Cybercrime investigation in Finland

References

• Baryamureeba, V., & Tushabe, F. (2004). The enhanced digital investigation process model. Kampala: Institute of Computer Science, Makerere University.
   Google Scholar
• Bossler, A. M., & Holt, T. J. (2012). Patrol officers' perceived role in responding to cybercrime. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(1), 165–181.10.1108/13639511211215504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. S. D. (2015). Investigating and prosecuting cyber crime: Forensic dependencies and barriers to justice. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 9, 55–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cangemi, D. (2004). Procedural law provisions of the council of Europe convention on cybercrime. International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 18, 165–171.10.1080/1360086042000223472
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. T. (2012). Examining perceptions of local law enforcement in the fight against crimes with a cyber component. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35, 272–284.10.1108/13639511211230039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson, R. V. (1994). The division of expert knowledge in policing and security. The British Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 149–175.10.2307/591490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finland’s Cyber Security Strategy. (2013). Government Resolution 24.1.2013. Helsinki: Secretariat of the Security Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Gogolin, G., & Jones, J. (2010). Law enforcement’s ability to deal with digital crime and the implications for business. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 19, 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Grabosky, P. (2004). The global dimension of cybercrime. Global Crime, 6, 146–157.10.1080/1744057042000297034
   Google Scholar
• Hinduja, S. (2004). Perceptions of local and state law enforcement concerning the role of computer crime investigative teams. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27, 341–357.10.1108/13639510410553103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinduja, S., & Schafer, J. A. (2009). US cybercrime units on the world wide web. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 32, 278–296.10.1108/13639510910958181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, T. J., & Bossler, A. M. (2011). Police perceptions of computer crimes in two southeastern cities: An examination from the viewpoint of patrol officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 396–412.
   Google Scholar
• Hunton, P. (2010). Cyber crime and security: A new model of law enforcement investigation. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4, 385–395.10.1093/police/paq038
   Google Scholar
• Kankaanranta, T., & Vuorensyrjä, M. (2013). Tapio Huttunen, Chief of the Varsinais-Suomi Police Department, Finland. In B. F. Baker & D. K. Das (Eds.), Trends in policing: Interviews with police leaders across the globe (pp. 161–181). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katila, K. (1968). Kriminaalitaktiikka [Criminal tactics]. Kirjapaino Oy: Kuopio.
   Google Scholar
• Köckritz, U., Loikala, V-P., Laine, T., Tompuri, J., Levonen, M., Honkamäki, J., … Niemi, H. (2008). Tietotekniikkatutkinnan järjestäminen poliisissa. Työryhmän loppuraportti [Arranging Computer Forensics and Cybercrime Investigation in the Police. Final Report of Working Group.] Poliisin ylijohdon julkaisusarja 7/2008. Sisäasiainministeriö.
   Google Scholar
• Köksal, T. (2009). The Effect of Police Organization on Computer Crime (Doctoral Dissertation). Kent State University. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/kent1248077373/inline
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Homewood: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, A., Kiravuo, T., & Kajantie, S. (2016). Policing the cyber-physical space. The Police Journal, 89(4), 290–310.10.1177/0032258X16647420
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, A., Linderborg, K. & Saarimäki, J. (2016). Tietoverkkorikollisuuden tilannekuva [Current status of cybercrime situation awareness] Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston kanslia. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://tietokayttoon.fi/documents/10616/2009122/17_Tietoverkkorikollisuuden+tilannekuva.pdf/6ef911d2-cbe8-43bd-aafa-e10ed573f28a?version=1.0
   Google Scholar
• Leppänen, A., & Virta, S. (2014). Kohti systeemiälykästä kyberturvallisuuden hallintaa – kyberrikollisuus ja sen torjunta [Towards systems intelligence in cybersecurity governance – cybercrimes and prevention]. Futura, 33, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Leukfeldt, E. R., Veenstra, S., & Stol, W. (2013). High Volume Cyber Crime and Organization of the Police: The results of two empirical studies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Losavio, M., Seigfried-Spellar, K. C., & Sloan, J. J. III (2016). Why digital forensics is not a profession and how it can become one. Criminal Justice Studies, 29, 143–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreadie, K. (2009). Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations: A modern-day interpretation of an economic classic. Oxford: Infinite Ideas Limited.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, F. (2014). Complexity theory, trans-disciplinary working and reflective practice. In A. Pycroft & C. Bartollas (Eds.), Applying complexity theory: Whole systems approaches to criminal justice and social work (pp. 181–198). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, E., & McGibbon, E. (2014). Intersecting contexts of oppression within complex public systems. In A. Pycroft & C. Bartollas (Eds.), Applying complexity theory: Whole systems approaches to criminal justice and social work (pp. 159–180). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nahn, J. (2010). Policing cyberspace. A structural and cultural analysis. El Paso: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• NIJ. (2001). Electronic Crime Scene Investigation: A guide for Frist Responders. Technical Working Group for Electronic Crime Scene Investigation. National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Ciardhuáin, S. (2004). An extend model of cybercrime investigations. International Journal of Digital Evidence, 3(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Poliisihallitus [National Police Board]. (2015). Esitys poliisin kybervaltuuksien muutostarpeista [Proposal of required changes in Police’s cybermandate] (Unpublished report).
   Google Scholar
• Pycroft, A. (2014). Complexity theory: An overview. In A. Pycroft & C. Bartollas (Eds.), Applying complexity theory: Whole systems approaches to criminal justice and social work (pp. 15–37). Bristol: The Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781447311409.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sisäministeriö. (2014). Sisäministeriön vuosikertomus 2014 [Annual Yearbook 2014 by Ministry of the Interior Finland]. Retrieved March 22, 2017, from http://intermin.fi/documents/1410869/4113506/sm-vuosikertomus_2014/59d28e98-29ce-443a-a11e-c34930e52752
   Google Scholar
• Stambaugh, H., Beaubre, D. S., Icove, D. J., Baker, R., Cassaday, W., & Williams, W. P. (2001). Electronic crime needs assessment for state and local law enforcement. National Institute of Justice, Research report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J.-R., Shih, M.-L., & Hwang, M.-S. (2015). A survey of digital evidences forensic and cybercrime investigation procedure. International Journal of Network Security, 17, 497–509.
   Google Scholar
• The Security Committee (2014). The national implementation programme of the Cyber Security Strategy. Helsinki: The Security Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2009). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi [Qualitative research and content analysis] Jyväskylä: Tammi.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Comprehensive study on cybercrime. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved March 8, 2016, from https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/UNODC_CCPCJ_EG.4_2013/CYBERCRIME_STUDY_210213.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vincze, E. A. (2016). Challenges in digital forensics. Police Practice and Research, 17, 183–194.10.1080/15614263.2015.1128163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, D. S. (2007a). Cybercrime: Transformation of crime in the information age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, D. S. (2007b). Policing cybercrimes: Situating the public police in networks of security within cyberspace. Police Practice and Research, 8, 183–205.10.1080/15614260701377729
   Google Scholar
• Willits, D., & Nowacki, J. (2016). The use of specialized cybercrime policing units: An organizational analysis. Criminal Justice Studies, 29, 105–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., Holt, T., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Complexity science: Complexity and clinical care. BMJ, 323, 685–688.10.1136/bmj.323.7314.685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilyurt, H. (2011). The response of American police agencies to digital evidence (Doctoral Dissertation). Ohio: University of Central Florida.
   Google Scholar