A Comparative Policy Analysis of Coalition Strategies: Case Studies of Nuclear Energy and Forest Management in India

References

• Abraham, I., 1999, Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: Science, Secrecy and the Postcolonial State, (London: Zed Books).
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A., 1999, Community in conservation: Tracing the outlines of an enchanting concept, in: R. Jeffery and N. Sundar (Eds) A New Moral Economy for India’s Forests? Discourses of Community and Participation (New Delhi: Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd), pp. 92–108.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, E. A., 2011, PolicXy change and learning in response to extreme flood events in hungary: An advocacy coalition approach. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), pp. 485–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahuguna, V. K. and Upadhyay, A., 2001. Strengthening of Joint Forest Management. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. Available at http://moef.nic.in/divisions/forprt/jfm/html/strength.htm
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D., 1993, Agendas and Instability in American Politics, (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bidwai, P. and Ramana, M. V., 2007, Home, Next to N-Reactor. Tehelka. Available at http://www.tehelka.com/story_main31.asp?filename=Ne230607home_next_SR.asp
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi, R. and Godbole, G., 2005, Perceptions of the Madhya Pradesh Forest Department, (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University).
   Google Scholar
• Cloward, R. and Piven, F. F., 1979, Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail, (New York: Vintage Books Edition).
   Google Scholar
• Craig, J., J. and Perrow, C., 1977, Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946–1972). American Sociological Review, 42(2), pp. 249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAE, 2010, Annual Report 2009–2010, (Mumbai: Department of Atomic Energy).
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande, V., 2011, No safety study undertaken on Jaitapur project: Justice Shah. The Hindu, Available at http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2040287.ece
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M., Roy, S., Maiti, D. and Saha, S., 2005, Protecting India’s forests: The effectiveness of forest protection committees, the case of southern west Bengal. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12(1), pp. 68–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. K., 1973, The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. The American Political Science Review, 67(1), pp. 11–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgin, D. J. and Weible, C. M., 2013, A Stakeholder Analysis of Colorado Climate and Energy Issues Using Policy Analytical Capacity and the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Review of Policy Research, 30(1), pp. 114–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evrard, A., 2012, Political Parties and Policy Change: Explaining the Impact of French and German Greens on Energy Policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 14(4), pp. 275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. P., 1985, National styles and policy sectors: Explaining structured variation. Journal of Public Policy, 5(4), pp. 467–496.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, K., 2006, India’s Nuclear Bomb and National Security, (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Ghanekar, N., 2011, N-plant protests to reach Jantar Mantar. Tehelka. Available at http://www.tehelka.com/story_main50.asp?filename=Ws270711NUCLEAR.asp
   Google Scholar
• Guha, R., 1983, Forestry in British and post-British India: A historical analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, 18(44), pp. 1882–1896.
   Google Scholar
• Guha, R. and Gadgil, M., 1989, State forestry and social conflict in British India. Past & Present, 123(1), pp. 141–177.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V., 2000, European integration and migration policy: Vertical policy‐making as venue shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), pp. 251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, K., 2013, Order in a Chaotic Subsystem: A Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Facility Siting Using Coalition Opportunity Structures and the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. and Taylor, R., 1996, Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), pp. 936–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo, H., 1978, Issue networks and the executive establishment, in: A. King (Ed) The Political System (Washington, D.C: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research), pp. 87–124.
   Google Scholar
• Hindustan Times, 2012a, Indefinite fast against Kudankulam N-plant resumes, Available at http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Chennai/Indefinite-fast-against-Kudankulam-N-plant-resumes/Article1-849108.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hindustan Times, 2012b, Madras high court reserves order on Kudankulam, Available at http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/TamilNadu/Madras-high-court-reserves-order-on-Kudankulam/Article1-918132.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. J., 1974, Peasant land occupations. Past & Present, 62, pp. 120–152.
   Google Scholar
• India Today, 2012a, Kudankulam: Centre appeals protestors to end fast, Available at http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/kudankulam-centre-appeals-protesters-to-end-fast-in-the-interest-of-nation/1/179306.html
   Google Scholar
• India Today, 2012b, Madras HC raps Centre over Kudankulam nuclear plant, Available at http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/madras-hc-raps-centre-over-kudankulam-nuclear-plant/1/213476.html
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., 2011, Network structures within policy processes: coalitions, power, and brokerage in swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), pp. 435–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 1993, India at the crossroads in global environmental policy. Global Environmental Change, 3(1), pp. 32–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, C. J. and Perrow, C., 1977, Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946–1972).American Sociological Review, 42(2), pp. 249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W., 1984, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, (Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company).
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. P., 1986, Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), pp. 57–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, F., 2007, Protest and Opportunities: A Theory of Social Movements and Political Change, (Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W. and Giugni, M., 1995, New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, D., 2001, Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: an application to Swiss drug policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), pp. 623–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P. and Schneider, V., 2012, Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), pp. 731–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, Michael A., Ferguson, Charles D. and Council on Foreign Relations, 2006, U.S.-India Nuclear Cooperation: a Strategy for Moving Forward, (New York: Council on Foreign Relations).
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., 1971, Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), pp. 682–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N., 1996, Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, M. N., 1977, Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), pp. 1212–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murali, K. S., Murthy, I. K. and Ravindranath, N. H., 2006, Sustainable community forest management systems: A study on community forest management and joint forest management institutions from India. International Review for Environmental Strategies, 6(1), pp. 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Nerve, 2011, Violent protests rock Ratnagiri over death of anti-Jaitapur activist, Available at http://www.nerve.in/news:253500387668
   Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, D., 2011, Shifting resources and venues producing policy change in contested subsystems: A case study of Swedish Signals Intelligence Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), pp. 461–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkovich, G., 2010, Global implications of the U.S.-India deal. Daedalus, 139(1), pp. 20–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W. C., 2005, India and the new look of US nonproliferation policy. Nonproliferation Review, 12(2), pp. 343–354.
   Google Scholar
• Pralle, S. B., 2003, Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(3), pp. 233–260.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. and Teune, H., 1970, The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, (New York: John Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V., 2012, The Power of Promise: Examining Nuclear Energy in India, (New Delhi: Viking).
   Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V. and Kumar, A., 2010, Safety first? Kaiga and other nuclear stories. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(7), pp. 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, D. B. and Ramana, M. V., 2008, Violating letter and spirit: Environmental clearances for Koodankulam reactors. Economic & Political Weekly, 43(51), pp. 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, C. R. and Ramana, M. V., 2003, Prisoners of the Nuclear Dream, (New Delhi: Orient Longman).
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. J., 1982, Policy Styles in Western Europe, (Australia: Allen & Unwin).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, E. C., 1998, Greening at the Grassroots: Alternative Forestry Strategies in India, (New Delhi: Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S. B., 1992, Forest protection committees in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 27(29), pp. 1528–1530.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1993, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1999, The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment, in: Sabatier P. A. (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, Colarado: Westview Press), pp. 117–166.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C., 2007, The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications, in: P. Sabaiter (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Cambridge, MA: Westview Press), pp. 189–220.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, N. C., 1997, The Saga of Participatory Forest Management in India, (Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research).
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E., 1957, Intensity, visibility, direction and scope. The American Political Science Review, 51(4), pp. 933–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., 1995, Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences, 28(3), pp. 243–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, G., 1992, Indigenous Vision: Peoples of India, Attitudes to the Environment, (New Delhi: SAGE Publications Inc).
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. and Bandyopadhyay, J., 1986, The Evolution, Structure, and Impact of the Chipko Movement. Mountain Research and Development, 6(2), pp. 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundarrajan, G. 2011, PIL filed in Madras High Court against the Koodankulam Nuclear Power Project. DiaNuke, Available at http://www.dianuke.org/pil-filed-in-madras-high-court-against-the-koodankulam-nuclear-power-project/
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. G., 1967, Peasant Communism in Southern Italy, (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. G., 1983, Struggling to Reform: Social Movements and Policy Change During Cycles of Protest, (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, A. J., 2001, India’s Emerging Nuclear Posture: Between Recessed Deterrent and Ready Arsenal, (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Tiwary, M., 2004, Participatory Forest Policies and Politics in India, (Hampshire, England: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, G., 1994, Bhabha and His Magnificent Obsessions, (Hyderabad: Universities Press (India) Limited).
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, V. S. and Reddy, R. V., 1998, Assessment of environmental policies and policy implementation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(1/2), pp. 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, T., 1989, Hugging the Trees: The Story of the Chipko Movement, (New Delhi; New York: Penguin Books).
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A. and McQueen, K., 2009, Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), pp. 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Nuclear News, 2012, Kudankulam delays mount up. Available at http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN_Kudankulam_delays_mount_up_1701121.html
   Google Scholar