Governance Networks and Accountability Patterns in the Provision of Housing for Migrants: The Case of Central and Eastern European Workers in the Netherlands

References

• Aarsæther, N., H. Bjørnå, T. Fotel, and E. Sørensen. 2009. “Evaluating the Democratic Accountability of Governance Networks: Analysing Two Nordic Megaprojects.” Local Government Studies 35 (5): 577–594. doi:10.1080/03003930903227394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntsen, L., and N. Skowronek. 2021. “State-Of-The-Art Research Overview of the Impact of COVID-19 on Migrant Workers in the EU and the Netherlands.” Nijmegen Sociology of Law working paper series.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, I., V. Lowndes, and L. Pratchett. 2011. “Policy Networks and Governance Networks: Towards Greater Conceptual Clarity.” Political Studies Review 9 (3): 297–308. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00239.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booster Team Migrant Workers. 2020. Geen Tweederangsburgers. Aanbevelingen Om Misstanden Bij Arbeidsmigranten in Nederland Tegen Te Gaan. [No Second Class Citizens. Recommendations to Combat Abuses Among Migrant Workers in the Netherlands.]. The Hague: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. 2007. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Journal 13 (4): 447–468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. 2010. “Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism.” West European Politics 33 (5): 946–967. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., P. Scholten, and R. Zapata-Barrero. 2019. The Routledge Handbook of the Governance of Migration and Diversity in Cities. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Committee Lessons from Recent Labour Migration. 2011. Arbeidsmigratie in goede banen. [Labour migration in the right direction]. The Hague: Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of Social Affairs and Employment. 2021. Verslag van een rondetafelgesprek 28 June 2021 [Report of a round table discussion 28 June 2021]. The Hague: Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and D. L. Miller. 2000. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39 (3): 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, J. 2004. “European Housing Policies: Bringing the State Back In?” European Journal of Housing Policy 4 (3): 253–260. doi:10.1080/1461671042000307242.
   Google Scholar
• Driessen, P. P., C. Dieperink, F. Van Laerhoven, H. A. Runhaar, and W. J. Vermeulen. 2012. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance–Experiences from the Netherlands.” Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (3): 143–160. doi:10.1002/eet.1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., and G. R. Teisman. 2008. “Public-Private Partnership: On the Edge of Project and Process Management. Insights from Dutch Practice: The Sijtwende Spatial Development Project.” Environment and Planning C, Government & Policy 26 (3): 614–626. doi:10.1068/c66m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbersen, G., A. Leerkes, P. Scholten, and E. Snel. 2017. “The Intra-EU Mobility Regime: Differentiation, Stratification and Contradictions.” Migration Studies 5 (3): 337–355. doi:10.1093/migration/mnx044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmark, A. 2007. “Democratic Accountability and Network Governance—problems and Potentials.” In Theories of Democratic Network Governance, 274–296. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 1975. “Alternative Conceptions of Accountability: The Example of Health Administration.” Public Administration Review 35 (3): 279–286. doi:10.2307/974763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Annual Report on Intra-EU Labour Mobility 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Policy Institute. 2020. Are Agri-Food Workers Only Exploited in Southern Europe? Case Studies on Migrant Labour in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Brussels: Open Society Foundations.
   Google Scholar
• Expertise Centre Flexible Living. 2019. Routekaart naar goede huisvesting voor EU-arbeidsmigranten. [Roadmap to good housing for EU migrant workers]. Hilversum: Expertisecentrum Flexwonen.
   Google Scholar
• Federation of Dutch Trade Unions. 2020. Eerlijke arbeidsmigratie in een socialer Nederland [Fair labor migration in a more social Netherlands]. Utrecht: FNV.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Netherlands. 2021. Jaarrapportage Arbeidsmigranten 2021 [Annual Report Migrant Workers 2021]. The Hague: Rijksoverheid.
   Google Scholar
• Greenports Netherlands. 2021. Kernboodschap Bouwen, bouwen, bouwen! [Key message Build, build, build!]. Zoetermeer: Greenports Nederland.
   Google Scholar
• Haffner, M., and M. Elsinga. 2009. “Deadlocks and Breakthroughs in Urban Renewal: A Network Analysis in Amsterdam.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24 (2): 147–165. doi:10.1007/s10901-009-9137-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler Series B, Human Geography 71 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., and S. M. Barrett. 1990. “Structure and Agency in Land and Property Development Processes: Some Ideas for Research.” Urban Studies 27 (1): 89–103. doi:10.1080/00420989020080051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., J. Kemeny, and T. Manzi. 2003. “Power, Discursive Space and Institutional Practices in the Construction of Housing Problems.” Housing Studies 18 (4): 429–446. doi:10.1080/02673030304252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, V., and D. A. Groetelaers. 2018. “Regional Governance and Public Accountability in Planning for New Housing: A New Approach in South Holland, the Netherlands.” Environment & Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (6): 1027–1045. doi:10.1177/2399654417733748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. 2001. “Comparative Housing and Welfare: Theorising the Relationship.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16 (1): 53–70. doi:10.1023/A:1011526416064.
   Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. 2006. “Corporatism and Housing Regimes.” Housing, Theory and Society 23 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/14036090500375423.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.H., and J. Koppenjan. 2012. “Governance Network Theory: Past, Present and Future.” Policy & Politics 40 (4): 587–606. doi:10.1332/030557312X655431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. Koppenjan. 2016. Governance Networks in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klok, P., B. Denters, M. Boogers, and M. Sanders. 2018. “Intermunicipal Cooperation in the Netherlands: The Costs and the Effectiveness of Polycentric Regional Governance.” Public Administration Review 78 (4): 527–536. doi:10.1111/puar.12931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokx, A., and R. Van Kempen. 2010. “Dutch Urban Governance: Multi-Level or Multi-Scalar?” European Urban and Regional Studies 17 (4): 355–369. doi:10.1177/0969776409350691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, M., and T. Metze. 2014. “The Legitimacy of Regional Governance Networks: Gaining Credibility in the Shadow of Hierarchy.” Urban Studies 51 (11): 2371–2386. doi:10.1177/0042098013513044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M. 2023. “The Experience of Precarity: Low-Paid Economic migrants’ Housing in Manchester.” Housing Studies 38 (2): 307–326. doi:10.1080/02673037.2021.1882663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manting, D., T. Kleinepier, and C. Lennartz. 2022. “Housing Trajectories of EU Migrants: Between Quick Emigration and Shared Housing as Temporary and Long-Term Solutions.” Housing Studies 1–21. doi:10.1080/02673037.2022.2101629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum, D., and A. Findlay. 2018. “Oiling the Wheels? Flexible Labour Markets and the Migration Industry.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (4): 558–574. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1315505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. 2012. Nationale verklaring van partijen betrokken bij de (tijdelijke) huisvesting van EU-arbeidsmigranten [National declaration of parties involved in the (temporary) accommodation of EU migrant workers]. The Hague: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. 2021. Handreiking Huisvesting van Arbeidsmigranten [Guide to Housing Migrant Workers]. The Hague: Ministerie Van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. 2022. Programma ‘Een thuis voor iedereen’ [Program ‘A home for everyone‘]. The Hague: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.
   Google Scholar
• Money, J. 1997. “No Vacancy: The Political Geography of Immigration Control in Advanced Industrial Countries.” International Organization 51 (4): 685–720. doi:10.1162/002081897550492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, D., and M. Lee Rhodes. 2007. “Special Issue on Network Theory and Social Housing.” Housing, Theory and Society 24 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/14036090601002264.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Rotterdam. 2021. Werken Aan Een Menswaardig Bestaan. Actieprogramma EU-Arbeidsmigranten 2021-2025 [Working on a Dignified Existence. Action Program EU Migrant Workers 2021-2025]. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of The Hague. 2019. Samen voor de stad Coalitieakkoord 2019-2022, Together for the city Coalition Agreement 2019-2022. The Hague: Gemeente Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of The Hague. 2020. Voortgangsrapportage aanpak huisvesting arbeidsmigranten [Progress report on migrant workers’ housing]. The Hague: Gemeente Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of The Hague. 2021. Commissievergadering Ruimte 31-03-2021 Voortgangsrapportage Aanpak Huisvesting Arbeidsmigranten [Committee Meeting Spatial Planning 31-03-2021 Progress Report on Migrant workers’ Housing]. The Hague: Gemeente Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Myrberg, G. 2017. “Local Challenges and National Concerns: Municipal Level Responses to National Refugee Settlement Policies in Denmark and Sweden.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (2): 322–339. doi:10.1177/0020852315586309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Of Rotterdam, M. 2021a. Vergadering WIISA 19-05-2021 Actieprogramma EU-Arbeidsmigranten [WIISA Meeting 19-05-2021 Action Program EU Migrant Workers]. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Of Rotterdam, M. 2021b. Raadsvergadering 20-05-2021 Voortgangsrapportage Huisvesting Arbeidsmigranten [Council meeting 20-05-2021 Progress Report Housing Migrant Workers]. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, L., A. Corrado, and A. Triandafyllidou. 2022. “Migrant Labour in the Agri-Food System in Europe: Unpacking the Social and Legal Factors of Exploitation.” European Journal of Migration and Law 24 (2): 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2007. “Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance.” European Law Journal 13 (4). doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00379.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2010. “Accountability and Multi-Level Governance: More Accountability, Less Democracy?” West European Politics 33 (5): 1030–1049. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PBLQ. 2020. EU-Arbeidsmigranten in de Provincie Zuid-Holland [EU Migrant Workers in the Province of South Holland]. The Hague: PBLQ.
   Google Scholar
• Poppelaars, C., and P. Scholten. 2008. “Two Worlds Apart: The Divergence of National and Local Immigrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands.” Administration & Society 40 (4): 335–357. doi:10.1177/0095399708317172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pralle, S. B. 2003. “Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy.” Journal of Public Policy 23 (3): 233–260. doi:10.1017/S0143814X03003118.
   Google Scholar
• Randstad audit office. 2019. Bouwen aan regie. Onderzoek naar de provinciale rol op het gebied van wonenResearch into the provincial role in the field of housing], [Developing direction. Amsterdam: Randstedelijke Rekenkamer.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. L. 2007. “Strategic Choice in the Irish Housing System: Taming Complexity.” Housing, Theory and Society 24 (1): 14–31. doi:10.1080/14036090601002876.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, D. 2006. “Immigrants’ Social Rights in Comparative Perspective: Welfare Regimes, Forms in Immigration and Immigration Policy Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (3): 229–244. doi:10.1177/0958928706065594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T. 2011. “Does Horizontal Accountability Work? Evaluating Potential Remedies for the Accountability Deficit of Agencies.” Administration & Society 43 (4): 387–416. doi:10.1177/0095399711412931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. G., and A. Çağlar. 2009. “Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies: Migrant Incorporation and City Scale.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35 (2): 177–202. doi:10.1080/13691830802586179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, P., G. Engbersen, M. van Ostaijen, and E. Snel. 2018. “Multilevel Governance from Below: How Dutch Cities Respond to Intra-EU Mobility.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (12): 2011–2033. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., and D. Yanow. 2013. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snel, E., M. van Ostaijen, and M. ‘t Hart. 2019. “Rotterdam as a Case of Complexity Reduction: Migration from Central and Eastern European Countries” In Coming to Terms with Superdiversity, edited by P. Scholten, P. Van de Laar, 153–170. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• SNF. 2022. Nu 700 ondernemingen met SNF-keurmerk met meer dan 100.000 bedden. [Now 700 SNF-certified companies with over 100,000 beds]. Tilburg: Stichting Normering Flexwonen.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2005. “The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks.” Scandinavian Political Studies 28 (3): 195–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2007. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. 2021a. CBS Migrantenmonitor 2019, Statistics Netherlands Migrant Monitor 2019. The Hague: CBS.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. 2021b. Vooral Minder Immigranten van Buiten de EU [Fewer Immigrants from Outside the EU]. The Hague: CBS.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. 2020. “How Housing Systems are Changing and Why: A Critique of Kemeny’s Theory of Housing Regimes.” Housing, Theory and Society 37 (5): 521–547. doi:10.1080/14036096.2020.1814404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., and J. Cruikshank. 1987. Breaking the Impasse. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Szytniewski, B., and M. van der Haar. 2022. “Mobility Power in the Migration Industry: Polish workers’ Trajectories in the Netherlands.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (19): 4694–4711. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2022.2061931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., B. Guy Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sørensen. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulceluse, M., B. Bock, and T. Haartsen. 2022. “A Tale of Three Villages: Local Housing Policies, Well‐being and Encounters Between Residents and Immigrants.” Population, Space and Place 28 (8): e2467. doi:10.1002/psp.2467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bortel, G. 2009. “Network Governance in Action: The Case of Groningen Complex Decision-Making in Urban Regeneration.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24 (2): 167–183. doi:10.1007/s10901-009-9138-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bueren, E. M., E. Klijn, and J. F. Koppenjan. 2003. “Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (2): 193–212. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhage, R. 2003. “The Role of the Public Sector in Urban Development: Lessons from Leidsche Rijn Utrecht (The Netherlands).” Planning Theory & Practice 4 (1): 29–44. doi:10.1080/1464935032000057191.
   Google Scholar
• Work Force, O. 2021. Position paper rondetafelgesprek 28-06-2021 [Position paper round table discussion 28-06-2021]. The Hague: Commissie voor Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. 2012. “Further Understanding Accountability in Public Organizations: Actionable Knowledge and the Structure–Agency Duality.” Administration & Society 44 (3): 255–284. doi:10.1177/0095399711417699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R., T. Caponio, and P. Scholten. 2017. “Theorizing the ‘Local Turn’in a Multi-Level Governance Framework of Analysis: A Case Study in Immigrant Policies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (2): 241–246. doi:10.1177/0020852316688426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar