Surveillance cameras and crime: a review of randomized and natural experiments

References

• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30.10.1257/jep.24.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, A. A. (2005). Hot spots policing and crime prevention: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(3), 317–342.10.1007/s11292-005-8133-z
   Google Scholar
• Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2016). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials ( Working Paper No. 22595). Retrieved from NBER: http://www.nber.org/papers/w22595.pdf10.3386/w22595
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (2003). Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 49–68.10.1177/0002716202250789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerell, M. (2016). Hot spot policing with actively monitored CCTV cameras. International Criminal Justice Review, 26(2), 187–201.10.1177/1057567716639098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, S., Mejía, D., & Tabón, S. (2017). The deterrent effect of public surveillance cameras on crime ( Working paper No. 9). Retrieved from: https://economia.uniandes.edu.co/components/com_booklibrary/ebooks/dcede2017-09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M., & Spriggs, A. (2005). Assessing the impact of CCTV. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. Retrieved from: https://www.cctvusergroup.com/downloads/file/Martin%20gill.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, R., & Downs, D. M. (2011). Controlling retail theft with CCTV domes, CCTV public view monitors, and protective containers: A randomized controlled trial. Security Journal, 24, 237–250. doi:10.1057/sj.2011.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J., Mulligan, D. K., & Raphael, S. (2008). The San Francisco community safety camera program: An evaluation of the effectiveness of San Francisco’s community safety cameras. Berkley: CITRIS, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• La Vigne, N., & Lowry, S. (2011). Evaluation of camera use to prevent crime in commuter parking lots: A randomized controlled trial. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/236740.pdf
   Google Scholar
• La Vigne, N. G., Lowry, S. S., Markman, J. A., & Dwyer, A. M. (2011). Evaluating the use of public surveillance cameras for crime control and prevention. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center. Retreived from https://ric-zai-inc.com/Publications/cops-w0614-pub.pdf10.1037/e718202011-001
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O. (2015). Experimental research design. In W. G. Jennings (Ed.), The encyclopedia of crime and punishment. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi 10.1002/9781118519639.wbecpx113
   Google Scholar
• Munyo, I., & Rossi, M. (2016). Is it displacement? Evidence on the impact of police monitoring on crime ( Working Paper No. 126). Retrieved from: ftp://webacademicos.udesa.edu.ar/pub/econ/doc126.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. (1999). A review of CCTV evaluations: Crime reduction effects and attitudes towards its use. Crime Prevention Studies, 10(1), 123–155. Retrieved from http://www.popcenter.org/library/crimeprevention/volume_10/0a_Title_pages.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Piza, E. L. (2016). The crime prevention effect of CCTV in public places: A propensity score analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 4(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2016.1226931
   Google Scholar
• Piza, E. L., Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L. W., & Gilchrist, A. M. (2015). The effects of merging proactive CCTV monitoring with directed police patrol: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 43–69. doi:10.1007/s11292-014-9211-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priks, M. (2014). Do surveillance cameras affect unruly behavior? A close look at grandstands. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116, 1160–1179. doi:10.1111/sjoe.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priks, M. (2015a). The effects of surveillance cameras on crime: Evidence from the Stockholm subway. The Economic Journal, 125, F289–F305. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priks, M. (2015b). Verksamma insatser mot brott? En ESO-rapport om orsak och verkan [Effective interventions against crime? An ESO-report about cause and effect] ( Report No. 2015:4). Stockholm: Expertgruppen för studier i offentlig ekonomi.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J. E., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. D. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Sivarajasingam, V., Shepherd, J. P., & Matthews, K. (2003). Effect of urban closed circuit television on assault injury and violence detection. Injury Prevention, 9, 312–316.10.1136/ip.9.4.312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutzer, A., & Zehnder, M. (2013). Is camera surveillance an effective measure of counterterrorism? Defence and Peace Economics, 24, 1–14. doi:10.1080/10242694.2011.650481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E., & Gill, M. (2014). CCTV: Reflections on its use, abuse and effectiveness. In M. Gill (Ed.), The handbook of security (pp. 705–726). London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-67284-4
   Google Scholar
• Vollaard, B., & Hamed, J. (2012). Why the police have an effect on violent crime after all: Evidence from the British Crime Survey. The Journal of Law and Economics, 55(4), 901–924.10.1086/666614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, B., & Lahtinen, M. (2016). Kameraövervakningens effekter – vad vet vi och vad vet vi inte? [The effects of video surveillance – What we know and what we don’t know]. In W. Agrell, & T. Petterson (Eds.), Övervakning och integritet: Teknik, skydd och aktörer i det nya kontrollandskapet [Surveillance and integrity: Technology, protection and actors in the new control landscape] (pp. 142–172). Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Lum, C. M., & Petrosino, A. (2001). Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578(1), 50–70.10.1177/000271620157800104
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Effects of closed circuit television surveillance on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17, 1–73. doi:10.4073/csr.2008.17
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, B. C., Peel, M. E., Farrington, D. P., Elffers, H., & Braga, A. A. (2011). Research design influence on study outcomes in crime and justice: A partial replication with public area surveillance. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(2), 183–198.10.1007/s11292-010-9117-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehnder, M. (2009). The economics of subjective security and camera surveillance. Basel: WWZ. Retrieved from https://wwz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/wwz/redaktion/wipo/Alois_Stutzer/Zehnder_B-099.pdf
   Google Scholar