1,048
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Policy Analysis and Policy Know-how: A Case Study of Civil Servants in England’s Department of Health

Pages 286-304 | Received 23 Jun 2013, Accepted 28 Apr 2014, Published online: 13 Jun 2014

References

  • Blackler, F., 1995, Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations : An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), pp. 1021–1046. doi:10.1177/017084069501600605
  • Blunkett, D., 2000, Influence or Irrelevance: Can Social Science Improve Government?, Swindon: ESRC, and Department for Education and Employment, February.
  • Brewer, G. D. and DeLeon, P., 1983, The Foundations of Policy Analysis. (Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press).
  • Bridgman, P. and Davis, G., 1997, Australian Policy Handbook. (St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin).
  • Cabinet Office, 1999a, Modernising Government, (London: HM Stationery Office).
  • Cabinet Office, 1999b, Professional Policy-Making for the 21st Century, (London: The Stationery Office).
  • Cabinet Office, 2010, Civil Service Code, London: Cabinet Office. Available at http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/about/values (accessed 11 September 2012).
  • Cairney, P., 2013, Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), pp. 1–21. doi:10.1111/psj.12000
  • Caplan, N., 1979, The two communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 22, pp. 459–470. doi:10.1177/000276427902200308
  • Civil Service Capability Reviews, 2009, Department of Health: Progress and Next Steps, (London: Cabinet Office).
  • Civil Service Commission, 2012, Civil Service Code. Civil Service Commission Website. Available at http://civilservicecommission.independent.gov.uk/civil-service-code/ (accessed 17 May 2014).
  • Colebatch, H., 2006, What work makes policy? Policy Sciences, 39(4), pp. 309–321. doi:10.1007/s11077-006-9025-4
  • Colebatch, H., Hoppe, R. and Noordegraaf, M. (Eds), 2010, Working for Policy. (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
  • Colebatch, H. K. and Degeling, P., 1986, Talking and doing in the work of administration. Public Administration and Development, 6(4), pp. 339–356. doi:10.1002/pad.4230060404
  • Cook, S. and Seely Brown, J., 1999, Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), pp. 381–400. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.4.381
  • Cook, S. and Wagenaar, H., 2012, Navigating the eternally unfolding present: Toward an epistemology of practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), pp. 3–38. doi:10.1177/0275074011407404
  • Dewey, J., 1917, The need for a recovery of philosophy, in: R. Talisse and S. Aikin (Eds) The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 109–140.
  • Dror, Y., 1967, Policy analysts: A new professional role in government service. Public Administration Review, 27(3), pp. 197–203. doi:10.2307/973282
  • Dror, Y., 1968. Public policymaking reexamined. (San Francisco, CA: Chandler Pub. Co.; Science Research Associates, distributors, Chicago).
  • Dye, T. R., 1972, Understanding Public Policy. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
  • Feldman, M. and March, J., 1981, Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), pp. 171–186. doi:10.2307/2392467
  • Feldman, M. S., 1989, Order Without Design: Information Production and Policy Making. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
  • Fischer, F., 2003, Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. (Oxford: Oxford University Press) Available at http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/politicalscience/9780199242641/toc.html (accessed 7 February 2014).
  • Freeman, R., Griggs, S. and Boaz, A., 2011, The practice of policy making. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practicex, 7(2), pp. 127–136. doi:10.1332/174426411X579180
  • Freeman, R. and Sturdy, S. (Eds), 2014, Knowledge in Policy: Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted. (Bristol: Policy Press).
  • Greenhalgh, T. and Russell, J., 2006, Reframing evidence synthesis as rhetorical action in the policy making drama. Healthcare Policy 1(2), pp. 34–42.
  • Hoppe, R., 1999, Policy analysis, science, and politics: from “speaking truth to power” to “making sense together”. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), pp. 201–10.
  • Hoppe, R. and Jeliazkova, M., 2006, How policy workers define their job: A Netherlands case study, in: H. K. Colebatch (Ed) The Work of Policy: An International Survey (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books), pp. 35–60.
  • Lam, A., 2000, Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), pp. 487–513. doi:10.1177/0170840600213001
  • Landry, R., Amara, N. and Lamari, M., 2001, Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy, 30, pp. 333–349. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0
  • Lasswell, H. D., 1956, The Decision Process; Seven Categories of Functional Analysis. (College Park: Bureau of Governmental Research, College of Business and Public Administration, University of Maryland).
  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E., 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Lindblom, C., 1959, The science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), pp. 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677
  • Majone, G., 1989, Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
  • Marmor, T., Freeman, R. and Okma, K., 2005, Comparative perspectives and policy learning in the world of health care. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 7(4), pp. 331–348. doi:10.1080/13876980500319253
  • May, J. V. and Wildavsky, A. B., 1978, The Policy Cycle. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).
  • Maybin, JM., 2013. Knowledge and Knowing in Policy Work: A case study of civil servants in England’s Department of Health. (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh). Available at http://kingsfund.koha-ptfs.eu/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=108791 (accessed 17 May 2014).
  • Maybin, J., 2014, “We know who to talk to”: Embodied knowledge in England’s Department of Health. in: R. Freeman and S. Sturdy (Eds) Knowledge in Policy: Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted (Bristol: Policy Press), pp. 79–102.
  • Number 10, 2010. Government Launches Big Society Programme. Number 10. Available at http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/big-society/ (accessed 28 February 2012).
  • Nutley, S. M., Walter, I. and Davies, H. T. O., 2007, Using Evidence. How Research Can Inform Public Services. (Bristol: The Policy Press).
  • Page, E. and Jenkins, W., 2005, Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Parsons, W., 2007, Policy analysis in Britain, in: F. Fischer, G. J. Miller and M. S. Sidney (Eds) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. theory, Politics and Methods. Public Administration and Public Policy (New York, NY: CRC Press), pp. 537–552.
  • Radin, B., 2000, Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
  • Richardson, J. J., 1982, Policy Styles in Western Europe. (London: Allen & Unwin).
  • Rose, R., 1981, The Political Status of Higher Civil Servants in Britain. (Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, Centre for the Study of Public Policy).
  • Ryle, G., 1949, The Concept of Mind. (London: Hutchinson).
  • Schwartz-Shea, P., 2006, Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities, in: D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn (Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe), pp. 89–114.
  • Schwartz-Shea, P. and Yanow, D., 2012, Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. (Abingdon: Taylor & Francis).
  • Secretary of State for Health, 2010, Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS, (London: The Stationery Office).
  • Simon, H., 1947, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations 1st ed. (New York: Macmillan).
  • Stake, R., 1994, Case study, in: N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications), pp. 236–247.
  • Tenbensel, T., 2006, Policy Knowledge for Policy Work, in: H. K. Colebatch (Ed) The Work of Policy: An International Survey (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), pp. 199–216.
  • HM Treasury, 2003, The Green Book. Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. (London: The Stationery Office, 2011) Available at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/data_greenbook_index.htm (accessed 17 May 2014).
  • Wagenaar, H., 2004, “Knowing” the rules: Administrative work as practice. Public Administration Review, 64(6), pp. 643–656. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00412.x
  • Wagenaar, H. and Cook, S., 2003, Understanding policy practices: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis, in: M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (Eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis : Understanding Governance in the Network Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 139–173.
  • Weiss, C., 1979, The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), pp. 426–431. doi:10.2307/3109916
  • Weiss, C. and Bucuvalas, M., 1980, Social Science Research and Decision-Making. (New York: Columbia University Press).
  • Wittrock, B., Wagner, P. and Wollmann, H., 1991, Social science and the modern state: Policy knowledge and political institutions in Western Europe and the United States. in: P. Wagner, C.H. Weiss, B. Wittrock and H. Wollman (Eds) Social Sciences and Modern States. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 28–85.
  • Yanow, D., 2000, Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Yanow, D., 2006a, Neither rigorous nor objective: Interrogating criteria for knowledge claims in interpretive science, in: D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn (Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe), pp. 67–88.
  • Yanow, D., 2006b, Thinking interpretively: Philosophical presuppositions and the human sciences, in: D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn (Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe), pp. 5–26.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.