Imitating dysphonic voice: a suitable technique to create speech stimuli for spoken language processing tasks?

References

• Morsomme D, Minel L, Verduyckt I. Impact of teachers’ voice quality on children’s language processing skills. VOCOLOGIE: Stem Stemstoornissen. 2011;9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner M, Lyberg-Åhlander V, Brännström J, et al. Listening comprehension and listening effort in the primary school classroom. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlén B, Haake M, von Lochow H, et al. Is children’s listening effort in background noise influenced by the speaker’s voice quality? Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;43:47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Lochow H, Lyberg-Åhlander V, Sahlén B, et al. The effect of voice quality and competing speakers in a passage comprehension task: performance in relation to cognitive functioning in children with normal hearing. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;43:32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medwetsky L. Spoken language processing model: bridging auditory and language processing to guide assessment and intervention. LSHSS. 2011;42:286–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton V, Watson DR. The impact of impaired vocal quality on children’s ability to process spoken language. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2001;26:17–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogerson J, Dodd B. Is there an effect of dysphonic teachers' voices on children's processing of spoken language? J Voice. 2005;19:47–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Kastberg T, von Lochow H, et al. The influence of voice quality on sentence processing and recall performance in school-age children with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;21:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, von Lochow H, Lyberg-Åhlander V, et al. Immediate passage comprehension and encoding of information into long-term memory in children with normal hearing: the effect of voice quality and multitalker babble in noise. Am J Audiol. 2018;27:231–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chui JCH, Ma E. The Impact of dysphonic voices on children’s comprehension of spoken language. J Voice. 2018;pii: S0892-1997:30487–30488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg-Åhlander V, Haake M, Brännström J, et al. Does the speaker’s voice quality influence children’s performance on a language comprehension test? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17:63–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg-Åhlander V, Holm L, Kastberg T, et al. Are children with stronger cognitive capacity more or less disturbed by classroom noise and dysphonic teachers? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17:577–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagihara N. Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness. J Speech Hear Res. 1967;10:531–541.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattys SL, Davis MH, Bradlow AR, et al. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: a review. Lang Cognit Process. 2012;27:953–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitling S, Rydell R, Lyberg-Åhlander V. Design of a clinical vocal loading test with long-time measurement of voice. J Voice. 2015;29:261.e13–261.e27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remacle A, Schoentgen J, Finck C, et al. Impact of vocal load on breathiness: perceptual evaluation. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2014;39:139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvaux V, Caucheteux L, Huet K, et al. Voice disguise vs. impersonation: acoustic and perceptual measurements of vocal flexibility in non experts. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech); 2017 August 20–24; Stockholm, Sweden: ISCA; 2018. 3777–3781.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero JC, Schoentgen J, Behlau M. Physics-based synthesis of disordered voices. In: Bimbot F, editor. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech); 2013 August 25–29; Lyon, France: Isca; 2014. 587–591.
   Google Scholar
• Sofranko JL, Prosek RA. The Effect of experience on response time when judging synthesized voice quality. J Voice. 2014;28:24–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerratt BR, Kreiman J. Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:2560–2566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natour YS, Saleem AF. The performance of the time-frequency analysis software (TF32) in the acoustic analysis of the synthesized pathological voice. J Voice. 2009;23:414–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoentgen J, Fraj S, Lucero JC. Testing the reliability of grade, roughness and breathiness scores by means of synthetic speech stimuli. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015;40:5–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy PJ, McGuigan KG, Walsh M, et al. Investigation of a glottal related harmonics-to-noise ratio and spectral tilt as indicators of glottal noise in synthesized and human voice signals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;123:1642–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert M, Madazio G, Gielow I, et al. Perceptual error analysis of human and synthesized voices. J Voice. 2017;31:516–5e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraj S, Schoentgen J, Grenez F. Development and perceptual assessment of a synthesizer of disordered voices. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;132:2603–2615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Antoñanzas-Barroso N, Gerratt BR. Integrated software for analysis and synthesis of voice quality. Behav Res Methods. 2010;42:1030–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergan CC, Titze IR, Story B. The perception of two vocal qualities in a synthesized vocal utterance: ring and pressed voice. J Voice. 2004;18:305–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu EM, Murdoch B, Hird K, et al. Perception of synthesized voice quality in connected speech by Cantonese speakers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:1091–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu EML, Murdoch B, Hird K, et al. Cultural and language differences in voice quality perception: a preliminary investigation using synthesized signals. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60:107–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates J. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61:49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bodt MS, Van de Heyning PH, Wuyts FL, et al. The perceptual evaluation of voice disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1996;50:283–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de Heyning PH. Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice. 1999;13:508–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. Disord Hum Commun. 1981;5:1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, et al. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. J Voice. 2010;24:540–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryn Y, Weenink D. Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index. J Voice. 2015;29:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Barsties B, et al. The value of the acoustic voice quality index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:1609–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommée T, Maryn Y, Finck C, et al. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, version 03.01, in French. J Voice. 2019;pii: S0892-1997:30517–30514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsties B, De Bodt M. Assessment of voice quality: current state-of-the-art. 2015. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015;42:183–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khomsi A. ELO: Évaluation du Langage Orale [language test]. ECPA Pearson. 2001;
   Google Scholar
• Macchi L, Descours C, Girard É, et al. ELDP: Épreuve Lilloise de Discrimination Phonologique [ELDP1 protocol & manual]. 2018. [cited 2019 August 28]. Available from: http://orthophonie.univ-lille2.fr/stocks/stock-contents/epreuve-lilloise-de-discrimination-phonologique.html.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat (version 6.0.29) [Computer software]. 2017. [cited 2019 August 28]. Available from: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller I, Remacle A, Morsomme D. NODYS: NOrmophonic and DYsphonic Speech samples [database]. 2019 Jan 18 [cited 2019 Jan 18]. In: Mendeley data [internet]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/g2fmkw8t85.1
   Google Scholar
• Light RJ. Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol Bull. 1971;76:365.
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren KA. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. TQMP. 2012;8:23.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108:1867–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Gadepalli C, Farideh J, et al. Machine learning applied to GRBAS voice quality assessment. Adv Sci Tech Eng Syst J. 2018;3:329–338.
   Google Scholar
• Shah RK, Engel SH, Choi SS. Relationship between voice quality and vocal nodule size. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139:723–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar