Listening evaluation and classification of female singing voice categories

References

• Cotton S. Fach vs. voice type: a call for critical discussion. J Sing. 2012;69:153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Thurman L, Theimer A, Grefsheim E, et al. Classifying voices for singing: assigning choral parts and solo literature without limiting vocal ability. In: Thurman L, Welch G, editors. Bodymind & voice: foundations of voice education. 2nd ed. Iowa: Collegeville, Minn.: VoiceCare Network; Iowa City, Iowa: National Center for Voice & Speech; Minneapolis, Minn.: Voice Center of Fairview, 2000; 772–782.
   Google Scholar
• Titze IR. Principles of voice production. second ed. Iowa City IA: National Center for Voice and Speech; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst CT, Duus E, Jers H, et al. Quantitative voice class assessment of amateur choir singers: a pilot investigation. Int J Res Choral Sing. 2012;4:47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Roers F, Murbe D, Sundberg J. Voice classification and vocal tract of singers: a study of X-ray images and morphology. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;125:503–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roers F, Murbe D, Sundberg J. Predicted singers' vocal fold lengths and voice classification-a study of X-ray morphological measures. J Voice. 2009;23:408–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson H, Hertegard S. Vocal fold dimensions in professional opera singers as measured by means of laser triangulation. J Voice. 2008;22:734–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernobel'skii SI. The speaking fundamental frequency and the singing voice type. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2010;6:36–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleveland TF. Acoustic properties of voice timbre types and their influence on voice classification. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977;61:1622–1629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson AM, Kempster GB. Classification of the classical male singing voice using long-term average spectrum. J Voice. 2011;25:538–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycke H, Decoster W, Ivanova A, et al. Discrimination of three basic female voice types in female singing students by voice range profile-derived parameters. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64:80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycke H, Ivanova A, Van Hulle MM, et al. Discrimination of three basic male voice types by voice range profile-derived parameters. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2013;65:20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndtsson G, Sundberg J. Perceptual significance of the center frequency of singer's formant. STL-QPSR. 1994;35:95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Bloothooft G, Plomp R. Spectral analysis of sung vowels. III. Characteristics of singers and modes of singing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986;79:852–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dmitriev L, Kiselev A. Relationship between the formant structure of different types of singing voices and the dimensions of supraglottic cavities. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1979;31:238–241.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg J. Level and center frequency of the singer's formant. J Voice. 2001;15:176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloothooft G, Plomp R. The sound level of the singer's formant in professional singing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986;79:2028–2033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes JJ, Davis PF, Oates JF, et al. The relationship between professional operatic soprano voice and high range spectral energy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116:530–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson ML. Can listeners hear who is singing? What is the pitch bandwidth of singer discrimination in untrained listeners?. J Voice. 2012;26:322–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson ML. Dissimilarity and the classification of female singing voices: a preliminary study. J Voice. 2003;17:195–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson ML. Dissimilarity and the classification of male singing voices. J Voice. 2008;22:290–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloothooft G, Plomp R. Spectral analysis of sung vowels. I. Variation due to differences between vowels, singers, and modes of singing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;75:1259–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naxos Digital Services. Naxos Music Library. Hong Kong: Naxos Digital Services, 2004. <http://www.naxosmusiclibrary.com/home.asp>.
   Google Scholar
• Wapnick J, Ekholm E. Expert consensus in solo voice performance evaluation. J Voice. 1997;11:429–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm E, Papagiannis GC, Chagnon FP. Relating objective measurements to expert evaluation of voice quality in Western classical singing: critical perceptual parameters. J Voice. 1998;12:182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates JM, Bain B, Davis P, et al. Development of an auditory-perceptual rating instrument for the operatic singing voice. J Voice. 2006;20:71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich N, Bezard P, Garnier M, et al. Towards a common terminology to describe voice quality in Western lyrical singing: contribution of a multidisciplinary research group. J Interdiscip Music Stud. 2008;2:71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Štěpánek J, Moravec O. Timbre of musical sounds and its verbal description - the results of the grant project GA ČR 202/02/1370. Praha: Musical Faculty of Academy of Performing Arts in Prague. 2005;p. 47.
   Google Scholar
• Granqvist S. The visual sort and rate method for perceptual evaluation in listening tests. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2003;28:109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2011b [Computer software], Natick, Massachusetts, United States: The MathWorks, Inc. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Appelman DR. The science of vocal pedagogy: theory and application. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986;p. 434.
   Google Scholar
• Vurma A, Ross J. Where is a singer's voice if it is placed &quot;forward&quot;? J Voice . 2002;16:383–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts C, Barnes-Burroughs K, Estis J, et al. The singing power ratio as an objective measure of singing voice quality in untrained talented and nontalented singers. J Voice. 2006;20:82–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frič M, Berti A, Voběrková L. Perceptual and vibro-acoustic evaluation of changes in the shape of the vocal tract. Akustika. 2017;28:33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frič M. Perceptual strategies of evaluation of voice resonance. In: New trends of an acoustic spectrum – peer-reviewed proceedings, Zvolen: Technical University in Zvolen 2014;73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Verdolini K, Druker DG, Palmer PM, et al. Laryngeal adduction in resonant voice. J Voice. 1998;12:315–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze IR. A theoretical study of F0-F1 interaction with application to resonant speaking and singing voice. J Voice. 2004;18:292–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CG, Finnegan EM, Karnell MP. Resonant voice: spectral and nasendoscopic analysis. J Voice. 2005;19:607–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg J. Articulatory interpretation of the &quot;singing formant&quot; J Acoust Soc Am. 1974;55:838–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bele IV. The speaker's formant. J Voice. 2006;20:555–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Kwon HJ, Choi HJ, et al. The singer's formant and speaker's ring resonance: a long-term average spectrum analysis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;1:92–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze IR. Acoustic interpretation of resonant voice. J Voice. 2001;15:519–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier M, Henrich N, Crevier-Buchman L, et al. Glottal behavior in the high soprano range and the transition to the whistle register. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;131:951–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert I, Lotz AF, Duong LL, et al. Measuring the impact of audio compression on the spectral quality of speech data. In: Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung. Leipzig, Germany: TUDpress. 2016;81:229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Bele IV. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality. J Voice. 2005;19:555–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon NP, Helou LB, Stojadinovic A. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V. J Voice. 2011;25:e7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson G, Sundberg J. Formant frequency tuning in singing. J Voice. 1992;6:256–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier M, Henrich N, Smith J, et al. Vocal tract adjustments in the high soprano range. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;127:3771–3780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich N, Smith J, Wolfe J. Vocal tract resonances in singing: strategies used by sopranos, altos, tenors, and baritones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;129:1024–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloothooft G, Plomp R. The timbre of sung vowels. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;84:847–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar