Octogenarians died mainly of cardiovascular diseases five years after acute coronary syndrome

References

• Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2999–3054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909–2945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2501–2555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleby CE, Ivanov J, Mackie K, et al. In-hospital outcomes of very elderly patients (85 years and older) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77:634–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer SP, Westerhout CM, Simes RJ, et al. Mortality and morbidity reduction by primary percutaneous coronary intervention is independent of the patient's age. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:324–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanmugasundaram M. Percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients: is it beneficial? Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38:398–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein LW. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly patient (Part I of II). J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18:286–295.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas MP, Moscucci M, Smith DE, et al. Outcome of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly and the very elderly: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium. Clin Cardiol. 2011;34:549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan BP, Gurvitch R, Duffy SJ, et al. An evaluation of octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:928–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz JC, Alonso JJ, Duran JM, et al. Coronary stent implantation in patients older than 75 years of age: clinical profile and initial and long-term (3 years) outcome. Am Heart J. 2002;143:620–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varani E, Aquilina M, Balducelli M, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians: Acute and 12 month results in a large single-centre experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:449–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiew C, Williams T, Hatton R, et al. Influence of age on long-term outcome after emergent percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22:273–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savonitto S, Cavallini C, Petronio AS, et al. Early aggressive versus initially conservative treatment in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:906–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegn N, Abdelnoor M, Aaberge L, et al. Invasive versus conservative strategy in patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris (After Eighty study): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1057–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damman P, Clayton T, Wallentin L, et al. Effects of age on long-term outcomes after a routine invasive or selective invasive strategy in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative analysis of individual data from the FRISC II–ICTUS–RITA-3 (FIR) trials. Heart. 2012;98:207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avezum A, Makdisse M, Spencer F, et al. Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am Heart J. 2005;149:67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel DM, Redfield MM, Weston SA, et al. Mode of death in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure in the general population. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008;10:1108–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta LS, Beckie TM, DeVon HA, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in women: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2016;133:916–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfredsson J, Clayton T, Damman P, et al. Impact of an invasive strategy on 5 years outcome in men and women with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2014;168:522–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoni ML, Yiu KH, Atary JZ, et al. Distribution of culprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treatedwith primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis. 2011; 22:533–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheeraert PJ, Henriques JP, De Buyzere ML, et al. Out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: coronary angiographic determinants. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35:144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Abejón E, Rejas-Gutiérrez J, Criado-Espegel P, et al. Smoking impact on mortality in Spain in 2012. Med Clin (Barc). 2015;145:520–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar