Influence of gender and age on the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 in Dutch-speaking Flemish children and adults

References

• Dalston RM, Neiman GS, Gonzalezlanda G. Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: a cross-dialect and cross-culture study . Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:285–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuning K, Wieneke GH, van Wijngaarden HA, Dejonckere PH. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:277–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karling J, Larson O, Leanderson R, et al. NORAM-an instrument used in the assessment of hypernasality: a clinical investigation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:135–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lierde K, Wuyts FL, Bonte K, Van Cauwenberge P. The nasality severity index: an objective measure of hypernasality based on a multiparameter approach. A pilot study. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2007;59:31–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns DA, Hansen JHL, Kaiser JF, editors. Recent advances in hypernasal speech detection using the nonlinear teager energy operator. Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language; 1996; PA (USA): ICSLP 96.
   Google Scholar
• Maier A, Reuß A, Hacker C, Schuster M, Nöth E, editors. Analysis of hypernasal speech in children with cleft lip and palate. 11th International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue; 2008; Brno, Czech Republic: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Rah DK, Ko YI, Lee C, Kim DW. A noninvasive estimation of hypernasality using a linear predictive model. Ann Biomed Eng 2001;29:587–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayalakshmi P, Reddy MR, O'Shaughnessy D. Acoustic analysis and detection of hypernasality using a group delay function. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54:621–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelck EH, Boliek CA, Hagler PH, Rieger JM. Current practices for evaluation of resonance disorders in North America. Semin Speech Lang 2011;32:58–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis KE, Watterson TL, Houghton SM. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality. J Commun Disord 2003;36:49–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nellis JL, Neiman GS, Lehman JA. Comparison of nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:157–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado-Oliveira R, Marques IL, Souza L, et al. Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence. CoDAS 2015;27:51–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watterson T, McFarlane SC, Wright DS. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate. J Commun Disord 1993;26:13–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee GS, Wang CP, Fu S. Evaluation of hypernasality in vowels using voice low tone to high tone ratio. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009;46:47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnegard K, Lohmander A, van Doorn J. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores. Int J Lang&Amp; Commun Disord/Royal College of Speech &Amp; Language Therapists 2012;47:556–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia AF, Castro Marino VC, Pegoraro-Krook MI, et al. Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production. CoDAS 2014;26:395–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehill TL, Lee ASY, Chun JC. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:80–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watterson T, Lewis K, Allord M, et al. Effect of vowel type on reliability of nasality ratings. J Commun Disord 2007;40:503–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettens K, Wuyts FL, De Graef C, et al. Effects of age and gender in normal speaking children on the Nasality Severity Index: an objective multiparametric approach to hypernasality. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2013;65:185–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettens K, Van Lierde KM, Corthals P, et al. The Nasality Severity Index 2.0: revision of an objective multiparametric approach to hypernasality. Cleft Palate-Cran J 2016;53:e60–e70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Weijer J, Slis I. Nasaliteitsmeting met de nasometer. Logop Foniatr 1991;63:97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lee G, Yang CCH, Kuo TBJ. Voice low tone to high tone ratio – a new index for nasal airway assessment. Chin J Physiol 2003;46:123–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee GS, Wang CP, Yang CCH, Kuo TBJ. Voice low tone to high tone ratio: a potential quantitative index for vowel [a:] and its nasalization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006;53:1437–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher SG, Bishop ME. Measurement of nasality with Tonar. Cleft Palate J 1970;7:610–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Lierde KM, Wuyts FL, De Bodt MD, Van Cauwenberge P. Age-related patterns of nasal resonance in normal Flemish children and young adults. Scand J Plast Recons 2003;37:344–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyten A, D'Haeseleer E, Hodges A, et al. Normative nasalance data in Ugandan english-speaking children. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2012;64:131–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okalidou A, Karathanasi A, Grigoraki E. Nasalance norms in Greek adults. Clin Linguist Phonet 2011;25:671–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prathanee B, Thanaviratananich S, Pongjunyakul A, Rengpatanakij K. Nasalance scores for speech in normal Thai children. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003;37:351–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnegard K, van Doorn J. Normative data on nasalance scores for Swedish as measured on the Nasometer: influence of dialect, gender, and age. Clin Linguist Phonet 2009;23:58–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols AC. Nasalance statistics for two Mexican populations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet AP, Rochet BL, Sovis EA, Mielke DL. Characteristics of nasalance in speakers of western Canadian English and French. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1998;20:94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney T, Sell D, O'Regan M. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:168–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden P, Hobbel HHF, Van der Laan B, et al. Nasometry normative data for young Dutch children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:420–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn J, Purcell A. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:287–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Bressmann T, Poburka B, et al. Dialectical effects on nasalance: a multicenter, cross-continental study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015;58:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg J, Bok S, Juhasz M, et al. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:785–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaver EJ, Dalston RM, Leeper HA, Adams LE. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:715–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tachimura T, Mori C, Hirata S, Wada T. Nasalance score variation in normal adult Japanese speakers of Mid-West Japanese dialect. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000;37:463–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lierde K, Wuyts FL, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:112–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Elsaad T, Quriba A, Baz H, Elkassaby R. Standardization of nasometry for normal Egyptian Arabic speakers. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2012;64:271–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill TL. Nasalance measures in Cantonese-speaking women. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J 2001;38:119–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson JM, Robinson KL, Nerbonne MA. Patterns of nasalance in a sample of normal gerontologic subjects. J Commun Disord 1978;11:469–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh ML, Fee EJ, Kalinowski J, et al. Nasometric values for three dialectal groups within the Atlantic provinces of Canada. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1994;18:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Müller R, Beleites T, Hloucal U, Kühn M. Objective measurement of normal nasality in the Saxony dialect. Hno 2000;48:937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapanen ML. Nasalance scores in normal Finnish speech. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1991;43:197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RT. Nasometric values for normal Spanish-speaking females: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:333–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarac ET, Kayikci MEK, Ozkan S. Nasality evaluation of Turkish phonemes in vowel-consonant combinations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:894–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park M, Baek WS, Lee E, et al. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children. J Plast ReconstrAmp Aesthet Surg 2014;67:173–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo R, Floyd LA, Warren DW, et al. Nasalance and nasal area values: cross-racial study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:143–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishima K, Sugii A, Yamada T, et al. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance scores in a Japanese population. J J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008;36:8–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'haeseleer E, Bettens K, De Mets S, et al. Normative data of nasalance scores for Flemish adults using the Nasometer II: influence of dialect and gender. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2015;67:42–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P, Weenink D. PRAAT: doing phonetics by computer. 5.3.78 ed. Amsterdam; 2014. Available at: http://www.praat.org/ [last accessed 10 Sep 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Feng G, Castelli E. Some acoustic features of nasal and nasalized vowels: a target for vowel nasalization. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:3694–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipsen P, Jr, Lee S. Reference data for the American English acoustic vowel space. Clin Linguist Phonet 2012;26:926–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorperian HK, Kent RD. Vowel acoustic space development in children: a synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007;50:1510–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher SG. Diagnosing speech disorders from cleft palate. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992;112:155–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Everything you never wanted to know about statistics. In Carmichael M, ed. London Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: Sage; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehn DP. A cineradiographic investigation of velar movement variables in two normals. Cleft Palate J 1976;13:88–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zajac DJ, Lutz R, Mayo R. Microphone sensitivity as a source of variation in nasalance scores. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:1228–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker W, Behrbohm H, Kaschke O, Nawka T, Swift A. Ear, nose, and throat diseases: with head and neck surgery. Stuttgard, New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M, Hans MG, Strohl KP, et al. Soft tissue growth of the oropharynx. Angle Orthod 1996;66:393–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watterson T, York SL, McFarlane SC. Effects of vocal loudness on nasalance measures. J Commun Disord 1994;27:257–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou X, Gao S, Hui SL. Biometrics 1997;53:1129–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar