A Comparative Analysis of Expert Advisors’ Role Perceptions in Policymaking: The Case of Hong Kong, China

References

• Aberbach, J. D. and Rockman, B. A., 1989, On the rise, transformation, and decline of analysis in the US government. Governance, 2(3), pp. 293–314. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.1989.tb00094.x
   Google Scholar
• Ackerly, B. A., 2005, Is liberalism the only way toward democracy? Confucianism and democracy. Political Theory, 33(4), pp. 547–576. doi:10.1177/0090591705276879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barke, R. P. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C., 1993, Politics and scientific expertise: Scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy. Risk Analysis, 13(4), pp. 425–439. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00743.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besha, P., 2010, Policy making in China’s space program: A history and analysis of the Chang’e lunar orbiter project. Space Policy, 26, pp. 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2010.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C., 2009, The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Brickman, R. and Rip, A., 1979. Science Policy Advisory Councilsin France, The Netherlands and the United States, 1957-77: A Comparative Analysis. Social Studies of Science, 9(2s), 167–198.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R., 1980, Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. P. and Wei, L., 2015, The impact of external change on civil service values in post-colonial Hong Kong. The China Quarterly, 222, pp. 522–546. June. doi:10.1017/S0305741015000405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, W., 2007, Hybrid politics and new competitiveness: Hong Kong’s 2007 chief executive election. East Asia, 25, pp. 365–388. doi:10.1007/s12140-008-9057-9
   Google Scholar
• Cheek, T., Ownby, D., and Fogel, J., 2018, Mapping the intellectual public sphere in China today. China Information, 32(1), pp. 107–120. doi:10.1177/0920203X18759789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W., 2016, Street politics in a hybrid regime: The diffusion of political activism in post-colonial Hong Kong. The China Quarterly, 226, pp. 383–406. doi:10.1017/S0305741016000394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, B. L. A. and Wong, P. C., 2004, Who advised the Hong Kong government? The politics of absorption before and after 1997. Asian Survey, 44(6), pp. 874–894. doi:10.1525/as.2004.44.6.874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Chor-yung. 2014, Hong Kong’s systemic crisis of governance and the revolt of the “Post-80s” youths: The anti-express rail campaign. in: Y. S. Joseph and Cheng (Eds) New Trends Of Political Participation in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: City University of HongKong Press, 417–447.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, P. T., 2011, Civic engagement in the policy process in Hong Kong: Change and continuity. Public Administration and Development, 31, pp. 113–121. doi:10.1002/pad.597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, Y. H., 2016, Sources of regime legitimacy in Confucian societies. Journal of Chinese Governance, 1(2), pp. 195–213. doi:10.1080/23812346.2016.1172402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. and Evans, R., 2007, Rethinking Expertise (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Craft, J. and Howlett, M., 2012, Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: Location and content in policy advisory systems. Journal of Public Policy, 32(2), pp. 79–98. doi:10.1017/S0143814X12000049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., 2002, Policy analysis and planning: From science to argument. in: F. Fischer (Ed.) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (London: Routledge), pp. 213–232.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. and Berejikian, J., 1993, Reconstructive democratic theory. The American Political Science Review, 87(1), pp. 48–60. doi:10.2307/2938955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning, D. and Osuna, W., 1994, Policy analysts’ roles and value orientations: An empirical investigation using Q methodology. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(4), pp. 629–657. doi:10.2307/3325491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. L. and Ingram, H. M., 2009, Making science useful to decision-makers: Climate forecasts, water management, and knowledge networks. Weather, Climate and Society, 1, pp. 9–21. doi:10.1175/2009WCAS1007.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 1993, Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26, pp. 165–187. doi:10.1007/BF00999715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2009, Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fobe, E., Brans, M., Vancoppenolle, D., and Van Damme, J., 2013, Institutionalized advisory systems: An analysis of member satisfaction of advice production and use across 9 strategic advisory councils in Flanders (Belgium). Policy and Society, 32, pp. 225–240. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley, B., 2012, Authoritarian environmentalism and China’s response to climate change. Environmental Politics, 21(2), pp. 287–307. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.651904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckman, P., 2014, Policy: The art of science advice to government. Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science, 507, pp. 163–165. doi:10.1038/507163a
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A., 2003, Technology assessment at the German Bundestag: ‘expertising’ democracy for ‘democratising’ expertise. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), pp. 193–198. doi:10.3152/147154303781780515
   Google Scholar
• Gu, E. and Goldman, M., 2004, Introduction: The transformation of the relationship between Chinese intellectuals and the state. in: E. Gu and M. Goldman (Eds) Chinese Intellectuals between State and Market (Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor and Francis), pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M., 1992, Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), pp. 1–85. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H., Swedlow, B., and Unger, D. (2014). Policy advocacycoalitions as causes of policy change in China? Analyzingevidence from contemporary environmental politics. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), 313–334. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.857065
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, G. M., Forest, P., Sandall, J. L., Lalor, B. M., and Keenan, R. J., 2013, Managing the environmental science-policy nexus in government: Perspectives from public servants in Canada and Australia. Science and Public Policy, 40(4), pp. 529–543. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hird, J. A., 2005, Power, Knowledge and Politics: Policy Analysis in the States (Washington, DC, USA: Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., 1999, Policy analysis, science and politics: From ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), pp. 201–210. doi:10.3152/147154399781782482
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., 2009, Scientific advice and public policy: Expert advisers’ and policymakers’ discourses on boundary work. Poiesis Prax, 6(3–4), pp. 235–263. doi:10.1007/s10202-008-0053-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe, R., 2016, Towards the comparative study of policy work. A rejoinder to Radin’s views on policy analysis as “Advice to a Client”. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), pp. 302–306. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1175192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huat, C. B., 2011, Singapore as model: Planning innovations, knowledge experts. in: A. Roy and A. Ong (Eds) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global (Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Huneeus, C., 2000, Technocrats and politicians in an authoritarian regime: The ‘Odeplan Boys’ and the ‘Gremialists’ in Pinochet’s Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(2), pp. 461–501. doi:10.1017/S0022216X00005812
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, K. and Gschwend, M., 2014, Science in policy-making: Neutral experts or strategic policy-makers? West European Politics, 37(5), pp. 993–1018. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.920983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 2003, (No?) Accounting for expertise. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), pp. 157–162. doi:10.3152/147154303781780542
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. and Rodan, G., 2007, Beyond hybrid regimes: More participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization, 14(5), pp. 773–794. doi:10.1080/13510340701635647
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., 1990, Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis (Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole).
   Google Scholar
• King, A. Y. C., 1975, Administrative absorption of politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the grass roots level. Asian Survey, 15(5), pp. 422–439. doi:10.2307/2643255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdom, J. W. 1995, Alternatives, and Public Policies,2nd Ed. New York : HarperCollins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., 2004, Political context and opportunity. in: D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi (Eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Pub), pp. 67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, J. T. M., 2015, Political decay in Hong Kong after the occupy central movement. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 42, pp. 99–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W. F. and Chan, K. N., 2017, Policy advocacy in transitioning regimes: Comparative lessons from the case of harbour protection in Hong Kong. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(1), pp. 54–71. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1095427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, H. K., 2000, Citizen participation and policymaking in Singapore: Conditions and predicaments. Asian Survey, 40(3), pp. 436–455. doi:10.2307/3021155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow, L. and Carr, S., 2007, Europeanizing advisory expertise: The role of “independent, objective, and transparent” scientific advice in Agri-Biotech regulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(6), pp. 880–895. doi:10.1068/c05123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W. and Wong, W., 2019, Advocacy coalitions, policy stability, and policy change in China: The case of birth control policy, 1980–2015. Policy Studies Journal. Early View. doi:10.1111/psj.12329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberatore, A. and Funtowicz, S., 2003, “Democratizing” expertise, “expertizing” democracy: What does this mean, and why bother? Science and Public Policy, 30(3), pp. 146–150. doi:10.3152/147154303781780551
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. and Cohen, D. K., 1979, Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, J. and Brown, A. D., 2009, Research and advice giving: A functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian Ministry of Health. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(4), pp. 903–926. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00583.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, T. T. and Cooper, T. L., 1997, Values in flux: Administrative ethics and the Hong Kong public servant. Administration & Society, 29(3), pp. 301–324. doi:10.1177/009539979702900303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin, M. and Oberg, P., 2014, Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policymaking. Policy Sciences, 47(1), pp. 25–49. doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9182-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maasen, S. and Weingart, P., 2005, What’s new in scientific advice to politics? In S. Maasen and P. Weingart (Eds) Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-making (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• MacRae, D. and Whittington, D., 1997, Expert Advice for Policy Choice: Analysis and Discourse (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G., 1989, Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, B., and Thomas, D. B. 2013. Q Methodology, 2nd Ed. UK: Sage Publishing. doi:10.4135/9781483384412
   Google Scholar
• Meltsner, A. J., 1976, Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mertha, A., 2009, “Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0”: Political pluralization in the Chinese policy process. The China Quarterly, 200(December), pp. 995–1012. doi:10.1017/S0305741009990592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miners, N., 1991, The Government and Politics of Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Noakes, S., 2014, The role of political science in China: Intellectuals and authoritarian resilience. Political Science Quarterly, 129(2), pp. 239–260. doi:10.1002/polq.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., 2003, Democratizing expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), pp. 151–156. doi:10.3152/147154303781780461
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen, K., 2011, Framing the democracy debate in Hong Kong. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(70), pp. 479–497. doi:10.1080/10670564.2011.565179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, C. and Bindman, E., 2019, Civic participation in a hybrid regime: Limited pluralism in policymaking and delivery in contemporary Russia. Government and Opposition, 54(1), pp. 98–120. doi:10.1017/gov.2017.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, W., 2001, Modernizing policy-making for the twenty first century: The professional model. Public Policy and Administration, 16(3), pp. 93–110. doi:10.1177/095207670101600307
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. and Barker, A., 1993, Introduction: Governments, information, advice and policy-making. in: B. G. Peters and A. Barker (Eds) Advising West European Governments: Inquiries, Expertise and Public Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A., Jr, 2007, The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics (Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M., 1999, The public policy of the European Union: Whither politics of expertise. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(5), pp. 757–774. doi:10.1080/135017699343360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A., 2015, Science and policy analysis in the U.S. office of information and regulatory affairs. Administration & Society, 50(2), pp. 1–25. doi:10.1177/0095399715581048
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A., 2016, Policy analysis and advising decisionmakers: Don’t forget the decisionmaker/client. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), pp. 290–301. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1175191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, R., 2004, Plumbing the depths of D.C.’s drinking water crisis. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(12) pp. 225A–227A. June. doi:10.1021/es040525h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietig, K., 2014, ‘Neutral’ experts? How input of scientific expertise matters in international environmental negotiations. Policy Sciences, 47(2), pp. 141–160. doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9188-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, E. W., 2009, Who is to blame? Agency, causality, responsibility and the role of experts in Russian framings of global climate change. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(4), pp. 593–619. doi:10.1080/09668130902826154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, L. 2010. The Public Sector in Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, D. A. and Scholten, P., 2006, The political flow of wisdom: Science institutions as policy venues in the Netherlands. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), pp. 1104–1118. doi:10.1080/13501760600924209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, S., Burnett, M., Hills, P., and Welford, R., 2009, Trust, public participation and environmental governance in Hong Kong. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(2), pp. 99–114. doi:10.1002/eet.502
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N., 2011, The making of an intellectual hero: Chinese narratives of Qian Xuesen. The China Quarterly, 206, pp. 352–371. doi:10.1017/S0305741011000300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, S. and Stenner, P., 2012, Doing Q-methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation (Los Angeles: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., 2008, Expert-based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), pp. 615–635. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., 2009, Coalitions, science, and belief change: Comparing adversarial and collaborative policy subsystems. Policy Studies Journal, 37(2), pp. 195–212. doi:10.1111/psj.2009.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L. 1998. Policy analysis and evidence: A CraftPerspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), pp. 114–128. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01928.x
   Google Scholar
• Wengle, S. A., 2012, Engineers versus managers: Experts, market-making and state-building in Putin’s Russia. Economy and Society, 41(3), pp. 435–467. doi:10.1080/03085147.2012.661623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigell, M. 2008. Mapping ‘Hybrid Regimes’: Regime types and concepts in Comparative Politics. Democratization, 15(2), pp.230–250. doi:10.1080/13510340701846319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Y. and Han, R., 2016, Challenging, but not trouble-making: Cultural elites in China’s urban heritage preservation. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(98), pp. 292–306. doi:10.1080/10670564.2015.1075720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, E. H. and Chan, E. H., 2011, Problem issues of public participation in built-heritage conservation: Two controversial cases in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 35(3), pp. 457–466. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., 2013, Policy change and expert involvement in China. Public Administration, 91(2), pp. 281–302. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01976.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar