Bricolage in Collaborative Housing in Finland: Combining Resources for Alternative Housing Solutions

References

• Ache, P., and M. Fedrowitz. 2012. “The Development of Co-Housing Initiatives in Germany.” Built Environment 38 (3): 395–412. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.395.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., and R. E. Nelson. 2005. “Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (3): 492–504. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, I. 1999. Urban Transformations: Power, People and Urban Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bresson, S., and S. Denèfle. 2015. “Diversity of Self-Managed Co-Housing Initiatives in France.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 5–16. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2009. “Design Coding and the Creative, Market and Regulatory Tyrannies of Practice.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2643–2667. doi:10.1177/0042098009344226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czischke, D. 2018. “Collaborative Housing and Housing Providers: Towards an Analytical Framework of Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Housing Co-Production.” International Journal of Housing Policy, Special Issue: Self-Organised and Civil Society Participation in Housing Provision 18 (1): 55–81. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droste, C. 2015. “German Co-Housing: An Opportunity for Municipalities to Foster Socially Inclusive Urban Development?” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 79–92. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, J., and J. Teller. 2012. “”Bricolage Planning: Understanding Planning in a Fragmented City.”.” In Urban Development, edited by S. Polyzos, 93-126. Rijeka: InTech. https://www.intechopen.com/books/urban-development/bricolage-planning-understanding-planning-in-a-fragmented-city
   Google Scholar
• Franke, C. 2014. “Raw Space Housing.” Master’s Thesis, Aalto University. https://issuu.com/carolinfranke/docs/raw_space_housing.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. 2007. “Epistemological Bricolage: How Practitioners Make Sense of Learning.” Administration & Society 39 (4): 476–496. doi:10.1177/0095399707301857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2012. “”Seeding Community: Collaborative Housing as a Strategy for Social and Neighbourhood Repair.”.” Built Environment 38 (3): 364–394. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.364.
   Google Scholar
• Hamiduddin, I., and N. Gallent. 2016. “Self-Build Communities: The Rationale and Experiences of Group-Build (Baugruppen) Housing Development in Germany.” Housing Studies 31 (4): 356–383. doi:10.1080/02673037.2015.1091920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankonen, J. 1994. Lähiöt Ja Tehokkuuden Yhteiskunta: Suunnittelujärjestelmän Läpimurto Suomalaisten Asuntoalueiden Rakentumisessa 1960-Luvulla [Mass Housing and the Society of Efficiency: The Breakthrough of Planning System in Housing Districts in the 1960s]. Tampere: Gaudeamus Kirja. Otatieto: TTKK.
   Google Scholar
• Horelli, L. 1989. “’Uusi Arki’ Ja Kehittämistutkimus [’New Everyday Life’ and Planning Research].” Yhteiskuntasuunnittelu 1: 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 1999. “Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage: Toward a Theory of Collaborative Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (1): 9–26. doi:10.1080/01944369908976031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juntto, A. 1990. Asuntokysymys Suomessa: Topeliuksesta Tulopolitiikkaan [The Social History of Finnish Housing Policy: From Philanthropy to Corporatism]. Helsinki: Asuntohallitus.
   Google Scholar
• Kekkonen, M. 1989. Vuosaaren hartiapankkirakentamisen historia: Ryhmärakentamisen järjestäminen ja yhteisöllisyyden merkitys [The History of DIY Construction in Vuosaari: Collaborative Building and the Meaning of Community]. Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L., P. McLaren, and S. R. Steinberg. 2011. “Critical Pedagogy, and Qualitative Research: Moving to the Bricolage.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S., . Lincoln, 163–178. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Korpela, S. 2012. “Casa Malta: A Case Study of A Contemporary Co-Housing Project in Helsinki.” Built Environment 38 (3): 336–344. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.336.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A. 2015. “Self-managed Co-housing in the Context of an Ageing Population in Europe.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 32–45. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011425
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., and H. Stoeger. 2018. “The Role of the Local Institutional Context inUnderstanding Collaborative Housing Models: Empirical Evidence from Austria.” International Journal of Housing Policy, Special Issue: Self-Organised and Civil Society Participation in Housing Provision 18 (1): 35–54. doi:10.1080/19491247.2016.1265265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. 1966. The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leybourne, S. A. 2009. “Improvisation and Agile Project Management: A Comparative Consideration.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 2 (4): 519–535. doi:10.1108/17538370910991124.
   Google Scholar
• Lujanen, M. 2004. “Division of Labour between Housing Policy Actors.” In Housing and Housing Policy in Nordic Countries, edited by M. Lujanen, 43–55. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, S. 1993. “Reviewing the rhetoric.” In: Making Better Places: Urban Design Now, edited by R. Hayward and S. McGlynn. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., and F. Michael. 2015. The Psychology of Planning in Organizations: Research and Applications. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmi, E., L. Puro, and M. Lujanen. 2017. Kansan Osake: Suomalaisen Asunto-Osakeyhtiön Vaiheet [Civic Share: The History of Finnish Housing Company System]. Helsinki: Suomen Kiinteistöliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. 2016. “The Social Capital of Cohousing Communities.” Sociology 50 (2): 400–415. doi:10.1177/0038038515573473.
   Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. 1999. “The State and Self-Help Housing in Urban Finland, 1920 to 1950.” Housing Studies 14 (3): 329–339. doi:10.1080/02673039982821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. 2005. “How Divergent Housing Institutions Evolve: A Comparison of Swedish Tenant Co-Operatives and Finnish Shareholders’ Housing Companies.” Housing Theory and Society 22 (4): 213–236. doi:10.1080/14036090500375373.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, K., and M. Fernández Arrigoitia. 2015. “Development of New Cohousing: Lessons from a London Scheme for the Over-50s.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 106–121. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. 2014. Housing and Living Conditions. Helsinki: Tilastokeskus. http://www.stat.fi/til/asas/2014/01/asas_2014_01_2015-10-14_tau_003_fi.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2015a. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Towards a Long-Term Perspective of Self-Managed Collaborative Housing Initiatives.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2015b. “Understanding Co-Housing from a Planning Perspective: Why and How?” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 64–78. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2016. “The Re-Emergence of Self-Managed Co-Housing in Europe: A Critical Review of Co-Housing Research.” Urban Studies 53 (10): 2023–2040. doi:10.1177/0042098015586696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzell, D. 1990. “Dissonance of Formal and Informal Planning Styles, or Can Formal Planners Do Bricolage?” City & Society 4 (2): 114–130. doi:10.1525/city.1990.4.2.114.
   Google Scholar
• Vainio, T. 2008. Kohti Yksilöllisempää: Asuntotuotannon Laatumuutokset 1990–2005 [Towards More Individuality: Changes of Quality in Housing Production in 1990–2005]. Helsinki: VTT.
   Google Scholar
• Väliniemi, J., M. Rask, and P. Timonen. 2008. Asumisen Tarjontakatsaus: Konseptitarkastelu Kuluttajien Valinta- Ja Vaikutusmahdollisuuksista Pääkaupunkiseudun Asuntotuotannossa [Review of Housing Supply: Review of the Concepts for Consumers’ Opportunities for Influence and Choice in the Housing Supply in the Capital Region]. Helsinki: Kuluttajatutkimuskeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U., and L. Horelli. 2012. “Design for Gender Equality: The History of Co-Housing Ideas and Realities.” Built Environment 38 (3): 315–335. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.315.
   Google Scholar