Homo Economicus in a Big Society: Understanding Middle-class Activism and NIMBYism towards New Housing Developments

References

• Abram, S., J. Murdoch, and T. Marsden. 1996. “The Social Construction of ‘Middle England’: The Politics of Participation in Forward Planning.” Journal of Rural Studies 12 (4): 353–364.10.1016/S0743-0167(96)00037-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2012. “The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: ‘Neoliberal’ Episodes in Planning.” Planning Practice & Research 28 (1): 6–26.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, M., G. Bramley, C. Leishman, D. Watkins, and M. White. 2010. NHPAU Sub-regional Market Modelling Feasibility: Main Report on Model Testing and Feasibility. London: NHPAU/DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L. 2010. “‘We Raised It with the Head’: The Educational Practices of Minority Ethnic, Middle-class Families.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 31 (4): 449–469.10.1080/01425692.2010.484921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., and M. Pill. 2011. “The Continuing Popularity of the Neighbourhood and Neighbourhood Governance in the Transition from the ‘Big State’ to the ‘Big Society’ Paradigm.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (5): 927–942.10.1068/c1133r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., and C. Wong. 2012. “The Delusion of Strategic Spatial Planning: What’s Left after the Labour Government’s English Regional Experiment?” Planning Practice & Research 28 (1): 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, K. 2004. Review of Housing Supply: Delivering Stability: Securing Our Future Housing Needs. Final Report & Recommendations. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, K. 2006. Barker Review of Land Use Planning: Final Report – Recommendations. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, M., and E. Jackson. 2013. “Place-making and Place Maintenance: Performativity, Place and Belonging among the Middle Classes.” Sociology 47 (4): 793–809.
   Google Scholar
• Blond, P. 2010. Red Tory: How Left and Right have Broken Britain and How we can Fix It. London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, L. 1988. “Political Participation and School Closures: An Investigation of Bias in Local Authority Decision Making.” Policy and Politics 16: 41–54.10.1332/030557388782455136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley, G. 2007. “The Sudden Rediscovery of Housing Supply as a Key Policy Challenge.” Housing Studies 22: 221–241.10.1080/02673030601132847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley, G., and N. K. Karley. 2005. “How much Affordable Housing is Needed in England.” Housing Studies 20 (5): 685–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley, G., and K. Kirk. 2005. “Does Planning make a Difference to Urban Form? Recent Evidence from Central Scotland.” Environment & Planning A 37: 355–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser, M. 2012. “Tracing the Democratic Narrative: Big Society, Localism and Civic Engagement.” Local Government Studies 39 (1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Communities and Local Government. 2010. Decentralisation and Localism Bill: An Essential Guide. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, A. D. H., G. Burgess, R. Dunning, E. Ferrari, J. Henneberry, F. Lyall Grant, S. Monk, S. Rowley, C. Watkins, and C. Whitehead. 2010. The Incidence, Value and Delivery of Planning Obligations in England in 2007–08. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, J. B., and V. Nadin. 2006. Town and Country Planning in the UK. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Damer, S., and C. Hague. 1971. “Public Participation in Planning: A Review.” The Town Planning Review 42 (3): 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear, M. 1992. “Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (3): 288–300.10.1080/01944369208975808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. 2004. “Discourses of Objection: Towards an Understanding of Third-party Rights in Planning.” Environment and Planning A 36 (9): 1549–1570.10.1068/a36176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. G. 1973. The Containment of Urban England: The Planning System: Objectives, Operations, Impacts. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, A., and P. Matthews. 2014, in press. “Bourdieu and the Big Society: Empowering the Powerful in Public Service Provision?” Policy & Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, A., N. Bailey, K. Besemer, G. Bramley, M. Gannon, and D. Watkins. 2013. Coping with the Cuts? York: Local Government and Poorer Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, N., and Y. Rydin. 2012. “What Can Social Capital Tell Us about Planning under Localism?” Local Government Studies 39 (1): 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A. 2012. “Creating ‘A Generation of NIMBYs’? Interpreting the Role of the State in Managing the Politics of Urban Development.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30 (3): 520–535.10.1068/c11156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., and T. Manzi. 2013. “New Localism, Old Retrenchment: The ‘Big Society’, Housing Policy and the Politics of Welfare Reform.” Housing, Theory and Society 30 (1): 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., and L. Pratchett. 2012. “Local Governance under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’.” Local Government Studies 38 (1): 21–40.10.1080/03003930.2011.642949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R. 2013. Making Sense of the Big Society: Perspectives from the Third Sector. Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P., and A. Hastings. 2013. “Middle-class Political Activism and Middle-class Advantage in Relation to Public Services: A Realist Synthesis of the Evidence Base.” Social Policy & Administration 47 (1): 72–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. 2013. The New Homes Bonus. London: The National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• NHPAU (National Housing and Planning Advice Unit). 2008. Meeting the Housing Requirements of an Aspiring, Growing and Prosperous Nation: Advice to the Housing Minister about the Housing Supply Range to Be Tested by the Regional Planning Authorities. Titchfield: NHPAU.
   Google Scholar
• NHPAU (National Housing and Planning Advice Unit). 2009. More Homes for More People: Building the Right Homes in the Right Places. Titchfield: National Housing and Planning Advice Unit.
   Google Scholar
• ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister). 2003. Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
   Google Scholar
• Park, A., J. Curtice, K. Thomson, M. Phillips, E. Clery, and S. Butt. 2011. British Social Attitudes – The 26th Report. London: National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. 2009. Open Source Planning: Green Paper. London: The Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2006. Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., T. Greenhalgh, G. Harvey, and K. Walshe. 2005. “Realist Review – a New Method of Systematic Review Designed for Complex Policy Interventions.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 10 (suppl 1): 21–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sage, D. 2012. “A Challenge to Liberalism? The Communitarianism of the Big Society and Blue Labour.” Critical Social Policy 32 (3): 365–382.10.1177/0261018312444411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M. 2010. “Class and Elective Belonging.” Housing, Theory and Society 27 (2): 115–161.10.1080/14036090903434975
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–299.10.2307/2151585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J. 2010. “The Exercise of Power to Limit the Development of New Housing in the English Countryside.” Environment and Planning A 42 (4): 1001–1016.10.1068/a42297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J. 2011. “Can Community Empowerment Reduce Opposition to Housing? Evidence from Rural England.” Planning Practice & Research 26 (5): 555–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J., and M. Shucksmith. 2012. “Planning for Housing in Rural England: Discursive Power and Spatial Exclusion.” Town Planning Review 82 (2): 169–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. 2012. “DEBATE: A Big Society Needs an Active State.” Policy & Politics 40 (1): 141–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor Hart, J. 1971. “The Inverse Care Law.” The Lancet 297 (7696): 405–412.10.1016/S0140-6736(71)92410-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, P. 2009. “Living in an Oasis: Middle-class Disaffiliation and Selective Belonging in an English Suburb.” Environment and Planning A 41 (12): 2874–2892.10.1068/a41120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood, R. 2002. “Parish Councils, Partnership and Governance: The Development of ‘Exceptions’ Housing in the Malvern Hills District, England.” Journal of Rural Studies 18 (3): 275–291.10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00042-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar