Towards an Urban Domesticity. Contemporary Architecture and the Blurring Boundaries between the House and the City

References

• Aggleton, P.,Cover, R., Leahy, D., Marshall, D., and Rasmussen, M. L., eds. 2018. Youth, Sexuality and Sexual Citizenship. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alftberg, A., and K. Hansson. 2012. “Introduction: Self-care Translated into Practice.” Culture Unbound 4 (3): 415–424. doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1243.
   Google Scholar
• Amann Alcocer, A., 2005. “El espacio doméstico: La mujer y la casa”. PhD diss., Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, J., and P. Kirkham, eds. 1989. A View from the Interior: Women and Design. London: Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Attiwill, S., 2012. “Interior, Practices of Interiorization, Interior Design”. PhD diss., RMIT University
   Google Scholar
• Aureli, P. V., and M. S. Giudici. 2018. “The Forum of Otium: Labour and Leisure in Ancient Greek and Roman Domestic Space.” In Work Body Leisure, edited by M. O. Verzier and N. Axel, 154–162. Rotterdam: Hatie Cantz.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G. 2014. Poetics of Space (1957). Translated by Maria Jolas. New York: Penguin books.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 1996. The System of Objects. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck-Gernsheim, E. 2003. La reinvención de la familia. En busca de nuevas formas de convivencia. Barcelona: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. 2004. The Location of Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, A., and R. Dowling. 2006. Home. Milton Park. UK and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bose, S., J. Self, and F. Williams. 2016. Home Economics: Five New Models for Domestic Life. London: Spaces.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, T. H., ed. 1993. Family Relations: Challenges for the Future. Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. 2005. “The Conspicious Body: Capitalism, Consumerism, Class and Consumption.” Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology 9 (1): 82–111. doi:10.1163/1568535053628436.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1996. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume 1: The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge: Blackwell! Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chávez Giraldo, J. D. 2010. “El Espacio Doméstico Tras el Soporte Arquitectónico: Claves para Comprender el Sentido Multidimensional de lo Íntimo en el Dominio del Hogar.” Dearq 07: 6–17. doi:10.18389/dearq7.2010.03.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, A., 2018. “Millennials Are Ordering More Food Delivery, But Are They Killing The Kitchen, Too?”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.forbes.com/sites/andriacheng/2018/06/26/millennials-are-ordering-food-for-delivery-more-but-are-they-killing-the-kitchen-too/#1d245ed3393e
   Google Scholar
• Colomina, B. 2014. “The Century of the Bed.” In The Century of the Bed, edited by ARGE, 10–23. Wien: curated by_vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Colomina, B. 2018. “The 24/7 Bed.” In Work Body Leisure, edited by M. O. Verzier and N. Axel, 189–204. Rotterdam: Hatie Cantz.
   Google Scholar
• Darke, J. 1994. “Women and the Meaning of Home.” In Housing Women, edited by R. Gilroy and R. Woods, 11–30. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cebada, E. C. 2011. “El Campo De La Cebada.” A+T 38: 162–167.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1986. Nomadology: The War Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz Méndez, C., I. García Espejo, and R. Gutiérrez Palacios. 2013. Hábitos alimentarios de los españoles. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Dogma. 2015. “Living and Working: How to Live Together”. Accessed 17 April 2019 https://architecture.mit.edu/sites/architecture.mit.edu/files/attachments/lecture/Tattara_living%20and%20working_intro.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Echeverría, J. 1994. Telépolis. Barcelona: Ediciones Destino.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverría, J. 1995. Cosmopolitas Domésticos. Barcelona: Anagrama.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. T., 2017. “New Ground Architecture”. Accessed 23 April 2019 http://www.owch.org.uk/architecture
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2013. Household Composition, Poverty and Hardship across Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission. ISSN: 2315-0807.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S. 1975. Wages against Housework. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., 2009. “The Reproduction of Labour-Power in the Global Economy, Marxist Theory and the Unfinished Feminist Revolution”. Paper presented at the Seminar on the Crisis of Social Reproduction and Feminist Struggle, Santa Cruz, UC.
   Google Scholar
• Float studio. 2017. “Casper NYC HQ” Accessed 23 April 2019 http://www.float.studio/casper-office
   Google Scholar
• Fuseproject. 2016. “Ori”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://fuseproject.com/work/ori/systems/?focus=overview
   Google Scholar
• FutureHaus. 2016. “Bathroom”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.futurehaus.tech/bath/
   Google Scholar
• Giaccardi, C., and M. Magatti. 2001. La globalizzazione non è un destino. Momenti strutturali ed esperienze soggettive nell’età contemporanea. Laterza: Bari.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., 2017. “Hybrid Bed-desk Frame by Pieter Peulen Helps Students Make the Most of Tiny Living Spaces”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.dezeen.com/2017/01/19/flexit-pieter-peulen-space-saving-furniture-students-imm-cologne-2017/
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, R., and R. Woods. 1994. Housing Women. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• GRT architects. 2017. “Objective Subject Offices”. Accessed 23 April 2019 http://www.grtarchitects.com/objective-subject-offices/
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P., B. Hughes, E. Jagger, K. Paterson, R. Russell, E. Tulle, and M. Tyler. 2000. The Body, Culture and Society: An Introduction. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen, H., and G. Baydar, eds. 2005. Negotiating Domesticity: Spatial Productions of Gender in Modern Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, B., 2018. MINI Living builds “global village” of Urban Cabin micro homes. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.dezeen.com/2018/12/19/mini-living-urban-cabin-micro-home-round-up-london-new-york-los-angeles-beijing-movie/
   Google Scholar
• IKEA. 2016. “Life at Home: What Makes a Home. Report 3”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://ikeamuseum.com/media/filer_public/9a/94/9a94647a-d356-4a6b-9803-3fc6a4ca0034/ikea_life_at_home_report_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacque, A. 2017. “Grindr Archiurbanism.” Log Magazine 41: 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Jaglarz, A., 2018. “Intelligent Bathroom: Intelligent Decision for Health”. In Intelligent Human System Integration: proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration, edited by W. Karwowsky and E. Ahram, 125–130. New York: Taschen.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K., and M. Ekaterina. 2008. “The Portable Home: The Domestication of Public Space.” Sociological Theory 26 (4): 324–343. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Cecla, F. 1995. Mente locale. Per un’antropologia dell’abitare. Milano: Elèuthera.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. 2007. “From Family Television to Bedroom Culture: Young People’s Media at Home.” In Media Studies: Key Issues and Debates, edited by E. Devereux, 302–321. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. 1993. Libidinal Economy. Bloomington: Indiana University press.
   Google Scholar
• Machtar, E., 2015. “For Your Next Party, Rent a Kitchen the Size of Your Apartment”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/for-your-next-party-rent-kitchen-size-your-apartment-180955230/#3TKwDpXoQfYjwoDC.99
   Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., M. Munro, and S. J. Smith. 1990. “Gender and the Meaning of the Home.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 14 (4): 625–647. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1990.tb00160.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairs, J., 2016. “World’s Largest Co-living Complex Promises Residents “Everything at Their Fingertips”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.dezeen.com/2016/04/28/collective-old-oak-common-co-living-plp-architecture-willesden-junction-london-housing/
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, S. 2004. “Understanding Home: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Sociological Review 52 (1): 62–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00442.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martella, F. 2018. “Hacia una nueva transformación de la sala de estar. Expansión del papel de la sala de estar a través de la sociedad contemporánea.” Reia 13: 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, K., 2010. Domesti/city. The dislocated home in the augmented space. Master thesis, Bartelett School of Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Meinhold, B., 2014. “Living Cube: Multi-Functional Furnishing Provides a ‘Home in a Box’ Solution”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://inhabitat.com/the-living-cube-multi-functional-furniture-piece-provides-a-home-in-a-box-solution/
   Google Scholar
• Mennell, S. 1985. All Manners of Food: Eating and Taste in England and France from the Middle Ages to the Present. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. 2004. Me++; the Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A., 2018. “Sieger Design Creates Tiny Home Spa that Fits inside Micro Apartments.” Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.dezeen.com/2018/07/13/sieger-design-small-size-premium-spa-bathroom-micro-apartments/
   Google Scholar
• Murado, C., and J. Elvira, 2012. “Teknobyen, Student Housing in Trondheim”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://muradoelvira.com/teknobyen-student-housing
   Google Scholar
• Pardo Díaz, G., 2016. “Cuerpo y Casa: Hacia el espacio domestico contemporáneo desde las transformaciones de la cocina y del cuarto de baño”. PhD diss., Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Puigjaner, A., 2016. “The “Kitchenless” House: A Concept for the 21st Century”. Interview by Cati Bestard. Accessed 17 April 2019 https://www.archdaily.com/793370/the-kitchenless-house-a-concept-for-the-21st-century
   Google Scholar
• Rechavi, T. B. 2008. “A Room for Living and Public Aspects in the Experience of the Living Room.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29: 133–143. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reigot, B. P., and R. K. Spina. 1996. Beyond the Traditional Family: Voices of Diversity. New york: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2015. Accelerazione e alienazione. Per una teoria critica del tempo nella tarda modernità. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Schemata Architects, 2019. “Kitchen Studio Suiba” Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.archdaily.com/913015/kitchen-studio-suiba-schemata-architects
   Google Scholar
• Self, J. 2016. “What You Should Think about Architecture.” Real Review 1: 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1977. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2003. “Mobile Transformations of “Public” and “Private” Life.” Theory Culture and Society 20 (3): 107–125. doi:10.1177/02632764030203007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Space 10. 2017. “Why Co-living Will Matter Even More on Our Increasingly Urban Planet.” Accessed 23 April 2019 https://medium.com/space10/could-co-living-be-the-solution-to-the-more-alarming-consequences-of-our-increasingly-urban-planet-76330a211b1a
   Google Scholar
• Steegmann, D., 2017. “Ciudad, Casa, Comida. Una aproximación poliédrica a los limites entro lo público y lo privado”. PhD diss., Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya.
   Google Scholar
• Studio Weave, 2018. Living closer: the many faces of co-living. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zT3YjL9HUl0B66S20hjGIfOCt9RdD-TB/view
   Google Scholar
• Sustersic, P., 2013. “Domestic Space in the Information Era: Architectural Design, Images and Life in a Technological Age”. PhD diss., University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., and J. Preston, eds. 2006. Intimus: Interior Design Theory Reader. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J. 1999. Globalization and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 1998. “Food and the Production of the Civilised Street.” In Images of the Street: Planning, Identity and Control in Public Space, edited by N. Fyfe, 192–204. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, B. 2012. “The Meaning of Domesticity.” In The Domestic Space Reader, edited by C. Briganti and K. Mezei, 153–156. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., 2016. “WeWork Opens Gorgeous WeLive Co-living Apartments on Wall Street”. Accessed 23 April 2019 https://inhabitat.com/nyc/wework-opens-gorgeous-welive-co-living-apartments-on-wall-street/
   Google Scholar
• Watakanyaka, A., L. Zhara, and P. Atmodiwirio, 2017. “Feeling at Home in Starbucks: Revealing Transient Urban Interior”. Paper presented at the Seoul World Architects Congress, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, J. 1997. “The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction.” In Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, edited by J. Weintraub and K. Kumar, 1–42. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, A., 2018. “Grafeoiphobia Is a Furniture for Desk-shy, Bed-happy Workers.” Accessed 23 April 2019 https://www.dezeen.com/2018/12/04/grafeoiphobia-office-furniture-geoffrey-pascal-bed-desk/
   Google Scholar
• Wodka, A., 2016. “U.S. Kitchen Incubators: An Industry Update. American Communities Trust, Econsult Solutions, Urbane Development”. Accessed 23 April 2019 http://www.econsultsolutions.com/report/us-kitchen-incubators-industry-update/
   Google Scholar
• Worrell, J. 2013. “Rebuilding Communities.” Domus 969: 66–75.
   Google Scholar