Assessing speech perception in Swedish school-aged children: preliminary data on the Listen–Say test

References

• Kuhl PK, Conboy BT, Coffey-Corina S, et al. Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008;363:979–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow AR, Kraus N, Nicol TG, et al. Effects of lengthened formant transition duration on discrimination and neural representation of synthetic CV syllables by normal and learning-disabled children. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;106:2086–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance M, Martindale N. Assessing speech perception in children with language difficulties: effects of background noise and phonetic contrast. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2012;14:48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi K, Lewis DE, Hoover BM, et al. Children’s recognition of American English consonants in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127:3177–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidén G. Speech audiometry; an experimental and clinical study with Swedish language material. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1954;114:1–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagerman B. Efficiency of speech audiometry and other tests. Br J Audiol 1993;27:423–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry - studies of reliability, computer-simulations and development of a new speech material for measuring speech reception threshold in noise. Scand Audiol 1984;21:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hällgren M, Larsby B, Arlinger S. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. Int J Audiol 2006;45:227–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B, Hermansson E. Speech recognition in noise 5-year-old normal-hearing children. Can J Speech-Lang PA 2015;39:52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witting M. In: Witting M, ed. Wittingmetoden. Metodkontakt. Kvartalsblad för information och fortbildning. Solna: Ekelunds förlag; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg E, Sahlén B. Nya NELLI – Neurolingvistisk undersökningsmodell för språkstörda barn. Löddeköpinge: UPAB; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wass M. Children with cochlear implants. Cognition and reading ability. Linköping: Linköping University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Borg E, Edquist G, Reinholdson AC, et al. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:1061–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen B. Auditiv diskrimination. PoM Språkteknik; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Öster A-M. Höra Tal: Frölunda data; 2000–2002.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack I. Auditory informational masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1975;57:S5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoen M, Meunier F, Grataloup CL, et al. Phonetic and lexical interferences in informational masking during speech-in-speech comprehension. Speech Commun 2007;49:905–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami U, Fosker T, Huss M, et al. Rise time and formant transition duration in the discrimination of speech sounds: the Ba-Wa distinction in developmental dyslexia. Dev Sci 2011;14:34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami U, Wang HL, Cruz A, et al. Language-universal sensory deficits in developmental dyslexia: English, Spanish, and Chinese. J Cogn Neurosci 2011;23:325–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davids N, Segers E, van den Brink D, et al. The nature of auditory discrimination problems in children with specific language impairment: an MMN study. Neuropsychologia 2011;49:19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmmed AU, Ahmmed AA, Bath JR, et al. Assessment of children with suspected auditory processing disorder: a factor analysis study. Ear Hear 2014;35:295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DR, Ferguson MA, Edmondson-Jones AM, et al. Nature of auditory processing disorder in children. Pediatrics 2010;126:e382–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DR. Sources of pathology underlying listening disorders in children. Int J Psychophysiol 2014;95:125–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PR, Moore DR, Amitay S. Development of auditory selective attention: why children struggle to hear in noisy environments. Dev Psychol 2015;51:353–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conboy BT, Sommerville JA, Kuhl PK. Cognitive control factors in speech perception at 11 months. Dev Psychol 2008;44:1505–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel LL. Current considerations in pediatric speech audiometry. Int J Audiol 2008;47:546–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao FM, Liu HM, Kuhl PK. Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study. Child Dev 2004;75:1067–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker JF, Yeung HH. Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 2005;9:519–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchon C, Floccia C, Fux T, et al. Call me Alix, not Elix: vowels are more important than consonants in own-name recognition at 5 months. Dev Sci 2015;18:587–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poltrock S, Nazzi T. Consonant/vowel asymmetry in early word form recognition. J Exp Child Psychol 2015;131:135–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White-Schwoch T, Kraus N. Physiologic discrimination of stop consonants relates to phonological skills in pre-readers: a biomarker for subsequent reading ability? Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott LL, Hammer MA, Scholl ME. Fine-grained auditory discrimination in normal children and children with language-learning problems. J Speech Hear Res 1989;32:112–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis D, Hoover B, Choi S, Stelmachowicz P. Relationship between speech perception in noise and phonological awareness skills for children with normal hearing. Ear Hear 2010;31:761–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn LM, Dunn DM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 3. Circle Pines (MN): American Guidance Service; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• DiSimoni FG, Mucha R. Use of the Token Test for Children to identify language deficits in preschool age children. J Aud Res 1982;22:265–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised. New York: New York Psychological Corp; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Biesbroek JM, van Zandvoort MJ, Kappelle LJ, et al. Shared and distinct anatomical correlates of semantic and phonemic fluency revealed by lesion-symptom mapping in patients with ischemic stroke. Brain Struct Funct 2015;221:2123–2134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg IM, Carlsson S, Lieberman M. Children's word fluency strategies. Scand J Psychol 2011;52:35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva D, Nichelli F, Devoti M. Developmental aspects of verbal fluency and confrontation naming in children. Brain Lang 2000;71:267–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreou G, Trott K. Verbal fluency in adults diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood. ADHD 2013;5:343–51.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll R, Warzybok A, Kollmeier B, Ruigendijk E. Age-related differences in lexical access relate to speech recognition in noise. Front Psychol 2016;7:990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaandorp MW, De Groot AM, Festen JM, et al. The influence of lexical-access ability and vocabulary knowledge on measures of speech recognition in noise. Int J Audiol 2016;55:157–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. The Swedish National Agency for Education: 19 elever i varje klass. Available from: https://www.skolverket.se/statistik-och-utvardering/nyhetsarkiv/nyheter-2014/19-elever-per-klass-i-grundskolan-1.219495 [last accessed 29 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. The Swedish National Agency for Education: Tema Modersmål. Available from: http://modersmal.skolverket.se/sites/svenska/index.php/component/content/article/1184-modermal-i-siffror [last accessed 29 Mar 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Hoien T, Lundberg I. Dyslexi – från teori till praktik. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ng EH, Rudner M, Lunner T, et al. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol 2013;52:433–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross LA, Del Bene VA, Molholm S, et al. Sex differences in multisensory speech processing in both typically developing children and those on the autism spectrum. Front Neurosci 2015;9:185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold LJ, Buss E. Children's identification of consonants in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013;56:1144–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes PB, Pinson EN. The speech chain: the physics and biology of spoken language. New York: W.H. Freemand and Company; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mannell R. Speech acoustics. Department of Linguistics, MacQuarie University; 2008. Available from: http://clas.mq.edu.au/speech/acoustics/waveforms/speech_waveforms.html [last accessed 15 Jul 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Tallal P. Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain Lang 1980;9:182–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callan DE, Jones JA, Callan AM, Akahane-Yamada R. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. Neuroimage 2004;22:1182–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallier C, Bosch L, Sebastian-Galles N. A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition 1997;64:B9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Lundeborg-Hammarström I, Persson C. Articulation, nasality and phonology in typically developing individuals: normative data from the Svante-test at 3 to 19 years of age. The International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• McCreery RW, Stelmachowicz PG. The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children. Ear Hear 2013;34:585–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis D, Schmid K, O'Leary S, et al. Effects of noise on speech recognition and listening effort in children with normal hearing and children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2016;59:1218–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsor J, Milbrath RL, Carney EJ. General slowing in language impairment: methodological considerations in testing the hypothesis. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;44:446–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stievano P, Scalisi TG. Unique designs, errors and strategies in the Five-Point Test: the contribution of age, phonemic fluency and visuospatial abilities in Italian children aged 6–11 years. Child Neuropsychol 2016;22:197–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristia A, Seidl A, Junge C, et al. Predicting individual variation in language from infant speech perception measures. Child Dev 2014;85:1330–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation K, Hulme C. Learning to read changes children's phonological skills: evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study of reading and nonword repetition. Dev Sci 2011;14:649–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schild U, Roder B, Friedrich CK. Learning to read shapes the activation of neural lexical representations in the speech recognition pathway. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2011;1:163–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar