Effects of inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis patients with moderate disability

References

• Compston A, LassmanH, Mc Donald I, Miller D, Noseworthy J, Smith K, et al. McAlpine's Multiple sclerosis, 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksson F, Fredrikson S, Masterman T, Jönsson B. Costs, quality of life and disease severity in multiple sclerosis: A cross sectional study in Sweden. Eur J Neurol 2001; 8: 27–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aisen ML, Sevilla D, Fox N. Inpatient rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Rehab 1996; 10: 43–6
   Google Scholar
• Carey RG, Seibert JH. Who makes the most progress in inpatient rehabilitation? An analysis of functional gain. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1988; 69: 337–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. Inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Do the benefits carry over to the community?. Neurology 1999; 52: 50–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1997; 42: 236–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspunn B, Stineman M, Agri R. Multiple sclerosis and rehabilitation outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1987; 68: 434–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd D, Howard RS. The benefit of inpatient neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 1995; 9: 198–203
   Google Scholar
• Kidd D, Thompson AJ. Prospective study of neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62: 423–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter DA, Edmondson A, Al Shahi R, Thompson AJ. Integrated care pathways in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: Completing the audit cycle. Mult Scler 1998; 4: 85–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solari A, Filippini G, Gasco P, Colla L, Salamaggi A, La Mantia L, et al. Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology 1999; 52: 57–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller KJ, Dawson K, Wiles CM. Physiotherapy in chronic multiple sclerosis: A controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 1996; 10: 195–204
   Google Scholar
• Reding MJ, La Rocca NG. Acute-hospital care versus rehabilitation hospitalisation for management of nonemergent complications in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Rehab 1987; 1: 13–7
   Google Scholar
• Storr LK, SorensenPS, Ravnborg M. The efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in stable multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2006; 12: 235–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzia J, Hadrell V, Rice-Oxley M. Evaluation of a nurse-led multidisciplinary neurological rehabilitaton programme using the Nottingham Health Profile. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 389–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig J, Young CA, Ennis M, Baker G, Boggild M. A randomised controlled trial comparing rehabilitation against standard therapy in multiple sclerosis patients receiving intravenous steroid treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 1225–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Playford ED, Thompson AJ. Does neurorehabilitation have a role in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis?. J Neurol 2003; 250: 1214–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JA, Hobart JC, Langdon DW, Thompson AJ. Clinical appropriateness: A key factor in outcome measure selection: The 36 item Short Form health survey in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 150–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis; An Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33: 1444–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1349–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella DF, Dineen K, Arnason B, Reder A, Webster KA, Karabatsos G, et al. Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology 1996; 47: 129–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholl CR, Lincoln NB, Francis VM, Stephan TF. Assessing quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 597–603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupp LB, La Rocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with Multiple Sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 1121–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Ward C, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutter GR, Reingold SC. The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC): An integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. Mult Scler 1999; 5: 244–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordenskiöld UM, Grimby G. Grip force in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia and in healthy subjects. A study with the Grippit® instrument. Scand J Rheumatol 1993; 22: 14–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985; 39: 386–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for 9 Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 1985; 5: 24–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmajian J. Ed. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1995. pp 78–9.
   Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinée S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring balance in elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physio Ther Can 1989; 41: 304–11
   Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 703–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desroisers J, Bravo G, Hebert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 751–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodkin DE, Hertsgaard D, Seminary J. Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: Improving assessment sensitivity with Box-and-Block and Nine-Hole-Peg Tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 850–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer A, Lindmark B. Test–retest intra-rater reliability of grip force in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 189–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson A, Dock J, Ravnborg MH. Quality of life as a measure of rehabilitation outcome in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1996; 93: 229–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerström C, Nordgren B. On the reliability and usefulness of methods for grip strength measurement. Scand J Rehab Med 1998; 30: 113–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Low Choy N, Kuys S, Richards M, Isles R. Measurement of functional ability following traumatic brain injury using the Clinical Outcomes Variable Scale: A reliability study. Aust J Physiother 2002; 48: 35–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstead AH, Hinman MR, Tomberlin JA. Reliability of the Berg Balance Scale and balance master limits of stability tests for individuals with brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005; 29: 18–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholl L, Hobart J, Dunwoody L, Cramp F, Lowe-Strong A. Measuring disability in multiple sclerosis: Is the Community Dependency Index an improvement on the Barthel Index?. Mult Scler 2004; 10: 447–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riazi A, Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Evidence-based measurement in multiple sclerosis: The psychometric properties of the physical and psychological dimensions of three quality of life rating scales. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 411–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solari A, Radice D, Manneschi L, Motti L, Montanari E. The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite: Different practice effects in the three test components. J Neurol Sci 2005; 228: 71–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart J, Freeman J, Thompson A. Kurzke scales revisited: The application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition. Brain 2000; 123(pt 5)1027–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar