A Comparison of the Interplay of Public and Occupational Work‒Family Policies in Austria, Denmark, Italy and the United Kingdom

References

• Abrahamson, P., Boje, T. P., and Greve, B., 2005, Welfare and Families in Europe (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Addabbo, T., Cardinali, V., Giovannini, D., and Mazzucchelli, S., 2017, Italy country note, in: S. Blum, A. Koslowski, and P. Moss (Eds) International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2017. Retrieved from http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/
   Google Scholar
• Adema, W. and Ali, N., 2014, Recent changes in family outcomes and policies in OECD countries: The impact of the economic crisis. Community, Work & Family, 18(2), pp. 145–166. doi:10.1080/13668803.2015.1013020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., and Kalleberg, A., 2006, Organizations and the intersection of work and family: A comparative perspective, in: S. Ackroyd, R. Batt, P. Thompson, and P. Tolbert (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 52–73.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, P., Kossek, E. E., Misra, K., and Belman, D., 2014, Work-life flexibility policies: Do unions affect employee access and use? Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 67(1), pp. 111–137. doi:10.1177/001979391406700105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloksgaard, L. and Rostgaard, T., 2017, Denmark country note, in: S. Blum, A. Koslowski, and P. Moss (Eds) International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2017. Retrieved from http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/
   Google Scholar
• Blome, A., 2017, The Politics of Work-Family Policy Reforms in Germany and Italy (Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Blum, S., Koslowski, A., and Moss, P. (Eds), 2017, International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2017. Available at http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, K. B., Oh, H., and Sharma, S., 2014, “Crowding in” or “crowding out”? An examination of the impact of the welfare state on generalized social trust. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23(1), pp. 61–68. doi:10.1111/ijsw.2014.23.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, J. and Mumford, K., 2004, Trade unions and family-friendly policies in Britain. Industrial and Labor Review, 57(2), pp. 204–222. doi:10.1177/001979390405700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, E., 2014, Defamilization typology re-examined: Re-measuring the economic independence of women in welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), pp. 442–454. doi:10.1177/0958928714542734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., 2011, Work-family conflict across 28 European countries: A multi-level approach, in: S. Drobnič and A. Guillén (Eds) Work-Life Balance in Europe: The Role of Job Quality (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 42–68.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, H., 2018, Dualization and the access to occupational family-friendly working-time arrangements across Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), pp. 491–507. doi:10.1111/spol.12379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., 2019, National-level family policies and workers’ access to schedule control in a European comparative perspective: Crowding out or in, and for whom? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 21(1), pp. 25–46. doi:10.1080/13876988.2017.1353745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. and Tijdens, K., 2013, Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: Using company-level data across 21 countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), pp. 1418–1434. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.712544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, J. and Courbage, C., 2015, Crowding out of long-term care insurance: Evidence from European expectations data. Health Economics, 24(1), pp. 74–88. doi:10.1002/hec.3148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, A. E. and Kalleberg, A. L., 2006, Family-friendly organizations? Work and family programs in the 1990s. Work and Occupations, 33(2), pp. 191–223. doi:10.1177/0730888405280446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitch, C. and Huffman, M., 2001, Family responsive benefits and the two-tiered labor market, in: R. Hertz and N. Marshall (Eds) Working Families: The Transformation of the American Home (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 103–130.
   Google Scholar
• Den Dulk, L., Groeneveld, S., Ollier-Malaterre, A., and Valcour, M., 2013, National context in work-life research: A multi-level cross-national analysis of the adoption of workplace work-life arrangements in Europe. European Management Journal, 31(5), pp. 478–494. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Dulk, L., Peters, P., and Poutsma, E., 2012, Variations in adoption of workplace work–Family arrangements in Europe: The influence of welfare-state regime and organizational characteristics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(13), pp. 2785–2808. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.676925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2014, The fourth work-life balance employer survey (2013) BIS Research Paper, No. 184, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W., 1983, The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, B. (ed.), 2011, The Varieties of Pension Governance – Pension Privatization in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G., 1999, Social Foundation of Postindustrial Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A., 1995, The Spirit of Community: The Reinvention of American Society (London: Fontana Books).
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound, 2006, Reconciliation of Work and Family Life in Collective Bargaining in the European Union (Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2005, Reconciliation of Work and Private Life: A Comparative Review of Thirty European Countries (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound), 2015, June, European Company Survey, 2013 [Computer File] (Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor]). SN: 7735. doi:10.5255/UKDA-SN-7735-1
   Google Scholar
• European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound), 2017, June, European Working Conditions Survey, 2015 [Computer File], 4th ed. (Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor]). SN: 8098. doi:10.5255/UKDA-SN-8098-4
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. M., 2002, Work/family reconciliation, gender wage equity and occupational segregation: The role of firms and public policy. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse De Politiques, 28(1), pp. 187–216. doi:10.2307/3552351
   Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, K., 2004, Welfare through work: An audit of occupational social provision at the turn of the new century. Social Policy & Administration, 38(5), pp. 437–455. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferragina, E. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M., 2015, Determinants of a silent (r)evolution: Understanding the expansion of family policy in rich OECD countries. Social Politics, 22(1), pp. 1–37. doi:10.1093/sp/jxu027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, T. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M., 2011, Cross-national perspectives on firm-level family policies: Britain, Germany, and the US compared, in: J. Clasen (Ed.) Converging Worlds of Welfare? British and German Social Policy in the 21st Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 129–154.
   Google Scholar
• Gornick, J. C. and Meyers, M. K., 2004, Welfare regimes in relation to paid work and care, in: J. Z. Giele and E. Holst (Eds) Changing Life Patterns in Western Industrial Societies (Oxford: Elsevier), pp. 45–67.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. and Milner, S., 2009, Trade unions and work-life balance: Changing times in France and the UK? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1), pp. 122–146. doi:10.1111/bjir.2009.47.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, B., 2012, Reconciliation of work and family life in four different welfare states NEUJOBS Working Paper, No. D 5.5.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., 2002, The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. S. and Jirjahn, U., 2009, Family-friendly practices and worker representation in Germany. Industrial Relations, 48(1), pp. 121–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Künemund, H. and Rein, M., 1999, There is more to receiving than needing: Theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19(1), pp. 93–121. doi:10.1017/S0144686X99007205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, S., 2003, Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), pp. 353–375. doi:10.1080/1461669032000127642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., 2006, Work/family reconciliation, equal opportunities, and social policies: The interpretation of policy trajectories at the EU level and the meaning of gender equality. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), pp. 420–437. doi:10.1080/13501760600560490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R., 1994, “She has other duties”: Women, citizenship and social security, in: S. Baldwin and J. Falkingham (Eds) Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf), pp. 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, H. and Zagel, H., 2016, Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), pp. 48–65. doi:10.1177/0958928715621712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischke, M., 2011, Types of public family support: A cluster analysis of 15 European countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(4), pp. 443–456. doi:10.1080/13876988.2011.583111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. J., 2013, Path shifting of the welfare state: Electoral competition and the expansion of work-family policies in Western Europe. World Politics, 65(1), pp. 73–115. doi:10.1017/S0043887112000251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Roemer, C., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J., 2005, Welfare states do not crowd out the family: Evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses. Ageing & Society, 25(6), pp. 863–882. doi:10.1017/S0144686X05003971
   Google Scholar
• Natali, D., 2017, The New Pension Mix in Europe: Recent Reforms, Their Distributional Effects and Political Dynamics (Brussels: Peter Lang).
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. and Koslowski, A., 2017, United Kingdom country note, in: S. Blum, A. Koslowski, and P. Moss (Eds) International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2017. Retrieved from http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/
   Google Scholar
• Ollier-Malaterre, A., 2009, Organizational work–Life initiatives: Context matters: France compared to the UK and the US. Community, Work & Family, 12(2), pp. 159–178. doi:10.1080/13668800902778942
   Google Scholar
• Orloff, A. S., 1993, Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), pp. 303–328. doi:10.2307/2095903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterman, P., 1995, Work-family programs and the employment relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), pp. 681–700. doi:10.2307/2393758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., and Sgroi, D., 2009, Happiness and productivity IZA Discussion Paper, No. 4645 (Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor).
   Google Scholar
• Øverbye, E., 1996, Public and occupational pensions in the Nordic countries, in: M. Shalev (Ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan (Basingstoke: Macmillian), pp. 159–186.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenswood, K. and Markey, R., 2011, The role of unions in achieving a family friendly workplace. Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(4), pp. 486–503. doi:10.1177/0022185611409113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M., 1996, Is America exceptional? Then role of occupational welfare in the United States and the European Community, in: M. Shalev (Ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan (Houndmills: Macmillian), pp. 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M. and Rainwater, L. (eds), 1986, Public/Private Interplay in Social Protection: A Comparative Study (New York: M. E. Sharpe).
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M. and Turner, J., 2001, Public-private interactions: Mandatory pensions in Australia, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Review of Population and Social Policy, 2001(10), pp. 107–153.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M. and Wadensjö, E. (eds), 1998, Enterprise and the Welfare State (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Rille-Pfeiffer, C., Dearing, H., and Schmidt, A. E., 2017, Austria country note, in: S. Blum, A. Koslowski, and P. Moss (Eds) International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2017. Retrieved from http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/
   Google Scholar
• Sani, G. M. D., 2018, The economic crisis and change in work-family arrangements in six European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(2), pp. 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C., 2013, Family policies, in: B. Greve (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State (Oxon: Routledge), pp. 381–390.
   Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C. and Keck, W., 2010, Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies, 12(5), pp. 675–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C., Leira, A., and Lewis, J., 2013, Introduction: Families and states, in: C. Saraceno, J. Lewis, and A. Leira (Eds) Families and Family Policies Volume I (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. xi–xxxx.
   Google Scholar
• Saxonberg, S., 2014, Attitudes towards balancing work and family life NEUJOBS Working Paper, D13.3.
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J. and Gerring, J., 2008, Case selection techniques in case study research – A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), pp. 294–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeleib-Kaiser, M., Saunders, A. M., and Naczyk, M., 2012, Shifting the public-private mix: A new dualisation of welfare? in: P. Emmenegger, S. Häusermann, B. Palier, and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (Eds) The Age of Dualization. The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 151–175.
   Google Scholar
• Titmuss, R., 1958, Essays on ‘The Welfare State’ (London: Allen & Unwin).
   Google Scholar
• Trampusch, C., 2013, Employers and collectively negotiated occupational pension in Sweden, Denmark and Norway: Promoter, vacillators and adversaries. European Journal of Industrial Relation, 19(1), pp. 37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. and Arts, W., 2005, The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1), pp. 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, J., 2016, ICTWSS Data Base Version 5.1 (Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS), University of Amsterdam).
   Google Scholar
• Wiß, T., 2017, Paths towards family-friendly working time arrangements: Comparing workplaces in different countries and industries. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), pp. 1406–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. J., De Menezes, L. M., and Lasaosa, A., 2003, Family-friendly management in Great Britain: Testing various perspectives. Industrial Relations, 42(2), pp. 221–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar