Collaborative Housing Research (1990–2017): A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Field

References

• Ache, P., and M. Fedrowitz. 2012. “The Development of Co-Housing Initiatives in Germany.” Built Environment 37 (3): 395–412. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.395.
   Google Scholar
• Aernouts, N., and M. Ryckewaert. 2015. “Reconceptualizing the “Publicness” of Public Housing: The Case of Brussels.” Social Inclusion 3 (2): 17–30. doi:10.17645/si.v3i2.63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aernouts, N., and M. Ryckewaert. 2017. “Beyond Housing: On the Role of Commoning in the Establishment of a Community Land Trust Project.” International Journal of Housing Policy 1–19. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1331592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen, M., and U. Runge. 2002. “Co-Housing for Seniors Experienced as an Occupational Generative Environment.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 9 (4): 156–166. doi:10.1080/11038120260501181.
   Google Scholar
• Angeras, A. 2015. “Des normes d’«habiter» questionnées: Le quartier de la Baraque.” Socio-Anthropologie (32): 41–54. doi:10.4000/socio-anthropologie.
   Google Scholar
• Anund Vogel, J., H. Lind, and P. Lundqvist. 2016. “Who Is Governing the Commons: Studying Swedish Housing Cooperatives.” Housing, Theory and Society 33 (4): 424–444. doi:10.1080/14036096.2016.1186730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attard, J.-P. 2013. “Un logement foncièrement solidaire: Le modèle des community land trusts.” Mouvements 74 (2): 143. doi:10.3917/mouv.074.0143.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoade, O., and V. Ahmed. 2014. “An Assessment of Land Use Sources of Barriers and the Community-Based Housing Model in the UK.” International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 7 (4): 539–558. doi:10.1108/ijhma-02-2013-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Baborska-Narozny, M., F. Stevenson, and P. Chatterton. 2014. “A Social Learning Tool – Barriers and Opportunities for Collective Occupant Learning in Low Carbon Housing.” Energy Procedia 62: 492–501. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.411.
   Google Scholar
• Bacqué, M.-H., and M. Gauthier. 2011. “Participation, urbanisme et études urbaines.” Participations 1 (1): 36. doi:10.3917/parti.001.0036.
   Google Scholar
• Baillergeau, É. 2007. “Favoriser les liens sociaux de proximité: De nouvelles pratiques d’intervention sociale dans les villes européennes.” Pensée plurielle 15 (2): 9. doi:10.3917/pp.015.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, I., and J.-D. Gerber. 2017. “Why are Housing Cooperatives Successful? Insights from Swiss Affordable Housing Policy.” Housing Studies 1–25. doi:10.1080/02673037.2017.1344958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béguin, H., and C. Lévy-Vroelant. 2012. “Habiter chez autrui: Pourquoi et comment?” Agora débats/jeunesses 61 (2): 61. doi:10.3917/agora.061.0061.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. 1992. “Not the Middle Way but Both Ways—Cooperative Housing in Sweden.” Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 9 (sup2): 87–104. doi:10.1080/02815737.1992.10801445.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. 1998. “Tenant’s Dilemma - on Collective Action in Housing.” Housing Studies 13 (1): 99–120. doi:10.1080/02673039883515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, N. 2006. “Maîtriser son logement: Réflexion sur l’inadaptation des instruments législatifs.” Droit et société (2): 553–583.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, P. J., and A. Rojey. 2017. “Aspects politiques et culturels des utopies d’aujourd’hui.” Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles 2: 86–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, F. 2015. “Le co-housing en Italie entre rêve et réalité. Une recherche sur les aspirations à la co-résidence.” International Review of Sociology 25 (3): 481–501. doi:10.1080/03906701.2015.1050308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biau, V., and A. d’Orazio. 2013. “Les architectes face à l’habitat participatif. Entre militantisme et professionnalisme?.” Cahiers Ramau 6: 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B. 2016. “Mapping Trajectories of Becoming: Four Forms of Behaviour in Co-Housing Initiatives.” Town Planning Review 87 (3): 275–296. doi:10.3828/tpr.2016.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgloh, S., and P. Westerheide. 2012. “The Impact of Mutual Support Based Housing Projects on the Costs of Care.” Housing Studies 27 (5): 620–642. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.697554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouillon, F. 2009. “Les habitants des squats n’ont rien d’exceptionnel.” Multitudes 37-38 (2): 238. doi:10.3917/mult.037.0238.
   Google Scholar
• Bouillon, F., R. Fourquemin, and C. Louey. 2012. “Le squat, lieu et promesse de résistances.” VST-Vie sociale et traitements (1): 79–85. doi:10.3917/vst.113.0079.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, R. 2017. “Forgotten Plotlanders: Learning from the Survival of Lost Informal Housing in the UK.” Housing, Theory and Society 34 (1): 79–105. doi:10.1080/14036096.2016.1197850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and J.-K. Helderman. 2012. “The Trade-Off between Capital and Community: The Conditions for Successful Co-Production in Housing.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23 (4): 1139–1155. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9310-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bresson, S. 2016. “L’habitat participatif en France: Une alternative sociale à la «crise»?” Les Cahiers de Cost (5): 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bresson, S., and S. Denèfle. 2015. “Diversity of Self-Managed Co-Housing Initiatives in France.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 5–16. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresson, S., and Tummers, L. 2014. “L’habitat participatif en Europe : vers des politiques alternatives de développement urbain ?” Métropoles 15: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Broer, S., and H. Titheridge. 2010. “Eco-Self-Build Housing Communities: Are They Feasible and Can They Lead to Sustainable and Low Carbon Lifestyles?” Sustainability 2 (7): 2084–2116. doi:10.3390/su2072084.
   Google Scholar
• Bronzini, M. 2017. “Contested issues surrounding social sustainability and self-building in Italy.” International Journal of Housing Policy 17 (3): 353–373. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1223450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusadelli, N., M. Lemay, and Y. Martell. 2016. “L’espace contemporain des «alternatives». Un révélateur des recompositions des classes moyennes ?” Savoir/Agir 38: 13–20. doi:10.3917/sava.038.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Bruun, M. H. 2011. “Egalitarianism and Community in Danish Housing Cooperatives: Proper Forms of Sharing and Being Together.” Social Analysis: the International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 55 (2): 62–83. doi:10.3167/sa.2011.550204.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, S. 2016. “Pursuing Urban Commons: Politics and Alliances in Community Land Trust Activism in East London.” Antipode 48 (1): 134–150. doi:10.1111/anti.12168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabré, E., and A. Andrés. 2017. “La Borda: A Case Study on the Implementation of Cooperative Housing in Catalonia.” International Journal of Housing Policy 1–21. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1331591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariou, E. 2012. “Habitat groupé et organismes HLM: Une utopie réalisable et reproductible?” Revue Internationale De l’Economie Sociale 91 (323): 29. doi:10.7202/1018341ar.
   Google Scholar
• Carriou, C. 2014. “Propriété privée, propriété de soi et sens du collectif. La «coopérative d’habitat Le Grand Portail» à Nanterre (France).” Espaces et sociétés 1: 213–227. doi:10.3917/esp.156.0213.
   Google Scholar
• Carriou, C. 2015. “Malentendus et inattendus autour de la participation habitante. La «coopérative» d’accession sociale Le Grand Portail à Nanterre (France).” Lien social et Politiques 73: 215–231. doi:10.7202/1030959ar.
   Google Scholar
• Carriou, C., and A. D’Orazio. 2015. “«L’habitat participatif», quand les institutions militent.” Socio-Anthropologie (32) (139–154). doi:10.4000/socio-anthropologie.1939.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. 2013. “Towards an Agenda for Post-Carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK’s First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (5): 1654–1674. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. 2016. “Building Transitions to Post-Capitalist Urban Commons.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (4): 403–415. doi:10.1111/tran.12139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F. 2015. “What Is Really Different between Cohousing and Gated Communities?” European Planning Studies 23 (12): 2566–2581. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1096915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F., and V. Baglione. 2014. “Living Together Privately: For a Cautious Reading of Cohousing.” Urban Research & Practice 7 (1): 20–34. doi:10.1080/17535069.2013.827905.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. S. 2004. “Evaluation of Community Planning and Life of Senior Cohousing Projects in Northern European Countries.” European Planning Studies 12 (8). doi:10.1080/0965431042000289296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapham, D., and K. Kintrea. 1994. “Community Ownership and the Break-Up of Council Housing in Britain.” Journal of Social Policy 23 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1017/s0047279400021632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapham, D., and K. Kintrea. 2000. “Community-Based Housing Organisations and the Local Governance Debate.” Housing Studies 15 (4): 533–559. doi:10.1080/02673030050081096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, G. J. 2013. “The Sustainable Urban District of Vauban in Freiburg, Germany.” International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 8 (4): 265–286. doi:10.2495/dne-v8-n4-265-286.
   Google Scholar
• Coele, M. 2014. “Co-Housing and Intergenerational Exchange: Exchange of Housing Equity for Personal Care Assistance in Intentional Communities.” Working with Older People 18 (2): 75–81. doi:10.1108/wwop-01-2014-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. A. 2014. “Exploring the Efficacy of Consensus-Based Decision-Making: A Pilot Study of the Cloughjordan Ecovillage, Ireland.” International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 7 (2): 233–253. doi:10.1108/IJHMA-06-2013-0040.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. A., and S. Wearing. 2013. “The Politics of Consensus: An Exploration of the Cloughjordan Ecovillage, Ireland.” Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal 5 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Czischke, D. 2017. “Collaborative Housing and Housing Providers: Towards an Analytical Framework of Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Housing Co-Production.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 55–81. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, M. 2017. “Quantifying the Environmental Impact of Ecovillages and Co-Housing Communities: A Systematic Literature Review.” Local Environment 22 (11): 1358–1377. doi:10.1080/13549839.2017.1348342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. 1991. “Housing Cooperatives: From Housing Improvement to Economic Regeneration.” Local Economy 6 (1): 48–60. doi:10.1080/02690949108726080.
   Google Scholar
• Debarre, A. 2013. “L’habitat participatif: Les pratiques des architectes en questions, mais des représentations résistantes de l’architecture.” Cahiers Ramau (6): 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Delendi, M. L. 2017. “Sustainable Living Models.” International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 12 (4): 772–779. doi:10.2495/sdp-v12-n4-772-779.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, G. 2012. “Towards Dialectic Utopias: Links and Disjunctions between Collaborative Housing and Squatting in the Netherlands.” Built Environment 38 (3): 430–442. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.430.
   Google Scholar
• Delorme, A. 2002. “Le processus d’individualisation en situation de précarité: Deux communautés de New Age Travellers en Grande-Bretagne.” Cahiers Internationaux De Sociologie 113 (2): 261. doi:10.3917/cis.113.0261.
   Google Scholar
• Denèfle, S. 2015. “L’habitat participatif comme exemplum des évolutions socio-politiques récentes.” Savoir/Agir 38: 13–20. doi:10.3917/sava.038.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Devaux, C. 2015a. “L’habitat participatif: D’une greffe à un noyau des écoquartiers.” Développement durable et territoires. Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie 6: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Devaux, C. 2015b. “L’habitat participatif: Vers la démocratisation de la production du logement?” Lien social et Politiques (73): 157–175. doi:10.7202/1030956ar.
   Google Scholar
• Devaux, C. 2015c. “Concevoir et gérer l’habitat en commun. Vers un changement sociétal?” Socio-anthropologie (32): 71–86. doi:10.4000/socio-anthropologie.
   Google Scholar
• Devaux, C. 2016. “Habitat participatif et politiques de l’habitat: Un mariage par intérêt?” Revue française des affaires sociales (3): 151–174.
   Google Scholar
• Devaux, C. 2017. “L’habitat participatif: Vers l’avènement de l’habitat durable?.” Sciences de la société 98: 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, P., R. Douglas, and T. Reynolds. 2015. “Collaborative Design of Older Women’s CoHousing.” Working with Older People 19 (4): 188–194. doi:10.1108/wwop-08-2015-0018.
   Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, J. 2008. “Le Familistère de Guise: Habitat collectif et autonomie ouvrière.” Revue du Nord 1: 63–76. doi:10.3917/rdn.374.0063.
   Google Scholar
• Dotson, T. 2016. “Trial-And-Error Urbanism: Addressing Obduracy, Uncertainty and Complexity in Urban Planning and Design.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 9 (2): 148–165. doi:10.1080/17549175.2015.1029511.
   Google Scholar
• Droste, C. 2015. “German Co-Housing: An Opportunity for Municipalities to Foster Socially Inclusive Urban Development?” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 79–92. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, J. 2006. “Zukunftssicherung gemeinnütziger Wohnbaugenossenschaften in Österreich.” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen 56 (1): 19–25. doi:10.1515/zfgg-2006-0104.
   Google Scholar
• Engelsman, U., M. Rowe, and A. Southern. 2016. “Community Land Trusts: A Radical or Reformist Response to the Housing Question Today?” ACME: an International Journal for Critical Geographies 15 (3): 589–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, A., and J. Walker. 2013. “Complexity Management in Practice: A Viable System Model Intervention in an Irish Eco-Community.” European Journal of Operational Research 225 (1): 118–129. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fijalkow, Y. 2009. “Le tiers secteur associatif dans la régulation de l’habitat en France: Une hypothèse géographique.” L’Information géographique 73 (2): 47–59. doi:10.3917/lig.732.0047.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, R. 2012. “Transgressing Urban Utopanism: Autonomy and Active Desire.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 94 (2): 89–106. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2012.00398.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fois, F., and G. Forino. 2014. “The Self-Built Ecovillage in L’Aquila, Italy: Community Resilience as a Grassroots Response to Environmental Shock.” Disasters 38 (4): 719–739. doi:10.1111/disa.12080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 1991. Collaborative Communities: Cohousing, Central Living, and Other New Forms of Housing with Shared Facilities. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2000. “Introduction to the Cohousing Issue.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2): 91–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2012. “Seeding Community: Collaborative Housing as a Strategy for Social and Neighbourhood Repair.” Built Environment 38 (3): 364–394. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.364.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, M. G. 2017. “Great Spatial Expectations: On Three Objects, Two Communities and One House.” Current Sociology 65 (4): 603–622. doi:10.1177/0011392117694071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart, H. 2013. “Gruppendynamik in Baugemeinschaften.” Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung 44 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1007/s11612-012-0198-3.
   Google Scholar
• Gerards, S., R. De Ridder, and S. De Bleeckere. 2015. “Designing Multigenerational Dwelling: A Workshop with Four Flemish Architecture Firms.” International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR 9 (2): 20–30. doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i2.658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierse, C., and M. Wagner. 2012. “Gemeinschaftliche Wohnprojekte - Eine Wohnform für alle sozialen Lagen und Lebensalter?” Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 58 (1): 59–82. doi:10.1515/zsr-2012-0103.
   Google Scholar
• Hamiduddin, I., and N. Gallent. 2016. “Self-Build Communities: The Rationale and Experiences of Group-Build (Baugruppen) Housing Development in Germany.” Housing Studies 31 (4): 365–383. doi:10.1080/02673037.2015.1091920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. 1999a. “Aided Self-Help Housing, a Case of Amnesia: Editor’s Introduction.” Housing Studies 14 (3): 277–280. doi:10.1080/02673039982795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. 1999b. “Slipping through the Cracks: The Origins of Aided Self-Help Housing, 1918-53.” Housing Studies 14 (3): 281–309. doi:10.1080/02673039982803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, S. R. 1999. “Self-Help Housing in the Weimar Republic: The Work of Ernst May.” Housing Studies 14 (3): 311–328. doi:10.1080/02673039982812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoddé, R. 2013. “Inviter l’habitant dans l’enseignement: un dispositif pour apprendre à concevoir autrement.” Cahiers Ramau 6: 217–239.
   Google Scholar
• Home, R. 2010. “Peri‐Urban Informal Housing Development in Victorian England: The Contribution of Freehold Land Societies.” Planning Perspectives 25 (3): 365–373. doi:10.1080/02665433.2010.481188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, A. 2017. “Theorising the Dynamics of Collaborative Consumption Practices: A Comparison of Peer-To-Peer Accommodation and Cohousing.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23: 53–69. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ischer, P. 2012. “De la construction d'un « chez-soi collectif » à la composition d'un « chez-nous ». Enquête auprès de jeunes actifs suisses.” Agora dèbats/jeunesses 61: 119-131. doi:10.3917/agora.061.0119.
   Google Scholar
• Iorio, A. 2013. “Le Espace pensè, espace rêvè? La relation à l’espace dans les projets émergents de cohabitat.” Journal des anthropologues 134–135: 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Iorio, A. 2015. “Le cohousing: Un nouveau mode d’habiter? Réflexions à partir des projets émergents de cohabitat italiens.” Socio-Anthropologie 32: 87–101. doi:10.4000/socio-anthropologie.
   Google Scholar
• Jann, A. 2015. “Age-Wohnmatrix. Bedürfnisse statt Begriffe ins Zentrum stellen.” Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 48 (2): 164–168. doi:10.1007/s00391-013-0566-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2011. “Saving Space, Sharing Time: Integrated Infrastructures of Daily Life in Cohousing.” Environment and Planning A 43: 560–577. doi:10.1068/a43296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2013. “Against the ‘Tyranny’ of Single-Family Dwelling: Insights from Christiania at 40.” Gender, Place & Culture 20 (8): 939–959. doi:10.1080/0966369x.2012.753583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2015. “Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Social Architecture of Co-Housing: Evidence from the UK, USA and Australia.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 93–105. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H., and A. Bonnett. 2013. “Progressive Nostalgia in Novel Living Arrangements: A Counterpoint to Neo-Traditional New Urbanism?” Urban Studies 50 (11): 2349–2370. doi:10.1177/0042098013478235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolanki, O., and A. Vilkko. 2015. “The Meaning of a “Sense of Community” in a Finnish Senior Co-Housing Community.” Journal of Housing for the Elderly 29 (1–2): 111–125. doi:10.1080/02763893.2015.989767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2017. “Housing choices in later life as unclaimed forms of housing activism.” Contemporary Social Science 12 (1–2): 138–152. doi:10.1080/21582041.2017.1334127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. V., N. Coviello, and Y. K. Tang. 2011. “International Entrepreneurship Research (1989–2009): A Domain Ontology and Thematic Analysis.” Journal of Business Venturing 26 (6): 632–659. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehl, K., and V. Then. 2013. “Community and Civil Society Returns of Multi-Generation Cohousing in Germany.” Journal of Civil Society 9 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1080/17448689.2013.771084.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, E., and S. Heath. 2001. “Choosing This Life: Narratives of Choice Amongst House Sharers.” Housing Studies 16 (5): 619–635. doi:10.1080/02673030120080080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, S. 2008. “Demografischer Wandel – neue Wohnformen im Alter?.” Sozialwissenschaften & Berufspraxis 31 (2): 337–349.
