685
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

, ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 168-172 | Received 19 Apr 2020, Accepted 11 Dec 2020, Published online: 26 Dec 2020

References

  • Gunter RL, Kilgo P, Guyton RA, et al. Impact of preoperative chronic lung disease on survival after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(4):1322–1328.
  • De Miguel-Díez J, López-De-Andrés A, Hernández-Barrera V, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is not associated with worse in-hospital outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement in Spain (2001–2015). J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;60(3):413–421.
  • Liao YB, He ZX, Zhao ZG, et al. The relationship between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and transcatheter aortic valve implantation-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(Suppl 1):570–578.
  • Ando T, Adegbala O, Akintoye E, et al. Is transcatheter aortic valve replacement better than surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A nationwide inpatient sample analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008408.
  • Auffret V, Becerra Munoz V, Loirat A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in lower-surgical-risk patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(10):1863–1868.
  • de Miguel-Diez J, López-de-Andrés A, Hernández-Barrera V, et al. Impact of COPD on outcomes in hospitalized patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement in Spain. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;95:339–347.
  • Dvir D, Waksman R, Barbash IM, et al. Outcomes of patients with chronic lung disease and severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement or standard therapy: insights from the PARTNER trial (placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(3):269–279.
  • Henn MC, Zajarias A, Lindman BR, et al. Preoperative pulmonary function tests predict mortality after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(2):578–585, 586. e1–e2.
  • Mentias A, Faza NN, Raza MQ, et al. Management of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in patient with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;28(4):783–790.
  • Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agustí AG, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(4):347–365.
  • Kwak MJ, Bhise V, Warner MT, et al. National trend of utilization, clinical and economic outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(8):1321–1329.
  • Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC, et al. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 updated March 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011; [cited 2020 Dec 17]. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, et al. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(4):408–414.
  • Babaliaros V, Devireddy C, Lerakis S, et al. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(8):898–904.
  • Condado JF, Haider MN, Lerakis S, et al. Does minimalist transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement produce better survival in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2017;89(4):775–780.
  • Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, et al. Chapter 13: including nonrandomized studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 updated March 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011; [cited 2020 Dec 17]. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Clarke M. Chapter 18: reviews of individual patient data. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 updated March 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011; [cited 2020 Dec 17]. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.