Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Study of Policy Processes

References

• Adam, S. and Kriesi, H., 2007, The network approach, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 129–154.
   Google Scholar
• Aliseda, A., 2006. Abductive Reasoning: logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation, Vol. 330 (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Amenta, E. and Poulsen, J. D., 1994, Where to begin: A survey of five approaches to selecting independent variables for qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 23, pp. 22–53. doi:10.1177/0049124194023001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S., 1993, On time and comparative research. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 5(2), pp. 131–167. doi:10.1177/0951692893005002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D., 1991, Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), pp. 1044–1074. doi:10.2307/2131866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. and Elman, C., 2006, Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis, 14, pp. 250–267. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg-Schlosser, D. and Meur, G. D., 2009, Comparative research design: Case and Variable Selection, in: B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin (Eds) Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE Publications), pp. 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. and Haverland, M., 2012, Designing Case Studies: explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research (New York: Palgrave MacMillan).
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., Kreutzer, M., Rentl, M. and Thiele, J., 2009, Preconditions for foreign activities of european regions: Tracing causal configurations of economic, cultural, and political strategies. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 40(1), pp. 171–199. doi:10.1093/publius/pjp024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braumoeller, B. F., 2015. Guarding against false positives in qualitative comparative analysis. Political Analysis, 23, pp. 471–487. doi:10.1093/pan/mpv017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braumöller, B., 2003, Causal complexity and the study of politics. Political Analysis, 11, pp. 209–233. doi:10.1093/pan/mpg012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., 2013, Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), pp. 1–21. doi:10.1111/psj.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caren, N. and Panofsky, A., 2005, TQCA A technique for adding temporality to qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(2), pp. 147–172. doi:10.1177/0049124105277197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T., 2006, Tracing causal mechanisms. International Studies Review, 8(2), pp. 362–370. doi:10.1111/misr.2006.8.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, A., 2010, Damoklesschwert Referendum? Die indirekte Wirkung ausgebauter Volksrechte auf die Rechte religiöser Minderheiten. Swiss Political Science Review, 16(1), pp. 1–41. doi:10.1002/spsr.2010.16.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, A. and Danaci, D., 2012, direct democracy and minority rights: Direct and indirect effects on religious minorities in Switzerland. Politics and Religion, 5(1), pp. 133–160. doi:10.1017/S1755048311000666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., 2014, Comment: QCA should set aside the algorithms. Sociological Methodology, 44(1), pp. 122–126. doi:10.1177/0081175014542568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., 2005, Applying Ragin’s Crisp and Fuzzy Set QCA to large datasets: Social class and educational achievement in the national child development study. Sociological Research Online, 10(2). doi:10.5153/sro.1068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., 1995, Model or Metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43(1), pp. 136–158. doi:10.1111/post.1995.43.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., Kvist, J. and Skaaning, S.-E., 2013, Making the most of configurational comparative analysis: An assessment of QCA applications in comparative welfare-state research. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), pp. 185–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeli, I., Rihoux, B. and Rothmayr, C., 2015, Intermediate-N comparison: Configurational comparatie methods, in: I. Engeli and C. Rothmayr (Eds) Comparative Policy Studies. Conceptual and Methodological Challenges (London/Gordonsville, VA: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 85–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., 2012, Entscheidungsstrukturen in der Schweizer Politik zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts (Zürich/Chur: Verlag Rüegger).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., 2014, Coalition structures and policy change in a consensus democracy. The Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), pp. 344–366. doi:10.1111/psj.2014.42.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., 2015, Institutions and coalitions in policy processes: A cross-sectoral comparison. Journal of Public Policy, 35(2), pp. 245–268. doi:10.1017/S0143814X14000166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C., 2011, Building better causal theories: A fuzzy-set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, pp. 393–420. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C., Marx, A. and Rihoux, B., 2014, Comment: Getting QCA right. Sociological Methodology, 44(1), pp. 95–100. doi:10.1177/0081175014542079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. L. and Bennett, A., 2005, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge/London: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F., 2012, Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies, in: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (Eds) Handbook of International Relations (Thousand Oaks: SAGE), pp. 453–470.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, K., 2012, Comparative public policy: Using the comparative method to advance our understanding of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), pp. 11–26. doi:10.1111/psj.2012.40.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., 2004, Privatizing Risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), pp. 243–260. doi:10.1017/S0003055404001121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hak, T., Jaspers, F. and Dul, J., 2013, The analysis of temporally ordered configurations: Challenges and solutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 38, pp. 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., 2003, Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research, in: J. Mahoney and D. Rueschenmeyer (Eds) Comparative-Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 373–403.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A. D., Ingold, K., Nohrstedt, D. and Weible, C. M., 2014, Policy change in comparative contexts: Applying the advocacy coalition framework outside of Western Europe and North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), pp. 299–312. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.941200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M., 2003, Studying Public Policy: policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hug, S., 2013, Qualitative comparative analysis: How inductive use and measurement error lead to problematic inference. Political Analysis, 21, pp. 252–265. doi:10.1093/pan/mps061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R., 2005, The Politics of Attention: how Government Prioritizes Problems (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W., 1995, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (Boston, MA: Little, Brown).
   Google Scholar
• Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., Varone, F. and Hill, M., 2007, Public Policy Analysis (Bristol: The Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Krogslund, C., Choi, D. D. and Poertner, M., 2015, Fuzzy sets on shaky ground: Parameter sensitivity and confirmation bias in fsQCA. Political Analysis, 23(1), pp. 21–41. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D., 1951, The Policy Orientation, the Policy Sciences (Stanford: Standord University Press), pp. 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, E. S., 2005, Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), pp. 435–452. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., 1971, Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), pp. 682–693. doi:10.2307/1955513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., 1999, Patterns of Democracy: government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Henry, A. D. and Mccoy, M., 2010, Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), pp. 287–300. doi:10.1111/ajps.2010.54.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. R. and Szatrowski, A., 2014, Qualitative comparative analysis in critical perspective. Sociological Methodology, 44(1), pp. 1–79. doi:10.1177/0081175014532763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., 2007, De facto independence after delegation: A fuzzy-set analysis. Regulation & Governance, 1, pp. 271–294. doi:10.1111/rego.2007.1.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., 2009, The role of independent regulatory agencies in policy-making: A comparative analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), pp. 450–470. doi:10.1080/13501760802662854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M. and Levi-Faur, D., 2013, Dealing with errors in QCA. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), pp. 198–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E., 1995, Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), pp. 145–174.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, K. A. and Bressers, H., 2013, A comparative analysis of how actors implement: Testing the contextual interaction theory in 48 cases of wetland restoration. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(3), pp. 203–219. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.785668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P., 2000, Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), pp. 251–267. doi:10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. and Skocpol, T., 2002, Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. Political Science: the State of the Discipline, 3, pp. 693–721.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, J., Mannak, R. S. and Cambré, B., 2015, Combining structure, governance, and context: A configurational approach to network effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), pp. 479–511. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., 1987, The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., 1994, A qualitative comparative analysis of pension systems, in: T. Janoski and A. M. Hicks (Eds) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 300–309.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., 2000, Fuzzy-Set Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., 2008, Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy-Sets and Beyond (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. and Marx, A., 2013, QCA, 25 years after “the comparative method”: Mapping, challenges, and innovations - mini-symposium. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), pp. 167–235. doi:10.1177/1065912912468269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C. C., 2009, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., Rezhsöhazy, I. and Bol, D., 2011, Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in public policy analysis: An extensive review. German Policy Studies, 7(3), pp. 9–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. and Mazmanian, D., 1979, The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis, 5(4), pp. 481–504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., 1987, Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: An advocacy coalition framework. Science Communication, 8, pp. 649–692. doi:10.1177/0164025987008004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., 2007a, Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., 2007b, The need for better theories, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M., 2007, The advocacy coalition framework, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 189–222.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W., 1997, Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research (Boulder, Colorado/Oxford: Westview Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E. and Weible, C. M., 2013, New theories of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), pp. 389–396. doi:10.1111/psj.2013.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q. and Rohlfing, I., 2013, Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(4), pp. 559–597. doi:10.1177/0049124113481341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q. and Wagemann, C., 2006, Reducing complexity in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 45, pp. 751–786. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2006.45.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q. and Wagemann, C., 2010, Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9, pp. 397–418. doi:10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q. and Wagemann, C., 2012, Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F. and Garrett, G., 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Skaaning, S.-E., 2011, Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), pp. 391–408. doi:10.1177/0049124111404818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K., 2000, Timing and temporality in the analysis of institutional evolution and change. Studies in American Political Development, 14(1), pp. 101–108. doi:10.1017/S0898588X00213035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiem, A., 2014, Navigating the complexities of qualitative comparative analysis: Case numbers, necessity relations, and model ambiguities. Evaluation Review, 38, pp. 487–513. doi:10.1177/0193841X14550863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiem, A., Baumgartner, M. and Bol, D., 2015, Still lost in translation! A correction of three misunderstandings between configurational comparativists and regressional analysts. Comparative Political Studies. Published online before print. doi:10.1177/0010414014565892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaisey, S., 2014, Comment: QCA works–when used with care. Sociological Methodology, 44(1), pp. 108–112. doi:10.1177/0081175014542083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, S., Klijn, E.-H., Edelenbos, J. and Van Buuren, A., 2013, What makes governance networks work? A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 14 Dutch spatial planning projects. Public Administration, 91(4), pp. 1035–1055. doi:10.1111/padm.2013.91.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, B., 2011, Under which conditions does spending on active labor market policies increase? An fsQCA analysis of 53 governments between 1985 and 2003. European Political Science Review, 3(2), pp. 229–252. doi:10.1017/S1755773910000378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R., 2013, A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), pp. 175–192. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasaki, S. and Rihoux, B., 2009, A commented review of applications, in: B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin (Eds) Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE Publications), pp. 123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N., 2003, Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N., 2007, The multiple streams framework, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 65–92.
   Google Scholar