A survey of interventions used by speech-language pathologists for children with speech sound disorders in the Middle East

References

• Alanazi AA. And speech-language pathology practice in Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci. 2017;11(5):43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Alsalmi L, Mayo R. An overview of facilities providing clinical services for persons who stutter in Kuwait. Perspect ASHA Sigs. 2016;1(4):79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Abou-Elsaad T, Afsah O, Rabea M. Identification of phonological processes in Arabic-speaking Egyptian children by single-word test. J Commun Disord.; 2021;77:80–93.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson AT, Amayreh MM. Phonological errors and sound changes in Arabic-speaking children. Clin Ling Phonet. 2000;14(2):79–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattab G. Lebanese Arabic speech acquisition. In: McLeod S, editor. The international guide to speech acquisition. United States: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2007. p. 300–312.
   Google Scholar
• Alqattan S. Early phonological acquisition by Kuwaiti Arabic children. UK: Newcastle University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ayyad HS, Bernhardt BM, Stemberger JP. Kuwaiti Arabic: acquisition of singleton consonants. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016;51(5):531–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Buainain H, Shain K, Al-Timimy F. Baseline data for Arabic acquisition with clinical applications: some phonological processes in Qatari children’s speech. Int J Business Soc Res. 2012;2(6):18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Khoja MA. A survey of formal and informal assessment procedures used by speech-language pathologists in Saudi Arabia. Speech Lang Hear. 2019;22(2):91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Shaalan S. Considerations for developing and adapting language and literacy assessments in Arabic-speaking countries. In: Grigorenko E, editor. Multicultural psychoeducational assessment. New York (NY): Springer; 2009. p. 287–314.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod S, Baker E. Children's speech: an evidence-based approach to assessment and intervention. Boston: Pearson; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wren Y, Harding S, Goldbart J, et al. A systematic review and classification of interventions for speech‐sound disorder in preschool children. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53(3):446–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker E, McLeod S. Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: part 1: narrative review. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011;42(2):102–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsaad M, McCabe P, Purcell A. The application of the maximal opposition therapy approach to an Arabic-speaking child. J Commun Disord. 2019;81:105913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe PJ. Elizabeth usher memorial lecture: how do we change our profession? Using the lens of behavioural economics to improve evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;20(3):300–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe V, Pring T. Children with phonological problems: a survey of clinical practice. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008;43(2):154–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod S, Baker E. Speech-language pathologists' practices regarding assessment, analysis, target selection, intervention, and service delivery for children with speech sound disorders. Clin Linguist Phon. 2014;28(7–8):508–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira C, Lousada M, Jesus LM. The clinical practice of speech and language therapists with children with phonologically based speech sound disorders. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2015;31(2):173–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To CK, Law T, Cheung PS. Treatment intensity in everyday clinical management of speech sound disorders in Hong Kong. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(5):462–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty N, Titterington J, McLeod S, et al. Intervention for children with phonological impairment: knowledge, practices and intervention intensity in the UK. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53(5):995–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramson JH. WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2011;8(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khamis-Dakwar R, Froud K, Gordon P. Acquiring diglossia: mutual influences of formal and colloquial Arabic on children's grammaticality judgments. J Child Lang. 2012;39(1):61–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman Paul R, Norris Janet A, Monjure J. Comparison of process targeting and whole language treatments for phonologically delayed preschool children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1990;21(2):102–109.
   Google Scholar
• Brumbaugh KM, Smit AB. Treating children ages 3–6 who have speech sound disorder: a survey. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013;44(3):306–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lousada M, Jesus LMT, Capelas S, et al. Phonological and articulation treatment approaches in Portuguese children with speech and language impairments: a randomized controlled intervention study. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(2):172–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong L, Serry T, Erickson S, et al. Processes and challenges in clinical decision‐making for children with speech‐sound disorders. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53(6):1124–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel HL. The complexity approach to phonological treatment: how to select treatment targets. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018;49(3):463–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MM. Intervention efficacy and intensity for children with speech sound disorder. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(3):865–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams Hodsen B, Pagel Paden E. Targeting intelligible speech: a phonological approach to remediation. Austin: Pro-ed; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Berry MF, Eisenson J. Speech disorders: principles and practices of therapy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd B, Bradford A. A comparison of three therapy methods for children with different types of developmental phonological disorder. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;35(2):189–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passey J. Cued articulation. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson B, Paden E. Basic remediation concepts and procedures targeting intelligible speech: a phonological approach to remediation. San Diego: College-Hill Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Strand EA, Stoeckel R, Baas B. Treatment of severe childhood apraxia of speech: a treatment efficacy study. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;14(4):297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Klein ES. Phonological/traditional approaches to articulation therapy: a retrospective group comparison. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1996;27(4):314–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardcastle WJ, Gibbon F. Electropalatography and its clinical applications. In: Ball MJ and Code C, editors. Instrumental clinical phonetics; p. 149–193. Whurr Publishers: London; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut JA. Differential learning of phonological oppositions. J Speech Hear Res. 1990;33(3):540–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howell J, Dean E. Treating phonological disorders in children: Metaphon-theory to practice. London: Whurr; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hesketh C, Adams C, Nightingale C, et al. Anne. Phonological awareness therapy and articulatory training approaches for children with phonological disorders: a comparative outcome study. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;35(3):337–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner FF. Treatment of phonological disability using the method of meaningful minimal contrast: two case studies. J Speech Hear Disord. 1981;46(1):97–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young EC. An analysis of a treatment approach for phonological errors in polysyllabic words. Clin Ling Phonet. 1995;9(1):59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AL. Multiple oppositions: theoretical foundations for an alternative contrastive intervention approach. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2000;9(4):282–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarata S. Naturalistic intervention for speech intelligibility and speech accuracy. In: Interventions for speech sound disorders in children; 2010. p. 381–406.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt BH, Stemberger JP. Workbook in nonlinear phonology for clinical application. Austin TX: Pro-ed; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster G, Martin SE, Pope L. Working with children's phonology. Bicester: Winslow; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Hearing and Speech Centre. The Nuffield Centre Dyspraxia Programme. London (UK): Nuffield Centre Dyspraxia Programme Ltd.; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen C, Cupples L. Parents and children together (PACT): a collaborative approach to phonological therapy. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999;34(1):35–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon GT. The efficacy of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2000;31(2):126–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman SL, editor. Phonotactic therapy. Seminars in speech and language. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden D. The PROMPT model: use and application for children with mixed phonological-motor impairment. Adv Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;8(3):265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Stackhouse J, Wells B. Children's speech and literacy difficulties, Book1: a psycholinguistic framework. Vol. 1. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rvachew S. Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37(2):347–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oetter P, Richter E, Frick SM. MORE: integrating the mouth with sensory and postural functions. Minnesota: PDP Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar