Tackling the Big Questions in Social Impact Bond Research through Comparative Approaches

References

• Bovaird, T. and Davies, R., 2011, Outcome-based service commissioning and delivery— Does it make a difference? in: S. Groeneveld and S. van de Walle (Eds) New Steering Mechanisms in Public Management (Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, Volume 21) (Bingley: Emerald), pp. 93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, E., FitzGerald, C., Dixon, R., Economy, C., Hameed, T., and Airoldi, M., 2018, Building the Tools for Public Services to Secure Better Outcomes: Collaboration, Prevention, Innovation (Oxford: Government Outcomes Lab, University of Oxford, Blavatnik School of Government).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R., et al., 2010, Social Investment Ten Years On (London: Social Investment Task Force). Available at www.socialinvestmenttaskforce.org/downloads/SITF_10_year_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C., Graham, C., and Himick, D., 2016, Social Impact Bonds: The securitization of the homeless. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 55, pp. 63–82. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disley, E., Giacomantonio, C., Kruithof, K. and Sim, M., 2015, The Payment by Results Social Impact Bond Pilot at HMP Peterborough: Final Process Evaluation Report, Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. Available at https://www.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, E. and Harvie, D., 2014, Harnessing the social: State, crisis and (big) society. Sociology, 48(5), pp. 869–886. doi:10.1177/0038038514539060
   Google Scholar
• Edmiston, D. and Nicholls, A., 2018, Social Impact Bonds: The role of private-based capital in outcome-based commissioning. Journal of Social Policy, 47(1), pp. 57–76. doi:10.1017/S0047279417000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, C., Carter, E., Dixon, R., and Airoldi, M., 2019, Walking the contractual tightrope: A transaction cost economics perspective on Social Impact Bonds. Public Money & Management, 39, pp. 458–467. doi:10.1080/09540962.2019.1583889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. and Morris, S., 2019, Evaluating outcome-based payment programmes: Challenges for evidence based policy. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, pp. 1–17. doi:10.1080/17487870.2019.1575217
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M., and Mays, N., 2018, Narratives of promise, narratives of caution: A review of the literature on Social Impact Bonds. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), pp. 4–28. doi:10.1111/spol.2018.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GO Lab, 2019, Projects database. Available at https://golab.bsg.ox.ac.uk/knowledge-bank/project-database/
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson-Wright, E., Gardiner, S., and Putcha, V., 2015, The Potential and Limitations of Impact Bonds: Lessons from the First Five Years of Experience Worldwide (Brookings).
   Google Scholar
• HMG, 2012, Growing the Social Investment Market: HMG Social Investment Initiatives. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/204990/HMG_social_investment_initiatives_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice and SocialFinance UK. 2010, 'Minister Launches Social Impact Bond Pilot'.Press release 10 September, Ministry of Justice, London.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, N., Mulheirn, I., and Shorthouse, R., 2013, Risky business: Social Impact Bonds and public services. Available at http://www.smf.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, J., Besharov, D. and Costa, K., 2012, Social Impact Bonds 101: Defining an Innovative New Financing Tool for Social Programs, Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Available at http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/open-government/news/2012/03/22/11238/social-impact-bonds-101/
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R., 2016, The subordination of urban policy in the time of financialization, in: J. DeFilippis (Ed.) Urban Policy in the Time of Obama (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. N. N., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., and Van de Ven, A. H., 2013, Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), pp. 1–13. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebman, J. and Sellman, A., 2013, Social Impact Bonds: A Guide for State and Local Governments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School Social Impact Bond Technical Assistance Lab).
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, T., Kimmitt, J., Wilson, R., Martin, M., and Gibbon, J., 2018, The institutional work of creating and implementing Social Impact Bonds. Policy & Politics. doi:10.1332/030557318X15333032765154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, N., Sinclair, S., Roy, M., Huckfield, L., and Donaldson, C., 2013, Social Impact Bonds: A wolf insheep’s clothing? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21(3), pp. 247–257. doi:10.1332/204674313X13812372137921
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., Reeder, N., Aylott, M., and Bo’sher, L., 2011, Social Impact Investment: The Challenge and Opportunity of Social Impact Bonds (London: Young Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Neyland, D., 2018, On the transformation of children at-risk into an investment proposition: A study of Social Impact Bonds as an anti-market device. The Sociological Review, 66(3), pp. 492–510. doi:10.1177/0038026117744415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., and Tomkinson, E. 2015. 'The Peterborough Pilot Social Impact Bond' in Nicholls, Paton and Emerson Social Finance. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 345.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T., 1992, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., 2006, The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), pp. 377–388. doi:10.1080/14719030600853022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (ed.), 2010, The New Public Governance? (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, G., 2018, Pay for success is quietly undergoing a radical simplification. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 678(1), pp. 103–110. doi:10.1177/0002716218769036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., 1999, Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), pp. 711–724. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., 2008, Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA), in: B. Rihoux and C. Ragin (Eds) Configurational Comparative Analysis (Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T., 2013, The centre for Social Impact Bonds. Civil Service Quarterly. Available at https://quarterly.blog.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Roman, J., Walsh, K., Bieler, S., and Taxy, S., 2014, Five Steps to Pay for Success: Implementing Pay for Success Projects in the Juvenile and Criminal Justice Systems, Urban Institute. Available at http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/413148-Five-Steps-to-Pay-for-Success.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ronicle, J., Fox, T., and Stanworth, N., 2016, Reconnections Social Impact Bond: Reducing loneliness in Worcestershire. Big Lottery Fund. Available at https://www.bigsocietycapital.com
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2013. Beyond Evidence Based Policy in Public Health: The Interplay Of Ideas. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137026583
   Google Scholar
• Social Finance, 2010, Towards a New Social Economy: Blended Value Creation through Social Impact Bonds (London: Social Finance).
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S., Fraser, A., McHugh, N., and Warner, M. 2019. Widening perspectives on social impact bonds. Journal Of Economic Policy Reform, Doi/full/10.1080/17487870.2019.1568249 doi:10.1080/17487870.2019.1568249
   Google Scholar
• Tse, A. and Warner, M., 2018, The razor’s edge: Social Impact Bonds and the financialization of early childhood services. Journal of Urban Affairs, pp. 1–17. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1465347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M., 2013, Private finance for public goods: Social Impact Bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4), pp. 303–319. doi:10.1080/17487870.2013.835727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar