770
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

State versus Indigenous Peoples’ Rights: Comparative Analysis of Stable System Parameters, Policy Constraints and the Process of Delegitimation

Pages 335-355 | Received 17 Jan 2013, Accepted 28 Apr 2014, Published online: 06 Aug 2014

References

  • Abinales, P. N. and Amoroso, D. J., 2005, State and Society in the Philippines (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).
  • Andersson, M., 1999, Change and Continuity in Poland’s Environmental Policy (Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
  • Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2002, Indigenous Peoples/Ethnic Minorities and Poverty Reduction in the Philippines (Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank).
  • Bello, W., Docena, H., de Guzman, M. and Malig, M. L., 2004, The Anti-development State: The Political Economy of Permanent Crisis in the Philippines (Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press).
  • Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H. and Norman, R. Z., 1998, The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, pp. 379–405. doi:10.2307/2657555
  • Birkland, T. A., 2010, An Introduction to the Policy Process, 3rd ed. (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe).
  • Castro, N. T., 2000, Three years of the indigenous peoples rights act: Its impact on indigenous communities. Kasarinlan, 15, pp. 35–54.
  • Dela Santa, E., 2013, The politics of implementing Philippine Tourism Policy: A policy network and advocacy coalition framework approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 18, pp. 913–933. doi:10.1080/10941665.2012.717958
  • Elliot, C. and Schlaepfer, R., 2001, Understanding forest certification using the advocacy coalition framework. Forest Policy and Economics, 2, pp. 257–266. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00043-0
  • Ellison, B. A. and Newmark, A. J., 2010, Building the reservoir to nowhere: The role of agencies in advocacy coalitions. The Policy Studies Journal, 38, pp. 653–678. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00378.x
  • Erni, C., 2008, The Concepts of Indigenous Peoples in Asia: A Resource Book (Copenhagen, Denmark: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs).
  • Hirtz, F., 2003, It takes modern means to be traditional: On recognizing indigenous cultural communities in the Philippines. Development and Change, 34, pp. 887–914. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2003.00333.x
  • Jenkins-Smith, H. C. and Sabatier, P. A., 1993, The study of public policy processes, in: P. A. Sabatier, H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 237–256.
  • Jones, M. D. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C., 2009, Trans-subsystem dynamics: Policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. The Policy Studies Journal, 37, pp. 37–58. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00294.x
  • Kübler, D., 2001, Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: An application to Swiss drug policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 8, pp. 623–641. doi:10.1080/13501760110064429
  • Lyday, T. Q.. 2004, The mineral industry of the Philippines. United States Geological Survey. Available at http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/country/2004/rpmyb04.pdf (Accessed 4 November 2012).
  • Lynch, O. J., 2011, Colonial Legacies in a Fragile Republic: Philippine Land Law and State Formation (Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press).
  • Magno, F., 2001, Forest devolution and social capital: State-civil society relations in the Philippines. Environmental History, 6, pp. 264–286. doi:10.2307/3985087
  • Malayang, B. S., III, 2001, Tenure rights and ancestral domains in the Philippines. A study of the roots of conflict. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 157, pp. 661–676. doi:10.1163/22134379-90003805
  • Manaytay, A. M.. 2008, Group warns: With the transfer of NCIP under the DENR, lumad rights maybe in danger. Available at http://www.insidemindanao.com/article60.html (Accessed 8 December 2012).
  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. and Kent, J., 2000, Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, pp. 853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501
  • Nohrstedt, D. and Weible, C. M., 2010, The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 1, pp. 1–32. doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1035
  • Ostrom, E., 2005, Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), 1998, New law on indigenous peoples faces legal challenge. Available at http://pcij.org/stories/1998/ipra2.html (Accessed 9 October 2012).
  • Pralle, S., 2003, Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy. Journal of Public Health Policy, 23, pp. 233–260. doi:10.1017/S0143814X03003118
  • Sabatier, P. A., 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, pp. 98–130. doi:10.1080/13501768880000051
  • Sabatier, P. A., 2007, Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C., 1993, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy) (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C., 1999, The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 117–166.
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M., 2007, The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications, in: P. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 189–220.
  • Villamor, G. B., 2006, The rise of protected area policy in the Philippine forest policy: An analysis from the perspective of Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Forest Policy and Economics, 9, pp. 162–178. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.003
  • Walker, H. A. and Zelditch, M., Jr., 1993, Power, legitimacy and stability of authority: A theoretical research program, in: J. Berger and M. Zelditch Jr. (Eds) Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), pp. 364–381.
  • Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P. and Sabatier, P. A., 2012, Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45, pp. 1–21. doi:10.1007/s11077-011-9143-5
  • Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., 2005, Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California. Policy Studies Journal, 33, pp. 181–201. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00101.x
  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D. and deLeon, P., 2011, A quarter century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39, pp. 349–360. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x
  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A. and McQueen, K., 2009, Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 37, pp. 121–140. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x
  • World Bank, 2007, The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act: Legal and Institutional Frameworks, Implementation and Challenges. Discussion Papers 42823 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.