   Google Scholar
• Krokfors, K. 2012. “Co-Housing in the Making.” Built Environment 38 (2): 309–314. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.309.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A. 2009. “L’habitat solidaire. Expériences de femmes vieillissantes.” Multitudes 2: 247–252. doi:10.3917/mult.037.0247.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A. 2013. “Habiter et vieillir en citoyens actifs: Regards croisés France-Suède.” Retraite et société (2): 101–120.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A. 2015a. “Self-Managed Co-Housing in the Context of an Ageing Population in Europe.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 32–45. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labit, A. 2015b. “Habiter autrement pour vieillir autrement.” Socio-Anthropologie-revue interdisciplinaire de sciences humaines et sociales 32: 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A. 2016. “Habiter en citoyenneté et solidarité pour mieux vieillir.” Gérontologie et société 38 (1): 141–154. doi:10.3917/gs1.149.0141.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A., and K. Chaland. 2010. “L’habitat groupé autogéré en France et en Allemagne. Perspectives d’avenir dans le contexte du vieillissement démographique.” Espace populations sociétés. Space populations societies 2010/1: 131–142. doi:10.4000/eps.3982.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A., and N. Dubost. 2016. “Housing and Ageing in France and Germany: The Intergenerational Solution.” Housing, Care and Support 19 (2): 45–54. doi:10.1108/hcs-08-2016-0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lager, D., B. van Hoven, and L. Meijering. 2012. “Places that Matter: Place Attachment and Wellbeing of Older Antillean Migrants in the Netherlands.” European Spatial Research and Policy 19 (1). doi:10.2478/v10105-012-0007-6.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., and A. Novy. 2014. “Cooperative Housing and Social Cohesion: The Role of Linking Social Capital.” European Planning Studies 22 (8): 1744–1764. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.800025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., and D. Roessl. 2013. “The Governance of Co-operative Housing: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.” nternational Journal of Co-operative Management 6 (2): 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., and H. Stoeger. 2017. “The Role of the Local Institutional Context in Understanding Collaborative Housing Models: Empirical Evidence from Austria.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 35–54. doi:10.1080/19491247.2016.1265265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. G., and A. Lund Hansen. 2015. “Commodifying Danish Housing Commons.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 97 (3): 263–274. doi:10.1111/geob.12080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laviolette, P. 2008. “A Matter of Co-Opportunism: (In)Alienability in London Social Housing.” City & Society 20 (1): 130–149. doi:10.1111/j.1548-744X.2008.00009.x.
   Google Scholar
• Le Marchand, A. 2009. “L’habitat «non-ordinaire» et la ville post-fordiste.” Multitudes (2): 229–236. doi:10.3917/mult.037.0229.
   Google Scholar
• Leenhardt, H. 2011. “Zukunft quartier, l’avenir, le quartier. De nouvelles formes d’organisation, en Allemagne, pour pouvoir vieillir dans son quartier (même en cas de démence).” Gérontologie et société 34 (1): 205–219. doi:10.3917/gs.136.0205.
   Google Scholar
• Leenhardt, H. 2017. “Les formes alternatives d’habitat pour les personnes âgées, une comparaison Allemagne-France.” Gérontologie et société 39 (1): 187–206. doi:10.3917/gs1.152.0187.
   Google Scholar
• Lietaert, M. 2010. “Cohousing’s Relevance to Degrowth Theories.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (6): 576–580. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. G., D. Peel, and L. B. Janssen-Jansen. 2015. “Self-Build in the UK and Netherlands: Mainstreaming Self-Development to Address Housing Shortages?” Urban, Planning and Transport Research 3 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1080/21650020.2014.987403.
   Google Scholar
• Magnier, J. 2017. “L’habitat participatif et l’impératif écologique: Une utopie réaliste.” Sciences de la société 98: 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Marckmann, B., K. Gram-Hanssen, and T. H. Christensen. 2012. “Sustainable Living and Co-Housing: Evidence from a Case Study of Eco-Villages.” Built Environment 38 (3): 413–429. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.413.
   Google Scholar
• Matysek-Imielińska, M. 2016. “Educational Civil Experiment – A Story of a Particular Radical Housing Estate.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS) 14 (3): 251–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mause, K. 2008. “The Tragedy of the Commune: Learning from Worst-Case Scenarios.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 37 (1): 308–327. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2007.01.015.
   Google Scholar
• Maxey, L. J. 2004. “The Participation of Younger People within Intentional Communities: Evidence from Two Case Studies.” Children’s Geographies 2 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1080/1473328032000168741.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., and C. Durrett. 1994. Cohousing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves. Berkeley, CA: Habitat Press/Ten Speed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijering, L., and D. Lager. 2014. “Home-Making of Older Antillean Migrants in the Netherlands.” Ageing and Society 34 (5): 859–875. doi:10.1017/S0144686X12001377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijering, L., P. Huigen, and B. Van Hoven. 2007. “Intentional Communities in Rural Spaces.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 98 (1): 42–52. doi:10.1111/tesg.2007.98.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mésini, B. 2004. “Résistances et alternatives rurales à la mondialisation.” Études rurales, no. 169–170: 043–059. doi:10.4000/etudesrurales.
   Google Scholar
• Mésini, B. 2011. “Quelle reconnaissance de l’habitat léger, mobile et éphémère?” Techniques & Culture, no. 56: 148–165. doi:10.4000/tc.5742.
   Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, A. 2015. “Un design social sous le poids des héritages: Le cas de l’habitat groupé à Vienne.” Lien social et Politiques (73): 177–198. doi:10.7202/1030957ar.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. 2013. “Participation: housing and urban viability.” Journal of Architecture and Urbanism 37 (3): 218–225. doi:10.3846/20297955.2013.832483.
   Google Scholar
• Minora, F., D. Mullins, and P. A. Jones. 2013. “Governing for Habitability: Self–Organised Communities in England and Italy.” International Journal of Co-Operative Management 6 (2): 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. 2016. “Replication through Partnership: The Evolution of Partnerships between Community Land Trusts and Housing Associations in England.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 82–102. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1198084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T., and D. Mullins. 2013. “Scaling-Up or Going Viral? Comparing Self-Help Housing and Community Land Trust Facilitation.” Voluntary Sector Review 4 (3): 333–353. doi:10.1332/204080513x671931.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., and K. McKee. 2012. “Empowering Local Communities? An International Review of Community Land Trusts.” Housing Studies 27 (2): 280–290. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.647306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, S., and A. Pittini. 2012. Profiles of a Movement: Co-Operative Housing around the World. Brussels: CECODHAS Housing Europe; Ottawa: ICA Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D., D. Czischke, and G. van Bortel. 2012. “Exploring the Meaning of Hybridity and Social Enterprise in Housing Organisations.” Housing Studies 27 (4): 405–417. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.689171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, D., and M. L. Rhodes. 2007. “Special Issue on Network Theory and Social Housing.” Housing, Theory and Society 24 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/14036090601002264.
   Google Scholar
• Ndiaye, A., A. Carimentrand, and M.-R. Gallard. 2015. “Les écoquartiers, territoires d’expérimentation des nouvelles utopies urbaines? Le cas de l’habitat participatif.” Développement durable et territoires 6 (2). doi:10.4000/developpementdurable.10922.
   Google Scholar
• Némoz, S. 2008. “De la «co-âgitation» urbaine aux «maisonnées» intergénérationnelles.” Agora débats/jeunesses (3): 30–39. doi:10.3917/agora.049.0030.
   Google Scholar
• Némoz, S. 2007. “Les ambivalences de l'individualisme contemporain. Fondations et charpentes urbaines de maisonnées intergénérationnelles.” Annales de la recherche urbaine 102: 111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Némoz, S. 2017. “Le devenir de l’habitat intergénérationnel: une revisite socio-anthropologique.” Gérontologie et société 39 (1): 207–220. doi:10.3917/gs1.152.0207.
   Google Scholar
• Niederhauser, R. 2012. “Gemeinsam nicht allein sein: die Alters- Wohngemeinschaft.” Schweizerisches Archiv für Volkskunde 108 (2): 209–217. doi:10.5169/seals-348937.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson Motevasel, I. 2006. “Senior Housing in Sweden—A Question of Class Differences and Collective Aging.” Journal of Housing for the Elderly 20 (3): 77–93. doi:10.1300/J081v20n03_06.
   Google Scholar
• Novy, K. 1991. “Deregulierung in der Sackgasse: Alte und neue Probleme und Chancen einer “sozial gebundenen Wohnungswirtschaft” in Österreich.” Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen: ZögU/Journal for Public and Nonprofit Services 14 (2): 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Odermatt, A., and J. E. van Wezemael. 2004. “Wohnbaugenossenschaften in der Schweiz - Entwicklungsalternative für Ostdeutschland?” Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde 78 (1): 115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, E., and M. Dunn. 2009. “Perspectives on Utilising Community Land Trusts as a Vehicle for Affordable Housing Provision.” Local Environment 14 (8): 749–764. doi:10.1080/13549830903096486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. 2015. “Senior Co-Housing Communities in Denmark.” Journal of Housing for the Elderly 29 (1–2): 126–145. doi:10.1080/02763893.2015.989770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P., S. MacKenzie, D. Bachrach, and N. Podsakoff. 2005. “The Influence of Management Journals in the 1980’s and 1990’s.” Strategic Management Journal 26: 473–488. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prades, J. 2015. “Du concept d’«innovation sociale».” Revue Internationale De L’économie Sociale: Recma, no. 338: 103–112. doi:10.7202/1033876ar.
   Google Scholar
• Priemus, H., and F. Dieleman. 2002. “Social Housing Policy in the European Union: Past, Present and Perspectives.” Urban Studies 39 (2): 191–200. doi:10.1080/00420980120102911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruvost, G. 2013. “L’alternative écologique. Vivre et travailler autrement.” Terrain - Anthropologie & sciences humaines (60): 36–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pruvost, G. 2015. “Faire village autrement. Des communautés introuvables aux réseaux d’habitats légers.” Socio-Anthropologie 32: 21–39. doi:10.4000/socio-anthropologie.
   Google Scholar
• Pruvost, G. 2017. “Critique en acte de la vie quotidienne à la ZAD de Notre-Dame-des-Landes (2013-2014).” Politix (1): 35–62. doi:10.3917/pox.117.0035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randell, M., and S. Cumella. 2009. “People with an Intellectual Disability Living in an Intentional Community.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (JIDR) 53 (8): 716–726. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01181.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauws, W. 2016. “Civic Initiatives in Urban Development: Self-Governance versus Self-Organisation in Planning Practice.” Town Planning Review 87 (3): 339–361. doi:10.3828/tpr.2016.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, R. 2013. “Die Kunst des Gemeinsamen: Potenziale und Herausforderungen selbstverwalteter Wohnprojekte.” Sozialwissenschaften & Berufspraxis 36 (1): 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rogojanu, A. 2015. “Gemeinschaftliches Bauen und Wohnen zwischen Selbstorganisation, Solidarität und stadtpolitischen Interessen.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Volkskunde 118 (3–4): 177–201.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfelder, C. 2017. “Vieillir dans un habitat autogéré: La question du «vivre ensemble».” Gérontologie et société 39 (1): 155–167. doi:10.3917/gs1.152.0155.
   Google Scholar
• Routier, C., A. d'Arripe, and S. Soyez. 2017. “Retour d’expérience sur une démarche de coconception.” Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles 2017/2: 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Roux, N. 2014. “Habiter autrement, un autre rapport au temps.” Ecologie & politique 48 (1): 37. doi:10.3917/ecopo.048.0037.
   Google Scholar
• Rudel, M., E. Görtler, and M. Abraham. 2016. “Seniorengenossenschaften.” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen 66 (1): 25–46. doi:10.1515/zfgg-2016-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. 2014. “Differences between Cohousing and Gated Communities. A Literature Review.” Sociological Inquiry 84 (2): 316–335. doi:10.1111/soin.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. 2015. “The Effects of Cohousing on the Social Housing System: The Case of the Threshold Centre.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 30 (4): 631–644. doi:10.1007/s10901-015-9436-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. 2016. “The Social Capital of Cohousing Communities.” Sociology 50 (2): 400–415. doi:10.1177/0038038515573473.
   Google Scholar
• Ruonavaara, H. 2005. “How Divergent Housing Institutions Evolve: A Comparison of Swedish Tenant Co‐Operatives and Finnish Shareholders’ Housing Companies.” Housing, Theory and Society 22 (4): 213–236. doi:10.1080/14036090500375373.
   Google Scholar
• Sachi Noro, R. 2010. “Chacun a sa caravane. L’habitat caravane et l’organisation sociale chez les Manouches semi-sédentaires ou sédentaires dans la région paloise.” Journal Des Anthropologues. Association Française Des Anthropologues, 120–121.
   Google Scholar
• Sandstedt, E., and S. Westin. 2015. “Beyond Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. Cohousing Life in Contemporary Sweden.” Housing, Theory and Society 32 (2): 131–150. doi:10.1080/14036096.2015.1011687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargisson, L. 2007. “Strange Places: Estrangement, Utopianism, and Intentional Communities.” Utopian Studies 18 (3): 393–424.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, K., and M. Fernández Arrigoitia. 2015. “Development of New Cohousing: Lessons from a London Scheme for the Over-50s.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 106–121. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiders, K. 2011. “Zurück zur Großfamilie?” Sozialer Fortschritt 60 (11): 264–271. doi:10.3790/sfo.60.11.264.
   Google Scholar
• Semprebon, M., and S. Vicari Haddock. 2016. “Innovative Housing Practices Involving Immigrants: The Case of Self-Building in Italy.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 31 (3): 439–455. doi:10.1007/s10901-015-9464-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, H. 1991. “State, Market, and Community: Housing Co-Operatives in Theoretical Perspective.” Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 6 (3): 185–203. doi:10.1007/BF02496502.
   Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J., and B. Bengtsson. 2016. “The Pyrrhic Victory of Civil Society Housing? Co-Operative Housing in Sweden and Norway.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 124–142. doi:10.1080/14616718.2016.1162078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellerberg, A., and T. Woll. 2014. “Dwellings and Generational Change in Owner Communities.” Town Planning Review 85 (3): 341–362. doi:10.3828/tpr.2014.21.
   Google Scholar
• Steinführer, A., and A. Haase. 2009. “Flexible–Inflexible: Socio-Demographic, Spatial and Temporal Dimensions of Flat Sharing in Leipzig (Germany).” GeoJournal 74 (6): 567–587. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9248-3.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F., M. Baborska-Narozny, and P. Chatterton. 2016. “Resilience, Redundancy and Low-Carbon Living: Co-Producing Individual and Community Learning.” Building Research & Information 44 (7): 789–803. doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1207371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuppia, P. 2016. “La révolution dans le jardin. Utopies communautaires et expériences néo-rurales françaises après Mai 68.” Education et sociétés, no. 1: 49–64. doi:10.3917/es.037.0049.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2015. “Between Boundaries: From Commoning and Guerrilla Gardening to Community Land Trust Development in Liverpool.” Antipode 47 (4): 1021–1042. doi:10.1111/anti.12154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, R., R. Holt, A. MacPherson, and L. Pittaway. 2005. “Using Knowledge within Small and Medium-Sized Firms: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.” International Journal of Management Reviews 7 (4): 257–281. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2005.7.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunhurst, C., and C. Ritchie. 1992. “Housing in the Dearne Valley: Doing Community OR with the Thurnscoe Tenants Housing Co-Operative Part 1 – The Involvement of the Community OR Unit.” The Journal of the Operational Research Society 43 (7): 677–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunhurst, C., C. Ritchie, J. Friend, and P. Booker. 1992. “Housing in the Dearne Valley: Doing Community OR with the Thurnscoe Tenants Housing Co-Operative Part 1 – The Involvement of the Community OR Unit.” The Journal of the Operational Research Society 43 (2): 81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., D. Denyer, and P. Smart. 2003. “Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review.” British Journal of Management 14 (3): 207–222. doi:10.1111/bjom.2003.14.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2015a. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Towards a Long-Term Perspective of Self-Managed Collaborative Housing Initiatives.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2015b. “Understanding Co-Housing from a Planning Perspective: Why and How?” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 64–78. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2016. “The Re-Emergence of Self-Managed Co-Housing in Europe: A Critical Review of Co-Housing Research.” Urban Studies 53 (10): 2023–2040. doi:10.1177/0042098015586696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turok, I. 1993. “Tackling Poverty through Housing Investment: An Evaluation of a Community Self‐Build Project in Glasgow.” Housing Studies 8 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1080/02673039308720749.
   Google Scholar
• Tyvimaa, T. 2011. “Social and Physical Environments in Senior Communities: The Finnish Experience.” International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 4 (3): 197–209. doi:10.1108/17538271111152997.
   Google Scholar
• Ufer, U. 2013. “La modernité entre les valeurs d’échange et d’usage.” Eurostudia 8 (1–2): 35–62.
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2013. “Alternative Capitalism and Creative Economy: The Case of Christiania.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (5): 1785–1798. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01167.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhetsel, A., R. Kessels, T. Zijlstra, and M. Van Bavel. 2017. “Housing preferences among students: collective housing versus individual accommodations? A stated preference study in Antwerp (Belgium).” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 32 (3): 449-470. doi:10.1007/s10901-016-9522-5.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. 1992. From Central Kitchen to Community Co-Operation - Development of Collective Housing in Sweden. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. 1997. “Collective Housing in Scandinavia - How Feminism Revised a Modernist Experiment.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 14 (4): 329–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. 2000. “From Collective Housing to Cohousing A Summary of Research.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2): 164–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U., and L. Horelli. 2012. “Design for Gender Equality: The History of Co-Housing Ideas and Realities.” Built Environment 38 (3): 315–335. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.315.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U., ed. 2010. Living Together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities Around the World. Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5-9 May 2010. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology and Kollektivhus NU.
   Google Scholar
• Vey, J. 2016. “Crisis Protests in Germany, Occupy Wall Street, and Mietshäuser Syndikat: Antinomies of Current Marxist- and Anarchist-Inspired Movements and Their Convergence.” Capital & Class 40 (1): 59–74. doi:10.1177/0309816815627389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viazzo, P. P., and J. González Díez. 2016. “Les « nouvelles formes de famille » en Italie entre convergences morphologiques et persistances culturelles.” Ethnologie française 162 (2): 219–228. doi:10.3917/ethn.162.0219.
   Google Scholar
• Vignet, J. 2016. “L’habitat participatif, espace de souveraineté commune ou communauté sélective de l’économie solidaire?” RECMA 3: 88–102.
   Google Scholar
• Wakeman, R. 1999. “Reconstruction and the Self-Help Housing Movement: The French Experience.” Housing Studies 14 (3): 355–366. doi:10.1080/02673039982849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wankiewicz, H. 2015. “The Potential of Cohousing for Rural Austria.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 46–63. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasshede, C. 2016. “Normalization of Children: Politics and Images of Children in the Freetown of Christiania.” Childhood 23 (2): 207–220. doi:10.1177/0907568215592041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasshede, C. 2017. “The Child of the Common: Governing Children in the Freetown Christiania, Denmark.” Children & Society 31 (5): 403–413. doi:10.1111/chso.12211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechuli, Y. 2017. “Neighborly Assistance: High Expectations of Multi-Generation Cohousing Projects.” Working with Older People 21 (3): 133–139. doi:10.1108/wwop-02-2017-0006.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M. 2008. “A Potential Method for the Interpretive Synthesis of Qualitative Research: Issues in the Development of ‘Meta-Interpretation’.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11 (2): 13–28. doi:10.1080/13645570701401222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiest, K., M.-L. Baldin, S. Hildebrandt, and G. Montanari. 2017. “Genossenschaftliche Prinzipien und genossenschaftliche Alltagspraxis – Der gemeinschaftliche Wohnungssektor in Leipzig.” Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 75 (2): 143–156. doi:10.1007/s13147-016-0441-4.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2005. “Sun, Surf and Sustainable Housing—Cohousing, the Californian Experience.” International Planning Studies 10 (2): 145–177. doi:10.1080/13563470500258824.
   Google Scholar
• Zdrenka, M., A. Lessow, J.-C. Johannsen, N. M. Klapproth, A.-K. Koloff, F. Wernecke, N. Großmann, and C. Petersen-Ewert. 2016. “Gemeinschaft in betreuten Hausgemeinschaften am Beispiel des „Wilhelm Leuschner Seniorenzentrums“.” HeilberufeScience 7 (1): 19–24. doi:10.1007/s16024-015-0259-y.
   Google Scholar