Collective Action, Civil Society, and Public Policy in Turkey

References

• Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E., and Su, Y., 2010, The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, pp. 287–307. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın-Düzgit, S. and Kaliber, A., 2016, Encounters with Europe in an era of domestic and international turmoil: Is Turkey a de-Europeanising candidate country? South European Society and Politics, 21(1), pp. 1–14. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1155282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S. E., Çarkoglu, A., and Ertan, G., 2017, Türkiye’de kisilerarasi sosyal güven ve bireysel belirleyicileri. METU Studies in Development, 44(1), pp. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Banaszak, L. A., 2005, Inside and outside the state: Movement insider status, tactics, and public policy achievements, in: D. S. Meyer, V. Jenness, and H. M. Ingram (Eds) Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 149–176.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D., 2010, Agendas and Instability in American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R. and Mahoney, C., 2005, Social movements, the rise of new issues, and the public agenda, in: D. S. Meyer, V. Jenness, and H. M. Ingram (Eds) Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A., 2000, Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, pp. 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Johnson, J. C., 2013, Analyzing Social Networks. (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Bosi, L. and Uba, K., 2009, The outcomes of social movements. Mobilization, 14, pp. 409–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. and Linton, A., 2002, The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy: Some recent evidence and theoretical concerns. Social Forces, 81(2), pp. 380–408. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, J., 2004, Third sector participation in the policy process: A framework for comparative analysis. Policy and Politics, 32(2), pp. 241–257. doi:10.1332/030557304773558170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIVICUS, 2017, Over a year on from the coup: Civil society still under siege. Available at https://monitor.civicus.org/newsfeed/2017/10/06/over-year-coup-civil-society-still-under-siege/.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, D. M. and Snow, D. A., 2000, The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), pp. 1063–1104. doi:10.1086/210399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M., 2003, Social movements, contentious actions, and social networks: ‘From metaphor to substance’, in: M. Diani and D. McAdam (Eds) Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M., 2015, The Cement of Civil Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. K., 1973, The conditions of protest behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review, 67(1), pp. 11–28. doi:10.2307/1958525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertan, G., 2018, Policy analysis in civil society organizations, in: C. Bakir and G. Ertan (Eds) Policy Analysis in Turkey (Bristol: University of Bristol: Policy Press), pp. 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Esen, B. and Gumuscu, S., 2016, Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), pp. 1581–1606. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, M. W. and Edwards, B., 1996, The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), pp. 38–52. doi:10.1353/jod.1996.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M., 1998, Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 98, pp. 371–393. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, R. V., 1991, Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. American Sociological Review, 56, pp. 716–729. doi:10.2307/2096251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo, H., 1978, Issue networks and the executive establishment, in: A. King (Ed.) The New American Political System (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research), pp. 87–124
   Google Scholar
• Heper, M. and Yıldırım, S., 2011, Revisiting civil society in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 11(1), pp. 1–18. doi:10.1080/14683857.2011.558307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. and Cashore, B., 2009, The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), pp. 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İçduygu, A., Meydanoğlu, Z., and Sert, D. (2011). Civil society in Turkey: At a turning point. CIVICUS Civil Society Index (CSI) Project Country Report for Turkey II.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., 2011, Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), pp. 435–459. doi:10.1111/psj.2011.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, M. and Ingram, H., 2005, Creating credible edibles: The organic agriculture movement and the emergence of US federal organic standards, in: D. S. Meyer, V. Jenness, and H. M. Ingram (Eds) Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 121–148
   Google Scholar
• IPC, 2017, Trends in Turkish civil society. Available at https://cdn.americanprogress.org/content/uploads/2017/07/07052143/TurkishCivil-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., and Sabatier, P. A., 2014, The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research, in: P. Sabatier and C. Weible (Eds) Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed.). (Chicago, IL: Westview Press), pp. 15–34
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., 1979, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), pp. 263. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaman, M. L. and Aras, B., 2000, The crisis of civil society in Turkey. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 2(2), pp. 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J., 1984, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (Boston: Little, Brown and Company).
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., 1986, Political opportunity structures and political Protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, pp. 57–85. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, F., 2007, Protest and Opportunities: The Political Outcomes of Social Movements (Cambridge: Campus Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., 2004, Protest in time and space: The evolution of waves of contention, in: D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi (Eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 19–46.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. and Rucht, D., 2002, Protest event analysis, in: B. Klandermans and S. Staggenborg (Eds) Methods of Social Movement Research (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 231–259.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., 2004, Political context and opportunity, in: D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi (Eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P., 2013, Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: A discourse network analysis of German pension politics. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), pp. 169–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., 1996, Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions, in: D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald (Eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., 2005, Velcro triangles: Elite mobilization of local antidrug issue coalitions, in: D. S. Meyer, V. Jenness, and H. M. Ingram (Eds) Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 87–115
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D. and Zaid, M., 1977, Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), pp. 1212–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler, S., 2005, Policy feedback effects for collective action: Lessons from veterans’ programs, in: D. S. Meyer, V. Jenness, and H. M. Ingram (Eds) Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy (University of Minnesota Press), pp. 211–235.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., 2005, Social movements and public policy: Eggs, chicken, and theory, in: D. S. Meyer, V. Jenness, and H. M. Ingram (Eds) Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy (University of Minnesota Press), pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., Jenness, V., and Ingram, H. M. (Eds), 2005, Routing The Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press)
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 2005, Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press).
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E., 2015, Turkey’s judiciary and the drift toward competitive authoritarianism. The International Spectator, 50(2), pp. 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passy, F., 2003, Social networks matter. But how?, in: M. Diani and D. McAdam (Eds) Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 21–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pettinicchio, D., 2017, Elites, policy, and social movements. Research in Political Sociology, 24, pp. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B. and Boşnak, B., 2015, Taking stock of the Europeanization of civil society in Turkey: The case of NGOs, in: A. Tekin and A. Güney (Eds) The Europeanization of Turkey (London: Routledge), pp. 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., 1988, An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), pp. 129–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C., 1993, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Boulder, CO: Westview).
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M., 2007, The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed.) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 189–222.
   Google Scholar
• Sarigil, Z., 2010, Bargaining in institutionalized settings: The case of Turkish reforms. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), pp. 463–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, J. and Gerring, J., 2008, Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), pp. 294–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simga, H. and Goker, G. Z., 2017, Whither feminist alliance? Secular feminists and Islamist women in Turkey. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 23(3), pp. 273–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 1978, From Mobilization to Revolution (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. and Workman, S., 2017, Struggle and triumph in fusing policy process and comparative research, in: C. M. Weible and P. A. Sabatier (Eds) Theories of the Policy Process (New York: Routledge), pp. 329–362.
   Google Scholar
• TUSEV, 2013, Sivil Toplum Kuruluslari ile Kamu Sektoru Iliskileri Sorunlar-Beklentiler. Available at http://www.siviltoplum-kamu.org/usrfiles/files/Ortakliklar_Belgesi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., and Sabatier, P. A., 2012, Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45(1), pp. 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar