“Some are More Open than Others”: Comparing the Impact of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on Local and Central Government in the UK

References

• Access to Information Review Task Force (AIRTF), 2001, Report 9: The access to information act and records management. Available at http://www.atirtf-geai.gc.ca/paperrecords1-e.html (accessed June 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, K. N., Henriksen, H., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J. N., Sannarnes, M. K., Møyfrid, K. and Enemærke, M., 2010, Fads and facts of e-government: A review of impacts of e-government (2003–2009). International Journal of Public Administration, 33(11), pp. 564–579.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C., 2011, Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government websites. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), pp. 11–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC, 2012, Cameron’s dividing line on access to information. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17286328 (accessed 7 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Badgley, K., Dixon, M. and Dozois, P., 2003, In search of the chill: Access to information and record-keeping in the government of Canada. Archavia, 55. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/issue/view/414 (accessed 10 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., 2011, Privacy advocacy from the inside and the outside: Implications for the politics of personal data protection in networked societies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(2), pp. 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T. and Grimes, J. M., 2010, Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 264–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, T., 2010, A Journey (London: Arrow).
   Google Scholar
• Blair, T., 2012, Letter by Rt. Hon. Tony Blair MP to the Rt. Hon Alan Beith MP. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmjust/96/tb01.htm (accessed 13 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, 2011a, Open Public Services White Paper (Cm 8145) (London: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, 2011b, Making Open Data Real: A Public Consultation (London: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, 2012, Open Data White Paper: Unleashing the Potential (Cmd 8353) (London: TSO).
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., 2010, PM’s Podcast on Transparency. Available at http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2010/05/pms-podcast-on-transparency-51171 (accessed 6 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Public Scrutiny, 2012, Justice Committee Written evidence from Centre for Public Scrutiny. Available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmjust/96/96we17.htm (accessed 13 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. A., 2010, Freedom of information and local government: Concepts and issues, in: R. Chapman and M. Hunt (Eds.) Freedom of Information: Local Government and Accountability (London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd), pp. 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y. and Logan, J., 2011, A government of the people: How crowdsourcing can transform government. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1868283 (accessed 25 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, A., 2010, The Cost of Freedom of Information (London: Constitution Unit).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL), 2008, Local Leadership and Public Trust: Openness and Accountability in Local and London Government (London: The Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Communities and Local Government Committee, 2011, Localism: Third Report of Session 2010–12 (HC547) (London: TSO).
   Google Scholar
• Constitution Unit, 2011, FOI and Local Government: Surveys by the Constitution Unit Covering the Five Years from 2005 to 2010. Available at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/foi/foi-and-local-government/FOI-Surveys-5-year-Summary-01Dec2010.pdf (accessed 11 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Cordis, A. S. and Warren, P. L., 2012, Sunshine as disinfectant: The effect of state freedom of information act laws on public corruption. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1922859 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1922859 (accessed 10 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG, 2010a, A Plain English Guide to the Localism Bill (London: DCLG).
   Google Scholar
• DCLG, 2010b, 2008–2009. Citizenship Report: Empowering Communities Topic Report (London: DCLG).
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. and Tufte, E. R., 1973, Size and Democracy (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Darch, C. and Underwood, P., 2010, Freedom of Information in the Developing World: Demand, Compliance and Democratic Behaviours (Chandos: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T., 2010. Open Data, Democracy and Public Sector Reform: A Look at Open Government Data Use from data.gov.uk. University of Oxford: MSc Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B., 2002, Size and political trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 20, pp. 793–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), 2011, Consultation on Code of Recommended Practice for Local Authorities on Data Transparency (London: DCLG).
   Google Scholar
• Dunion, K., 2010, Freedom of information in Scotland and the UK: Time to notice the difference, in: R. Chapman and M. Hunt (Eds.) Freedom of Information: Local Government and Accountability (London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd), pp. 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Dunion, K., 2011, Freedom of Information in Scotland in Practice (Dundee: Dundee University Press).
   Google Scholar
• E-democracy, 2010, Accountability: The problem with armchair auditors. Available at http://www.edemocracyblog.com/political-blog/accountability-the-problems-with-armchair-auditors/ (accessed 24 November 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, I., 2003, Access law and lost records: A commentary on “In Search of the Chill”. Archavia, 55. Available at http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/issue/view/414 (accessed 13 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R., 2012, Disgruntled, disillusioned and disengaged: Public attitudes to politics in Britain today. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(4), pp. 877–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., Graham, M. and Weil, D., 2007, Full Disclosure; the Perils and Promise of Transparency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. and Weil, D., 2010, Open government and open society, in: D. Lathrap and L. Ruma (Eds.) Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation (Cambridge: O’Reilly), pp. 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Gains, F. and John, P., 2010, What do bureaucrats like doing? Bureaucratic preferences in response to institutional reform. Public Administration Review, 70(3), pp. 455–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., 2000, Access denied: The Access to Information Act and its effect on public records creators. Archavia, 49. Available at http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/issue/view/426 (accessed 11 July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., 2010, Transparency of public decision-making: Towards trust in local government?. Policy and Internet, 2(1), pp. 5–35.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., 2011, The shady side of sunlight. Paper for the annual conference of the European Group of Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania,September 8–10, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. and Welch, E., 2012, Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer‐mediated transparency of local governments. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 562–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardian, 2010a, Armchair audit: Sense and nonsense,24 November.
   Google Scholar
• Guardian, 2010b, World exclusive: Tony Blair interview. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/sep/01/tony-blair-a-journey-interview (accessed 1 September 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Guardian, 2011a, Mrs. Angry: How to be an armchair auditor,8 July.
   Google Scholar
• Guardian, 2011b, Councillors to get veto on town hall salaries Over £100,000. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/feb/16/councillors-get-veto-town-hall-salaries-100000 (accessed 15 February 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Halonen, A., 2011, The Impact of Open Data on Local Government, Unpublished MA thesis, UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Halonen, A., 2012, Being Open About Data. Analysis of the UK Open Data Policies and Applicability of Data. Available at http://finnish-institute.org.uk/images/stories/pdf2012/being%20open%20about%20data.pdf (accessed 3 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hansard Society, 2010, Audit of Political Engagement 7: The 2010 Report with a Focus on MPs and Parliament (London: Hansard Society).
   Google Scholar
• Hazell, R., 1989, Freedom of information in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Public Administration, 67, pp. 189–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazell, R. and Worthy, B., 2010, Assessing the performance of FOI in different countries. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), pp. 352–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazell, R., Worthy, B. and Bourke, G., 2012, Open house: Freedom of information and its impact on the UK parliament. Public Administration, 90(4), pp. 901–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazell, R., Worthy, B. and Glover, M., 2010, The Impact of Freedom of Information on British Central Government: Does FOI Work? (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Holsen, S. and Worthy, B., 2010, Open government at local level in England: FOI implementation 2005-2008, in: R. Chapman and M. Hunt (Eds.) Freedom of Information: Local Government and Accountability (London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd), pp. 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., 2007, What happens when transparency meets blame avoidance?. Public Management Review, 9(2), pp. 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., 2010, Accountability and transparency: Siamese Twins, matching parts, awkward couple?. West European Politics, 33, pp. 989–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. and Heald, D., 2006, Transparency: The key to better governance? (No. 135). (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Huijboom, N. and Van Den Broek, T., 2011, Open data: An international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12. Available at http://www.epractice.eu/files/European%20Journal%20epractice%20Volume%2012_1.pdf (accessed 7 August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, M., 2010, Local government, freedom of information and participation, in: R. Chapman and M. Hunt (Eds.) Freedom of Information: Local Government and Accountability (London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd), pp. 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Irish Independent, 2008, How councillors ran up payments bill of €75m,3 August.
   Google Scholar
• James, O., 2011, Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), pp. 399–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., 2008, The Future of Local Government: Has It One? (London: Public Management and Policy Association).
   Google Scholar
• Justice Committee (House of Commons), 2012, Post-Legislative Scrutiny of the Freedom of Information Act 2000; Volumes 1 and 2 [HC 96-i) (London: TSO).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. and Lee, J., 2012, E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), pp. 819–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. B., 2012, Shining the light from the inside: Access professionals’ perceptions of government transparency. Communication Law and Policy, 17(3), pp. 299–328.
   Google Scholar
• Lidberg, J., 2002. For your information–the impact of freedom of information legislation on journalism practice and content in Western Australia and Sweden, MA Thesis, Murdoch University, Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Association, 2012, Local Government Transparency Survey 2012. (London: LGA). Available at http://www.local.gov.uk/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=bfad418d-1be8-43c8-bb9a-40faf3d41b82&groupId=10171
   Google Scholar
• Local Public Data Panel, 2010, Minutes 16/12/2010. Available at http://data.gov.uk/blog/local-public-data-panel-%E2%80%93-sixth-meeting-16-december-2010 (accessed 12 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. and Pratchett, L., 2012, Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the “big society’. Local Government Studies, 38(1), pp. 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. and Stoker, G., 2001a, Trends in public participation: Part 1–local government perspectives. Public Administration, 79(1), pp. 205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. and Stoker, G., 2001b, Trends in public participation: Part 1–citizens’ perspectives. Public Administration, 79(2), pp. 445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOJ, 2008, Freedom of Information: Statistics on Implementation in Central Government 2007 (London: MOJ).
   Google Scholar
• MOJ, 2010, Information Rights Tracker Wave 14. Available from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/217865/foi-tracker-survey-wave-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, M., 2010a, Access to local government information in Ireland: Attitudes of decision makers. Open Government Journal, 6(1). Available at http://www.opengovjournal.org/article/view/5617 (accessed 11 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, M., 2010b, The impact of freedom of information on Irish local government, in: R. Chapman and M. Hunt (Eds.) Freedom of Information: Local Government and Accountability (London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd), pp. 73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., 2013, Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Administration Review Early View Mar 2013) Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6210/earlyview (accessed 14 March 2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel, T., 2008, Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey, 2nd ed. (Paris: UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Millard, J., 2008, E-government measurement for policy makers. European Journal of ePractice, 4. Available at http://www.epractice.eu/en/document/287914 (accessed 10 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice (MOJ), 2011, Freedom of Information: Statistics on Implementation in Central Government 2010 (London: MOJ).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2012, Government Response to the Justice Committee’s Report: Post-legislative scrutiny of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Cm 8505). Available at http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/policy/moj/gov-resp-justice-comm-foi-act.pdf (accessed 7 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. V., Van Amburg, D. and Mithas, S., 2010, Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), pp. 257–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostberg, K. and Erikkson, F., 2009, The problematic freedom of information principle: The Swedish experience’ in Flinn, Andrew and Harriet Jones. Freedom of Information: Open Access, Empty Archives?, (London: Routledge) pp. 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B., Pierre, J. and King, D. S., 2005, The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), pp. 1275–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P., 2000, The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13(4), pp. 475–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L. and Royo, S., 2010, Is e-government leading to more accountable and transparent local governments? An overall view. Financial Accountability & Management, 26(1), pp. 3–20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1542308 (accessed 12 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowksi, S. J., 2007, Transparency in the Path of Administrative Reform (New York: State University of New York Press).
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowksi, S. J., 2010, The operationalization of municipal transparency: Primary administrative functions and intervening factors. Transparencia y Privacidad, 1. Available at http://www.transparenciayprivacidad.org.mx/numero_1/articulos_1_in.html (accessed 7 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. and Van Ryzin, G., 2007, Citizen attitudes towards transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), pp. 306–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Accounts Committee (PAC), 2012, Implementing the Transparency Agenda (HC 102) (London: TSO).
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, J., 2009, Understanding policy change as a historical problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), pp. 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relly, J. E. and Cuillier, D., 2010, A Comparison of Political, Cultural, and Economic Indicators of Access to Information in Arab and non-Arab states. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), pp. 360–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relly, J. E. and Sabharwal, M., 2009, Perceptions of transparency of government policy making: A cross–national study. Government Information Quarterly, 26, pp. 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righettini, M. S., 2011, Institutionalization, leadership, and regulative policy style: A France/Italy comparison of data protection authorities. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(2), pp. 143–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., 2005, Spin control and freedom of information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada. Public Administration, 83(1), pp. 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., 2010, A great and revolutionary law? the first four years of India’s right to information act. Public Administration Review, 70(6), pp. 925–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., 2012, Transparency in troubled times. Tenth World Conference of the International Ombudsman Institute, November 2012; Suffolk University Law School Research Paper 12–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., 2011, E-government stakeholders – who are they and what do they want?. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), pp. 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, N., Abraham, S. and Wright, G., 2012, Open Government Data Study: India. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2071605 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2071605 (accessed 3 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A. and Flinn, A., 2010, Information governance, records management, and freedom of information: A study of local government authorities in England. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), pp. 337–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, K., 2010, Volunteering Information? the Use of Freedom of Information Laws by the Third Sector in Scotland – Survey Findings (Glasgow: University of Strathcylde).
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., 2000, The Nature of British Local Government (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., 2004, Transforming Local Government (London: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., Gains, F., Greasley, S., John, P. and Rao, N., 2007, The Outcomes and Impacts of the New Council Constitutions (London: DCLG).
   Google Scholar
• Van De Walle, S., Van Roosbroek, S. and Bouckaert, G., 2008, Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), pp. 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vleugels, R., 2012, Overview of all FOI Law Around the World – 2012 update. Available at http://www.right2info.org/resources/publications/laws-1/ati-laws_fringe-special_roger-vleugels_2011-oct (accessed 16 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Weibing, X., 2010, China’s limited push model of FOI legislation. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), pp. 346–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E., 2012, The relationship between transparent and participative government: A study of local governments in the United States. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, pp. 193–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D. M., 2004, E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp. 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whatdotheyknow.com, 2011, Armchair Auditing Help (FOI Request). Available at http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/armchair_auditing_help (accessed 12 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• White, N., 2007, Free and Frank: Making the Official Information Act Work Better (Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. and Game, C., 2011, Local Government in the United Kingdom (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Worthy, B., 2010, More open but no more trusted? The impact of FOI on British central government. Governance, 23(4), pp. 561–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, B., 2012, A powerful weapon in the right hands? How members of parliament have used freedom of information in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs. doi: 10.1093/pa/gss091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, B., Hazell, R., Amos, J. and Bourke, G., 2011, Town Hall Transparency? the Impact of FOI on Local Government in England (London: Constitution Unit).
   Google Scholar
• Worthy, B., forthcoming 2013, Freedom of information and the MPs’ expenses scandal, in: J. Hudson (Ed.) At the Public’s Expense? the Political Consequences of the 2009 British MPs’ Expenses Scandal (Oxford: OUP).
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H. and Robinson, D. G., 2012. The new ambiguity of ‘Open Government’. 59 UCLA L. Rev. Disc. 178.
   Google Scholar