https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-9122
References
- Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists: Clinical Guidelines. Bicester, Oxon, United Kingdom. Speechmark Publishing Ltd; 2005. p. 93–111.
- Dickson S, Barbour RS, Brady M, et al. Patients’ experiences of disruptions associated with post-stroke dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008;43(2):135–153.
- Lirani-Silva C, Mourão LF, Gobbi LT. Dysarthria and quality of life in neurologically healthy elderly and patients with Parkinson’s disease. Codas. 2015;27(3):248–254.
- Mackenzie C, Lowit A. Behavioural intervention effects in dysarthria following stroke: communication effectiveness, intelligibility and dysarthria impact. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007;42(2):131–153.
- McMillan AS, Leung KC, Pow EH, et al. Oral health-related quality of life of stroke survivors on discharge from hospital after rehabilitation. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(7):495–503.
- Schröter-Morasch H, Ziegler W. Rehabilitation of impaired speech function (dysarthria, dysglossia). GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology. Head and Neck Surg. 2005;4:Doc15.
- Mann W. Postoperative funktionelle Ergebnisse bei Tumoren der Mundhöhle und des Oropharynx [Postoperative functional results in oral and oropharyngeal tumors]. HNO. 1985;33(3):138–143.
- Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, van de Bree R, et al. Validity of patient-reported swallowing and speech outcomes in relation to objectively measured oral function among patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Dysphagia. 2015;30(2):196–204.
- Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Doornaert P, et al. Prevalence of swallowing and speech problems in daily life after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer based on cut-off scores of the patient-reported outcome measures SWAL-QOL and SHI. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(7):1849–1855.
- Schönweiler R, Altenbernd C, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Artikulationsfähigkeit und Verständlichkeit der Sprache bei Patienten mit Mundhöhlenkarzinomen. Ein Vergleich prä- und postoperativer Ergebnisse bei verschiedenen Rekonstruktionstechniken [Articulatory capacity and intelligibility of speech of patients with carcinomas of the mouth cavity. A comparison of pre- and postoperative results of various reconstruction techniques]. Hno. 1996;44(11):634–639.
- Keilmann A, Konerding U, Oberherr C, et al. Articulation handicap index: an instrument for quantifying psychosocial consequences of impaired articulation. Europ Arch ORL. 2016 Dec;273(12):4493–4500.
- WHO 2017. [Internet] International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); [cited 2019 Jul 16] Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
- Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6(3):66–70.
- Costa DS. Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: A conceptual or an empirical distinction? Qual Life Res. 2015;24(9):2057–2065.
- Konerding U. Which kind of psychometrics is adequate for patient satisfaction questionnaires? PPA. 2016;10:2083–2090. eCollection 2016.
- Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2003;80(3):217–222.
- Nawka T, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, De Bodt M, et al. Item reduction of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) based on the original version and on European translations. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61(1):37–48.
- Kuder GF, Richardson MW. The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika. 1937; 2(3):151–160.
- Union internationale contre le cancer [Internet] TNM classification of malignant tumours. [cited 2019 Jul 16]. Available from: http://www.uicc.org/resources/tnm
- Feldt LS, Woodruff DJ, Salih FA. Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1987; 11(1):93–103.
- Bonett DG, Wright TA. Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall, and Spearman Correlations. Psychometrika. 2000;65(1):23–28.