References
- Adam, C., Hurka, S., Knill, C., Peters, B. G., and Steinebach, Y., 2019, Introducing vertical policy coordination to comparative policy analysis: The missing link between policy production and implementation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(5), pp. 499–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1599161
- Aragon, C., Aranguren, M. J., Diez, M. A., Iturrioz, C., and Wilson, J. R., 2014, Participatory evaluation: A useful tool for contextualising cluster policy? Policy Studies, 35(1), pp. 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2013.803532
- Beach, D. and Pedersen, R. B., 2013, Process-tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press).
- Beach, D. and Pedersen, R. B., 2016, Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching and Tracing (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
- Befani, B., Ledermann, S., and Sager, F., 2007, Realistic evaluation and QCA: Conceptual parallels and an empirical application. Evaluation, 13(2), pp. 171–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007075222
- Bobrow, D. B. and Dryzek, J. S., 1987, Policy Analysis by Design (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
- Brady, H. E. and Collier, D., 2010, Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed. (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers).
- Brans, M., Geva-May, I., and Howlett, M., 2017, Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis (New York; London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group).
- Breen, M. and Doyle, D., 2013, The determinants of privatization: A comparative analysis of developing countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(1), pp. 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.741439
- Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., and Aversano, N., 2018, Accountability and transparency to fight against corruption: An international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(5), pp. 486–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393951
- Carter, D. P., Weible, C. M., Siddiki, S. N., and Basurto, X., 2016, Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs: An illustration from the US national organic program regulation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(1), pp. 159–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629815603494
- Collins, M. E., 2018, Comparative analysis of state policymaking in child welfare: Explaining policy choices. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(4), pp. 370–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1390867
- Dowding, K. M., 2015, The Philosophy and Methods of Political Science (London; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).
- Fischer, F., 2003, Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Fischer, F. and Forester, J., 1993, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (London: UCL Press).
- Fontaine, G., Medrano, C., and Narváez Quiñónez, I., 2020, The Politics of Public Accountability: Policy Design in Latin American Oil Exporting Countries (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
- Fontaine, G., Narvaez, I., and Velasco, S., 2018, Explaining a policy paradigm shift: A comparison of resource nationalism in Bolivia and Peru. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 20(2), pp. 142–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1272234
- George, A. L. and Bennett, A., 2005, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press).
- Geva-May, I., 2005, Thinking like a policy analyst: Policy analysis as a clinical profession, in: Thinking like a Policy Analyst: Policy Analysis as a Clinical Profession (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–50.
- Ghinoi, S., Wesz, V. J., and Piras, S., 2018, Political debates and agricultural policies: Discourse coalitions behind the creation of Brazil’s Pronaf. Land Use Policy, 76, pp. 68–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.039
- Gutberlet, J., 2015, More inclusive and cleaner cities with waste management co-production: Insights from participatory epistemologies and methods. Habitat International, 46, pp. 234–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.004
- Hall, P. A., 1986, Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France (New York: Oxford University Press).
- Hedström, P. and Ylikoski, P., 2010, Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), pp. 49–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
- Heikkila, T., Berardo, R., Weible, C. M., and Yi, H., 2019, A comparative view of advocacy coalitions: Exploring shale development politics in the United States, Argentina, and China. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(2), pp. 151–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1405551
- Hong, I., Kwon, E., and Kim, B., 2019, Measuring social policy change in comparative research: Survey data evidence from South Korea. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(2), pp. 131–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1418207
- Hoppe, R. and Colebatch, H., 2016, The role of theories in policy studies and policy work: Selective affinities between representation and performation? Available at https://nls.ldls.org.uk/welcome.html?ark:/81055/vdc_100044904880.0x000003
- Huff, R. F., 2011, Measuring performance in US municipalities: Do personnel policies predict system level outcomes? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(1), pp. 11–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2011.538535
- Illari, P. M., Russo, F., and Williamson, J., 2011, Causality in the Sciences (Oxford, England; New York: Oxford University Press).
- Jackson, P. T., 2016, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics, 2nd ed. (Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge).
- James, M. and Thelen, K., 2010, A theory of gradual institutional change, in: J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (Eds) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power (Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–30.
- Jones, S., 2014, Flirting with climate change: A comparative policy analysis of subnational governments in Canada and Australia. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(5), pp. 424–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.942570
- Kulczycki, A., 2014, A comparative study of abortion policymaking in Brazil and South America: The salience of issue networks and policy windows. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(1), pp. 62–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785669
- Kvist, J., 2006, Diversity, ideal types and fuzzy sets in comparative welfare state research, in: S. Rihoux and H. Grimm (Eds), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis (New-York: Springer), ch. 8.
- Lee, S. -Y. and Whitford, A. B., 2009, Government effectiveness in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(2), pp. 249–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980902888111
- Lee, T. and Koski, C., 2014, Mitigating global warming in global cities: Comparing participation and climate change policies of C40 cities. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(5), pp. 475–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.910938
- Lijphart, A., 1971, Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), pp. 682–693. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513
- Liu, Z. and Geva-May, I., 2021, Comparative public policy analysis of COVID-19 as a naturally occurring experiment. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(2), pp. 131–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2021.1894074
- Mahoney, J., 2001, Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), pp. 111–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687587
- Marier, P., 2020, Using focus groups in comparative policy analysis, in: B. G. Peters and G. Fontaine (Eds) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis (Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 297–311.
- Mavrot, C., Hadorn, S., and Sager, F., 2019, Mapping the mix: Linking instruments, settings and target groups in the study of policy mixes. Research Policy, 48, pp. 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.012
- Melloni, E., Pesce, F., and Vasilescu, C., 2016, Are social mechanisms usable and useful in evaluation research? Evaluation, 22(2), pp. 209–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016643900
- Nair, S., 2020, Designing policy pilots under climate uncertainty: A conceptual framework for comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1695973
- Pacheco-Vega, R., 2020, Using ethnography in comparative policy analysis: Premises, promises and perils, in: B. G. Peters and G. Fontaine (Eds) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis (Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 312–332.
- Peters B. Guy, 2013, Strategies for Comparative Research in Political Science (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
- Peters, B. G., and Fontaine, G., 2020, Introduction to the Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis: An Introductory Study, in: B. G. Peters and G. Fontaine (Eds) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis (Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar), pp. 1–18
- Peters, B. G. and Fontaine, G. (Eds), 2020a, Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis (Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing).
- Plomien, A., 2019, Gender inequality by design: Does successful implementation of childcare policy deliver gender-just outcomes? Policy and Society, 38(4), pp. 643–662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1617513
- Przeworski, A. and Teune, H., 1985, The Logic of Comparative Social Inqiry (Malabar: Robert E. Krieger).
- Rose, S. K. and Sohngen, B., 2011, Global forest carbon sequestration and climate policy design. Environment and Development Economics, 16(4), pp. 429–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X11000027
- Saetren, H., 2015, Crucial factors in implementing radical policy change: A comparative longitudinal study of Nordic central agency relocation programs. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 17(2), pp. 103–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1015361
- Sager, F. and Andereggen, C., 2012, Dealing with complex causality in realist synthesis: The promise of qualitative comparative analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(1), pp. 60–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011411574
- Schmidt, T. S. and Sewerin, S., 2019, Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes - An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Research Policy, 48, pp. 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.012
- Schneider, A. L., 2006, Patterns of change in the use of imprisonment in the American states: An integration of path dependence, punctuated equilibrium and policy design approaches. Political Research Quarterly, 59(3), pp. 457–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900313
- Siddiki, S., Weible, C. M., Basurto, X., and Calanni, J., 2011, Dissecting policy designs: An application of the institutional grammar tool. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), pp. 79–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00397.x
- Silvestre, H. C., 2017, (Incumbent) politics and burdens in the social construction of target groups: The Brazilian Bolsa Familia conditional cash transfer programme. Development Policy Review, 35(5), pp. 703–720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12254
- Spohr, F., 2016, Explaining path dependency and deviation by combining multiple streams framework and historical institutionalism: A comparative analysis of German and Swedish labor market policies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), pp. 257–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1122210
- Steffen, M., 2010, Social health insurance systems: What makes the difference? The Bismarckian case in France and Germany. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 12(1–2), pp. 141–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980903076252
- Thomann, E., Lieberherr, E., and Ingold, K., 2016, Torn between state and market: Private policy implementation and conflicting institutional logics. Policy and Society, 35(1), pp. 57–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.12.001
- Thomann, E., van Engen, N., and Tummers, L., 2018, The necessity of discretion: A behavioral evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), pp. 583–601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy024
- Vancoppenolle, D., Sætren, H., and Hupe, P., 2015, The politics of policy design and implementation: A comparative study of two Belgian service voucher programs. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(2), pp. 157–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1006831
- Vannoni, M., 2019, A comparative test of the punctuated equilibrium theory: Policy punctuations in tobacco control. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), pp. 350–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2018.1492675
- Wendt, C. and Kohl, J., 2010, Translating monetary inputs into health care provision: A comparative analysis of the impact of different modes of public policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 12(1–2), pp. 11–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980903076161
- Wenzelburger, G. and Hörisch, F., 2016, Framing effects and comparative social policy reform: Comparing blame avoidance evidence from two experiments. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), pp. 157–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1053743
- Wersun, A., 2010, Triple translation: Academic and managerial discourses of knowledge transfer policy in a new university in Scotland. Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(5), pp. 665–682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2010.516949