Of Rating and Ranking in the Comparison of Fiscal Institutions

References

• Allen, R., 2013, Challenges in reforming budgetary institutions in developing countries, in: M. Cangiano, C. Teresa and M. Lazare (Eds) Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R., Richard, H. and Potter, B. H. (Eds), 2013a, The International Handbook of Public Financial Management (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., 2012, The logical limits of best practice administrative solutions in developing countries, Public Administration and Development, 32(2), pp. 137–153. doi:10.1002/pad.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., 2013, The Limits of Institutional Reforms in Development. Changing Rules for Realistic Solutions (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Cangiano, M., Cole, N., de Renzio, P., Krause, P. and Seligmann, R., 2014, This is PFM, Center for International Development at Harvard University, Working Paper No. 285, July
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Pritchett, L. and Woolcock, M., 2012, Escaping capability traps through problem-driven iterative adaptation (PDIA), Center for International Development Working Paper 239 (Cambridge, MA).
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, C., 2009, Governance Indicators, Dissertation, Maastricht University, Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, C. and Oman, C. P., 2006, Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators (Paris: OECD Development Centre).
   Google Scholar
• Blum, J., Manning, N. and Srivastava, V., 2012, Public sector management reform: Toward a problem-solving approach, in: Economic Premise, No. 100 (Washington, DC: The World Bank: Poverty Reduction and Economic Management (PREM) Network), pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. B., Peters, G. and Verhoest, K., 2010, The Coordination of Public Sector Organization. Shifting Patterns of Public Management (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Budina, N., Kinda, T., Schaecht, A. and Weber, A., 2013, Numerical fiscal rules: International trends, in: M. Cangiano, C. Teresa and M. Lazare (Eds) Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• Cangiano, M., Teresa, C. and Lazare, M. (Eds), 2013, Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• de Renzio, P., 2013, Assessing and comparing the quality of public financial management systems: Theory, history, and evidence, in: R. Allen, H. Richard and B. H. Potter (Eds) The International Handbook of Public Financial Management (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J., 2012, The non-technical context of PFM reform, background paper to the PEFA Exposure Draft Guidance Note On Sequencing PFM Reforms, June.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J., 2013, Good Practice Note on Sequencing PFM Reforms, January. Available at: https//www.pefa.org/ (accessed December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2006, Public Finances in EMU. Part III: Numerical Fiscal Rules and Institutions for Sound Public Finances, No.3, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D. and Kraay, A., 2009, Governance Matters VIII: aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996–2008 (Washington, DC: World Bank Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M., 2010, The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues, in: Global Economy and Development (Washington, DC: Brooking).
   Google Scholar
• Kopits, G. and Symansky, S., 1998, Fiscal Rules, IMF Occasional Paper 162.
   Google Scholar
• North, D., 1991, Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), pp. 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Overman, S. E. and Boyd, K. J., 1994, Best practice research and post-bureaucratic reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(1), pp. 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., 2011, ‘Moderation in all things’: International comparisons of governance quality. Financial Accountability & Management, 27(4), pp. 437–457. doi:10.1111/faam.2011.27.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G., 2011, Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Hupe, P., 2011, Talking about government. The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), pp. 641–658. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.532963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L. and Woolcock, M., 2004, Solutions when the solution is the problem: Arraying the disarray in development. World Development, 32(2), pp. 191–212. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M. and Andrews, M., 2010, Capability Traps? The Mechanisms Of Persistent Implementation Failure, Working Paper No. 234, Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R., 2003, What’s wrong with best practice policies—And why relevant practices are better, in: On Target? Government by Measurement (London: House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee HC 62-II).
   Google Scholar
• Schaechter, A., Kinda, T., Budina, N. and Weber, A., 2013, Fiscal Rules in Response to the Crisis—Toward the Next-Generation Rules. A New Dataset, IMF Working Paper WP/12/187 (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A., 2013, Reflections on two decades of public financial management reforms, in: M. Cangiano, C. Teresa and M. Lazare (Eds) Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture (Washington, DC: IMF).
   Google Scholar
• Theurl, T. and Wicher, J., 2012, Comparing Informal Institutions Cesifo DICE Report.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A., 1975, Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company).
   Google Scholar