A pilot investigation of twang quality using magnetic resonance imaging

References

• Björkner E. Musical theater and opera singing – why so different? A study of subglottal pressure, voice source, and formant frequency characteristics. J Voice. 2008;22(5):533–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg S, Gramming P, LoVetri J. Comparisons of pharynx, source, formant, and pressure characteristics in operatic and musical theatre singing. J Voice. 1993;7(4):301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echternach M, Popeil L, Traser L, et al. Vocal tract shapes in different singing functions used in musical theater singing: a pilot study. J Voice. 2014;28(5):653.e1–653.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echternach M, Traser L, Richter B. Vocal tract configurations in tenors’ passagio in different vowel conditions: a real-time magnetic resonance imaging study. J Voice. 2014;28(2):262.e1–262.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estill J. Belting and classic voice quality: some physiological differences. Med Probl Perform Art. 1988;3:37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone RE, Jr, Cleveland T, Sundberg J, et al. Aerodynamic and acoustical measures of speech, operatic, and Broadway vocal styles in a professional female singer. J Voice. 2003;17(3):283–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlashan J, Aaen M, Sadolin C. Overdrive and edge as refiners of “belting?”. J Voice. 2017;31(3):385.e11–385.e22.
   Google Scholar
• Paget R. Human Speech. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, & Trubner; 1930. p. 96, 216.
   Google Scholar
• Vennard W. Singing: the mechanism and the technic. Rev ed. New York: Carl Fischer; 1967. p. 90, 115, 156, 217.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa E, Estill J, Kmucha S, et al. The contribution of aryepiglottic constriction to “ringing” voice quality. J Voice. 1989;3(4):342–350.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard L, Steinhauer K. A novel treatment for hypophonic voice: twang therapy. J Voice. 2007;21(3):294–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze IR, Bergan C, Hunter E, et al. Source and filter adjustments affecting the perception of vocal qualities “twang” and yawn. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2003;28:47–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg J, Thalén M. What is twang? J Voice. 2010;24(6):654–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze IR. Acoustic interpretation of resonant voice. J Voice. 2001;15(4):519–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze IR. Nonlinear source-filter coupling: theory. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;123(5):2733–2749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison M, Rammage L. Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification. Acta Otolaryngol. 1993;113(3):428–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer K, Klimek M, Estill J. The estill voice model: theory and translation. Pittsburgh (PA): Estill Voice International; 2017. p. 59–69, 115–126, 155–168, 217.
   Google Scholar
• Echternach M, Burk F, Burdumy M, et al. Morphometric differences of vocal tract articulators in different loudness conditions in singing. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos R, Murphy D, Howard D, et al. Determining the relevant criteria for three-dimensional vocal tract characterization. J Voice. 2018;32(2):130–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echternach M, Birkholz P, Traser L, et al. Articulation and vocal tract acoustics at soprano subject’s high fundamental frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;137(5):2586–2595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresch E, Narayanan S. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging investigation of resonance tuning in soprano singing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;128(5):EL335–EL341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf R, Thurmer H, Berg W, et al. Effect of the alexander technique on muscle activation, movement kinematics, and performance quality in collegiate violinists and violists: a pilot feasibility study. Med Probl Perform Art. 2017;32(2):78–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan HJ, Hays T. The influence of body mapping on student musicians’ performance experiences. Int J Educ Arts. 2014;15:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis C. New concepts in motor learning and training related to voice rehabilitation. Perspect ASHA Sigs. 2018;3(3):56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Aaen M, McGlashan J, Sadolin C. Investigating laryngeal “tilt” on same-pitch phonation – preliminary findings of vocal mode metal and density parameters as alternatives to cricothyroid-thyroarytenoid “mix”. J Voice. 2019;33:806.e9–806.e21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traser L, Burdumy M, Richter B, et al. The effect of supine and upright position on vocal tract configurations during singing – a comparative study in professional tenors. J Voice. 2013;27(2):141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traser L, Burdumy M, Richter B, et al. Weight-bearing MR imaging as an option in the study of gravitational effects on the vocal tract of untrained subjects in singing phonation. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döllinger M, Berry D, Montequin D. The influence of epilarynx area on vocal fold dynamics. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(5):724–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samlan R, Kreiman J. Perceptual consequences of changes in epilaryngeal area and shape. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;136(5):2798–2806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi DY, Bae JH, Youn KH, et al. Anatomical considerations of the longitudinal pharyngeal muscles in relation to their function on the internal surface of the pharynx. Dysphagia. 2014;29(6):722–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandaele DJ, Perlman AL, Cassell MD. Intrinsic fibre architecture and attachments of the human epiglottis and their contributions to the mechanism of deglutition. J Anat. 1995;186(Pt 1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titze IR, Story B. Acoustic interaction of the voice source with the lower vocal tract. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;101(4):2234–2243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar