Correlation of ST changes in leads V4–V6 to area of ischemia by CMR in inferior STEMI

References

• Hasdai D, Sclarovsky S, Solodky A, et al. Prognostic significance of maximal precordial ST-segment depression in right (V1 to V3) versus left (V4 to V6) leads in patients with inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:1081–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson ED, Hathaway WR, Zabel KM, et al. Prognostic significance of precordial ST segment depression during inferior myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: results in 16,521 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlatky MA, Califf RM, Lee KL, et al. Prognostic significance of precordial ST-segment depression during inferior acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:325–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum Y, Wagner GS, Barbash GI, et al. Correlation of angiographic findings and right (V1 to V3) versus left (V4 to V6) precordial ST-segment depression in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasberg B, Pinchas A, Barbash GI, et al. Importance of reciprocal ST segment depression in leads V5 and V6 as an indicator of disease of the left anterior descending coronary artery in acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1990;63:339–341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasdai D, Birnbaum Y, Porter A, et al. Maximal precordial ST-segment depression in leads V4–V6 in patients with inferior wall acute myocardial infarction indicates coronary artery disease involving the left anterior descending coronary artery system. Int J Cardiol. 1997;58:273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assali AR, Sclarovsky S, Herz I, et al. Comparison of patients with inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with versus without ST-segment elevation in leads V5 and V6. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:81–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsuka Y, Sugiura T, Hatada K, et al. Clinical characteristics of ST-segment elevation in lead V6 in patients with Q-wave acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 1999;10:465–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson M, Ubachs JF, Hedström E, et al. Myocardium at risk after acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance: quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West AM, Kramer CM. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial infarction, viability, and cardiomyopathies. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35:176–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörensson P, Heiberg E, Saleh N, et al. Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delewi R, Ijff G, van de Hoef TP, et al. Pathological Q waves in myocardial infarction in patients treated by primary PCI. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:324–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijveldt R, van der Vleuten PA, Hirsch A, et al. Early electrocardiographic findings and MR imaging-verified microvascular injury and myocardial infarct size. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:1187–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atar D, Abitbol JL, Arheden H, et al. Rationale and design of the 'MITOCARE' Study: a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of TRO40303 for the reduction of reperfusion injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Cardiology. 2012;123:201–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atar D, Arheden H, Berdeaux A, et al. Effect of intravenous TRO40303 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: MITOCARE study results. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiberg E, Ugander M, Engblom H, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial infarction from MR images by accounting for partial volume effects: animal, phantom, and human study. Radiology. 2008;246:581–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris RM, Barnaby PF, Brandt PW, et al. Prognosis after recovery from first acute myocardial infarction: determinants of reinfarction and sudden death. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:408–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husser O, Monmeneu JV, Sanchis J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived intramyocardial hemorrhage after STEMI: Influence on long-term prognosis, adverse left ventricular remodeling and relationship with microvascular obstruction. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:2047–2054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waha S, Desch S, Eitel I, et al. Impact of early vs. late microvascular obstruction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging on long-term outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison with traditional prognostic markers. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2660–2668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel I, Desch S, de Waha S, et al. Long-term prognostic value of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. Heart. 2011;97:2038–2045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochet AA, Lorgis L, Lalande A, et al. Major prognostic impact of persistent microvascular obstruction as assessed by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2117–2126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Aidi H, Adams A, Moons KG, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction or suspected or known coronary artery disease. A systematic review of prognostic studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1031–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atar D, Agewall S. End of story? Studies on prevention of reperfusion injury encounter perpetual defeats. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2015;1:46–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemmensen P, Grande P, Aldrich HR, et al. Evaluation of formulas for estimating the final size of acute myocardial infarcts from quantitative ST-segment elevation on the initial standard 12-lead ECG. J Electrocardiol. 1991;24:77–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairey CN, Shah PK, Lew AS, et al. Electrocardiographic differentiation of occlusion of the left circumflex versus the right coronary artery as a cause of inferior acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:456–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huey BL, Beller GA, Kaiser DL, et al. A comprehensive analysis of myocardial infarction due to left circumflex artery occlusion: comparison with infarction due to right coronary artery and left anterior descending artery occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:1156–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiasa Y, Morimoto S, Wada T, et al. Differentiation between left circumflex and right coronary artery occlusions: studies on ST-segment deviation during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Clin Cardiol. 1990;13:783–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner RA, Hill NE, Mookherjee S, et al. Diagnostic significance for coronary artery disease of abnormal Q waves in the “lateral” electrocardiographic leads. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:431–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerci RJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, George RT, et al. Aligning coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion territories: an algorithm for the CORE320 multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:587–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar