PET evaluation of myocardial perfusion function after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Stone GW, Kandzari DE, Mehran R, et al. Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part I. Circulation. 2005;112(15):2364–2372. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.481283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofferson RD, Lehmann KG, Martin GV, et al. Effect of chronic total coronary occlusion on treatment strategy. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(9):1088–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeroudi OM, Alomar ME, Michael TT, et al. Prevalence and management of coronary chronic total occlusions in a tertiary veterans affairs hospital. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(4):637–643. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, et al. Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian multicenter chronic total occlusions registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(11):991–997. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques JP, Hoebers LP, Råmunddal T, et al. Percutaneous intervention for concurrent chronic total occlusions in patients with STEMI: the EXPLORE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(15):1622–1632. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Lee PH, Ahn JM, et al. Randomized trial evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of chronic total occlusion. Circulation. 2019;139(14):1674–1683. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.031313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, et al. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(26):2484–2493. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güzel T, Aktan A, Demir M, et al. Relationship between contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic coronary total occlusion. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022;68(8):1078–1083. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboul-Enein F, Kar S, Hayes SW, et al. Influence of angiographic collateral circulation on myocardial perfusion in patients with chronic total occlusion of a single coronary artery and no prior myocardial infarction. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(6):950–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Surber R, Ferrari M, et al. The functional reserve of collaterals supplying long-term chronic total coronary occlusions in patients without prior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(20):2406–2412. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan C, Yang W, Song L, et al. Association of acute procedural results with long-term outcomes after CTO PCI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(3):278–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, et al. Value of hybrid imaging with PET/CT to guide percutaneous revascularization of chronic total coronary occlusion. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2015;8(7):26. doi: 10.1007/s12410-015-9340-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, et al. Comparison of coronary CT angiography, SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease determined by fractional flow reserve. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(10):1100–1107. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuijfzand WJ, Biesbroek PS, Raijmakers PG, et al. Effects of successful percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function. EuroIntervention. 2017;13(3):345–354. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-01014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher SP, Driessen RS, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Recovery of myocardial perfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions is comparable to hemodynamically significant non-occlusive lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(6):1059–1066. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher SP, Stuijfzand WJ, Driessen RS, et al. Impact of specific crossing techniques in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention on recovery of absolute myocardial perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(11):e008064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter RW, Schumacher SP, van Diemen PA, et al. Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on absolute perfusion in remote myocardium. EuroIntervention. 2022;18(4):e314–e323. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Dong P, Dong X, et al. Long-term changes in ischemic burden after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective observational study. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(7):7632–7640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur SSK, Achim A, Toth GG. Clinical application of results of the ISCHEMIA trial. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2021;33(2):125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achim A, Leibundgut G. FAME 3 fails to defame coronary artery bypass grafting: what went wrong in the percutaneous coronary intervention arm? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(1):ezac036. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Hildick-Smith D, Martin Yuste V, et al. Three-year outcomes of a randomized multicentre trial comparing revascularization and optimal medical therapy for chronic total coronary occlusions (EuroCTO). EuroIntervention. 2023;19(7):571–579. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirai T, Grantham JA, Sapontis J, et al. Quality of life changes after chronic total occlusion angioplasty in patients with baseline refractory angina. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(3):e007558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulards DCJ, Vlaar PJ, Wijnbergen I, et al. Coronary physiology before and after chronic total occlusion treatment: what does it tell us? Neth Heart J. 2021;29(1):22–29. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01470-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzel T, Bilik MZ, Arslan B, et al. The effect of atherogenic plasma index on collateral development in patients with chronic coronary total occlusion. j-ebr. 2021;4(4):291–301. doi: 10.30714/j-ebr.2021471924.
   Google Scholar
• Aktan A, Güzel T, Özbek M, Demir M, Kılıç R, Arslan B, Aslan B. The relationship between coronary collateral circulation and visceral fat. EJCM 2021;9(1):27–38. doi: 10.32596/ejcm.galenos.2021-01-05
   Google Scholar
• Werner GS. The role of coronary collaterals in chronic total occlusions. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014;10(1):57–64. doi: 10.2174/1573403x10666140311123814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schumacher SP, Kockx M, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Ischaemic burden and changes in absolute myocardial perfusion after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(6):e462–e471. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Tian J, Zhang L, et al. Myocardial viability, functional status, and collaterals of patients with chronically occluded coronary arteries. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:754826. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.754826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong W, Li J, Mi H, et al. Relationship between collateral circulation and myocardial viability of (18)F-FDG PET/CT subtended by chronic total occluded coronary arteries. Ann Nucl Med. 2018;32(3):197–205. doi: 10.1007/s12149-018-1234-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SA, Alsanjari O, Keulards DCJ, et al. Changes in absolute flow, myocardial resistance and FFR after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2023;19(2):e123–e133. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Emig U, Mutschke O, et al. Regression of collateral function after recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions: a serial assessment by intracoronary pressure and Doppler recordings. Circulation. 2003;108(23):2877–2882. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000100724.44398.01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Kim CY, Kim N, et al. Coronary collaterals function and clinical outcome between patients with acute and chronic total occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(6):585–593. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone AM, De Caterina AR, Basile E, et al. Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended by a stenosis on fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(1):29–36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.971101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladwiniec A, Cunnington MS, Rossington J, et al. Collateral donor artery physiology and the influence of a chronic total occlusion on fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(4):e002219. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megaly M, Saad M, Tajti P, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention on left ventricular systolic function and reverse remodeling. J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31(5):562–571. doi: 10.1111/joic.12538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sabbagh A, Patel VG, Jeroudi OM, et al. Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing retrograde percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 3,482 patients from 26 studies. Int J Cardiol. 2014;174(2):243–248. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini L, Poletti E, Ayoub M, et al. Coronary artery perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(9):e804–e811. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael TT, Papayannis AC, Banerjee S, et al. Subintimal dissection/reentry strategies in coronary chronic total occlusion interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(5):729–738. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.969808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS. Reducing radiation exposure during PCI of chronic total occlusions - better is not good enough. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(5):e496–e498. doi: 10.4244/EIJV14I5A88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge L, Zhong X, Ma J, et al. Safety and feasibility of a low frame rate protocol for percutaneous coronary intervention to chronic total occlusions: preliminary experience. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(5):e538–e545. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achim A, Szigethy T, Olajos D, et al. Switching from proximal to distal radial artery access for coronary chronic total occlusion recanalization. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:895457. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.895457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young MN, Secemsky EA, Kaltenbach LA, et al. Examining the operator learning curve for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(8):e007877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Auger D, Di Mario C, et al. CMR guidance for recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(5):547–556. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everaars H, Schumacher SP, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Functional recovery after percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;37(10):3057–3068. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02355-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lee JM, Park TK, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with or without preprocedural exercise stress test. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(1):e3. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar