What Is Co-Housing? Developing a Conceptual Framework from the Studies of Danish Intergenerational Co-Housing

References

• Andersen, H. S. 1985. “Danish Low-Rise Housing Co-Operatives (Bofællesskaber) as an Example of a Local Community Organization.” In Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 2: 49–66. doi:10.1080/02815738508730062.
   Google Scholar
• Bladt, L. E. 2015. “Fristaden Christiania 1971-“. In "danmarkshistorien.dk'", Department of History and Classical Studies, School of Culture and Society, University of Aarhus.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. H. W., and S. Leland. 2018. “Co-Housing for Whom? Survey Evidence to Support the Diffusion of Socially and Spatially Integrated Housing in the United States.” In Housing Policy Debate. Vol. 28:5, p 653–667. Routlegde, Taylor Francis Group. doi:10.1080/10511482.2018.1424724
   Google Scholar
• Bresson, S., and S. Denèfle. 2015. “Diversity of Self-Managed Co-Housing Initiatives in France.” Urban Research and Practice 8: (1): 5–16. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysch, S. 2018. “Designing and Building Housing Together: The Spanish Case of La Borda.” proceedings from the Collaborative Housing workshop at European Network of Housing Research conference, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. 2015. Low Impact Living A Field Guide to Ecological, Affordable Community Building. Earthscan Tools for Community Planning. Oxon, New York: Routlegde.
   Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F., and V. Baglione. 2014. “Living Together Privately: For a Cautious Reading of Cohousing.” Urban Research and Practice 7 (1): 20–34. doi:10.1080/17535069.2013.827905.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. S. 2004. “Evaluation of Community Planning and Life of Senior Cohousing Projects in Northern European Countries.” In European Planning Studies 12 (8): 1189–1216. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.1080/0965431042000289296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, D. L. 2013-14. “Transparency, Equivalence, and Effectiveness, How Sociocracy Can Help Communities, Part I-IV.” Communities 160 (Part I): 59–63. vol. 161 Part II (2013) p. 61-66, vo. 163, Part III (2014) p. 57-63, vol. 165 Part IV (2014) p. 60-63. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Czischke, D. 2018. “Collaborative Housing and Housing Providers: Towards an Analytical Framework of Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in Housing Co-Production.” International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 55–81. 2 January 2018. doi:10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jorge Huertas, V. 2018. “Focusing on Retrofit Cohousing. Tactics for Future Implementation.” proceedings from the Collaborative Housing workshop at European Network of Housing Research conference, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Degnbol, M. C. 2018. Fælles Fundament Økonomi for Bofællesskaber Og Kollektiver. Forlaget Bosammen, CopenhagenDenmark.
   Google Scholar
• Droste, C. 2015. “German Co-Housing: An Opportunity for Municipalities to Foster Socially Inclusive Urban Development?” Urban Research and Practice 8:1,: 79–92. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrett, C. 2005. Senior Cohousing: A Community Approach to Independent Living. Canada: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Elm, A., and T. Dilling-Hansen, Eds. 2003. Økosamfund I Danmark, Hvordan Drømme Bliver Til Virkelighed. Galten, Denmark: LØS Landsforeningen for Økosamfund.
   Google Scholar
• El-Tanany, R., A. Ahrenkiel, and J. F. Christensen. 2011. Drømmen Lever – 40 År I Kollektivlandsbyen Toustrup Mark. Denmark: Kle-Art.
   Google Scholar
• Foldager, I., and S. Dyck-Madsen. 2002. Munksøgård En Økologisk Bebyggelse Ved Roskilde, Erfaringsopsamling Og Anbefalinger. Det Økologiske Råd. Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 1991. Collaborative Communities. Cohousing, Central Living and Other New Forms of Housing with Shared Facilities. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. 2000. Edt. “Introduction to the Special Issue”, and ”American Cohousing: The First Five Years”. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17 (2), Theme Issue: Cohousing (Summer,2000) 91–93. Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganer, S. 2016. Fremtidens Bofællesskaber I Funktionstømte Bygninger I Storbyen, Provinsbyen Og På Landet. Copenhagen, Denmark: Dansk Bygningsarv and Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Gram-Hanssen, K., and J. O. Jensen. 2005. “Green Buildings in Denmark from Radical Ecology to Consumer-Oriented Market Approaches?” In Sustainable Architectures Cultures and Natures in Europe and North America, edited by S. Guy and S. A. Moore, 165–183. New York: Spon Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P., R. Kitchin, B. Bartley, and D. Fuller. 2002 (2005). Thinking Geographically: Space, Theory and Contemporary Human Geography, Continiuum. London, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, S., (Edt), E. L. Bendixen, L. Dilling, C. Holten, G. Illeris, B. Bjerre, and B. Rasmussen. 1997. Sættedammen I 25 År. Sættedammen: Hillerød Bogtrykkeri.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, P., and H. G. Larsen. 2018. “An Alternative for Whom? the Evolution and Socio-Economic of Danish Cohousing.” Urban Research & Practice. Accessed 22 April 2018. doi:10.1080/17535069.2018.1465582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2015. “Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Social Architecture of Co-Housing: Evidence from the UK, USA and Australia.” Urban Research and Practice 8:1: 93–105. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. O. 2001. “Green Building in an Infrastructure Perspective.” In Urban Infrastructure in Transition Networks, Building, Plans, edited by S. Guy, S. Marvin, and T. Moss, 121–135. London and Sterling VA, USA: Earthscan Publications, .
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. M. 1985. Lokalsamfund, Selvforvaltning Og Fysisk Planlægning. SBi-planlægning 52. Hørsholm: SBi Forlag. Danish Building Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jepsen, M. R., and A. G. Busck. 2018. Hvad Skaber Rurale Successer Og Hvor Lang Rækker Brandet? Eksemplificeret Ved Landsbyen Torup I Halsnæs Kommune. Danmark: IGN Rapport, (web)Institut for Geovidenskab og Naturforvaltning, Københavns Universitet. December 978-87-7903-771-7
   Google Scholar
• Korpela, S. 2012. “Casa Malta: A Case Study of Contemporary Co-Housing Project in Helsinki.” Co-Housing in the Making. Built Environment 38 (3): 309–314.
   Google Scholar
• Krokfors, K. 2012. “Edt. “Co-Housing in the Making”.” Co-Housing in the Making. Built Environment. 38 (3): 309–314.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., C. Carriou, and D. Czischke. 2018. “Collaborative Housing Research (1990-2017): A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Field.” Housing, Theory and Society: 1–30. doi:10.1080/14036096.2018.1536077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. G. 2018. “Constructing Homes to Build Community: Activist Co-Housing in Barcelona.” proceedings from the Collaborative Housing workshop at European Network of Housing Research conference, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. G. 2019. “Three Phases of Danish Cohousing: Tenure and the Development of an Alternative Housing Form.” Housing Studies 1–23. doi:10.1080/02673037.2019.1569599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. G., and A. L. Hansen. 2015. “Commodifying Danish Housing Commons.” Geografiska Annaler 97 (3): 263–274. Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography. doi:10.1111/geob.12080.
   Google Scholar
• Lietaert, M. 2010. “Cohousing’s Relevance to Degrowth Theories.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (6): 576–580. Sciencedirect. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, L. V. 2012. “Sociale og praktiske fællesskaber – et blik på bofællesskaber og boligplanlægning i dag.” Master Thesis, Roskilde University Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Manzanti, B. 2007. “Choosing Residence, Community and Neighbours – Theorzing Families’ Motives for Moving.” Geografiske Annaler 89 (1): 53–68. Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00239.x.
   Google Scholar
• Marckmann, B. 2009. “Hverdagslivets Kritik: Økosamfund I Danmark”. PhD dissertation, Sociologisk Institut Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Marckmann, B., K. Gram-Hanssen, and T. H. Christensen. 2012. “Sustainable Living and Co-Housing: Evidence from a Case Study of Eco-Villages”.” Co-Housing in the Making. Built Environment 38:3,: 413–429.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, C. C. 2000. “Site Planning, Building Design and a Sense of Community: An Analysis of Six Cohousing Schemes in Denmark, Sweden and the Nederlands.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17 (2): 146–163. Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, D., and D. Entin. 2011. Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Cohousing Association of the United States (Coho/US).
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, D., and A. Sanguinetti 2015. “Findings from the 2012 National Survey of Cohousing Residents.” proceedings from the cohousing Research Network (CRN) Worksshop, National Cohousing Conference, Friday May 29, Durham, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Martinussen, P. V. 2010. “Self-Grown Sustainability. A Study of Private Initiatives in Sustainable Urban Planning.” Master thesis, Frederiksberg: University of Copenhagen. Faculty of LIFE science.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., and C. Durrett. 1989. “Cohousing in Denmark.” In New Households. New Housing, edited by K. A. Frank and S. Ahrentzen, 95–126. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., and C. Durrett. 2011. Creating Cohousing. Building Sustainable Communities. (First edt. 1988). Canada: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, G. 2005. Sustainable Community. Learning from the Cohousing Model. University of Victoria, Canada, USA: Trafford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nygaard, E. 1984. Tag over Hovedet Dansk Boligbyggeri Fra 1945 Til 1982. Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pagh, C., and J. Viemose. 2016. Deleby – Bofællesskaber Som Drivkraft for Regional Udvikling. Urgent. Copenhagn, Denmark: Agency & LB analyse, Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. 2013. Det Store Eksperiment Hverdagsliv I Seniorbofællesskaber. Copenhagen, Denmark: Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut, Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. 2015. “Senior Co-Housing Communities in Denmark.” Journal of Housing for the Elderly 29 (1–2): 126–145. Routlegde, Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1080/02763893.2015.989770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2013. Doing Visual Ethnography. 2nd and 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2007. Visual Methodologies, an Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, Second Edition. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. 2016. “The Social Capital of Cohousing Communities.” Sociology 50 (2): 400–415. SAGE. doi:10.1177/0038038515573473.
   Google Scholar
• Sanguinetti, A. 2014. “Transformational Practies in Cohousing; Enhancing Resident’ Connection to Community and Nature.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 40: 86–96. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanguinetti, A. 2015. ““Diversifying Cohousing: The Retrofit Model” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research.” Research Gate 32:1: 68–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sargisson, L. 2012. “Second-Wave Cohousing: A Modern Utopia?” Utopian Studies Penn State University Press 23: 28–56. doi:10.5325/utopianstudies.23.1.0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stender, M. 2014. “Nye Steder Med Liv Og Sjæl? Stedskabelse I Tre Danske Boligbyggerier”. PhD dissertation, Copenhagen: Danish Building Research Institute and Royal Academy of Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Thörn, H., C. Wasshede, and T. Nilson. 2011. Space for Urban Alternatives? Christiania 1971-2011. Möklinta: Gidlunds Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Antonini. 2001. “Our Common House: Using the Built Environment to Develop Supportive Communities.” PhD-dissertation, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2015a. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Towards a Long Term Perspective of Self-Managed Collaborative Housing Initiatives.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 1–4. Edt Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2015b. “Understanding Co-Housing from a Planning Perspective: Why and How?” Urban Research & Practice 8 (1): 64–78. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. 2017. “Learning from the Co-Housing Initiatives between Passivhaus Engineers and Active Inhabitants.” PhD dissertation, Rotterdam: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Architectural Engineering + Technology, Management of the Built Environment and Urbanism.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, S. 2017. The Ten Most Influential Buildings in History. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Vedel-Petersen, F., E. B. Jantzen, and K. Ranten. 1988. “Bofællesskaber En Eksempelsamling.” SBi rapport 187, Hørsholm: SBi Forlag, Danish Building Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. 2000. “From Collective Housing to Cohousing – A Summary of Research.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research JSTOR 17 (2): 164–178. Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U. 2010. Edt. “Living Together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities around the World. Proceedings from the International Collaborative Housing Conference in Stockholm 5-9 May.” Report. Stockhom: Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Royal Institute of Technology in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U., and L. Horelli. 2012. “Design for Gender Eguality: The History of Co-Housing Ideas and Realities.” Built Environment 38 (3): 309–314. doi:10.2148/benv.38.3.315.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2005. “Designing Neighboorhoods for Social Interaction: The Case of Cohousing.” Journal of Urban Design 10 (2): 195–227. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2008. “Predicting an American Future for Cohousing.” ScienceDirect. Futures 40: 268–286. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2007.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar