955
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Policing football crowds in Sweden

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 35-53 | Received 12 Mar 2018, Accepted 16 Aug 2018, Published online: 20 Sep 2018

References

  • Adang, O. (2012). Reforming the policing of public order in Sweden: Combining research and practice. Policing and Society, 7(3), 326–335.
  • Audrey, Z., Fields, M., Goss, T., Robinson, A., & Morash, M. (2002). Action research for community oriented policing and comprehensive school safety planning. In M. Morash & K. Ford (Eds.), The move to community policing: Making change happen (pp. 204–222). London: Sage.
  • Brå. (2008). Strategies against football-related disorder. (English summary of Brå report No 2008: 20). Stockholm: Author.
  • Bradford, B. (2014). Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and Society, 24(1), 22–43.
  • Bradford, B., Murphy, K., & Jackson, J. (2014). Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. British Journal of Criminology, 54(4), 527–550.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Carter, H., Drury, J., Rubin, J. G., Williams, R., & Amlôt, R. (2015). Applying crowd psychology to develop recommendations for the management of mass decontamination. Health Security, 13(1), 45–53.
  • Delle Porta, D., & Reiter, H. (2006). The policing of transnational protest. A conclusion. In D. Delle Porta, A. Peterson, & H. Reiter (Eds.), The policing of transnational protest (pp. 175–189). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579–604. doi:10.1348/014466600164642
  • Drury, J., Stott, C., & Farsides, T. (2003). The role of police perceptions and practices in the development of “Public Disorder”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(7), 1480–1500.
  • Geva, R., & Shem-Tov, O. (2002). Setting up community policing centres: Participatory action research in decentralised policing services. Police Practice and Research: an International Journal, 3(3), 189–200.
  • Gorringe, H., Rosie, M., Waddington, D., & Kominou, M. (2011). Facilitating ineffective protest? The policing of the 2009 Edinburgh NATO protests. Policing and Society: an International Journal of Research and Policy, 22(2), 115–132.
  • Gorringe, H., Stott, C., & Rosie, M. (2012). Dialogue police, decision making, and the management of public order during protest crowd events. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9(2), 111–125.
  • Green, A. (2006). Ert jobb – vår hobby!. kriminologiske institutionen. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
  • Green, A. (2009). Fotboll och huliganism. Kriminologiska institutionen. Stockholm University, Stockholm. Report 2009: 1.
  • Havelund, J., Ilum, J., Jensen, M. A., Nielsen, B. P., Rasmussen, K., & Stott, C. (2011). Event policing - Dialogue in the policing of mass events in Denmark. European Police Science and Research Bulletin, 3 (4), 3–7.
  • HMIC. (2009). Adapting to protest. London: Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary.
  • Hoggett, J., & Stott, C. (2010). Crowd psychology, public order police training and the policing of football crowds. Policing: an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33(2), 218–235.
  • Holgersson, S. (2010). Dialogue police - Experiences, observations and opportunities. Stockholm: Swedish National Police Board.
  • Holgersson, S., & Knutsson, J. (2011). Dialogue policing: A means for less crowd violence? In T. D. Madensen & J. Knutsson (Eds.), Preventing crowd violence. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.
  • Hylander, I., & Granström, K. (2010). Organizing for a peaceful crowd: An example of a football match. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11, 2.
  • Koshy, E., Koshy, V., & Waterman, H. (2010). Action research in healthcare. London: Sage.
  • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2005). All you need to know about action research. London: Sage.
  • Nassauer, A. (2018). Situational dynamics and the emergence of violence in protests. Psychology of Violence, 8(3), 293–304.
  • Neufeld Redekop, V., & Paré, S. (2010). Beyond control – A mutual respect approach to protest crowd-police relations. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Northam, G. (1988). Shooting in the dark - Riot Police in Britain. London: Faber and Faber.
  • Prati, G., & Pietrantoni, L. (2009). Elaborating the police perspective: The role of perceptions and experiences in the explanation of crowd conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 991–1001.
  • Radburn, M., & Stott, C. (2018). The social psychological processes of ‘procedural justice’: Concepts, critiques and opportunities. Criminology & Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1748895818780200
  • Radburn, M., Stott, C., Bradford, B., & Robinson, M. (2018). When is policing fair? Groups, identity and judgements of the procedural justice of coercive crowd policing. Policing and Society, 28(6), 647–664.
  • Radmann, A. (2012). Idrottsvåldets karaktär. En forsknings- och kunskapsinventering. In SOU (Ed.), Mindre våld for pengarna. Delbetänkande av Nationell samordning mot brottslighet i samband med idrottsarrangemang [Less violence for the money: Partial report on National Coordination Against Crime in Sport]. State public report, 23, Stockholm. (pp. 235–304).
  • Radmann, A. (2013). Huliganlandskapet - medier, våld och maskuliniteter (Vol. 13). Malmö: Malmö Studies in Sport Sciences. Idrottsforum.org. Retrieved from Idrottsforum.org
  • Radmann, A. (2015). Vad är huliganism? Malmö: Arx Förlag.
  • Rai, R. K. (2012). A participatory action research training initiative to improve police effectiveness. Action Research, 10(3), 225–243.
  • Reicher, S. (1984). The St. Paul’s riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1–21.
  • Reicher, S. (1996). “The Battle of Westminster”: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115–134.
  • Reicher, S., Stott, C., Cronin, P., & Adang, O. (2004). An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order policing. Policing: an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27(4), 558–572.
  • Reicher, S., Stott, C., Drury, J., Adang, O., Cronin, P., & Livingstone, A. (2007). Knowledge-based public order policing: principles and practice. Policing. 1, 403–415.
  • Rosander, M., & Guva, G. (2012). ”Keeping the peace — police behaviour at a mass event”. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9(1), 52–68. doi:10.1002/jip.1352
  • Scott, C-G. (2012). Djurgårdens fina grabbar: Local identities and the cross-national transfer of spectator-related football violence. Social History, 45(90), 221–244.
  • SOU. (2012). Mindre våld för pengarna. Delbetänkande av Nationell samordning mot brottslighet i samband med idrottsarrangemang. [Less violence for the money: Partial report on National Coordination Against Crime in Sport]. Stockholm: State public report, 23.
  • Stott, C., Adang, O., Livingstone, A., & Schreiber, M. (2007). Variability in the collective behaviour of England fans at Euro2004: ‘Hooliganism’, public order policing and social change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 75–100.
  • Stott, C., Adang, O., Livingstone, A., & Schreiber, M. (2008). Tackling football hooliganism: A quantitative study of public order, policing and crowd psychology. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 14(2), 115–141.
  • Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the ‘poll tax riot’. Human Relations, 53, 247–273.
  • Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2017). Contemporary understanding of riots: Classical crowd psychology, ideology and the social identity approach. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 2–14.
  • Stott, C., Hoggett, J., & Pearson, G. (2011). ‘Keeping the peace’: Social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds. British Journal of Criminology, 52(2), 381–399.
  • Stott, C., Hutchison, P., & Drury, J. (2001). ‘Hooligans’ abroad? Inter-group dynamics, social identity and participation in collective ‘disorder’ at the 1998 World Cup Finals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 359–384.
  • Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (1998a). How conflict escalates: The inter-group dynamics of collective football crowd `Violence’. Sociology, 32(2), 353–377.
  • Stott, C., & Reicher, S. D. (1998b). Crowd action as inter-group process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 509–529.
  • Stott, C., West, O., & Radburn, M. (2018). Policing football ‘risk’? A participant action research case study of a liaison-based approach to ‘public order’. Policing and Society: an International Journal of Research and Policy, 28(1), 1–16.
  • Stott, C. J. (2003). Police expectations and the control of English soccer fans at ‘Euro2000ʹ. Policing: an International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 26, 640–655.
  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Vittrup, K. (2003). Operation. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Police.
  • Waddington, D. (2012). A ‘kinder blue’: Analysing the police management of the Sheffiled Anti-‘Lib Dem’ Protest of March 2011. Policing and Society, 23, 1–19.
  • Waddington, P. A. J. (1994). Liberty and order: Public order policing in a capital city. London: UCL Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.