The role of lag effect in distributed practice on learning novel vocabulary

References

• Schmidt R, Lee T. Motor control and motor learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Magill RA, Anderson D. Motor control and learning: concepts and applications. Dubuque: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kaipa R. Is there an interaction between task complexity and practice variability in speech-motor learning? Ann Neurosci. 2016;23(3):134–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas E, Robin DA, Austermann Hula SN, et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17(3):277–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortoli L, Robazza C, Durigon V, et al. Effects of contextual interference on learning technical sports skills. Percept Mot Skills. 1992;75(2):555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode S, Magill RA. Contextual interference effects in learning three badminton serves. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1986;57(4):308–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travlos AK. Specificity and variability of practice, and contextual interference in acquisition and transfer of an underhand volleyball serve. Perceptual Motor Skills. 2010;110(1):298–312.
   Google Scholar
• Skelton SL, Hagopian AL. Using randomized variable practice in the treatment of childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;23(4):599–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh JL, Nessler C, Cameron R, et al. Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: examination of treatment intensity and practice schedule. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(1):84–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas E, Farinella KA. Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55(2):561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams SG, Page AD. Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2000;8(4):215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiner LR, Sadagopan N, Sherwood DE. Effects of blocked versus random practice on speech motor skill acquisition and retention. JMLD. 2014;2(2):29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Namasivayam AK, Pukonen M, Goshulak D, et al. Treatment intensity and childhood apraxia of speech. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015;50(4):529–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim IS, LaPointe LL, Stierwalt JAG. The effect of feedback and practice on the acquisition of novel speech behaviors. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;21(2):89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaipa R, Howard B, Kaipa R, et al. Role of massed versus distributed practice in learning novel foreign language utterances. Motor Control. 2020;24(1):17–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, et al. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol Bull. 2006;132(3):354–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley AD, Longman D. The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics. 1978;21(8):627–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dail TK, Christina RW. Distribution of practice and metacognition in learning and long-term retention of a discrete motor task. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004;75(2):148–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea CH, Lai Q, Black C, et al. Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Hum Mov Sci. 2000;19(5):737–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom KC, Shuell TJ. Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. J Educ Res. 1981;74(4):245–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrick HP, Phelphs E. Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years. J Exp Psychol. 1987;13(2):344.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster FN. Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. J Educ Psychol. 1987;79(2):162–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightbown PM, Spada N. An innovative program for primary ESL students in Quebec. TESOL Q. 1994;28(3):563–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird S. Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax—ERRATUM. Appl Psycholinguist. 2011;32(2):435–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppino TC, Phelan H-A, Gerbier E. Level of initial training moderates the effects of distributing practice over multiple days with expanding, contracting, and uniform schedules: evidence for study-phase retrieval. Mem Cognit. 2018;46(6):969–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C, Noel H, Sawyer AG. A Meta-analysis of the spacing effect in verbal learning: implications for research on advertising repetition and consumer memory. J Consum Res. 2003;30(1):138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbier E, Toppino TC. The effect of distributed practice: neuroscience, cognition, and education. Trends Neurosci Educ. 2015;4(3):49–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby LL. On interpreting the effects of repetition: solving a problem versus remembering a solution. J Verb Learn Verb Behav. 1978;17(6):649–667.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox GB. Understanding the underlying mechanism of the spacing effect in verbal learning: a case for encoding variability and study-phase retrieval. J Cogn Psychol. 2016;28(6):684–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews T, Barbeau-Morrison A, Rvachew S. Application of the challenge point framework during treatment of speech sound disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021;64(10):3769–3785.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaipa R, Robb M, Jones R. The effectiveness of constant, variable, random, and blocked practice in speech-motor learning. J Motor Learn Dev. 2017;5(1):103–125.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock ER, Mcallister Byun T. Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: a case study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2015;29(1):59–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronk BC. How to use SPSS^®: a step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation. New York (NY): Routledge; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Barnette J. PDF document. Effect Size and Measures of Association; 2006. Available from: http://www.eval.org/summerinstitute/06SIHandouts/SI06 Barnette TR2 Online pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropract Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda NJ, Coburn N, Rohrer D, et al. Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications. Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):236–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers JB, Tomasello M. Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures. Dev Psychol. 2002;38(6):967–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan JJ, Radosevich DJ. A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don't. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(5):795–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaugh JL. Memory–a century of consolidation. Science. 2000;287(5451):248–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppino TC, Gerbier E. About practice: repetition, spacing, and abstraction. In: Psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 60. Waltham (MA): Elsevier; 2014. p. 113–189.
   Google Scholar
• Newell A, Rosenbloom PS. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. Cogn Skills Acquisit. 1981;1(1981):1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Wixted JT, Ebbesen EB. On the form of forgetting. Psychol Sci. 1991;2(6):409–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CD, Scarf D. Spacing repetitions over long timescales: a review and a reconsolidation explanation. Front Psychol. 2017;8:962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfberger S, Adi-Japha E, Karni A. Sex differences in motor performance and motor learning in children and adolescents: an increasing male advantage in motor learning and consolidation phase gains. Behav Brain Res. 2009;198(1):165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar