Upholding the 4th estate—exploring the corporate governance of the media ownership form of business foundations

References

• Asp, K., & Weibull, L. (1996). Svenska journalister om mångfald och medier [Swedish journalists about diversity and media]. Stockholm, Sweden: Rådet för mångfald inom massmedierna.
   Google Scholar
• Bagdikian, B. H. (2000). The media monopoly (6th ed.). Boston, MA, USA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. E. (2007). Media concentration and democracy: Why ownership matters. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breiner, J. (2017). Mapping the world’s digital media ecosystem: The quest for sustainability. In P. Berglez, U. Olausson, & M. Ots (Eds.), What is sustainable journalism?: Integrating the environmental, social, and economic challenges of journalism (pp. 257–276). Peter Lang Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. doi:10.1111/jcom.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvajal, M., García-Avilés, J. A., & González, J. L. (2012). Crowdfunding and non-profit media. Journalism Practice, 6(5–6), 638–647. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.667267
   Google Scholar
• Cranberg, G., Bezanson, R., & Soloski, J. (2001). Taking stock: Journalism and the publicly traded newspaper company. Ames, Berlin: Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cuilenberg, J., & McQuail, D. (2003). Media policy paradigm shifts towards a new communications policy paradigm. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 181. doi:10.1177/0267323103018002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, G. (2002). Media ownership: The economics and politics of convergence and concentration. London/Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dunaway, J. (2008). Markets, ownership, and the quality of campaign news coverage. Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1193–1202. doi:10.1017/S0022381608081140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunaway, J. (2011). Institutional effects on the information quality of campaign news. Journalism Studies, 12, 27–44. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2010.511947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, K. (2011). The poynter institute preserves the St Petersburg Times. ( Levy & Picard, Eds.) (pp. 73–78).
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedler, F., & Pennington, R. (2003). Employee-owned dailies: The triumph of economic self interest over journalistic ideals. International Journal on Media Management, 5(4), 262–274. doi:10.1080/14241270309390042
   Google Scholar
• Gerum, E., & Stieglitz, N. (2005). Corporate governance, ownership structures, and corporate strategy of media companies: The German experience. In R. G. Picard (ed.), Corporate governance of media companies, JIBS Research Report Series No. 2005-1 (pp. 127–146). Jönköping, Sweden: Jönköping International Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiglione, L. (1996, July/August). The price of independence. Presstime, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, K. E. (2010). Bloc-building in the Swedish newspaper industry since its beginnings. In O. Hultén, S. Tjernström, & S. Melesko (Eds.), Media mergers and the defence of pluralism (pp. 75–82). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iosifidis, P. (2010). Pluralism and concentration of media ownership: Measurement issues. Javnost–The Public, 17(3), 5–22. doi:10.1080/13183222.2010.11009033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keegan, V. (2011). Protecting the guardian through the Scott Trust ( Levy & Picard, Eds.) (pp. 57–66).
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., & van Wynsberghe, R. (2008). Cultivating the under-mined: Cross-case analysis as knowledge mobilization. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(1), 1–21, Art. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Klimkiewicz, B. (2009). Structural media pluralism and ownership revisited: The case of central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Media Business Studies, 6(3), 43–62. doi:10.1080/16522354.2009.11073488
   Google Scholar
• Konieczna, M., & Robinson, S. (2014). Emerging news non-profits: A case study for rebuilding community trust? Journalism, 15(8), 968–986. doi:10.1177/1464884913505997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D., & Picard, R. G. (2011). Is there a better structure for news providers? The potential in charitable and trust ownership. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, England.
   Google Scholar
• Lucchi, N., Ots, M., & Ohlsson, J. (2017). Innovation policies in Sweden. In H. van Kranenburg (Ed.), Innovation policies in the European news media industry (pp. 191–203). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. (2017). ‘The ideological challenge for the regional press; reappraising the community value of local newspapers’. The Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies, Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Melesko, S. (2000). Investeringar och produktivitet i landsortspress [Investments and productivity in local newspapers] (Research report Nr. 39). Gothenburg, Sweden: Gothenburg University
   Google Scholar
• Melesko, S. (2010). Motives for mergers and aquisitions in the Swedish regional press. Case: The sale of Center party press. In E. O. Hultén, S. Tjernström, & S. Melesko (eds.), Media mergers and the defence of pluralism (pp. 41–74). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• MRTV. (2015). Medieutveckling 2015. Stockholm, Sweden: Myndigheten för Radio & TV.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, E. M. (2009). Media ownership and concentration in America. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordicom. (2017, June 15). Statistics retrieved. Retrieved from http://www.nordicom.gu.se/sv/statistik-fakta/mediestatistik
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, J. (2012). The practice of newspaper ownership: Fifty years of control and influence in the Swedish local press ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Gothenburg. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/29101
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, J. (2013). De svenska tidningsstiftelserna: Partipressens sista bastion? [The Swedish newspaper foundations: The last fort of the party-owned press?]. Journalistica, 1, 10–32.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, K. (1996). Näringsdrivande stiftelser: En rättslig studie över ändamål, förmögenhet och förvaltning [Commercially active foundations: A legal study of their purposes, assets and governance]. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus Förlag AB.
   Google Scholar
• Ots, M. (2012). Competition, collaboration and cooperation: Swedish provincial newspaper markets in transition. Journal of Media Business Studies, 9(2), 43–63. doi:10.1080/16522354.2012.11073543
   Google Scholar
• Ots, M. (2013). Sweden: State support to newspapers in transition. In P. Murschetz (Ed.), State Aid for Newspapers (pp. 307–322). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ots, M., Krumsvik, A. H., Ala-Fossi, M., & Rendahl, P. (2016). The shifting role of Value-Added Tax (VAT) as a media policy tool: A three-country comparison of political justifications. Javnost - The Public, 23(2), 170–187. doi:10.1080/13183222.2016.1162988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (2005). Corporate governance: Issues and challenges. In R. G. Picard (ed.), Corporate governance of media companies, JIBS Research Report Series No. 2005-1 (pp. 1–10). Jönköping, Sweden: Jönköping International Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (2011). Charitable ownership and trusts in news organizations ( D. A. L. Levy & R. G. Picard, Eds.) (pp. 17–29).
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (2014). Twilight or new dawn of journalism? Journalism Studies, 15(5), 500–510. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.895530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G., & van Weezel, A. (2008). Capital and control: Consequences of different forms of newspaper ownership. International Journal on Media Management, 10(1), 22–31. doi:10.1080/14241270701820473
   Google Scholar
• Powers, E., & Yaros, R. A. (2012). Supporting online nonprofit news organizations: Do financial contributions influence stakeholder expectations and engagement? Journal of Media Business Studies, 9(3), 41–62. doi:10.1080/16522354.2012.11073551
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, J. (1998). Reviving the fourth estate: Democracy, accountability and the media. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, D. (2010). Online non-profits provide model for added local news. Newspaper Research Journal, 31(4), 16–28. doi:10.1177/073953291003100403
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, S., & Rose, C. (2004). Foundation ownership and financial performance. European Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 343–364. doi:10.1007/s10657-004-4277-y
   Google Scholar
• Vizcarrondo, T. (2013). Measuring concentration of ownership 1976–2009. International Journal on Media Management, 15(3), 177–195. doi:10.1080/14241277.2013.782499
   Google Scholar
• Weibull, L., & Anshelm, M. (1991). Signs of change: Swedish media in transition. Nordicom Review, 2, 37–63.
   Google Scholar
• Wigand, K., Haase-Theobald, C., Heuel, M., & Stolte, S. (Eds.). (2015). Stiftungen in der Praxis: Recht, Steuern, Beratung. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler [Foundations in practice: law, taxation, consulting].
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. I. (2010). Chinese newspaper ownership, corporate strategies, and business models in a globalizing world. International Journal on Media Management, 12(3–4), 205–230. doi:10.1080/14241277.2010.527314
   Google Scholar