Actuarial Criminology: Meeting Current Challenges in Southern Africa

References

• Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct. (2nd Ed.). Cincinatti, Ohio: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Harman, W.G., Hann, R.G., & Cormier, R.B. (1996). The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A revalidation of the SIR scale. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38(1), 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bruinsma, G., & Loeber, R. (2004). Challenges for criminological and criminal justice research. In G. Bruinsma, H. Elffers & J. de Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators: Developments in criminology and criminal justice research (pp. 3–20). Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Buruma, Y. (2004). Risk assessment and criminal law: Closing the gap between criminal law and criminology. In G. Bruinsma, H. Elffers & J. de Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators: developments in criminology and criminal justice research (pp. 41–61). Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Carrabine, E., Iganski, P., Lee, M., Plummer, K., & South, N. (2004). Criminology: A sociological introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clear, T.R., & Cadora, E. (2001). Risk and community practice. In K. Stenson & R.R. Sullivan (Eds.), Crime, risk and criminal justice (pp. 51–67). Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Crombag, H. F. M. (2004). Of crimes and punishment. In G. Bruinsma, H. Elffers & J. de Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators: developments in criminology and criminal justice research (pp. 97–105). Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Corrections. (2005). The White Paper on Corrections. Retrieved on February 15, 2006 from http://www-dcs.pwv.gov.za/Policies/White%20Paper/%20-%20Interactive.doc.
   Google Scholar
• DiCristina, B. (1995). Method in criminology: A philosophical primer. New York: Harrow & Heston.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, M. M. (2004). Actuarial justice and the modern state. In G. Bruinsma, H. Elffers, & J. de Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators: developments in criminology and criminal justice research (pp. 62–77). Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Hollin, C. (2006). Prediction studies. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage dictionary of criminology (pp. 312, 313). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2001). Penal policy and criminological challenges in the new millennium. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 34(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judicial Inspectorate of Prisons. (2005). Office of the Inspecting Judge. Annual Report 2000/2005: Prisoners and Prisons. Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. 2003. Understanding risk in criminal justice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. & Pritchard, J. (1996). Good practice in risk assessment and risk management. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Loza, W. (2003). Predicting violent and non-violent recidivism of incarcerated male offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 175–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loza, W., & Dhaliwal, G.K. (2005). Predicting violence among forensic-correctional populations: the past two decades of advancements and future endeavours. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2002). The effectiveness of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire as an Offenders’ Classification Measure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(1), 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2003). More evidence for the validity of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire for predicting violent and nonviolent recidivism: a 5-year follow-up study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(6), 709–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loza, W., Dhaliwal, G., Kroner, D.G,. & Loza-Fanous, A. (2000). Reliability, construct, and concurrent validities of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): A tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(3), 357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maderthaner, N. (2005). Significant factors contributing to youth offending. Unpublished master's thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Maree, A., & Prinsloo, J.H. (2003). An exploration of crime and crime risks with specific reference to South Africa. In M. Hough & A. du Plessis (Eds.), Combating crime in South Africa: contemporary perspectives (pp. 171–187). Pretoria: Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, E. (2006). Actuarialism. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage dictionary of criminology (pp. 67). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, P. (2006). Risk. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage dictionary of criminology (pp. 363–365). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ovens, M. (2006). The functioning of the criminologist in the South African criminal justice system. Acta Criminologica, 19(1),127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Stenson, K. 2001. The new politics of crime control. In K. Stenson & R.R. Sullivan (Eds.), Crime, risk and criminal justice (pp. 15–28). Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, R., & Loza, W. (2004). Cross validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism in Australian offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law, 11(2), 254–262.
   Google Scholar
• Zimring, F.E. (2004). The weakest link: human rights and the criminal offender in modern democratic government. In G. Bruinsma, H. Elffers & J. de Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators: developments in criminology and criminal justice research (pp. 106–112). Devon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Zinger, I. (2004). Actuarial risk assessment and human rights: a commentary. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46(5), 608–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar