2–3), 163–185. doi:10.1080/13875868.2005.9683802
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Webster, J., & Fang, A. C. (2010). ESpatialML: An event-driven spatial annotation framework. Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, C. (1983). Latin preverbs and cases. Latin Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 145–161.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1996). Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25(1), 353–382. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1997). Language and cognition: The cognitive consequences of spatial description in Guugu Yimithirr. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1), 98–131. doi:10.1525/jlin.1997.7.1.98
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Rasch, B. H. (2002). Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition, 84(2), 155–188. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00045-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity (Vol. 5). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 83(3), 265–294. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00009-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Sun, A., Han, J., & Li, C. (2020). A survey on deep learning for named entity recognition. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2020.2981314
   Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Sadler, D. D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In Language and space (pp. 493–529). The MIT Press. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353
   Google Scholar
• Longley, P., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems (4th). | Wiley. Wiley.Com https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Geographic+Information+Science+and+Systems%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781118676950
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, B., & Gwartney, D. (2011). Home Ground A guide to the American Landscape. Trinity University Press. https://tupress.org/9781595341754/home-ground/
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city (Vol. 11). MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (2004). How maps work: Representation, visualization, and design. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mai, G., Janowicz, K., He, C., Liu, S., & Lao, N. (2018). POIReviewQA: A semantically enriched POI retrieval and question answering dataset. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, 1–2. doi:10.1145/3281354.3281359
   Google Scholar
• Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 108–114. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowski, M., & Fritz, M. 2015. A pooling approach to modelling spatial relations for image retrieval and annotation. ArXiv, 1411.5190 [Cs] http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.5190
   Google Scholar
• Mani, I. (2009). SpatialML: Annotation scheme for marking spatial expression in natural language. Technical Report Version 3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Mani, I., Doran, C., Harris, D., Hitzeman, J., Quimby, R., Richer, J., … Clancy, S. (2010). SpatialML: Annotation scheme, resources, and evaluation. Language Resources and Evaluation, 44(3), 263–280. doi:10.1007/s10579-010-9121-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor, U., & Kordjamshidi, P. (2018). Anaphora resolution for improving spatial relation extraction from text. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Spatial Language Understanding, 53–62. doi:10.18653/v1/W18-1407
   Google Scholar
• Marchi Fagundes, C. K., Stock, K., & Delazari, L. S. (n d). A cross-linguistic study of spatial location descriptions in New Zealand English and Brazilian Portuguese natural language. Transactions in GIS. n/a(n/a doi:10.1111/tgis.12815
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M. (1989). Cognitive image-schemata for geographic information: Relations to user views and GIS interfaces. GIS/LIS, 89(2).
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., & Csillag, F. (1989). The nature of boundaries on ‘area-class’ maps. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 26(1), 65–78. doi:10.3138/D235-3262-062X-4472
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., & Egenhofer, M. J. (1994). Modeling spatial relations between lines and regions: Combining Formal mathematical models and human subjects testing. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 21(4), 195–212. doi:10.1559/152304094782540637
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., Comas, D., Egenhofer, M. J., Freundschuh, S. M., Gould, M. D., & Nunes, J. (1995). Evaluating and refining computational models of spatial relations through cross-linguistic human-subjects testing. In A. U. Frank & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Spatial information Theory A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 553–568). Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-60392-1_36
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., & Egenhofer, M. J. (1995). Topology of prototypical spatial relations between lines and regions in English and Spanish. Autocarto-Conference, 245–254.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., & Turk, A. G. (2003). Landscape categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, environment, and language. In W. Kuhn, M. F. Worboys, & S. Timpf (Eds.), Spatial information theory. Foundations of geographic information science (pp. 28–45). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_3
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., Turk, A. G., Burenhult, N., & Stea, D. (2011a). Landscape in language: An introduction. In D. M. Mark, A. G. Turk, N. Burenhult, & D. Stea (Eds.), Landscape in language: Transdisciplinary perspectives (Vol. 4, pp. 1–24). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., Turk, A. G., Burenhult, N., & Stea, D. (2011b). Landscape in language: Transdisciplinary perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mazalov, A., Martins, B., & Matos, D. (2015). Spatial role labeling with convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, 1–7. doi:10.1145/2837689.2837706
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, D., & Davis, E. (1984). Planning routes through uncertain territory. Artificial Intelligence, 22(2), 107–156. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(84)90045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilinger, T. (2008). The network of reference frames theory: A synthesis of graphs and cognitive maps. In C. Freksa, N. S. Newcombe, P. Gärdenfors, & S. Wölfl (Eds.), Spatial cognition VI. learning, reasoning, and talking about space (pp. 344–360). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_25
   Google Scholar
• Melo, F., & Martins, B. (2017). Automated geocoding of textual documents: A survey of current approaches. Transactions in GIS, 21(1), 3–38. doi:10.1111/tgis.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocnik, F.-B., Zipf, A., & Raifer, M. (2017). The OpenStreetMap folksonomy and its evolution. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 20(3), 219–230. doi:10.1080/10095020.2017.1368193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R., Goodchild, M. F., Gottsegen, J., & Fohl, P. (2003). Where’s downtown?: Behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3(2–3), 185–204. doi:10.1080/13875868.2003.9683761
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (2009). Cognitive research in GIScience: Recent achievements and future prospects. Geography Compass, 3(5), 1824–1840. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00273.x
   Google Scholar
• Nirenburg, S., & Raskin, V. (2001). Ontological semantics, formal ontology, and ambiguity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001, 151–161. doi:10.1145/505168.505183
   Google Scholar
• Nölle, J., Fusaroli, R., Mills, G. J., & Tylén, K. (2020). Language as shaped by the environment: Linguistic construal in a collaborative spatial task. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–10. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0404-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, D., & Unwin, D. J. (2010). Geographic information analysis (2nd). | Wiley. Wiley.Com https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Geographic+Information+Analysis%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780470288573
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning. Kegan Paul London.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, B., Lum, J., Schlossberg, J., & Gaby, A. (2017). How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography. Linguistic Typology, 21(3), 457–491. doi:10.1515/lingty-2017-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84(2), 189–219. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00046-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1880). On the algebra of logic. American Journal of Mathematics, 3(1) JSTOR, 15–57. doi:10.2307/2369442.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1965). The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce. Vol. 1 and 2. C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.). Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space/by Jean Piaget and Barbel Inhelder ; translated from the French by F.J. Langdon & J.L. Lunzer. Routledge & Kegan Paul London.
   Google Scholar
• Platonov, G., & Schubert, L. (2018). Computational models for spatial prepositions. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Spatial Language Understanding, 21–30. doi:10.18653/v1/W18-1403
   Google Scholar
• Proulx, M. J., Todorov, O. S., Taylor Aiken, A., & de Sousa, A. A. (2016). Where am I? Who am I? The relation between spatial cognition, social cognition and individual differences in the built environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 64. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruden, S. M., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2011). Children’s spatial thinking: Does talk about the spatial world matter? Developmental Science, 14(6), 1417–1430. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01088.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purves, R. S., Clough, P., Jones, C. B., Hall, M. H., & Murdock, V. (2018). Geographic information retrieval: progress and challenges in spatial search of text. now. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8311405
   Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky, J., Moszkowicz, J. L., & Verhagen, M. (2011). ISO-Space: The annotation of spatial information in language. Proceedings of the Sixth Joint ISO-ACL SIGSEM Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation, 6, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Quesnot, T., & Roche, S. (2015). Quantifying the significance of semantic landmarks in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In S. I. Fabrikant, M. Raubal, M. Bertolotto, C. Davies, S. Freundschuh, & S. Bell (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory (pp. 468–489). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23374-1_22
   Google Scholar
• Radke, M., Das, P., Stock, K., & Jones, C. B. (2019). Detecting the geospatialness of prepositions from natural language text (short paper). In S. Timpf, C. Schlieder, M. Kattenbeck, B. Ludwig, & K. Stewart(Eds., 14th international conference on spatial information theory (COSIT 2019) (Vol. 142, pp. 11:1–11:8). Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.COSIT.2019.11
   Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, S. R. (1937). Prolegomena to library classification. Madras: Madras Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2013). Knowing what a user likes: A design science approach to interfaces that automatically adapt to culture. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 427–453. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickheit, G., & Wachsmuth, I. (2006). Situated communication. Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, M. J. (1994). Constituting the Southwest contesting the Southwest re-inventing the southwest. Journal of the Southwest, 36(3), 221–241.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 104(3), 192–233. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J., & Lehmann, J. (2020). CASQAD – A new dataset for context-aware spatial question answering. In J. Z. Pan, V. Tamma, C. d’Amato, K. Janowicz, B. Fu, A. Polleres, … L. Kagal (Eds.), The semantic web – ISWC 2020 (pp. 3–17). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghian, P., & Kantardzic, M. (2008). The new generation of automatic landmark detection systems: Challenges and guidelines. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 8(3), 252–287. doi:10.1080/13875860802039257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saussure, F. D. (1967). Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Scheider, S., Nyamsuren, E., Kruiger, H., & Xu, H. (2021). Geo-analytical question-answering with GIS. International Journal of Digital Earth, 14(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/17538947.2020.1738568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirra, J. R. J. (1993). A contribution to reference semantics of spatial prepositions: The visualization problem and its solution in VITRA. The Semantics of Prepositions, 471–516. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110872576.471/html
   Google Scholar
• Schober, M. F. (1995). Speakers, addressees, and frames of reference: Whose effort is minimized in conversations about locations? Discourse Processes, 20(2), 219–247. doi:10.1080/01638539509544939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, C. (2006). The vertical axis in landscape description: Elaborations of the image schemas UP and DOWN. Landscape and Englishness, 1, 47.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, R., Stockwell, P., Wakabayashi, M., & Wiles, J. (2006). Towards a spatial language for mobile robots. In The evolution of language (pp. 291–298). WORLD SCIENTIFIC. doi:10.1142/9789812774262_0037
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., Stock, K., Morgan, F., Whitehead, B., & Medyckyj-Scott, D. (2021). Automated georeferencing of antarctic species. In K. Janowicz & J. A. Verstegen(Eds., 11th international conference on geographic information science (GIScience 2021)—Part II (Vol. 208, pp. 13:1–13:16). Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2021.II.13
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00005756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seresinhe, C. I., Moat, H. S., & Preis, T. (2018). Quantifying scenic areas using crowdsourced data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(3), 567–582. doi:10.1177/0265813516687302
   Google Scholar
• Shamai, S., & Ilatov, Z. (2005). Measuring sense of place. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografi, 96(5), 467–476. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00479.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A. R., Egenhofer, M., & Mark, D. (1998). Natural-language spatial relations between linear and areal objects: The topology and metric of English-language terms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 215–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shusterman, A., & Li, P. (2016). Frames of reference in spatial language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 115–161. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese(Ed., Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 9–55). JAI doi:10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60007-5
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & Varzi, A. C. (2000). Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research, 60(2), 401–420. doi:10.2307/2653492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & Mark, D. M. (2001). Geographical categories: An ontological investigation‬. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(7), 591–612. doi:10.1080/13658810110061199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. F. (2000). Ontology, metadata, and semiotics. In B. Ganter & G. W. Mineau (Eds.), Conceptual structures: Logical, linguistic, and computational issues (pp. 55–81). Springer. doi:10.1007/10722280_5
   Google Scholar
• Speriosu, M., & Baldridge, J. (2013). Text-driven toponym resolution using indirect supervision. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 1466–1476. https://aclanthology.org/P13-1144
   Google Scholar
• Spranger, M., & Steels, L. (2015). Co-acquisition of syntax and semantics: An investigation in spatial language. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1909–1915.
   Google Scholar
• Spranger, M., Suchan, J., & Bhatt, M. (2016). Robust natural language processing: Combining reasoning, cognitive semantics, and construction grammar for spatial language. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2908–2914. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3060832.3061028
   Google Scholar
• Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(2), 157–189. doi:10.1023/A:1009984621792
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10(4), 422–437. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90006-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, K. (2014, June). A geometric configuration ontology to support spatial querying. 17th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Castellon, Spain. http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/98734
   Google Scholar
• Stock, K. (2008). Determining semantic similarity of behaviour using natural semantic metalanguage to match user objectives to available web services. Transactions in GIS, 12(6), 733–755. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2008.01128.x
   Google Scholar
• Stock, K., & Cialone, C. (2011a). An approach to the management of multiple aligned multilingual ontologies for a geospatial earth observation system. In C. Claramunt, S. Levashkin, & M. Bertolotto (Eds.), GeoSpatial Semantics (pp. 52–69). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20630-6_4
   Google Scholar
• Stock, K., & Cialone, C. (2011b). Universality, language-variability and individuality: defining linguistic building blocks for spatial relations. In M. Egenhofer, N. Giudice, R. Moratz, & M. Worboys (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 391–412). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23196-4_21
   Google Scholar
• Stock, K., Stojanovic, T., Reitsma, F., Ou, Y., Bishr, M., Ortmann, J., & Robertson, A. (2012). To ontologise or not to ontologise: An information model for a geospatial knowledge infrastructure. Computers & Geosciences, 45, 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, K., & Yousaf, J. (2018). Context-aware automated interpretation of elaborate natural language descriptions of location through learning from empirical data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(6), 1087–1116. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1432861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, K., Morris, H., Forster, M., Paraku, R., & Egorova, E. (2019). He Tatai Whenua: Automated extraction of landscape terms and their meanings in New Zealand Maori. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.9869459.v1
   Google Scholar
• Stock, K., Jones, C. B., Russell, S., Radke, M., Das, P., & Aflaki, N. (2021). Detecting geospatial location descriptions in natural language text. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36(3), 587–584. doi:10.1080/13658816.2020.1811868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. H. (2013). Introducing physical geography (6th Edition | Wiley ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-ae/Introducing+Physical+Geography%2C+6th+Edition-p-9781118396209
   Google Scholar
• Studer, R., Benjamins, V. R., & Fensel, D. (1998). Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 25(1), 161–197. doi:10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000). Towards a cognitive semantics, vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. In Language, speech, and communication. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanasescu, V., Jones, C. B., Colombo, G., Chorley, M. J., Allen, S. M., & Whitaker, R. M. (2013). The personality of venues: Places and the five-factors (‘big five’) model of personality. 2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research and Application, 76–81. doi:10.1109/COMGEO.2013.12
   Google Scholar
• Tellex, S., Kollar, T., Dickerson, S., Walter, M., Banerjee, A., Teller, S., & Roy, N. (2011). Understanding natural language commands for robotic navigation and mobile manipulation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 25( 1), Article 1. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/7979
   Google Scholar
• Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, time, and the use of language: An investigation of relationships (Vol. 36). Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Tenbrink, T. (2011). Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 704–722. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenbrink, T. (2020). Cognitive discourse analysis: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tichy, P. (1988). The foundations of Frege’s logic. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1987). Learning to use prepositions: A case study*. Journal of Child Language, 14(1), 79–98. doi:10.1017/S0305000900012745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tudhope, D., Alani, H., & Jones, C. (2001). Augmenting thesaurus relationships: Possibilities for retrieval. Journal of Digital Information, 1(8). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/citations;jsessionid=0878B1362A23B313D346B254646254DE?doi=10.1.1.23.306
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 209–240). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twaroch, F. A., Jones, C. B., & Abdelmoty, A. I. (2008). Acquisition of a Vernacular Gazetteer from web sources. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Location and the Web, 61–64. doi:10.1145/1367798.1367808
   Google Scholar
• Twaroch, F. A., Brindley, P., Clough, P. D., Jones, C. B., Pasley, R. C., & Mansbridge, S. (2019). Investigating behavioural and computational approaches for defining imprecise regions. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 19(2), 146–171. doi:10.1080/13875868.2018.1531871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varzi, A. C. (2001). Vagueness in geography. Philosophy & Geography, 4(1), 49–65. doi:10.1080/10903770124125
   Google Scholar
• Vasardani, M., Winter, S., & Richter, K.-F. (2013). Locating place names from place descriptions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(12), 2509–2532. doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.785550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartmann, F. M., & Purves, R. S. (2017). What’s (not) on the map: Landscape features from participatory sketch mapping differ from local categories used in language. Land, 6(4), 79. doi:10.3390/land6040079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartmann, F. M., Acheson, E., & Purves, R. S. (2018a). Describing and comparing landscapes using tags, texts, and free lists: An interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(8), 1572–1592. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1445257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartmann, F. M., Acheson, E., & Purves, R. S. (2018b). Describing and comparing landscapes using tags, texts, and free lists: An interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(8), 1572–1592. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1445257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whorf, B. L. (2012). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, J., Guo, Q., & Hijmans, R. (2004). The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(8), 745–767. doi:10.1080/13658810412331280211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worboys, M. F., & Duckham, M. (2004). GIS: A computing perspective, second edition. Routledge & CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/GIS-A-Computing-Perspective-Second-Edition/Worboys-Duckham/p/book/9780415283755
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Z., Zhang, C., Goldberg, D. W., & Prasad, S. (2019). An NLP-based question answering framework for spatio-temporal analysis and visualization. Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Geoinformatics and Data Analysis, 61–65. doi:10.1145/3318236.3318240
   Google Scholar
• Yu, B., Shu, S., Liu, H., Song, W., Wu, J., Wang, L., & Chen, Z. (2014). Object-based spatial cluster analysis of urban landscape pattern using nighttime light satellite images: A case study of China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(11), 2328–2355. doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.922186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwarts, J. (2003). Shape, and Parts. Representing Direction in Language and Space, 1, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Zwarts, J. (2005). Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 739–779. doi:10.1007/s10988-005-2466-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar